A Pareto Front Numerical Reconstruction Strategy Applied to a Satellite System Conceptual Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modeling and Optimization in Space Engineering

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 200))

  • 395 Accesses

Abstract

A satellite system conceptual design problem is addressed in this work. A multi-objective parametric optimization problem is formulated and efficiently solved. The objectives considered are usually opposed among them, such as performance, mass, budget, and volume. By solving the optimization problem, a minimum set of different satellite configurations is obtained. Therefore, the decision-maker can select the best one, knowing that each one fulfills the requirements suite. The strategy developed in this work is based on the direct numerical simulation (DNS) of the optimization problem. The optimal Pareto front is obtained in a numerical setting. This new tool can optimize the complete system as a whole. Usually, in the standard engineering procedure, each of the interdisciplinary groups performs the optimization of their subsystem. After that, the optimized system is obtained by overlap** all of these individually optimized parts. Clearly, this standard procedure only can create a sub-optimal design. With the approach presented here the global optimal solution is guaranteed. The strategy is applied to a low orbit satellite model and a comparison with a genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization procedure is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papalambros, P. Y., Wilde, D. J. (2000) Principles of Optimal Design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao, S. S. (2009) Engineering Optimization - Theory and Practice. Wiley, NJ, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Belegundu, A. D., Chandrupatla, T. R. (2011) Optimization Concepts and Applications in Engineering. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K. (2001) Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, New York, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Space Flight Program and Project Management Handbook (2014) National Aeronautics and Space Administration, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. System Engineering Handbook (2017) National Aeronautics and Space Administration, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Larson, W. J., Wertz, J. R. (2005) Space Mission Analysis and Design. Microcosm Press, El Segundo, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ley, W., Wittmann, K., Hallmann, W. (2009) Handbook of Space Technology. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. W. J. Larson and J. R. Wertz (2005) Space Mission Analysis and Design. Space Technology Library - Vol 8. Microcosm.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Macdonald and V. Badescu (2014) The International Handbook of Space Technology. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. M. M. Rai (2015) Utilizing Direct Numerical Simulations of Transition and Turbulence in Design Optimization. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Report ID 2015-218932

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Monti and P. Gasbarri (2017) Dynamic load synthesis for shock numerical simulation in space structure design. Acta Astronautica, 137:222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Li and Z. Zheng and J. Yuan (2020) A trajectory optimization method with frictional contacts for on-orbit capture. Acta Astronautica, 175:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Wang and T. Huan and A. Li and H. Lu (2020) Mission analysis and optimal control for cislunar mission with spinning tether system in hyperbolic orbits. Acta Astronautica, 177:862–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Yano and I. Nishizaki (2020) Multiobjective two-level simple recourse programming problems with discrete random variables. Optimization and Engineering, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Kravanja and A. Sorsak and Z. Kravanja (2003) Efficient Multilevel MINLP Strategies for Solving Large Combinatorial Problems in Engineering. Optimization and Engineering, 4:97–151

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. P.K. Lewis and M.W.P. Tackett and C.A. Mattson (2014) Considering dynamic Pareto frontiers in decision making. Optimization and Engineering, 15:837–854

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. A.P. Curty Cuco and F.L. de Sousa and A.J. Silva Neto (2015) A multi-objective methodology for spacecraft equipment layouts. Optimization and Engineering, 16:165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Weber and S. Fasoulas and K Wolf (2011) Conceptual interplanetary space mission design using multi-objective evolutionary optimization and design grammars. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 225(11):1253–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Saboori and A. M. Bidgoli and B. Saboori (2014) Multiobjective Optimization in Repeating Sun-Synchronous Orbits Design for Remote-Sensing Satellites. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 27(5)

    Google Scholar 

  21. I. Meziane-Tani and G. Métris and G. Lion and A. Deschamps and F. T. Bendimerad and M. Bekhti (2016) Optimization of small satellite constellation design for continuous mutual regional coverage with multi-objective genetic algorithm. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9(4):627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Y. Jia and X. Yang (2015) Optimization of control parameters based on genetic algorithms for spacecraft attitude tracking with input constraints. Neurocomputing, 177:334–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Ravanbakhsh and S. Franchini (2012) Multiobjective optimization applied to structural sizing of low cost university-class microsatellite projects. Acta Astronautica 79:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H.R. Fazeley, H. Taei, H. Naseh and M. Mirshams (2016) A multi-objective, multidisciplinary design optimization methodology for the conceptual design of a spacecraft bi-propellant propulsion system. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 53:145–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. X.H. Wang, R.J. Li and R.W. **a (2013) Comparison of MDO Methods for an Earth Observation Satellite. Procedia Engineering, 67:166–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng You (2017) Space Microsystems and Micro/Nano Satellites. Butterworth-Heinemann and Elsevier Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by PID-UTN (Research and Development Program of the National Technological University, Argentina), CONICET (National Council for Scientific and Technical Research, Argentina), and CONAE (National Space Activities Commission, Argentina). The supports of these agencies are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastián M. Giusti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Santos, G.J., Giusti, S.M., Alonso, R. (2023). A Pareto Front Numerical Reconstruction Strategy Applied to a Satellite System Conceptual Design. In: Fasano, G., Pintér, J.D. (eds) Modeling and Optimization in Space Engineering. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24812-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation