The Good, the Bad, and the Yucky: Valenced Linguistic Intuitions and Linguistic Methodology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emotions, Metacognition, and the Intuition of Language Normativity

Abstract

Linguistic intuitions are a central source of evidence for linguistic claims. One under-appreciated feature of linguistic intuition is its normative character, including positive or negative valence, motivational force, and prescriptive content. Esa Itkonen and others have argued that these normative features provide one justification for a normative interpretation of the project of generative linguistics more generally. In this chapter, I review contemporary philosophical debates about the nature of linguistic intuition and argue that despite significant disagreement about what intuitions are and why they count as evidence, the normative features of those intuitions can be accommodated within a descriptive approach to linguistics. What’s more, those normative features shed light on the very mechanisms involved in producing those intuitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Chomsky (1986, pp. 36–40).

  2. 2.

    See Maynes and Gross (2013) for a review.

  3. 3.

    Though see discussion of Culbertson and Gross (2009) below.

  4. 4.

    For example, see Collins (2007), Antony (2008), Pietroski (2008), Rey (2008), Longworth (2009), Jutronic (2014), as well as numerous replies by Devitt, including more recently, Devitt (2014, 2020).

  5. 5.

    These features of normative judgment are drawn from O’Neill (2017).

References

  • Antony, Louise. 2008. Meta-linguistics: Methodology and pantology in Devitt’s Ignorance of language. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4): 643–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogen, James, and James Woodward. 1988. Saving the phenomena. Philosophical Review 97 (3): 303–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: It’s nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Syntactic structures. 2nd ed. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, John. 2007. Review of Ignorance of language, by Michael Devitt. Mind 116 (462): 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowart, Wayne, and Cairns, Helen S. 1987. Evidence for an anaphoric mechanism within syntactic processing: Some reference relations defy semantic and pragmatic constraints. Memory & Cognition 15 (4): 318–331. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197034

  • Culbertson, Jennifer, and Steven Gross. 2009. Are linguists better subjects? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 721–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, Michael. 2006. Ignorance of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Linguistic intuitions: In defense of “Ordinarism.” European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 10 (2): 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Linguistic intuitions: A response to gross and Rey. In Linguistic intuitions: Evidence and method, ed. Samuel Schindler, Anna Drożdżowicz, and Karen Brøcker, 51–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Steven. 2020. Linguistic intuitions: Error signals and the voice of competence. In Linguistic intuitions: Evidence and method, ed. Samuel Schindler, Anna Drożdżowicz, and Karen Brøcker, 13–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Steven, and Jennifer Culbertson. 2011. Revisited linguistic intuitions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3): 639–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itkonen, Esa. 2008. The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, ed. Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen, 279–305. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1994. Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. United States of America: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutronic, Dunja. 2014. Which are the data that competence provides for linguistic intuitions? European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 10 (2): 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul. 1984. Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longworth, Guy. 2009. Ignorance of linguistics: A note on Devitt’s Ignorance of Language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1): 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, Peter. 2011. The philosophy of generative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, William. 1988. Judgment and justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynes, Jeffrey. 2012. Linguistic intuition and calibration. Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (5): 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynes, Jeffrey, and Steven Gross. 2013. Linguistic intuitions. Philosophy Compass 8 (8): 714–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozari, Nazbanou, and Jared Novick. 2017. Monitoring and control in language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science 26 (5): 403–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Elizabeth. 2017. Kinds of norms. Philosophy Compass 12 (5): e12416. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Colin, Matt Wagers, and Ellen Lau. 2010. Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real time language comprehension. In Experiments at the interfaces, syntax & semantics, ed. Jeffrey Runner, vol. 37, 147–180. Bingley: Emerald Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, Paul. 2008. Think of the children. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (4): 657–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, Georges. 2008. In defense of folieism. Creation Journal of Philosophy 8 (2): 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Representation of language: Philosophical issues in Chomskyan linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, Carson T., and Jon Sprouse. 2013. Judgment data. In Research methods in linguistics, ed. Robert J. Podesva and Devyani Sharma, 27–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunk, William, Jr., and E.B. White. 1959. The elements of style. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Textor, Mark. 2009. Devitt on the epistemic authority of linguistic intuitions. Erkenntnis 71 (3): 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unterberg, Frank. 2020. Sprachgefühle: wissenschaftliches und alltagsweltliches Sprechen über “Sprachgefühl.” Zur Geschichte, Gegenwart und Vieldeutigkeit eines Begriffs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen. https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/73443

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1991. Philosophical investigations. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Maynes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maynes, J. (2023). The Good, the Bad, and the Yucky: Valenced Linguistic Intuitions and Linguistic Methodology. In: Romand, D., Le Du, M. (eds) Emotions, Metacognition, and the Intuition of Language Normativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17913-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17913-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17912-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17913-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation