Abstract
Science communication and public engagement serve a multitude of purposes—from marketing, recruitment, widening access, to civic responsibility for the translation of knowledge from academic disciplines to the public domain. There are a range of different public engagement methods, which can be adapted for various audiences. Creative approaches to teaching and learning translate well to outreach events due to their innovative nature and wide appeal, granting access to domains of knowledge or learning that are often restricted. Such approaches can be high or low fidelity and often rely on art-based techniques. However, as with all educational events, there is a hidden curriculum—unarticulated and unacknowledged learning—associated with outreach activities. We argue that a good event needs to consider, not only the hidden curriculum, but also go back to basics in terms of considering the basic physiological needs of participants. Using issues such as consent and representation, we unpack case studies to consider the hidden curriculum and the tacit messaging that can occur as part of outreach and engagement events. In this chapter, we consider the fundamental differences between outreach and public engagement. We then dissect creative approaches to such activities through the lens of the hidden curriculum and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Finally, we offer practical tips for those organising and facilitating such events.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burns TW, O'Connor DJ, Stocklmayer SM. Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public Understanding Sci. 2003;12(2):183–202.
National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement. What is public engagement? 2022 [1 June 2022]; Available from: https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/about-engagement/what-public-engagement.
Office for Students. Supporting disadvantaged students through higher education outreach. 2020 [1 June 2022]; https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/coronavirus-briefing-note-higher-education-outreach/.
Bowles S, Gintis H. Schooling in capitalist America twenty-five years later. Sociol Forum JSTOR. 2003;18(2)
Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994;69:861–71.
Hafferty FW, Gaufberg EH, O’Donnell JF. The role of the hidden curriculum in “on doctoring” courses. AMA J Ethics. 2015;17(2):129–37.
Hafferty FW, Gaufberg EH. The hidden curriculum 2016 [1 June 2022]. https://basicmedicalkey.com/the-hidden-curriculum/.
Brown ME, et al. Exploring the hidden curriculum’s impact on medical students: professionalism, identity formation and the need for transparency. Med Sci Educator. 2020;30(3):1107–21.
Brown ME, et al. ‘Too male, too pale, too stale’: a qualitative exploration of student experiences of gender bias within medical education. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e039092.
Finn G, Danquah A, Matthan J. Colonisation, cadavers and color: considering decolonisation of anatomy curricula. Anat Record. 2022;305(4):938–51.
Reference O. Oral culture; 2022.
Finn G. Using body painting and other art-based approaches to teach anatomy. In: Chan LK, Pawlina W, editors. Teaching anatomy: a practical guide. Germany: Springer; 2015. p. 155–64.
Taylor AM. Anatomy education to the public. In: Teaching anatomy. Springer, p. 73–84; 2020.
Aka JJ, et al. Teaching by stealth: utilising the hidden curriculum through body painting within anatomy education. Eur J Anat. 2018;22(2):173–82.
Cookson NE, Aka JJ, Finn GM. An exploration of anatomists’ views toward the use of body painting in anatomical and medical education: an international study. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(2):146–54.
Dueñas AN, Finn GM. Body painting plus: art-based activities to improve visualisation in clinical education settings. In: Biomedical visualisation. Springer, p. 27–42; 2020.
Finn G. Twelve tips for running a successful body painting teaching session. Medical Teacher. 2010;32(11):887–90.
Finn G, McLachlan J. A qualitative study of student responses to body painting. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(1):33–8.
Finn GM. Current perspectives on the role of body painting in medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;9:701.
Finn GM, et al. Ultra-violet body painting: A new tool in the spectrum of anatomy education. Eur J Anat. 2018;22(6):521–7.
Jariyapong P, et al. Body painting to promote self-active learning of hand anatomy for preclinical medical students. Med Educ Online. 2016;21(1):30833.
McMenamin PG. Body painting as a tool in clinical anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(July):139–44.
Op Den Akker JW, et al. Giving color to a new curriculum: bodypaint as a tool in medical education. Clin Anat. 2002;15:356–62.
Finn GM, Matthan J. Pedagogical perspectives on the use of technology within medical curricula: moving away from norm driven implementation. Biomed Visual. 2019:55–65.
Matthan J, Finn GM. The hidden curriculum of utilisation of imaging and unregulated digital resources within clinical education. In Biomedical Visualisation. Springer, p. 145–163; 2020.
Taylor AP. How a girl's 'death mask' from the 1800s became the face of CPR dolls. 2020 [1 June 2022]. https://www.livescience.com/cpr-doll-resusci-annie-face.html.
Finn G, Brown M. Ova-looking feminist theory: a call for consideration within health professions education and research. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2022:1–21.
Blewer AL, et al. gender disparities among patients receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the United States. Circulation. 2017;136(suppl_1):–A16409.
American Heart Association. Why women receive less CPR from bystanders. 2018 [1 June 2022]. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/11/181105105453.htm.
Finn GM, Hafferty FW, Quinton H. The significance of the body in health professions education. In Applied philosophy for health professions education. Springer, p. 85–101; 2022.
Verdonk P, et al. From gender bias to gender awareness in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14(1):135–52.
Maslow AH, A dynamic theory of human motivation; 1958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Finn, G.M., Brown, M.E.L. (2023). The Hidden Curriculum of Public Engagement for Creative Methods of Instruction. In: Varsou, O. (eds) Teaching, Research, Innovation and Public Engagement . New Paradigms in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22452-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22452-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22451-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22452-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)