Twenty-First Century Skills and Learning: A Case Study of Developments and Practices in the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Key Competences and New Literacies

Part of the book series: UNIPA Springer Series ((USS))

  • 186 Accesses

Abstract

The authors of this chapter faced a difficult task of summarizing the experience of one of the largest and most diversified school systems in the world. The US experience, as shown in the chapter, demonstrates that, in such diversified systems, the strongest signal is given through assessment. While most state education systems include information about twenty-first century skills in their curricular materials, none has adopted a formal set of standards on which students are summatively assessed. While most states have not aggressively prioritized twenty-first century skills in their standards, curricular guidance, assessment programs, and professional development programs, there are a few states that have done so. Efforts to introduce 21 century skills to schools can be quite diverse, and paths to success can be rather non-standard—like the North Carolina’s Digital-Age Learning Initiative which is discussed in detail in the chapter. This statewide comprehensive initiative aimed to prepare students for an increasingly competitive workplace by capitalizing on a variety of digital technologies to personalize student learning and develop an expanded array of skills and knowledge. This case demonstrates how digital instruments help translate disciplinary learning onto a new level: isolated content is conceptually intertwined into a coherent picture in project-based and community learning activities.

A note from the editors

This chapter was prepared by leading American expects in educational assessment from the excellent Boston College. They were faced with the difficult task to summarize the experience of modernizing the content of education in one of the largest and most diversified school systems in the world. This diversity has led to the fact that, in the United States, there are now schools that have become world leaders introducing innovations and develo** key competences and new literacies, but there are also super-conservative schools that stick stiffly to the curricula of the early twentieth century.

The US experience, as shown in the chapter, demonstrates that, in such diversified systems, the strongest signal is given through assessment.

It is also very interesting to explore the case of North Carolina discussed here in detail. It reveals that thoughtful technological modernization can have a strong modernizing effect on the content of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Florida has 67 counties, four laboratory schools that operate as independent districts, the Florida School for the Deaf and Blind, the Florida Virtual School, and the Okeechobee Youth Development Center that serves students in the state juvenile system.

  2. 2.

    National Education Association. 2017. “Rankings of the States 2016 and Estimates of School Statistics 2017.” http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/2017_Rankings_and_Estimates_Report-FINAL- SECURED.pdf.

  3. 3.

    IES: National Center for Education Statistics. Web released in January 9, 2018. “Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year 2014–15 (Fiscal Year 2015).” https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018301.pdf.

  4. 4.

    The Common Core Standards were developed through a partnership involving content area experts and organizations interested in improving student achievement. The development effort was spearheaded by the National Governors Association (NGA) that convened two teams, one that focused on English language arts and the other on mathematics. The effort was also supported by the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) that represents state-level education leaders and initiatives at a national level.

  5. 5.

    Similar to the Common Core Standards, the Next Generation Science Standards were developed by nationally recognized experts in science but are not national standards. Instead, similar to the Common Core, many states have opted to adopt the Next Generation Science Standards. However, other states have retained their own standards or have modified the Next Generation Standards.

  6. 6.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/US_state_historical_population_FRED_SMIL.svg.

  7. 7.

    https://www.bea.gov/regional/bearfacts/pdf.cfm?fips=37000&areatype=STATE&geotype=3.

  8. 8.

    http://www.governing.com/topics/education/gov-education-funding-states.html.

  9. 9.

    http://www.statemaster.com/graph/edu_ele_sec_pup_rat-elementary-secondary-pupil-teacher-ratio.

  10. 10.

    Strategic Policy Playbook, 2017, page 2.

References

  1. A Nation at Risk (1983) A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform. A report to the nation and the secretary of education United States Department of education by the national com- mission on excellence in education. https://www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html

  2. Clarke-Midura J, Code J, Zap N, Dede C (2012) Assessing science inquiry in the classroom: a case study of the virtual assessment project. In: Lennex L, Nettleton K (eds) Cases on inquiry through instructional technology in math and science: systemic approaches. IGI Publishing, NY, pp 138–164

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke-Midura J, Code J, Mayrath M, Dede C, Zap N (2012) Thinking outside the bubble: Virtual performance assessments for measuring inquiry learning. In: Mayrath M, Clarke-Midura J, Robinson D, Schraw G (eds) Technology based assessment for 21st century skills: theoretical and practical implications from modern research, Ch. 5. Information Age Publishing Inc., Charlotte, NC, pp 125–147

    Google Scholar 

  4. Code J, Clarke-Midura J, Zap N, Dede C (2012) Virtual performance assessment for serious games and virtual worlds. In: Wang H (ed) Interactivity in e-learning: cases and frameworks. IGI Publishing, NY, pp 230–252

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffin P, McGaw B, Care E (eds) (2012). Assessment and teaching of twenty-first century skills. Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5

  6. Haertel E, Herman J (2005) A historical perspective on validity arguments for accountability tests. Yearbook of the national society for the study of education (Vol 104, No 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2005.00023.x

  7. IES (2018) Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: school year 2014–15 (Fiscal Year 2015). IES: National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018301.pdf

  8. LEAP (2007) College learning for the new global century. A report from the National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/GlobalCentury_final.pdf

  9. NEA (2017) Rankings of the states 2016 and estimates of school statistics 2017. National Education Association. http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/2017_Rankings_and_Estimates_Report-FINAL-SECURED.pdf

  10. Pellegrino JW, Hilton ML (eds) (2012) Education for life and work. develo** transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Committee on defining deeper learning and 21st century skills; Center for Education; Division on behavioral and social sciences and education; National research council

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quellmalz ES, De Barger AH, Haertel G et al (2008) Exploring the role of technology-based simulations on science asessment: the calipers project. In: Coffey J, Douglas R, Stearns C (eds) Assessing science learning: perspectives from research and practice, Ch. 10. NSTA Press, Arlington, VA, pp 191–202

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rotherham AJ, Willingham DT (2010) 21st-century skills: not new, but a worthy challenge. American Educator 34(1):17–20

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ryan K, Shepard L (eds) (2008) The future of test-based educational accountability. Routledge, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Russell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Russell, M., Braun, H., Zhu, B. (2023). Twenty-First Century Skills and Learning: A Case Study of Developments and Practices in the United States. In: Dobryakova, M., Froumin, I., Barannikov, K., Moss, G., Remorenko, I., Hautamäki, J. (eds) Key Competences and New Literacies. UNIPA Springer Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23281-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23281-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23280-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23281-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation