Abstract
Particle size distribution plays an important role in the small-strain shear modulus G0 of granular soils. Numerous expressions were proposed for predicting the G0 of siliceous sands in the literature. There are significant differences between the mechanic characteristics of coral sand and siliceous sand. In this paper, a series of resonant column tests were conducted on the coral sand with various particle size distribution curves. The influences of uniformity coefficient Cu, mean-grain size d50, and fines content Fc on G0 of coral sand are investigated. For the given void ratio and confining stress, the G0 of coral sand is smaller than that of siliceous sand. The G0 of coral sand decreases with the increase of Cu, increases with the increase of d50, and first decreases then increases with the increase of Fc. The minimum void ratio emin, instead of the Cu, d50, and Fc, is adopted as a unified index for capturing the characteristics of the particle size distribution of granular soils. The relationships between the parameters in Hardin’s equation and emin are established and a minimum void ratio-based G0 expression for coral sand is proposed. The validity of the new expression for the other types of granular soils is confirmed using the G0 data in the literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åberg, B.: Void ratio of noncohesive soils and similar materials. J. Geotechn. Eng. 118(9), 1315–1334 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:9(1315)
Åberg, B.: Grain-size distribution for smallest possible void ratio. J. Geotechn. Eng. 122(1), 74–77 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:1(74)
Bellotti, R., Jamiolkowski, M., LoPresti, D.C.F., O’Neill, D.A.: Anisotropy of small strain stiffness in ticino sand. Géotechnique 46(1), 115–131 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.1.115
Brandes, H.G.: Simple shear behavior of calcareous and quartz sands. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 29(1), 113–126 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-010-9357-x
Bui, M.T.: Influence of some particle characteristics on the small strain response of granular materials. Southampton: School of Civil Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton (2009)
Chang, C.S., Deng, Y., Yang, Z.: Modeling of minimum void ratio for granular soil with effect of particle size distribution. J. Eng. Mech. 143(9), 04017060 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001270
Chen, G.X., Wu, Q., Zhao, K., Shen, Z.F., Yang, J.: A binary packing material-based procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction triggering during earthquakes. J. Geotechn. Geoenviron. Eng. 146(6), 04020040 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002263
Chen, G.X., Zhao, D.F., Chen, W.Y., Juang, C.H.: Excess pore-water pressure generation in cyclic undrained testing. J. Geotechn. Geoenviron. Eng. 145(7), 04019022 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002057
Cho, G.C., Dodds, J., Santamarina, J.C.: Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: natural and crushed sands. J. Geotechn. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(5), 591–602 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591)
Clayton, C.R.I.: Stiffness at small strain: research and practice. Géotechnique 61(1), 5–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2011.61.1.5
Cubrinovski, M., Ishihara, K.: Maximum and minimum void ratio characteristics of sand. Soils Found. 42(6), 65–78 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.42.6_65
Gu, X., Yang, J., Huang, M., Gao, G.: Bender element tests in dry and saturated sand: signal interpretation and result comparison. Soils Found. 55(5), 951–962 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.002
Ha Giang, P.H., Van Impe, P.O., Van Impe, W.F., Menge, P., Haegeman, W.: Small-strain shear modulus of calcareous sand and its dependence on particle characteristics and gradation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 100, 371–379 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.016
Hardin, B.O., Drnevich, V.P.: Shear modulus and dam** in soils: design equations and curves. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98(SM7), 667–692 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760
Hardin, B.O., Black, W.L.: Sand stiffness under various triaxial stresses. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 92(2), 27–42 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000865
Hardin, B.O.: The nature of stress-strain behavior of soils. In: Proceedings of Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, pp. 3–90. ASCE, New York (1978)
Hoyos, L.R., Suescún-Florez, E.A., Puppala, A.J.: Stiffness of intermediate unsaturated soil from simultaneous suction-controlled resonant column and bender element testing. Eng. Geol. 188, 10–28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.014
Kokusho, T.: Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found. 20(2), 45–60 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.20.2_45
Lashin, I., Ghali, M., Hussien, M.N., Chekired, M., Karray, M.: Investigation of small- to large-strain moduli correlations of normally consolidated granular soils. Can. Geotech. J. 58(1), 1–22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0741
Liu, X., Yang, J.: Influence of size disparity on small-strain shear modulus of sand-fines mixtures. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 115, 217–224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.011
Liu, X., Li, S., Sun, L.: The study of dynamic properties of carbonate sand through a laboratory database. Bull. Eng. Geol. Env. 79(7), 3843–3855 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01785-z
Lopez, F.A.F., Taboada, V.M., Ramirez, Z.X.G., Roque, D.C., Nabor, P.B., Dantal, V.S.: Normalized modulus reduction and dam** ratio curves for bay of campeche carbonate sand. In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference (2018). https://doi.org/10.4043/29010-ms
Menq, F.: Dynamic Properties of Sandy and Gravelly Soils. The University of Texas, Austin (2003)
Morsy, A.M., Salem, M.A., Elmamlouk, H.H.: Evaluation of dynamic properties of calcareous sands in Egypt at small and medium shear strain ranges. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 116, 692–708 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.030
Payan, M., Khoshghalb, A., Senetakis, K., Khalili, N.: Effect of particle shape and validity of Gmax models for sand: a critical review and a new expression. Comput. Geotech. 72, 28–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.11.003
Rui, S., Guo, Z., Si, T., Li, Y.: Effect of particle shape on the liquefaction resistance of calcareous sands. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 137, 106302 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106302
Ruan, B., Miao, Y., Cheng, K., Yao, E.L.: Study on the small strain shear modulus of saturated sand-fines mixtures by bender element test. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 25(1), 28–38 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1513870
Salem, M., Elmamlouk, H., Agaiby, S.: Static and cyclic behavior of North Coast calcareous sand in Egypt. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 55(12), 83–91 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.001
Senetakis, K., Anastasiadis, A., Pitilakis, K.: The small-strain shear modulus and dam** ratio of quartz and volcanic sands. Geotech. Test. J. 35(6), 20120073 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120073
Sharma, S.S., Ismail, M.A.: Monotonic and cyclic behavior of two calcareous soils of different origins. J. Geotechn. Geoenviron. Eng. 132(12), 1581–1591 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:12(1581)
Shi, J., Haegeman, W., Xu, T.: Effect of non-plastic fines on the anisotropic small strain stiffness of a calcareous sand. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 139, 106381 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106381
Van Impe, P.O., Van Impe, W.F., Manzotti, A., Mengé, P., Van den Broeck, M., Vinck, K.: Compaction control and related stress-strain behaviour of off-shore land reclamations with calcareous sands. Soils Found. 55(6), 1474–1486 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.10.012
Wichtmann, T., Triantafyllidis, T.: Influence of the grain-size distribution curve of quartz sand on the small strain shear modulus Gmax. J. Geotechn. Geoenviron. Eng. 135(10), 1404–1418 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000096
Xu, K., Gu, X., Hu, C., Lu, L.: Comparison of small-strain shear modulus and Young’s modulus of dry sand measured by resonant column and bender-extender element. Can. Geotech. J. 57(11), 1745–1753 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0823
Yang, J., Gu, X.Q.: Shear stiffness of granular material at small strains: does it depend on grain size? Géotechnique 63(2), 165–179 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.11.P.083
Youn, J.U., Choo, Y.W., Kim, D.S.: Measurement of small-strain shear modulus Gmax of dry and saturated sands by bender element, resonant column, and torsional shear tests. Can. Geotech. J. 45(10), 1426–1438 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-069
Acknowledgments
The study in this paper was supported by the project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M700309). This financial support is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liang, K., Chen, G., Dong, Q. (2022). Small-Strain Shear Modulus of Coral Sand with Various Particle Size Distribution Curves. In: Wang, L., Zhang, JM., Wang, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Bei**g 2022). PBD-IV 2022. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_188
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_188
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11897-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11898-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)