The Lacking Satirical Animals of Mary Shelley’s The Last Man

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Animal Satire

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 172 Accesses

Abstract

Mary Shelley’s novel The Last Man can be read as a satire of nineteenth-century British politics. Shelley uses her characters’ ambiguous animality to satirize a patriarchal political order from a feminist perspective and the discourse of species to illustrate a lack in the rights of man. In Shelley’s as in her mother Mary Wollstonecraft’s work, nonhuman animals highlight the invisible gaps produced within humanist rights discourse and call its model of sovereignty into crisis. Shelley’s novel, in its testing of Enlightenment theories of politics through the figure of the animal, develops a satirical deconstructive analysis of women’s experience, one that collapses the categories of sovereign, beast, woman, and criminal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Shelley, The Last Man, 18. Further references to this edition will be given parenthetically, in-text.

  2. 2.

    Ryan, Stalin, 50.

  3. 3.

    Williams, Mary Shelley’s bestiary; Mussgnug, Naturalizing apocalypse; Haslanger, The last animal; and Washington, Romantic Revelations, 66–99.

  4. 4.

    Knight, Literature of Satire, 47.

  5. 5.

    Carman, Radical Ecology, 22.

  6. 6.

    Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 243–57.

  7. 7.

    Foucault, Security, 125–30.

  8. 8.

    Wadiwel, Biopolitics, 80.

  9. 9.

    Chatterjee, Our bodies, 37.

  10. 10.

    Haslanger, The Last animal, 667; Washington, Romantic Revelations, 77.

  11. 11.

    Shelley, The Last Man, 242, 268.

  12. 12.

    Washington, Romantic Revelations, 66–67.

  13. 13.

    Ryan, Stalin, 50–51.

  14. 14.

    Derrida, The Beast & The Sovereign, 17.

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Ibid., 65, 32.

  18. 18.

    Still, Derrida and Other Animals, 306.

  19. 19.

    Hunt, Of whom, 83.

  20. 20.

    Klemann, How to think, 1.

  21. 21.

    Adams, Sexual Politics, 129–31; Botting, Mary Shelley, 166–70.

  22. 22.

    Singer, All animals, 51–52.

  23. 23.

    Deutscher, Sexual immunities, 93.

  24. 24.

    Carman, Radical Ecology, 158.

  25. 25.

    Deutscher, Sexual immunities, 78.

  26. 26.

    Derrida, The Beast & The Sovereign, 6.

  27. 27.

    Wollstonecraft, Wrongs, 117.

  28. 28.

    Quoted in Derrida, The Beast & The Sovereign, 11.

  29. 29.

    Derrida, The Beast & the Sovereign, 9.

  30. 30.

    Singer, It’s the end, 217.

  31. 31.

    Singer, The Usual Suspects.

  32. 32.

    Wollstonecraft, A Vindication, 76.

  33. 33.

    Foucault, Security, 122–30.

  34. 34.

    Wollstonecraft, A Vindication, 114.

  35. 35.

    Hammer, The world, 39.

  36. 36.

    Williams, Mary Shelley’s bestiary, 139.

  37. 37.

    Schmitt, The Concept; Agamben, Homo Sacer, 15–67.

  38. 38.

    Doody, Philosophy, 153–54.

  39. 39.

    Matz, Satire, 139.

  40. 40.

    Sigler, Fracture Feminism, 237.

  41. 41.

    Williams, Mary Shelley’s bestiary, 143; Haslanger, The last animal, 668.

  42. 42.

    See also Chatterjee, Our bodies.

Works Cited

  • Adams, Carol J. 2000. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. 10th Anniversary ed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2008. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2018. Mary Shelley and the Rights of the Child: Political Philosophy in Frankenstein. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman, Colin. 2018. The Radical Ecology of the Shelleys: Eros and Environment. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Ranita. 2014. Our bodies, our catastrophes: Biopolitics in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man. European Romantic Review 25 (1): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2013.863494.

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2009. The Beast & The Sovereign. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington. Vol. I. The Seminars of Jacques Derrida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, Penelope. 2015. Sexual immunities and the sexual sovereign. In Jacques Derrida: Key Concepts, ed. Claire Colebrook, 77–93. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doody, Margaret. 2009. Philosophy of the novel. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 63 (2): 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2003. “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. Trans. David Macey. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Trans. Graham Burchell. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Stephanie Barbé. 1990. The world as it will be? Female satire and the technology of power in The Handmaid’s Tale. Modern Language Studies 20 (2): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3194826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslanger, Andrea. 2016. The last animal: Cosmopolitanism in The Last Man. European Romantic Review 27 (5): 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2016.1211009.

  • Hunt, Alastair. 2018. …Of whom? In The Right to Have Rights, ed. Stephanie DeGooyer, Alastair Hunt, Lida Maxwell, and Samuel Moyn, 64–86. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemann, Heather. 2015. How to think with animals in Mary Wollstonecraft’s Original Stories and The Wrongs of Woman; or, Maria. The Lion and the Unicorn 39 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1353/uni.2015.0004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Charles A. 2004. The Literature of Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matz, Aaron. 2010. Satire in an Age of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mussgnug, Florian. 2012. Naturalizing apocalypse: Last men and other animals. Comparative Critical Studies 9 (3): 333–347. https://doi.org/10.3366/ccs.2012.0067.

  • Ryan, Karen L. 2009. Stalin in Russian Satire, 1917–1991. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 2007. The Concept of the Political. Trans. George Schwab. Expanded ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. 1826/2008. The Last Man. Ed. Morton D. Paley. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigler, David. 2021. Fracture Feminism: The Politics of Impossible Time in British Romanticism. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. 2002. All animals are equal … or Why the ethical principle on which human equality rests requires us to extend equal consideration to animals too. In Applied Ethics: Critical Concepts in Philosophy, ed. Ruth F. Chadwick and Doris Schroeder, vol. 4, 51–69. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Bryan. 2015. The Usual Suspects. Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Kate. 2020. It’s the end of the world as we know it and I feel queer: Mary Shelley, queer affect, and shapeshifting through The Last Man. In Material Transgressions: Beyond Romantic Bodies, Genders, Things, ed. Kate Singer, Ashley Cross, and Suzanne L. Barnett, 213–231. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Still, Judith. 2015. Derrida and Other Animals: The Boundaries of the Human. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wadiwel, Dinesh Joseph. 2018. Biopolitics. In Critical Terms for Animal Studies, ed. Lori Gruen, 79–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, Chris. 2019. Romantic Revelations: Visions of Post-Apocalyptic Life and Hope in the Anthropocene. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Cynthia Schoolar. 2006. Mary Shelley’s bestiary: The Last Man and the discourse of species. Literature Compass 3 (2): 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00306.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1989a. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. In The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Janet Todd and Marilyn Butler, vol. 5, 61–266. London: William Pickering.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989b. The Wrongs of Woman, or, Maria. A Fragment. In The Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, ed. Janet Todd and Marilyn Butler, vol. 1, 74–184. London: William Pickering.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sigler, D. (2023). The Lacking Satirical Animals of Mary Shelley’s The Last Man. In: McKay, R., McHugh, S. (eds) Animal Satire. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24872-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation