Abstract

Agenda are future oriented tools defining what to do and how to do it. In the Anthropocene, the future of agendas is ambiguous: while our room for manoeuvre shrinks, projections of futures scenarios are more nuanced than ever before in human history. To open up Anthropocene agendas and free them from presentism, novel ways of agenda making are needed that take the genuine temporalities the Anthropocene has disclosed, such as deep time, into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendt, H. ([1958] 1998). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjornerud, M. (2018). Timefulness: How thinking like a geologist can help save the world. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farrier, D. (2016). How the concept of deep time is changing. The Atlantic 31 Oct. 2016. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/10/aeon-deep-time/505922/

  • Glikson, A. Y., & Groves, C. (2015). Climate, fire and human evolution: The deep time dimensions of the Anthropocene. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanusch, F., & Biermann, F. (2020). Deep-time organizations: Learning institutional longevity from history. The Anthropocene Review, 7(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619886670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. ([1789] 1958). Thomas Jefferson to James Madison. Letter, 6 Sep. 1789. In Julian P. Boyd (Ed.), The Papers of Thomas Jefferson (Vol. 15). Princeton University Press. https://jeffersonpapers.princeton.edu/selected-documents/thomas-jefferson-james-madison.

  • Koselleck, R. ([1979] 2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time (Keith Tribe, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1996). Die Realität der Massenmedien. Springer Fachmedien.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2002). News influence on our pictures of the world. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 1–18). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H. (1996). Time: Modern and postmodern experience (Neville Plaice, Trans.). Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S., & Goodfield, J. (1982). The discovery of time. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claus Leggewie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leggewie, C., Hanusch, F. (2023). Agenda. In: Wallenhorst, N., Wulf, C. (eds) Handbook of the Anthropocene. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_256

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation