Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 35))

  • 421 Accesses

Abstract

Green Infrastructure is discussed to mean different things in alternative geographical, ecological and socio-economic contexts. However, the growing literature focussing on what Green Infrastructure is, what it does and how it should be delivered provides a baseline set of principles that help to situate the concept in academic and practice-based debates. The promotion of connected landscapes that are multi-functional that provide access to nature at the local, city and regional scale is central to Green Infrastructure thinking. Moreover, the need to integrate socio-economic and ecological perspectives into political decision-making has been repeatedly outlined as a key variable to successful policy creation and subsequent implementation. It is also important to align current Green Infrastructure thinking with the historical antecedents of greenspace planning to examine where complementarities can be identified between the past and the present. Overall, this introductory chapter sets out the principles and history of Green Infrastructure planning illustrating the nexus of people, policy and practice that permeates through the following chapters. It also outlines the broader parameters of the debates to come and grounds them in accepted principles of existing Green Infrastructure thinking.

Since the introduction of Green Infrastructure as a concept, many things have changed in how territories and city organisations use it within the context of planning. One of the remaining unresolved issues is its relationship with the landscape. To some extent, ‘landscape’ was the instrument that spatial planning used to introduce ecological elements that may otherwise have been difficult to embed within planning. When additional instruments emerged, such as Green Infrastructure, which was considered to be focussed on ecological issues, greater difficulties in implementation began. Through this paper, we will always capitalise both – ‘Green Infrastructure’ and ‘landscape’ – in order to use them as terms of reference, both to complement each other and to juxtapose them. It is understood that the expression Green Infrastructure also covers Blue Infrastructure, i.e. aquatic ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern, J. (1995). Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33(1–3), 131–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, G. (2014). Green infrastructure for landscape planning: Integrating human and natural systems. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T. (2012). Green cities of Europe (T. Beatley, Ed.). Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, M. A., & McMahon, E. T. (2006). Green infrastructure: Linking landscapes and communities, urban land. Island Press (Conservation Fund (Arlington, VA)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, D., & Thackray, R. (2007). The green infrastructure of sustainable communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridgeshire Horizons. (2011). Cambridgeshire green infrastructure strategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Che, W., et al. (2014). Integral stormwater management master plan and design in an ecological community. Journal of Environmental Science. Elsevier, 26(9), 1818–1823. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JES.2014.06.028

  • Cho, M.-R. (2010). The politics of urban nature restoration: The case of Cheonggyecheon restoration in Seoul, Korea. International Development Planning Review. Liverpool University Press, 32(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2010.05

  • Cilliers, E., Cilliers, & Juaneé, E. (2019). Reflecting on green infrastructure and spatial planning in Africa: The complexities, perceptions, and way forward. Sustainability. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 11(2), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020455

  • Conway, T. M. (2016). Tending their urban forest: Residents’ motivations for tree planting and removal. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. Elsevier GmbH, 17, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.008

  • Conway, T. M., & Urbani, L. (2007). Variations in municipal urban forestry policies: A case study of Toronto, Canada. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. Elsevier GmbH, 6(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.003

  • Davies, C., & Lafortezza, R. (2017). Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant? Land Use Policy. Pergamon, 69, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2017.08.018

  • du Toit, M. J., et al. (2018). Urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning. Elsevier B.V., 180, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.06.001

  • Duinker, P. N., & Greig, L. A. (2007). Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Elsevier, 27(3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIAR.2006.11.001

  • eftec, Environmental Finance and Countryscape. (2019). Greater Manchester natural capital investment plan. Final Report from eftec, Environmental Finance and Countryscape to Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA). London. Available at https://naturegreatermanchester.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/GM-Natural-Capital-Investment-Plan-Final180119.pdf

  • England’s Community Forests & Forestry Commission. (2012). Benefits to health and wellbeing of trees and green spaces. Farnham. Available at http://www.communityforest.org.uk/resources/case_study_health_and_wellbeing.pdf

  • Fábos, J. G. (2004). Greenway planning in the United States: Its origins and recent case studies. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(2–3), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finewood, M. H. (2016). Green infrastructure, grey epistemologies, and the urban political ecology of Pittsburgh’s water governance. Antipode. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111), 48(4), 1000–1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12238

  • Finewood, M. H., Matsler, A. M., & Zivkovich, J. (2019). Green infrastructure and the hidden politics of urban stormwater governance in a postindustrial city. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Routledge, 109(3), 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1507813

  • Firehock, K. (2015). Strategic green infrastructure planning: A multi-scale approach. Island Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities. Environmental Science and Policy. Elsevier Ltd, 93, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033

  • Garmendia, E., et al. (2016). Biodiversity and green infrastructure in Europe: Boundary object or ecological trap? Land Use Policy, 56, 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, J., & Sadler, J. (2012). Resilient ecological solutions for urban regeneration. Engineering Sustainability. Institution of Civil Engineers, 165(1), 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, R., et al. (2019). Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: What is the state of practice? Ecological Indicators. Elsevier, 96, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2017.09.042

  • Hellmund, P. C., & Smith, D. (2006). Designing greenways: Sustainable landscapes for nature and people. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2018). A green future: Our 25 year plan to improve the environment. HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, F. A., & Hopton, M. E. (2019). Develo** a framework for stormwater management: Leveraging ancillary benefits from urban greenspace. Urban Ecosystems. Springer New York LLC, 22(6), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00890-6

  • Howard, E. (2009). Garden cities of to-morrow (Illustrated edition). Dodo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., & Somper, C. (2014). The role of green infrastructure in climate change adaptation in London. The Geographical Journal. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 180(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12059

  • Jongman, R., & Pungetti, G. (2004). In R. Jongman & G. Pungetti (Eds.), Ecological networks and greenways: Concept, design and implementation. Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, L. (2013). Are trees always “good”? Urban political ecology and environmental justice in the valleys of south wales. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 1968–1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01138.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koc, C. B., Osmond, P., & Peters, A. (2017). Towards a comprehensive green infrastructure typology: A systematic review of approaches, methods and typologies. Urban Ecosystems. Springer US, 20(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0578-5

  • Konijnendijk, C. C. (2003). A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics, 5(2), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kordshakeri, P., & Fazeli, E. (2020). How the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the lack of accessible public spaces in Tehran. Cities & Health. Routledge, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1817690

  • Lachmund, J. (2013). Greening Berlin: The co-production of science, politics, and urban nature. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landscape Institute. (2013). Green infrastructure – An integrated approach to land use. Landscape Institute Position Statement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashford, C., et al. (2019). SuDS & sponge cities: A comparative analysis of the implementation of pluvial flood management in the UK and China. Sustainability. MDPI AG, 11(1), 213. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010213

  • Lennon, M., et al. (2016). Develo** green infrastructure “thinking”: Devising and applying an interactive group-based methodology for practitioners. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. Routledge, 59(5), 843–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., et al. (2005). Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: A case study in Bei**g, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72(4), 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., et al. (2020). Identifying enablers and barriers to the implementation of the green infrastructure for urban flood management: A comparative analysis of the UK and China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. Elsevier GmbH, 54, 126770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126770

  • Liao, K.-H. (2019). The socio-ecological practice of building blue-green infrastructure in high-density cities: What does the ABC Waters Program in Singapore tell us? Socio-Ecological Practice Research. Springer Singapore, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-019-00009-3

  • Liquete, C., et al. (2015). Map** green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, R., et al. (2020). A rapid sco** review of health and wellbeing evidence for the green infrastructure standards. Natural England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci, D. J., & Jordan, L. M. (2013). Benefits and challenges of linking green infrastructure and highway planning in the United States. Environmental Management, 51(1), 182–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsler, A. M., et al. (2021). A “green” chameleon: Exploring the many disciplinary definitions, goals, and forms of “green infrastructure”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104145

  • Mayor of London. (2021). The London plan: The strategic development strategy for greater London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerow, S. (2020). The politics of multifunctional green infrastructure planning in New York City. Cities. Elsevier Ltd, 100, 102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102621

  • Mell, I. C. (2014). Aligning fragmented planning structures through a green infrastructure approach to urban development in the UK and USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(4), 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mell, I. C. (2016). Global green infrastructure: Lessons for successful policy-making, investment and management. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mell, I. (2021). “But who’s going to pay for it?” Contemporary approaches to green infrastructure financing, development and governance in London, UK. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1931064

  • Mell, I., & Clement, S. (2020). Progressing green infrastructure planning: Understanding its scalar, temporal, geo-spatial and disciplinary evolution. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 38(6), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1617517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mell, I., & Whitten, M. (2021). Access to nature in a post Covid-19 world: Opportunities for green infrastructure financing, distribution and equitability in urban planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI AG, 18(4), 1527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041527

  • Nagendra, H., & Gopal, D. (2010). Street trees in Bangalore: Density, diversity, composition and distribution. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Elsevier, 9(2), 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt, L., et al. (2019). Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial analysis of distributional green equity in 10 US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning. Elsevier B.V., 181, 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.007

  • New York City Environmental Protection. (2010). NYC green infrastructure plan: A sustainable strategy for clean waterways. New York City Environmental Protection.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, F., Mell, I., & Clement, S. (2020). Novel solutions or rebranded approaches: Evaluating the use of nature-based solutions (NBS) in Europe. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities. Frontiers, 2, 572527. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.572527

  • Palardy, N. P., Boley, B. B., & Gaither, C. J. (2018). Resident support for urban greenways across diverse neighborhoods: Comparing two Atlanta BeltLine segments. Landscape and Urban Planning. Elsevier B.V., 180, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.021

  • Pauleit, S., et al. (2003). Promoting the natural greenstructure of towns and cities: English nature’s accessible natural greenspace standards model. Built Environment. Alexandrine Press, 29(2), 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauleit, S., et al. (2019). Advancing urban green infrastructure in Europe: Outcomes and reflections from the GREEN SURGE project. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. Urban & Fischer, 40, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2018.10.006

  • Pepper, D. (1996). Modern environmentalism: An introduction. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philadelphia Water Department. (2011). Green city, clean waters: The city of Philadelphia’s program for combined sewer overflow control. Philadelphia Water Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiao, X. J., Liao, K. H., & Randrup, T. B. (2020). Sustainable stormwater management: A qualitative case study of the sponge cities initiative in China. Sustainable Cities and Society. Elsevier Ltd, 53, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101963

  • Rastandeh, A., & Jarchow, M. (2020). Urbanization and biodiversity loss in the post-COVID-19 era: Complex challenges and possible solutions. Cities & Health. Taylor & Francis, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1788322

  • Rigolon, A., Browning, M., & Jennings, V. (2018). Inequities in the quality of urban park systems: An environmental justice investigation of cities in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning. Elsevier B.V., 178, 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.026

  • Scott, A., et al. (2018). Mainstreaming ecosystem science in spatial planning practice: Exploiting a hybrid opportunity space. Land Use Policy. Elsevier Ltd, 70, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.002

  • Seiwert, A., & Rößler, S. (2020). Understanding the term green infrastructure: Origins, rationales, semantic content and purposes as well as its relevance for application in spatial planning. Land Use Policy. Elsevier Ltd, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104785

  • Stilgenbauer, J. (2005). Landschaftspark Duisburg Nord – Duisburg, Germany. Places, 17(3), 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Town & Country Planning Association. (2012). Creating garden cities and suburbs today: Policies, practices. Partnerships and Model Approaches – A Report of the Garden Cities and Suburbs Expert Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugolini, F., et al. (2015). Knowledge transfer between stakeholders in the field of urban forestry and green infrastructure: Results of a European survey. Land Use Policy, 49, 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Manchester, et al. (2020). Develo** benchmarks and indicators to support the emerging national framework of green infrastructure standards for England. Final Report prepared for Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Natural England Project_28560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallecillo, S., et al. (2018). Spatial alternatives for green infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning. Elsevier, 174, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2018.03.001

  • Walmsley, A. (2006). Greenways: Multiplying and diversifying in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76(1–4), 252–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamsler, C., et al. (2020). Environmental and climate policy integration: Targeted strategies for overcoming barriers to nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 247, 119154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119154

  • Wang, J., & Banzhaf, E. (2018). Towards a better understanding of green infrastructure: A critical review. Ecological Indicators. Elsevier, 85, 758–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2017.09.018

  • **ng, Y., Jones, P., & Donnison, I. (2017). Characterisation of nature-based solutions for the built environment. Sustainability. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 9(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010149

  • Young, R. F. (2011). Planting the living city: Best practices in planning green infrastructure – Results from major U.S. cities. Journal of the American Planning Association. Routledge, 77(4), 368–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, B. (1996). Creating the garden city: The Singapore experience. Urban Studies. Sage Publications Sage UK: London, England, 33(6), 955–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989650011681

  • Zmelik, K., Schindler, S., & Wrbka, T. (2011) The European Green Belt: International collaboration in biodiversity research and nature conservation along the former Iron Curtain. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. Routledge, 24(3), 273–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuniga-Teran, A. A., et al. (2020). Challenges of mainstreaming green infrastructure in built environment professions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. Routledge, 63(4), 710–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1605890

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Mell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mell, I. (2023). After All, What Is GI?. In: Gomes Sant'Anna, C., Mell, I., Schenk, L.B.M. (eds) Planning with Landscape: Green Infrastructure to Build Climate-Adapted Cities. Landscape Series, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18332-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation