Energy-Positive Activity Recognition: Future Directions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Self-Powered Internet of Things

Abstract

This book has presented various mechanisms for self-powered activity recognition in IoT. Conventional activity recognition systems use various activity sensors such as accelerometers, magnetometers and gyroscopes for wearable-based activity recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 147.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 147.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khalifa S, Hassan M, Seneviratne A, Das SK (2015) Energy-harvesting wearables for activity-aware services. IEEE Internet Comput 19(5):8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khalifa S, Lan G, Hassan M, Seneviratne A, Das SK (2017) Harke: human activity recognition from kinetic energy harvesting data in wearable devices. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 17(6):1353–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sandhu MM, Khalifa S, Geissdoerfer K, Jurdak R, Portmann M (2021) SolAR: energy positive human activity recognition using solar cells. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom). IEEE, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lan G, Xu W, Ma D, Khalifa S, Hassan M, Hu W (2019) Entrans: leveraging kinetic energy harvesting signal for transportation mode detection. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst

    Google Scholar 

  5. Umetsu Y, Nakamura Y, Arakawa Y, Fujimoto M, Suwa H (2019) Ehaas: energy harvesters as a sensor for place recognition on wearables. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing communications (PerCom). IEEE, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lan G, Xu W, Khalifa S, Hassan M, Hu W (2017) Veh-com: demodulating vibration energy harvesting for short range communication. In: IEEE International conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom), Hawaii, USA, 2017, pp 170–179

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lan G, Ma D, Hassan M, Hu W (2018) Hiddencode: hidden acoustic signal capture with vibration energy harvesting. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom). IEEE, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma D, Wu Y, Ding M, Hassan M, Hu W (2020) Skin-mimo: vibration-based mimo communication over human skin. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2020-IEEE conference on computer communications. IEEE, pp 784–793

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baldominos A, Cervantes A, Saez Y, Isasi P (2019) A comparison of machine learning and deep learning techniques for activity recognition using mobile devices. Sensors 19(3):521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moradi B, Aghapour M, Shirbandi A (2022) Compare of machine learning and deep learning approaches for human activity recognition. In: 2022 30th international conference on electrical engineering (ICEE). IEEE, pp 592–596

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shakya SR, Zhang C, Zhou Z (2018) Comparative study of machine learning and deep learning architecture for human activity recognition using accelerometer data. Int J Mach Learn Comput 8(6):577–582

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li T, Sahu AK, Talwalkar A, Smith V (2020) Federated learning: challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Process Mag 37(3):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ates HC, Yetisen AK, Güder F, Dincer C (2021) Wearable devices for the detection of COVID-19. Nat Electron 4(1):13–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bianchi V, Bassoli M, Lombardo G, Fornacciari P, Mordonini M, De Munari I (2019) Iot wearable sensor and deep learning: an integrated approach for personalized human activity recognition in a smart home environment. IEEE Internet of Things J 6(5):8553–8562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lan G, Ma D, Xu W, Hassan M, Hu W (2017) Capsense: capacitor-based activity sensing for kinetic energy harvesting powered wearable devices. In: Proceedings of the 14th EAI international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems: computing, networking and services. ACM, pp 106–115

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin Q, Xu W, Lan G, Cui Y, Jia H, Hu W, Hassan M, Seneviratne A (2020) Kehkey: kinetic energy harvester-based authentication and key generation for body area network. In: Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, vol 4, no 1, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lan G, Ma D, Xu W, Hassan M, Hu W (2020) Capacitor-based activity sensing for kinetic-powered wearable iots. ACM Trans Internet of Things 1(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khalifa S, Hassan M, Seneviratne A (2015) Step detection from power generation pattern in energy-harvesting wearable devices. In: IEEE international conference on data science and data intensive systems. IEEE, pp 604–610

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khalifa S, Lan G, Hassan M, Hu W (2016) A Bayesian framework for energy-neutral activity monitoring with self-powered wearable sensors. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communication workshops (PerCom Workshops). IEEE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sandhu MM, Geissdoerfer K, Khalifa S, Jurdak R, Portmann M, Kusy B (2020) Towards energy positive sensing using kinetic energy harvesters. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom). IEEE, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hester J, Sorber J (2017) The future of sensing is batteryless, intermittent, and awesome. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM conference on embedded network sensor systems. ACM, p 21

    Google Scholar 

  22. Snader R, Kravets R, Harris III AF (2016) Cryptocop: lightweight, energy-efficient encryption and privacy for wearable devices. In: Proceedings of the 2016 workshop on wearable systems and applications, 2016, pp 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Venkatasubramanian KK, Banerjee A, Gupta SKS (2009) Pska: usable and secure key agreement scheme for body area networks. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 14(1):60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Revadigar G, Javali C, Xu W, Hu W, Jha S (2016) Secure key generation and distribution protocol for wearable devices. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communication workshops (PerCom Workshops). IEEE, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  25. Venkatasubramanian KK, Banerjee A, Gupta SK (2008) Plethysmogram-based secure inter-sensor communication in body area networks. In: MILCOM 2008-2008 IEEE military communications conference. IEEE, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rahman M, Carbunar B, Banik M (2013) Fit and vulnerable: attacks and defenses for a health monitoring device. ar**v:1304.5672

  27. Diez FP, Touceda DS, Camara JMS, Zeadally S (2015) Toward self-authenticable wearable devices. IEEE Wirel Commun 22(1):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nathan V, Paul S, Prioleau T, Niu L, Mortazavi BJ, Cambone SA, Veeraraghavan A, Sabharwal A, Jafari R (2018) A survey on smart homes for aging in place: toward solutions to the specific needs of the elderly. IEEE Signal Process Mag 35(5):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Christensen H, Amato N, Yanco H, Mataric M, Choset H, Drobnis A, Goldberg K, Grizzle J, Hager G, Hollerbach J et al (2021) A roadmap for us robotics–from internet to robotics 2020 edition. Found Trends® Robot 8(4):307–424

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robinson H, MacDonald B, Broadbent E (2014) The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. Int J Soc Robot 6(4):575–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Moid Sandhu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sandhu, M.M., Khalifa, S., Portmann, M., Jurdak, R. (2023). Energy-Positive Activity Recognition: Future Directions. In: Self-Powered Internet of Things. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27685-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27685-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27684-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27685-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation