Basic Two-Stage Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Network Data Envelopment Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 340))

  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

The simplest network structure is that of two divisions, in that the operations of the system are divided into two parts, performed by the two divisions. This type of system was first noticed by Charnes et al. (1986) in studying the performance of US Army recruitment. They found that army recruitment actually had two stages: creating awareness through advertising and signing contracts. To assess the impact of an input on the performance of the system, it is necessary to know the division that this input is associated with, so that the true effect of this input can be identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akther, S., Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2013). Estimating two-stage network slacks-based inefficiency: An application to Bangladesh banking. Omega, 41, 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, M., Shabani, A., Khodakarami, M., & Saen, R. F. (2014). Planning in feasible region by two-stage target-setting DEA methods: An application in green supply chain management of public transportation service providers. Transportation Research Part E- Logistics and Transportation Review, 70, 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., & Yang, F. (2011). Measuring the performance of internet companies using a two-stage data envelopment analysis model. Enterprise Information Systems, 5, 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9, 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Halek, R., Klopp, G., Schmitz, E., & Thomas, D. (1986). Two-phase data envelopment analysis approaches to policy evaluation and management of army recruiting activities: Tradeoffs between joint services and army advertising. Research Report CCS #532, Center for Cybernetic Studies, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Zhu, J., Yu, J. Y., & Noori, H. (2012). A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 221, 348–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Kao, C., & Zhu, J. (2013). Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 226, 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009a). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 1170–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2009b). Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 600–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2010). Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Li, Y., Liang, L., Salo, A., & Wu, H. (2016). Frontier projection and efficiency decomposition in two-stage processes with slacks-based measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(2), 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2004). Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management, 5, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilingerian, J. A., & Sherman, D. H. (2004). Health care applications: From hospitals to physicians, from productive efficiency to quality frontiers. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook of data envelopment analysis (pp. 481–537). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, Y. C., Lan, L. W., & Yen, B. T. H. (2010). A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: Integrated data envelopment analysis approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, Y. H., & Huang, C. W. (2011). Evaluating the optimal occupancy rate, operational efficiency, and profitability efficiency of Taiwan’s international tourist hotels. Service Industries Journal, 31, 2145–2163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cron, W., & Sobol, M. (1983). The relationship between computerization and performance: A strategy for maximizing economic benefits of computerization. Information and Management, 6, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despotis, D. K., Koronakos, G., & Sotiros, D. (2016). The “weak-link” approach to network DEA for two-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 254, 481–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., Liang, L., Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2011). A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 390–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2010). A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega, 38, 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C., Shureshjani, R. A., Foroughi, A. A., & Zhu, J. (2017). Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 257, 896–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. T. B., & Oh, K. B. (2008). Measuring online stockbroking performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108, 988–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holod, D., & Lewis, H. F. (2011). Resolving the deposit dilemma: A new DEA bank efficiency model. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35, 2801–2810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2011). Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 211, 515–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2014). Multi-period efficiency and Malmquist productivity index in two-stage production systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 232, 512–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2011). Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 176, 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keh, H. T., & Chu, S. F. (2003). Retail productivity and scale economies at the firm level: A DEA approach. Omega, 31, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keh, H. T., Chu, S. F., & Xu, J. Y. (2006). Efficiency, effectiveness and productivity of marketing in services. European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H. F., Mallikarjun, S., & Sexton, T. R. (2013). Unoriented two-stage DEA: The case of the oscillating intermediate products. European Journal of Operational Research, 229, 529–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2017). A fair evaluation of certain stage in a two-stage structure: Revisiting the typical two-stage DEA approaches. Omega, 68, 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55, 643–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2013). Integrated data envelopment analysis: Global vs. local optimum. European Journal of Operational Research, 229, 276–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2016). A note on two-stage network DEA model: Frontier projection and duality. European Journal of Operational Research, 248, 342–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. S., & Lu, W. M. (2012). Network-based method for ranking of efficient units in two-stage DEA models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63, 1153–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. S., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2010). DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: A case of R&D performance. Omega, 38, 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. T. (2011). A note on efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 212, 606–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. T., & Wang, R. T. (2009). Efficiency measures of PCB manufacturing firms using relational two-stage data envelopment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 4935–4939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. B., Zhou, Z. B., Ma, C. Q., Liu, D. B., & Shen, W. F. (2015). Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Omega, 56, 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, S. F. (2010). Performance evaluation for sustainable business: A profitability and marketability framework. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, S. F., & Lu, W. M. (2006). Does size matter? Finding the profitability and marketability benchmark of financial holding companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 23, 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, S. F., & Lu, W. M. (2009). An integrated performance evaluation of financial holding companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 198, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W. C. (2009). The evolution of R&D efficiency and marketability: Evidence from Taiwan's IC-design industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 17, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W. M., & Hung, S. W. (2009). Evaluating profitability and marketability of Taiwan's IC fabless firms: A DEA approach. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 68, 851–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Huang, C. L. (2014). Intellectual capital and national innovation systems performance. Knowledge-Based Systems, 71, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W. M., Wang, W. K., Hung, S. W., & Lu, E. T. (2012). The effects of corporate governance on airline performance: Production and marketing efficiency perspectives. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 48, 529–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. M. (2003). Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business Research, 56, 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., & Das, A. (2004). Exploring flexibility and execution competencies of manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21, 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (1999). An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 596–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rho, S., & An, J. (2007). Evaluating the efficiency of a two-stage production process using data envelopment analysis. International Transactions in Operational Research, 14, 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B. K., Zhu, J., Tone, K., & Klemen, B. M. (2014). Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 233, 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saranga, H., & Moser, R. (2010). Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45, 1270–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T. R., & Lewis, H. F. (2003). Two-stage DEA: An application to Major League Baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, C., Triantis, K., & Teodorović, D. (2007). Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective. Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review, 43, 453–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, R. W. (1970). Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, H. Y., & Wang, A. S. (2010). The efficiency analysis of life insurance company in Taiwan: Two-stage data envelopment analysis. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 38, 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsolas, I. E. (2011). Relative profitability and stock market performance of listed commercial banks on the Athens exchange: A non-parametric approach. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 22, 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsolas, I. E. (2013). Modeling profitability and stock market performance of listed construction firms on the Athens exchange: Two-stage DEA approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. H., Gopal, S., & Zionts. (1997). Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Huang, W., & Wu, J. (2014). Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA. Omega, 44, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M., & Chin, K. S. (2010). Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 8799–8808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., & Liu, H. M. (2012). Managerial efficiency in Taiwan bank branches: A network DEA. Economic Modelling, 29, 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, F., Wu, D., Liang, L., Bi, G., & Wu, D. D. (2011). Supply chain DEA: Production possibility set and performance evaluation model. Annals of Operations Research, 185, 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Z. (2006). A two-stage DEA model to evaluate the overall performance of Canadian life and health insurance companies. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 43, 910–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, M. M. (2012). Performance assessment of transport services with the ERM-NDEA model: Evidence from a domestic airline in Taiwan. Transportation Planning and Technology, 35, 697–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Sun, L., & Yang, W. (2013). A bargaining game model for efficiency decomposition in the centralized model of two-stage systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64, 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., Wang, K., & Zhang, B. (2014). Applying a network data envelopment analysis model to quantify the eco-efficiency of products: A case study of pesticides. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kao, C. (2023). Basic Two-Stage Systems. In: Network Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 340. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27593-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation