Implementing Change in Surgical Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The New Science of Medicine & Management
  • 139 Accesses

Abstract

This management project sought to understand the source of poor team dynamics in the operating room (OR) and develop an intervention to address key pain points.

We diagnosed the pain points in our hospital culture using qualitative interviews. We structured themes pulled from these interviews using the theory of Relational Coordination, which allowed us to develop a map that showed the quality of relationships and communication between key stakeholders. We then performed an organizational structures analysis that allowed us to determine a current and desired state for the organization. Findings from these methods informed the development and rollout of the intervention; a physician of the day (POD) role designed to implement and enforce policy changes. We determined the effects of this intervention using two efficiency measures of on-time start to surgical procedures and operating room turnover which were pulled from administrative records. These measures were observed for 6 months prior to the intervention and 1 year after the intervention.

Interviews reflected that nurses were put in the position of enforcing surgeon compliance to hospital policy. This proved challenging considering the traditional hierarchy of operating theaters which put surgeons in charge. In addition to creating a toxic work environment for nurses, this structure negatively impacted the relationships between administration and surgeons, as well as between administration and nurses. The implementation of the POD role was associated with increased efficiency. On-time starts increased from 78.7% to 82.5%. The turnover time improved substantially from 29.2 min to 20.5 min.

The operating room culture at our organization reflected a traditional top-down hierarchy that disincentivizes collaboration and physician adherence to policy. We found that develo** a third-party POD role helped to alleviate some of the power vacuum that surgeons were using to circumvent hospital policy, which created a more cohesive environment that facilitated increased OR efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gittell JH, Fairfield KM, Bierbaum B, Head W, Jackson R, Kelly M, et al. Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: a nine-hospital study of surgical patients. Med Care. 2000;38(8):807–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gittell JH, Weinberg DB, Bennett AL, Miller JA. Is the doctor in? A relational approach to job design and the coordination of work. Human Resource Manag. 2008;47(4):729–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrell JB. The impact of high quality relationships on proactive behaviour at work: evidence from independently owned hospitals in Ireland [internet] [doctoral]. Dublin City University; 2012 [cited 2020 Jun 5]. Available from: http://doras.dcu.ie/17508/

  4. Havens DS, Vasey J, Gittell JH, Lin W-T. Relational coordination among nurses and other providers: impact on the quality of patient care. J Nurs Manag. 2010;18(8):926–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Newell CL. The relationship between relational coordination, shared mental model, and surgery team effectiveness in preventing wrong site-surgery [Internet] [Ph.D.]. [United States–Minnesota]: Walden University; 2009 [cited 2020 Jun 5]. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/305080399/abstract/D8D772008DE245B2PQ/1

  6. Bae S-H, Mark B, Fried B. Impact of nursing unit turnover on patient outcomes in hospitals. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Mar;42(1):40–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Romanow D, Rai A, Keil M. Cpoe-enabled coordination: appropriation for deep structure use and impacts on patient outcomes. MIS Q. 2018 Mar;42(1):189–A11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gittell JH. Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Manag Sci. 2002 Nov;48(11):1408–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Womack JP, Shook J. Gemba walks. Version 1.0. Cambridge, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute; 2011. p. 348.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike K. Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, M.K. (2023). Implementing Change in Surgical Culture. In: Chilingerian, J.A., Shobeiri, S.A., Talamini, M.A. (eds) The New Science of Medicine & Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26510-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26510-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26509-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26510-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation