SSA: Similarity Structure Analysis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research
  • 76 Accesses

Definition

SSAsimilarity structure analysis (previously called smallest space analysis) – is a geometric technique for aiding comprehension of the spatial structure of correlation matrices or similarity coefficients matrices among variables. In this technique, the data are treated intrinsically in terms of inequalities, needing no explicit prespecified model.

Description

Similarity structure analysis (SSA) was introduced and developed by Louis Guttman (1968) with the aim of overcoming the limitations of factor analysis regarding the possibility of the testing of hypotheses (Guttman 1954, 1958). Mathematically from the point of view of spatial analysis, Guttman regarded factor analysis to be “but a special case of Smallest Space Analysis” (Guttman 1967, p. 78; 1982, p. 491). Details regarding the differences between SSA and factor analysis are to be found inter alia in Guttman (1967, 1982), Schlesinger and Guttman (1969), and Cohen (2003).

SSAis essentially a geometric technique....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amar, R. (2001). Mathematical formulation of regionality in SSA and POSAC/MPOSAC. In D. Elizur (Ed.), Facet theory: Integrating theory construction with data analysis, Prague (pp. 63–74). Praha: Matfyzpress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amar, R., & Toledano, S. (2001). Hudap manual. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilsky, W. (2003). Fear of crime, personal safety and wellbeing: A common frame of reference. In M. Vanderhallen, G. Vervaeke, P. J. Van Kopen, & J. Goethals (Eds.), Much to do about crime (pp. 37–55). Brussels: Politeia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, I., & Lingoes, J. (1987). Multidimensional similarity structure analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. H. (2000). A facet theory approach to examining overall and life satisfaction relationships. Social Indicators Research, 51, 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (2003). The identification of underlying dimensionality in social sciences: Differences between factor analysis and smallest space analysis. In S. Levy & D. Elizur (Eds.), Facet theory: Towards cumulative social science (pp. 61–71). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Center for Educational Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The Radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258–348). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1958). What lies ahead for factor analysis? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 18, 497–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1967). The development of nonmetric space analysis: A letter to Professor John Ross. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1977). What is not what in statistics. The Statistician, 26, 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1982). Facet theory, smallest space analysis and factor analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 491–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L., & Levy, S. (1982). On the definition and varieties of attitude and wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 10, 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L., & Levy, S. (1987). Similarity structure analysis (SSAR) of European elections. In J. Janssen, F. Marcotorchino, & J. M. Proth (Eds.), Data analysis: The ins and outs of solving real problems (pp. 193–204). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. (1976). The use of the map** sentence for coordinating theory and research: A cross-cultural example. Quality and Quantity, 10, 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. (1990). The map** sentence in cumulative theory construction: Well-being as an example. In J. J. Hox & J. De Jong-Gierveld (Eds.), Operationalization and research strategy (pp. 155–177). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S., & Amar, R. (2002). Processing square-asymmetric matrices via the intrinsic data analysis technique WSSA: A new outlook on sociometric issues. [CD-Rom]. In J. Blasius, E. de Leeuw, P. Schmidt, & E. Hox (Eds.), Social science methodology in the new millennium. Opladen, FRG: Leske and Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S., & Sabbagh, C. (2008). The wellbeing of the self’s personality: A structural analysis. Social Indicators Research, 89, 473–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C. (1968). The multivariate analysis of quantitative data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 3, 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingoes, J. C. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. Ann Arbor, MI: Mathesis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, I. M., & Guttman, L. (1969). Smallest space analysis of intelligence and achievement tests. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reuven Amar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Additional information

This entry is dedicated to the memory of Professor Adi Raveh, who passed away in July 2012, before the completion of this enterprise.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Amar, R., Levy, S. (2023). SSA: Similarity Structure Analysis. In: Maggino, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2840

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation