Context and Controversies of Australian Courts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Australian Courts

Abstract

As with most criminal justice systems internationally, the Australian system is not immune from controversy—both historically and contemporaneously. The arrival of the First Fleet in 1788 imposed monumental and ongoing systemic change for First Nations peoples, the impacts of which remain. This chapter is divided into two parts. The first charts the development of courts within the Australian criminal justice system, both historically and theoretically. The second identifies controversies which exist across various Australian court jurisdictions. A critical role of a justice system is to ensure fair and equitable access to all its systems and processes. To this end, five critical matters can be considered when contemplating access to the courts: (i) access to and financial imposts of legal representation; (ii) physical infrastructure; (iii) access to rehabilitation options; (iv) justice delays; and (v) participatory justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 147.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 147.69
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALRC (Australian Law Reform Commission). (2018). Pathways to justice: Inquiry into the incarceration rate of aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples (ALRC Report 133). Australian Government.https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/pathways-to-justice-inquiry-into-the-incarceration-rate-of-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples-alrc-report-133/

  • Basteman, W. (2009). Procedural due process under the Australian Constitution. Sydney Law Review, 31(3), 411–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2017 [1780]). Of the principle of utility. In J. Bennett (Ed.), An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. T. Payne and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, M. (2019). Disabled in rural Victoria: Exploring the intersection of victimisation, disability and rurality on access to justice. International Journal of Rural Criminology, 5(1), 88–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, U. (2011). Problem-solving courts: Theory and practice. Sociology Compass, 5(11), 957–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coverdale, R. (2016). Accessing justice in regional Australia: Evolving perspectives and contexts. In A. Harkness, B. Harris, & D. Baker (Eds.), Locating crime in context and place: Perspectives on regional, rural and remote Australia (pp. 108–119). The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, A. L. B., & Peck, S. (2023). Access to legal representation. In A. Harkness, J. R. Peterson, M. Bowden, C. Pedersen, & J. F. Donnermeyer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of rural criminology. Bristol University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnermeyer, J. F. (2022). Theoretical and empirical gaps in rural criminology. In M. Bowden & A. Harkness (Eds.), Rural transformations and rural crime: International critical perspectives in rural criminology (pp. 31–48). Bristol University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, J. A. (2006). Criminal justice. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, M., Odgers, S., & Yeo, S. (2015). Australian criminal justice (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, A., & Harris, B. (2014). Landscapes of violence: Women surviving family violence in rural and regional Victoria. Centre for Rural and Regional Law and Justice. Deakin University.https://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/287040/Landscapes-of-Violence-online-pdf-version.pdf

  • Gleeson, M. (2008, June 18). The privy council: An Australian perspective. Address to The Anglo-Australian Lawyers Society, the Commercial Bar Association and the Chancery Bar Association. London.https://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/speeches/former-justices/gleesoncj/cj_18jun08.pdf

  • Hess, B., & Harvey, A. K. (Eds.). (2019). Open justice: The role of courts in democratic society. Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International European and Regulatory Procedural Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. A., Leane, G. W. G., & Clarke, A. D. (2003). Australian legal institutions: Principles, structure and organisation (2nd ed.). Lawbook Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMDb. (2015). The Castle (1997) [online]. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0118826/quotes

  • Law Council of Australia. (2018, August). The justice project: Introduction and overview. Law Council of Australia.https://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/files/web-pdf/Justice%20Project/Final%20Report/Justice%20Project%20_%20Final%20Report%20in%20full.pdf

  • Law Council of Australia. (2021, September 22). New program to bring more lawyers to the bush [Media Release].https://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/media/media-releases/new-program-to-bring-more-lawyers-to-the-bush

  • Light, S. C. (1999). Understanding criminal justice. Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawson, S. (2021). The deep past of pre-colonial Australia. The Historical Journal, 64(5), 1477–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melcarne, A., Ramello, G. B., & Spruk, R. (2021). Is justice delayed justice denied? An empirical approach. International Review of Law and Economics, 65, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1998 [1861]). Utilitarianism (R. Crisp, Ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D. (1991). The rule of law in a penal colony. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, L. R., & Davies, A. (2022). Investigating access to justice, the rural lawyer shortage, and implications for civil and criminal legal systems. In R. A. Weisheit, J. R. Peterson, & A. Pytlarz (Eds.), Research methods for rural criminologists (pp. 67–78). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, M., Gou, X., Wang, Y., Lohmueller, K. E., Albrechtsen, A., Skotte, L., Lindgreen, S., Metspalu, M., Jombart, T., Kivisild, T., Zhai, W., Eriksson, A., Manica, A., Orlando, L., De La Vega, F. M., Tridico, S., Metspalu, E., Nielsen, K., Avila-Arcos, M. C., Moreno-Mayar, J. V. … Willerslev, E. (2011). An Aboriginal Australian Genome reveals separate human dispersals into Asia. Science, 334(6052), 94–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. The Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC). (1991). Royal Commission into aboriginal deaths in custody: National Report (Vols. 1–5). Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackville, R. (2004). Some thoughts on access to justice. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 2(85), 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, N. (1996). No ordinary judgement: Mabo, the Murray Islanders’ land case. Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sourdin, T., & Burstyner, N. (2014). Justice delayed is justice denied. Victoria University Law and Justice Journal, 4(1), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. (2018, December 20). The cost of a day in court is more emotionally, and financially draining than you might think. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-20/the-true-cost-of-a-day-in-court/10610408

  • White, R., Haines, F., & Asquith, N. (2017). Crime & criminology (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R., & Perrone, S. (2005). Crime and social control. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimshurst, K., & Harrison, A. (2000). The Australian criminal justice system: Issues and prospects. In D. Chappell & P. Wilson (Eds.), Crime and the criminal justice system in Australia: 2000 and beyond (pp. 3–21). Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeyer, V. (1962). A birthright and inheritance: The establishment of the rule of law in Australia. Tasmanian University Law Review, 1(5), 635–669. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UTasLawRw/1962/1.pdf

  • Wise, J., & Roberts, D. A. (2016). Development of crime and the criminal justice system in Australia. In A. Harkness, B. Harris, & D. Baker (Eds.), Locating crime in context and place: Perspectives on regional, rural and remote Australia (pp. 35–48). The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, B. (2018, July 24). Australian Courts Act 1828. Blog post. The Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House. https://www.moadoph.gov.au/blog/australian-courts-act-1828/#

    Google Scholar 

Legislation and Cases

  • Australia Act 1986 (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabo and others v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23, (1992) 175 CLR 1 1 F.C. 92/014 (3 June 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Charter of Justice, Letters Patent 2 April 1787.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marg Camilleri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Camilleri, M., Harkness, A. (2022). Context and Controversies of Australian Courts. In: Camilleri, M., Harkness, A. (eds) Australian Courts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19063-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19063-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19062-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19063-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation