Definition
A preference-based measure of health-related quality of life (also referred to as a multiattribute utility instrument) consists of two parts: (1) a health state classification system used to define health states and (2) preference weights (also referred to as a value set or tariff) for all health states defined by the classification system. For example, EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI2, and HUI3 are commonly used generic preference-based measures. Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life can be used to estimate the “Q” quality adjustment component of the QALY (quality-adjusted life year), for use in cost-effectiveness analysis of medical and health care interventions. This is because the scoring system of a preference-based measure of health-related quality of life is based on population preferences. Each health state defined by the classification...
References
Brazier, J., & Roberts, J. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based index from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42, 851–859.
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation a preference-based single index measure for health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Rowen, D. (2012). Methods for develo** preference-based measures of health. In A. M. Jones (Ed.), Elgar companion to health economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Brazier, J. E., Ratcliffe, J., Solomon, J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2016). Measuring and valuing health for economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brazier, J., Mulhern, B., Bjorner, J. B., Gandek, B., Rowen, D., Alonso, J., Vilagut, G., & Ware, J. (2020). Develo** a new version of the SF-6D health state classification system from the SF-36v2: SF-6Dv2. Medical Care, 58(6), 557–565.
Brooks, R., & the EuroQol Group. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37, 53–72.
Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., Denton, M., & Boyle, M. (2002). Multi-attribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113–128.
Hawthorne, G., Richardson, J., Osbourne, R., & McNeil, H. (1997). The Australian quality of life (AQoL) instrument. Monash University Working Paper 66.
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, B., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of a new five level version of the EQ-5D – the EQ-5D-5L. Quality of Life Research., 20(10), 1727–1736.
Kaplan, R. M., & Anderson, J. P. (1988). A general health policy model: Update and application. Health Services Research, 11, 478–507.
Richardson, J., Khan, M. A., Iezzi, A., & Maxwell, A. (2014). Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments. Medical Decision Making, 35, 276–291.
Sintonen, H., & Pekurinen, M. (1993). A fifteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15D) and its applications. In Anonymous (Ed.), Quality of life assessment: Key issues in the 1990s (pp. 185–195). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Torrance, G. W., Feeny, D. H., Furlong, W. J., Barr, R. D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Q. (1996). A multi-attribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health utilities mark 2. Medical Care, 34, 702–722.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rowen, D. (2023). Preference-Based Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life. In: Maggino, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2246
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2246
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17298-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17299-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences