Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Pediatric Sufferring

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Pediatric Suffering

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Ethics ((BRIEFSETHIC))

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

Baby Esther (or Essie, as her parents have taken to calling her) is a prematurely born eight-day-old neonate with severe lissencephaly syndrome who is currently residing in the neonatal intensive care unit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Thailand)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 46.00
Price includes VAT (Thailand)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 54.99
Price excludes VAT (Thailand)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amato, Joseph. 1990. Victims and values: A history and theory of suffering . New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Desai, Arti D., Chuan Zhou, Susan Stanford, Wren Haaland, James W. Varni, and Rita M. Mangione-Smith. 2014. Validity and responsiveness of the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales in the pediatric inpatient setting. JAMA Pediatrics 168: 1114–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ross, Lainie Friedman. 1998. Children, families, and health care decision-making . New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkinson, Dominic. 2013. Death or disability? The “Carmentis Machine” and decision-making for critically ill children . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salter, Erica K. 2020. The new futility? The rhetoric and role of “suffering” in pediatric decision making. Nursing Ethics 27: 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schneiderman, Lawrence J., Nancy S. Jecker, and Albert R. Jonsen. 1990. Medical futility: Its meaning and ethical implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 112: 949–954.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kodish, Eric. 2008. Paediatric ethics: A repudiation of the Groningen protocol. Lancet 371: 892–893.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kon, Alexander A. 2008. We cannot accurately predict the extent of an infant’s future suffering: The Groningen protocol is too dangerous to support. American Journal of Bioethics 8(11): 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedrich, Annie B., Kirsten M. Dempsey, and Erica K. Salter. 2020. The use of suffering in pediatric bioethics and clinical literature: A qualitative content analysis. Pediatric Ethicscope 27(1): 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berry, Wendell. 2000. Jayber Crow . Washington, DC: Counterpoint.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tate, Tyler. 2020. What we talk about when we talk about pediatric suffering. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09535-8

  12. Mayerfeld, Jamie. 1999. Suffering and moral responsibility . New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brady, Michael. 2018. Suffering and virtue . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues . Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Campelia, Georgina D., Jennifer C. Kett, and Aaron Wightman. 2020. Relational suffering and the moral authority of love and care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09530-z.

  16. Cassell, Eric J. 2004. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine , vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkinson, Dominic, and Amir Zayegh. 2020. Valuing life and evaluating suffering in infants with life-limiting illness. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09532-x.

  18. Benatar, David. 2006. Better never to have been: The harm of coming into existence . Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilkinson, D. 2006. Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die? Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 454–459.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lantos, John. 2020. Our suffering and the suffering of our time. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-020-09529-6.

  21. Oe, Kenzaburo. 1968. A personal matter . Trans. John Nathan. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyler Tate .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tate, T. (2022). Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Pediatric Sufferring. In: Tate, T. (eds) Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Pediatric Suffering. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19146-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation