Not So Niche: Innovation, Access, and Opportunity in the (Ibero) American Mediascape

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transnational Television and Latinx Diasporic Audiences
  • 63 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers a brief overview of the development of SLTV since the first satellite transmissions, with attention to intermedial changes and influences, the confluence of technological and socioeconomic change, changes in geographic source of programming, and the demographic impact of migratory flows. This is followed by a working definition of SLTV and PLTV, and an introduction to the conceptual parameters and research implications of “Latinx diasporic audience” and corresponding modes of spectatorship. There is also a section on research methodology.

The nation-state continues to produce ‘standard’ maps of territory, administrative units, resources and population, but the cultural logic of neoliberal multiculturalism adds to the kinds of maps produced.

Sarah A. Radcliffe (2010, 299)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I signal the neorealist approach of this film less to make a claim regarding its positioning with respect to contemporary Latinx cinema, and the legacy of neorealism in Latin American cinema, than to call attention to the strategies that situate it with respect to lived historical experience.

  2. 2.

    In the film, Julio is part of the political opposition to the dictator Anastasio Somoza, whose methods of political repression (including torture) prompted many Nicaraguans to leave the country as refugees.

  3. 3.

    On this point, and for a nuanced discussion of the gender politics in Después del Terremoto, see Fregoso 1993, 96-105.

  4. 4.

    Cf., for example, Anna McCarthy’s analysis of television viewing at point of purchase in McCarthy 2001.

  5. 5.

    My translation, incorporating elements of the translation appearing in García Canclini 2001, 39.

  6. 6.

    The first Spanish-language television station in the United States was founded by José Cortes in San Antonio, Texas, in 1955. It soon gave way to control by the SIN network; Piñón 2013, 76.

  7. 7.

    According to Castellot, Telesistema Mexicano representatives offered full support to the general manager and director of production of KTVU during a visit by the latter to Mexico the same year. Viewers in San Francisco could also access international programming through KEMO Channel 20. Ibid., 163.

  8. 8.

    In the early 1980s, Televisa owned 75% of SIN; Ibid., 247. The technological and legal (FCC) conditions for this transmission were in place as of 1973; Parsons 2015, 678-680.

  9. 9.

    See López 1995, 272, n. 14 for historical background on, and national examples of shows de auditorio. For shows de auditorio on SLTV, see Wilkinson 2016, 128-29. For a description of early SL programming in the United States, see Gutiérrez and Jorge 1984, 250-51.

  10. 10.

    There are differing figures given for the percentage of the Latinx audience that could be reached, depending on the source; Wilkinson has shown the disparity, for example, between figures generated by Arbitron and Strategy Research Corp. prior to the implementation of the Nielsen Hispanic Television Index (NHTI) in the early 1990s (Wilkinson 2016, 135); and he also mentions the figure of 85% coverage of Latinx households for Univisión by late 1988 (Ibid., 121).

  11. 11.

    Hispanic Business (December 1994): 52, quoted in Ben-Amor 2001, 93. While there is little doubt that the growth in purchasing power can be attributed to Hispanic population growth during this same period, the existence of employment opportunities in light manufacturing, as well as service professions, deserves mention.

  12. 12.

    Rankings from Variety, 25-31 August 1997, quoted in Ford 1999, 99.

  13. 13.

    In the early 1990s, 15.3 million households in Mexico owned at least one television set (Wilkinson 2016, 187). In a different study, published in 1995, it was found that Argentina had 97% penetration of television sets, Brazil had 85%, Chile had 90%, Colombia had 83%, Mexico had 85%, Peru had 67%, and Venezuela had 88% (Schneier-Madanes 1995, 172, 177, 182, 186, 203, 216, and 230).

  14. 14.

    Hence, the demand for SLTV in the United States functioned as a kind of “remittance system” for Latin American television enterprises, in a way analogous to regular remittances sent by migrants homeward.

  15. 15.

    For a discussion of import substitution production in Brazil, involving the reduced scheduling of imported U.S. programs and in this case encouraged by government incentive and the formation of a strong central industrial base, see Straubhaar 1984, 229-234.

  16. 16.

    According to a Mexican diplomat stationed in Miami, Florida, most Mexican migrants began to arrive in that state in the 1990s, given job opportunities in farm labor, construction, and services; most of South Florida’s Mexican immigrants are located in Homestead; email communication, Mexican consular diplomat 2014.

  17. 17.

    The number of cable subscribers nationwide went from 16 million in 1980 to 53 million in 1990; California Cable and Telecommunications Association 2017.

  18. 18.

    In 2014, people of Mexican origin accounted for 64% of the total Hispanic population in the United States; Stepler and Brown 2016. And, according to figures provided by Alejandro Portes and Rubén Rumbaut, Mexicans constituted the largest group of new legal immigrants in 2011; see Portes and Rumbaut 2014, 95.

  19. 19.

    Appadurai 1996, 31.

  20. 20.

    The remaining percentages are Mexican cinema, 19.25%, Latin American cinema, 2.48%, European cinema, 2.48% (Ibid.).

  21. 21.

    For the global destinations of telenovelas, see the essays in Allen 1995, Ríos and Castañeda 2011, Han 2019, 40-41. and Moran 2009.

  22. 22.

    As of 2002, domestic programming dominated prime time slots in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela (Fox and Waisbord 2002, 17).

  23. 23.

    On this point, and the uses of “culture as resource,” see Yúdice 2002, 17-18, and Yúdice 2003.

  24. 24.

    The “space” also includes France and Italy; see Armand Mattelart, Xavier Delcourt, and Michèle Mattelart, International Image Markets: In Search of an Alternative Perspective (London: Comedia 1984), cited in Moran 2009, 93. In several ways, this “Latin space” has been overshadowed by a) the formation of a common, supranational market linked to the European Union, in which German-language and other national televisions have become as accessible to Spain as “Latin”-sourced programming, and b) the flow of Latin American television to Spain since the 1990s has strengthened the transatlantic bond beyond what might have been possible among the Latin-rooted European countries.

  25. 25.

    For a definition and brief history of global circulation, see Moran 2009, 16-17.

  26. 26.

    For an analysis of crossborder reception, showing viewers’ preference for Spanish-language television, see Lozano 1996.

  27. 27.

    As Wilkinson points out, some of these ownership changes were facilitated by the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which expanded the allowable percentage of ownership to 35%; Wilkinson 2016, 164.

  28. 28.

    This is the term used by networks and polling organizations to refer to the geographical areas corresponding to actual broadcasting markets. In the case of the cities I am examining, the dma includes, but is not exactly coterminous with city limits, which is why I have chosen to broaden the frame of my field research to include metropolitan areas reached by the broadcast signal of SLTV networks.

  29. 29.

    As a sign of these “higher stakes,” advertising spending on SLTV increased from $220 million in 1992 to $3 billion in 2006 (Wilkinson 2016, 242).

  30. 30.

    For insight into aspects of the boom, notably as relates to the careers of Jennifer López and Ricky Martin, see Negrón-Muntaner 2004, 233-36, 241-46, and 253-59.

  31. 31.

    For a detailed account of the FCC battles, see Perlman 2016, 159-179. See also Wilkinson 2016, 93-114, and 154-59 for Univisión sales and 164-66 for Telemundo sale.

  32. 32.

    This listing is based on cities served by local SLTV stations, as well as the ranking of cities in terms of Hispanic population (these are first, second, third, fourth, sixth, eighth, eleventh, twelfth, and sixteenth largest in Hispanic population, respectively), according to Pew Hispanic Research based on tabulations of American Community Surveys for 2014; “Hispanic Population and Origin,” 2016.

  33. 33.

    The MundoFox network as initially designed was short lived due to ratings problems and underwent a name change to MundoMax when Fox International Channel sold its share to Colombia’s RCN TV in July 2015; see Malone 2015.

  34. 34.

    According to Marc Rosenblum and Doris Meissner, the IIRIRA “greatly (expanded) administrative authority for nonjudicial deportation decisions by DHS immigration enforcement officers and…(limited) grounds for relief from removal” (Rosenblum et al. 2014, 2). Since 1996, there has been an increase in formal removals (including “expedited removals”) and “immigration-related criminal charges for unauthorized immigrants” (Ibid. 3, 14). The effects of the IIRARA on immigrants were aggravated by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) and the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), which together with the IIRIRA “limited noncitizens’ access to public benefits and legal protections” (Blizzard and Batalova 2019). In her well-researched memoir, Once I Was You, journalist Maria Hinojosa discusses how the IIRIRA criminalized many immigrants and set up impediments to the naturalization process; Hinojosa 2020, 157-58.

  35. 35.

    84% of Detroit respondents said they had HDTV, and 6% said they were thinking of purchasing one; of those asked, 43% of Los Angeles respondents had a HDTV and 7% said they were thinking of purchasing one.

  36. 36.

    For coproductions and distribution arrangements between Colombia and Mexico, see Rincón and Martínez 2014, 170-73 and 182, n7.

  37. 37.

    According to Kenton Wilkinson, Telemundo claimed it was the first to transmit an entire newscast on the Internet, yet Univisión was more aggressive in establishing and making active use of the consumption of its digital presence (Wilkinson 2016, 224-25).

  38. 38.

    In 2009, the U.S. Bureau of the Census found that less than 50% of people with less than a high school education used computers, as compared to 95% of college graduates and people in households earning at least $75,000 per year; there was also a growing percentage gap between “white” and African Americans; see Roberts 2010, 186.

  39. 39.

    A significant portion of research conducted in the Miami metropolitan area was conducted in collaboration with Sallie Hughes, with the assistance of Juan Muhammad and Randall Martínez; focus groups were conducted at Miami-Dade College and the University of Miami as well as two local non-profits. Research results presented here pertain to pregroup surveys, as well as surveys at large. For details regarding the focus groups, see Hughes 2018 and Chap. 5 below.

  40. 40.

    Advocates filing appeals following the Hallmark sale included the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, and the Mexican-American Bar Association; advocates protesting the Perencchio-Televisa sale included the League of United Latin American Citizens, the GI Forum, the National Hispanic Media Coalition, the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, and Telemundo (Rodríguez 1999, 63, 65).

  41. 41.

    As Susan B. Coutin has described, some migrants, such as Salvadorans, may have experienced a loss of rights in their country of origin even though they are citizens; see Coutin 2000: 589-591. Denationalization might also include the turn toward translocal citizenship in the greater Mexican community; see Fitzgerald 2000, 32-39. Puerto Ricans might also be considered denationalized citizens, insofar as the island of Puerto Rico remains a territory of the United States and voting in national elections is limited to Puerto Ricans who reside on the mainland; for a succinct discussion of Puerto Rican nationhood and cultural identity in historical context, see Negrón-Muntaner 2004, 3-9.

  42. 42.

    While it is inadvisable to generalize about Latinx needs and interests (and differences in experience have been emerging among those who are Spanish- as opposed to English-dominant), in terms of “need,” there are clear signs that at present, many Latinxs suffer from greater disadvantages in pursuing higher education, access to affordable healthcare and housing, vulnerability to various forms of fraud, and inequities in pay and benefits. The double burden placed on Latinx women is especially striking: according to 2016 census bureau estimates, the estimated child poverty rate was 22.1% for Latinxs, and the family poverty rate for Latinx female headed households was 35.7%, higher than it was for African Americans and non-Hispanic white households; Julián Samora Policy Institute 2019. Moreover, according to the AAUW, “Hispanic women and Latinas” earn 54 cents for every dollar earned by men (lower than for Native Americans, African Americans, and women in general), “The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap,” American Association of University Women bulletin. The increased restrictions on immigration, not to mention aggressive measures taken to apprehend, detain, and deport unauthorized immigrants and refugees over the past few years, coupled with the impact of the coronavirus, have only worked to aggravate these disparities and hardships.

  43. 43.

    Wilkinson has commented that SL programming through V-me is accessible on PBS affiliated channels and has correctly observed that it is marketed as SL public television (Wilkinson 2016, 273).

  44. 44.

    For details on the history of the decline in the representation of ethnic minorities on public television, see Perlman 2016; see Casillas 2014 for a discussion of Latinx contributions to public radio programming, including bilingual public radio. The most notable example of a bilingual Latinx presence on U.S. public radio is Futuro Media Group’s Latino U.S.A., produced by Maria Hinojosa, which has been on the air since 2010.

  45. 45.

    Allison Perlman has related how the FCC ruled against community advocates’ arguments for an improvement in Latinx ownership and representation, on the grounds that SLTV is not in competition for the same market as ELTV (Perlman 2016).

  46. 46.

    See, for example, the table “Ownership of National Television Broadcasting Networks and Production Houses,” in Piñón 2014, 26.

  47. 47.

    An actual personage in Brazilian history, the story of **ca, the African slave who became the consort of the Portuguese governor of Minas Gerais, was first fictionalized in a novel by João Felicio dos Santos, then adapted into a screenplay for a homonymous film directed by Carlos Diegues (1976) prior to being “remade” as a television series with a story written by Agripa Vasconcelos and directed by Walter Avancini and Jacques Lagôa (Rede Manchete 1996).

  48. 48.

    Mexican and Venezuelan talent was recruited for telenovelas in Argentina beginning in the 1980s (Mazziotti 1996, 98-102).

  49. 49.

    For an informative discussion of how globalization affected television in Spain, see Maxwell 1997.

  50. 50.

    For a discussion of the ideological underpinnings of and discursive distinction among these cultural forms, see García Canclini 1982, 47-66. As García Canclini points out, the three categories of cultural production mentioned above are often found in an intermingled state; Ibid., 58-59. As will become clear in the chapters that follow, SLTV bridges and renders supple the boundary between these categories of cultural expression.

  51. 51.

    See Donohue 2011, 257-274, Torre 2012, 184, and Meza 2005 for an interesting discussion of Betty, La Fea’s adaptations both across and beyond the Americas.

  52. 52.

    For a classical definition of “public” as compared to “private” in the modern era, see Rex 1997, 212. In Chap. 1 above, I have also referred to how the juxtaposition of these terms applies in John Caldwell’s description of media industry gatherings.

  53. 53.

    Among the more important informal citizenship actions covered by SLTV were the 2006 immigration reform marches, which drew hundreds of thousands into the streets of 140 cities nationwide. For an excellent description of the marches, as well as subsequent actions by Dreamers leading up to the Dream Act, see Hinojosa 2020, 219-221, 238-242.

  54. 54.

    See the commentary by Amaya 2011, 183-184.

  55. 55.

    See Casillas 2014, 209-210, 215; and advertising producers at a Hispanic media summit in New York City, October 2010 complained about the chronically low budgets they were given to work with. As Wilkinson 2016, 262 has observed, advertising revenue can fluctuate in response to special events, such as political elections and World Cup soccer games, as was the case for Univisión in 2006.

  56. 56.

    Jonathan Gray has written about how TV criticism serves as an important “paratext” that can “set the parameters” for viewer engagement, see Gray 2011, 115.

  57. 57.

    Under representation of Latinxs and other people of color was also the subject of a special hearing of the congressional judiciary committee (“Diversity in America” 2020).

  58. 58.

    As of September 2016, the FCC established a “25 percent benchmark for foreign investment in U.S.-organized entities that control a U.S. broadcast, common carrier, or aeronautical fixed or en route radio licensee;” FCC 2016.

  59. 59.

    For a consideration of how “cultural proximity” between programming and viewer factor into patterns of spectatorship and the growth and resilience of national programming, see Straubhaar 1991, 39-59.

  60. 60.

    I have taken inspiration from three of the guidelines laid out by the Working Group at SUNY Buffalo (2012), as well as some of the precepts of grounded theory.

  61. 61.

    For an explanation of this method, see Silverman and Patterson 2015, 14-15.

  62. 62.

    The average age for Latinxs was 27.7 years old as of the 2010 census (compared to 36.8 for the population at large), Wilkinson 2016, 269.

  63. 63.

    For more extended discussions of Latinx categories of identification, see Dávila 2001, Oboler 1995, Amyot 1995, 92, and Fox 1997. See also Chap. 5 below.

  64. 64.

    This is the number of self-identified Latinxs in the U.S. census who have stated that they speak Spanish at home; from a Univisión analysis of 2014 ACLS data, see “Español in America” 2016. According to a Pew Hispanic report, Latinxs accounted for 54% of U.S. population growth between 2000 and 2014; see Stepler and López 2016. A more recent study has found that 23% of children speak a language other than English at home (Ryssdal 2019).

  65. 65.

    This figure pertains to documented immigrants; Observatorio de Inmigración-Centro de Estudios y Datos 2011, 43. The current Latinx diasporic population in the Community of Madrid is around 650,000; Observatorio de Inmigración-Centro de Estudios y Datos 2017, 4; cf. Instituto Nacional de Estadística 2017, which shows the population from four (Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador) out of the twelve Latin American source countries as totaling 432,774 in 2016; Ibid., 4.

  66. 66.

    Voting permissions for noncitizens in Spain will be discussed in Chap. 5.

  67. 67.

    As Kenton Wilkinson has noted, the term “Gen-ñ” has undergone several definitions (Wilkinson 2016, 222); generally speaking, it refers to a post-migration generation of Latinx millennials.

  68. 68.

    This is an example of a change to questionnaires and survey content based on grounded theory: I began to look at transnational networking through SLTV in more detail after conducting research in Madrid, Spain, and Miami, Florida.

  69. 69.

    For an excellent historical account of how Latinx consumers were transformed into a market for corporate products, and the ways in which the “how to” market became just as important as the cultural content of marketing, see Dávila 2001: especially 56-87.

  70. 70.

    For more on racial stratification and eclipsing in Latin American-derived programming on SLTV, see Dávila 2001, 168-69.

  71. 71.

    Alignment is a term introduced by Carl Plantinga to describe the spectator’s experience of film representations utilizing a cognitive, rather than psychoanalytical approach to understanding spectatorship (Plantinga 1999).

  72. 72.

    In my study, these issues emerged in two areas of the survey questionnaire—the reasons for viewing SLTV, and issues that viewers felt should be addressed by both ELTV and SLTV; see Tables 4.5 and 4.6.

  73. 73.

    By “subpublic,” I am referring to spaces that are not readily visible to denizens outside of a given community. Alternative public spheres have often been created within neighborhoods with a heavy immigrant population because of the need to protect those who are unauthorized immigrants. I will be commenting more on such spaces in Chap. 4.

Works Cited

  • ¡Mira Quién Baila! 2018. Univisión network, 16 September. Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • “100 Latinos Dijeron.” U.S. Game Shows Wiki, Fandom http://gameshows.wikia.com/wiki/100_Latinos_Dijeron accessed 12 September 2018.

  • Allen, Robert C., ed. 1995. To Be Continued…Soap Operas Around the World. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaya, Hector. 2011. “Television/Televisión.” In Flow TV: Television in the Age of Media Convergence, ed. Michael Kackman, Marnie Binfield, Matthew Thomas Payne, Allson Perlman, and Bryan Sebok. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amyot, Guilaine. 1995. “Une Conquête en Retour: Les télévisions hispaniques aux États-Unis.” In L’Amérique Latine et ses Télévisions, Du local au Mondial, ed. Graciela Schneier-Madanes, 91–101. Paris: Anthropos/INA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, Dudley. 1983. “The Primacy of Figure in Cinematic Signification.” In Cinema and Language, ed. Stephen Heath and Patricia Mellencamp, 133–140. Fredericksburg, MD: University Publications of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anti-Defamation League, et al. 2021. Letter for the Record. Hearing, “Disinformation Nation: Social Media’s Role in Promoting Extremism and Misinformation.” United States Congress, 24 March. Washington, D.C. https://www.nhmc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/FINAL-Letter-for-the-Record-EC-Tech-CEO-Hearing-3.25.21-Spanish-Language-Misinformation.pdf accessed 25 March 2021.

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Background—About Latino Public Broadcasting.” 2021. Latino Public Broadcasting https://lpbp.org/background/

  • Bahrampour, Tara. 2021. “Census Bureau Says It Will Stop Trying to Deliver Tally of Undocumented to Trump.” The Washington Post, 14 January, posted at 10:27 a.m. PST, accessed via Columbia Journalism Review, “The Media Today,” 15 January 2021, 1. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/2020-census-trump-undocumented-apportionment/2021/01/12/3b4c7388-5549-11eb-a817-e5e7f8a406d6_story.html

  • “Being Seen on Screen: Diverse Representation and Inclusion on TV.” 2020. Nielsen Diverse Intelligence series report. The Nielsen Company. December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Amor, Leïla. 2001. “Les medias latinos aux États-Unis.” In Problèmes d’Amérique Latine 43 (October-December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, Denise D., and C. Lee Harrington. 2002. “Markets and Meanings: The Global Syndication of Television Programming.” In Global Culture: Media, Arts, Policy and Globalization, ed. Diana Crane, Nobuko Kawashima, and Kenichi Kawasaki. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blizzard, Brittany, and Jeanne Batalova. 2019. Naturalization Trends in the United States. New York: Migration Policy Institute. 11 July https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/naturalization-trends-united-states-2017 accessed 2 July 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Anna, López, Gustavo, and Mark Hugo López. 2016. “Digital Divide Narrows as More Spanish Speakers and Immigrants Go Online.” Pew Hispanic Research, 20 July http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/7/20/digital-divide-narrows-for-latinos-as-more-spanish-speakers-and-immigrants-go-online/ accessed 17 July 2017.

  • Brunner, José Joaquin, and Carlos Catalán. 1995. Televisión, Libertad, Mercado y Moral. Santiago, Chile: Editorial los Andes.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Cable and Telecommunications Association. “History of Cable.” https://www.calcable.org/learn/history-of-cable/ accessed 9 July 2017.

  • Carter, Bill. 2006. “Sizzling a Year Ago, but Now Pfffft…” New York Times 25 December http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/25/business/media/25telenovela.html

  • Castañeda, Mari. 2011. “The Transnational Political Economy of Telenovelas and Soap Operas in the Digital Age.” In Soap Operas and Telenovelas in the Digital Age, ed. Diana I. Ríos and Mari Castañeda, 1. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellot, Gonzalo. 1999. La Televisión en México, 1950-2000. Mexico, D.F.: EDAMEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2010. “The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance.” In International Communication: A Reader, ed. Daya Kishan Thussu, 36–47. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, Leo. 2011. “Migration, National Identity, and Citizenship in a Transnational World.” In Migration and Identities: Conflict and the New Horizon, special issue: Conflict Studies in the Humanities, ed. Junji Koizumi and Mayumi Kodo. Osaka: Osaka University, Global COE Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros Group of Companies. “Our History.” http://www.cisneros.com/ourhistory accessed 9 July 2017.

  • Couldry, Nick, and Anna McCarthy, eds. 2004. Mediaspace: Place, Scale and Culture in a Media Age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutin, Susan B. 2000. “Denationalization, Inclusion, and Exclusion: Negotiating the Boundaries of Belonging.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 7: 585–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Stuart. 2013. “Popular Media as Public ‘Sphericules’ for Diasporic Communities.” In The Media Studies Reader, ed. Laurie Ouellette, 542–546. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dávila, Arlene. 2001. Latinos, Inc.: The Marketing and Making of a People. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Armas, Stacey M. and McCaskill, Andrew. 2018. “Descubrimiento Digital: The Online Lives of Latinx Consumers.” Diverse Intelligence Series. The Nielsen Company, March. https://33abefea-9e80-4592-9f12-919899a6420c.filesusr.com/ugd/e57448_4b31ac949d434e4b8ce62f2cd7d1ee9b.pdf

  • De la Fuente, Anna Marie. 2005. “Claxon Cooks up Chilevision Sale.” In Variety, Thursday, 28 April, posted 11:05 p.m. PT

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sipio, Louis, et al. 2000. “Talking Back to Television: Latinos Discuss How Television Portrays Them and Programming Options.” In The Future of Latino Independent Media: A NALIP Sourcebook, ed. Chon A. Noriega, 59–98. Los Angeles: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Diversity in America: The Representation of People of Color in the Media.” 2020. Hearing. House Committee on the Judiciary. 24 September. https://judiciary.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=3354 Accessed 22 June 2021.

  • Donohue, Courtney Brannon. 2011. “Importing and Translating Betty.” In Soap Operas and Telenovelas in the Digital Age, ed. Diana Ríos and Mari Castañeda. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, Andrew. 2006. Habermas: The Key Concepts. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fackler, Gary D. 2010. “The New Face of Social Media.” In Hispanic Business, 16 December https://www.HispanicBusiness.com Accessed 15 January 2011.

  • Fadul, Ligia Maria, Solis Leree, and Beatriz. 1995. “Mexique.” In L’Amérique Latine et ses Télévisions, Du local au Mondial, ed. Graciela Schneier-Madanes, 67–89. Paris: Anthropos/INA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faughnder, Ryan. 2021. “The New Streaming War Is in Spanish.” The Wide Shot newsletter, Los Angeles Times, 4 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Aníbal. 1999. La Marca de la Bestia: Identificación, desigualdades e infoentretenimiento en la sociedad contemporánea. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Geoffrey. 1997. Hispanic Nation: Culture, Politics, and the Constructing of Identity. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Elizabeth, and Silvio Waisbord. 2002. “Latin Politics, Global Media.” In Latin Politics, Global Media, ed. Elizabeth Fox and Silvio Waisbord, 1–21. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fregoso, Rosa Linda. 1993. The Bronze Screen: Chicana and Chicano Film Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Canclini, Néstor. 1982. Las Culturas populares en el capitalismo. Mexico, D.F.: Editorial Nueva Imagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Conumidores y Ciudadanos: Conflictos multiculturales de la globalización. Mexico, D.F.: Grijalbo.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Consumers and Citizens: Globalization and Multicultural Conflicts. Trans. George Yúdice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, Rodrigo, Toby Miller, and André Dorcé. 2014. “Converging from the South: Mexican Television in the United States.” In Contemporary Latina/o Media: Production, Circulation, Politics, ed. Arlene Dávila and Yeidy M. Rivero, 44–61. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, Antonio. 1999. “Chicano Politics and U.S. Policy in Central America, 1979-1990.” In Chicano Politics and Society in the Late Twentieth Century, ed. David Montejano, 154–172. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Jonathan. 2011. “The Reviews Are In, TV Critics and the (Pre) Creation of Meaning.” In Flow TV: Television in the Age of Media Convergence, ed. Michael Kackman, Marnie Binfield, Matthew Thomas Payne, Allison Perlman, and Bryan Sebok. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, Félix F., and Reina Shement, Jorge. 1984. “Spanish International Network: The Flow of Television from Mexico to the United States.” In Communication Research 11/2 (April): 241-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. 1981. “Encoding/decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language, ed. Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis, 128–138. Birmingham: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies; London: Hutchinson and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Benjamin M. 2019. “Fantasies of Modernity: Korean TV Dramas in Latin America.” Journal of Popular Film and Television 47 (1): 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havens, Timothy, and Amanda Lotz. 2012. Understanding Media Industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, Daniel. 2021. “Tackling Tinseltown’s Latin Culture Gap.” Los Angeles Times Sunday, 13 June, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa, Maria. 2020. Once I Was You: A Memoir of Love and Hate in a Torn America. New York: Atria Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Hispanic Population and Origin in Select U.S. Metropolitan Areas, 2014.” 2016. Hispanic Trends, Pew Research Center. 6 September. http://www.pewhispanic.org/interactives/hispanic-population-in-select-u-s-metropolitan-areas/t

  • “Hispanic Population Reaches Record 58 Million, U.S. Census.” 2017. Hispanic Trends. Pew Research Center, 16 June http://www.pewhispanic.org

  • Hughes, Sallie. 2018. “The Latino/a Audience Unbound: Intraethnic Social Hierarchies and Spanish-Language Television News.” Latino Studies 16/1 (April): 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igelnik, Ruth, and Budiman, Abby. 2020. “The Changing Racial and Ethnic Composition of the U.S. Electorate.” Pew Research Center. 23 September https://www.pewresearch.org/2020/09/23/the-changing-racial-and-ethnic-composition-of-the-u-s-electorate/ accessed 21 January 2021.

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística, “Cifras de Población a 1 de enero de 2017, Estadística de Migraciones (Spain) 2016, Datos Provisionales.” 2017. Press release. 29 June http://www.ine.es/prensa/cp_2017_p.pdf

  • Ionescu, Dina. 2006. “Engaging Diasporas as Development Partners for Home and Destination Countries: Challenges for Policymakers.” Report, IOM Migration Research Series 26. International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Meg. 2021. “Spanish-language TV Giant Univision Launches Streaming Service as Competition Heats Up,” Los Angeles Times, 30 March, posted 6 a.m. PT https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-03-30/univision-prende-tv-ad-supported-spanish-language-streaming-service?utm_id=28489&sfmc_id=450002 accessed 4 May 2021

  • Julián Samora Research Institute. 2019. “Latina/o Voter Turnout in the 2018 Midterm Elections.” Nexo (Spring): 18-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knauer, Lisa Maya. 2009. “Audiovisual Remittances and Transnational Subjectivities.” In Cuba in the Special Period: Culture and Ideology in the 1990s, ed. Ariana Hernández-Reguant, 159–177. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraidy, Marwan M. 2010. “Hybridity in Cultural Globalization.” In International Communication: A Reader, ed. Daya Kishan Thussu, 434–451. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Peggy, Glick Schiller, and Nina. 2007. “Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society.” In Sociology of Diaspora: A Reader, ed. Ajaya Kumarsahoo and Brij Maharaj, 156–193. Jaipur: Rowat.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, Ana M. 1995. “Our Welcomed Guests: Telenovelas in Latin America.” In To be continued…: Soap Operas Around the World, ed. Robert C. Allen. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, Cristina, and Torres, Jessica. 2015. “Single-Issue Syndrome: How Sunday Shows Undermine Hispanic Inclusion.” Report. Media Matters for America. Posted 4 March, 4:56 a.m. EST, http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/03/04/report-single-issue-syndrome-how-sunday-shows-u/202569 Accessed 17 July 2015.

  • Lozano, José Carlos. 1996. “Media Reception on the Mexican Border with the United States.” In Mass Media and Free Trade, NAFTA and the Cultural Industries, ed. Emile G. McAnany and Kenton T. Wilkinson, 157–186. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, Michael. 2015. “MundoFox Changes Name to MundoMax.” In Broadcasting and Cable 31 July. Posted 4:15 p.m. http://www.broadcastingcable.com/news/local-tv/mundofox-changes-name-mundomax/143014 Accessed 10 July 2017.

  • Malonga, Marie-France. 2007. “Les stratégies identitaires des minorités noires face å la télévision française.” In Médias, migrations, et cultures transnationales, ed. Tristan Mattelart, 62–68. Brussels: De Boeck and Larcier, S.A./Institut national de l’audiovisuel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Richard. 1997. “Spatial Eruptions, Global Grids: Regionalist TV in Spain and the Dialectics of Identity Politics.” In Refiguring Spain: Cinema/Media/Representation, 260–283. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazziotti, Nora. 1996. La Industria de la Telenovela: La Producción de Ficción en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Anna. 2001. Ambient Television: Visual Culture and Public Space. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mexican consular diplomat. 2014. Telephone conversation with author. 25 September. Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meza, Ed. 2005. “Feeling Latin Heat: Telenovelas Set Teutonic Ratings Alight.” Variety, Sunday, 24 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Albert. 2009. New Flows in Global TV. Bristol, UK: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, Kristin C. 2011. Listening to Latina/o Youth: Television Consumption within Families. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Moving online, The Next Level: Hispanic Newspaper Websites Establish Themselves Online.” 2007. Portada 25/5: 26-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, Ruth. 1948. “Admen Find It Difficult to Standardize Mexicans.” Ad Age 3: 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento, Rodrigo. 2022. Negocios Internacionais, Rede Globo. Interview with author (via videoconference), 22 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Hispanic Media Coalition. 2018. “An Open Letter to Netflix,” 15 March http://www.nhmc.org/open-letter-to-netflix Accessed 16 June 2018.

  • Navarro, Vinicius. 2012. “More than Copycat Television: Format Adaptation as Performance.” In Global Television Formats: Understanding Television Across Borders, ed. Tasha Oren and Sharon Shahaf, 23–38. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrón-Muntaner, Frances. 2004. Boricua Pop: Puerto Ricans and the Latinization of American Culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “NetSpan.” “Telemundo.” 2017. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telemundo edited 7 July 2017.

  • Noe-Bustamante, Luis, and Budiman, Abby. 2020. “Black, Latino and Asian Americans Have Been Key to Georgia’s Registered Voter Growth Since 2016.” Hispanic Trends, “Fact Tank: News in the Numbers.” Pew Research Center. 21 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oboler, Suzanne. 1995. Ethnic Labels, Latino Lives: Identity and the Politics of (Re)presentation in the United States. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatorio de Inmigración-Centro de Estudios y Datos. 2011. “Informe Demográfico de la Población Extranjera en la Comunidad de Madrid,” January.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Informe Demográfico de la Población Extranjera en la Comunidad de Madrid, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oktay, Julianne S. 2012. Grounded Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • “Over-the- Air TV Is Booming in U.S. Cities.” 2019. The Nielsen company, 11 March https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2019/over-the-air-tv-is-booming-in-us-cities

  • Parsons, Patrick. 2015. “The Evolution of the Cable-Satellite Distribution System.” In Routledge Reader on Electronic Media History, ed. Donald G. Godfrey and Susan L. Brinson. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payan, Tony. 2020. “Actors, Strategic Fields, and Game Rules: Examining Governance at the U.S.-Mexico Border in the Twenty-First Century.” In North American Borders in Comparative Perspective, ed. Guadalupe Correa-Cabrera and Victor Konrad, 39–71. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, Allison. 2016. Public Interests: Media Advocacy and Struggles over U.S. Television. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, Andrew. 2016. “Social Media Usage, 2005-2015.” Pew Research Center, 8 October 2015 http://www.pewresearch/internet Accessed 15 March.

  • Piñón, Juan. 2013. “Televisión Hispana en Estados Unidos: Una Industria Que Crece y se Diversifica.” In Zap** TV: El Paisaje de la Tele Latina, ed. Omar Rincón, 71–81. Bogotá: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, FES Comunicación.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. “Corporate Transnationalism: The U.S. Hispanic and Latin American Television Industries.” In Contemporary Latina/o Media: Production, Circulation, Politics, ed. Arlene Dávila and Yeidy M. Rivero, 21–43. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Carl. 1999. “The Scene of Empathy and the Human Face on Film.” In Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, ed. Carl Plantinga and Greg M. Smith, 239–255. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro, and Rubén Rumbaut. 2014. Immigrant America: A Portrait. 4th ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, Sarah A. 2010. “Re-Map** the Nation: Cartography, Geographical Knowledge and Ecuadorean Multiculturalism.” Journal of Latin American Studies 42/2 (May): 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez Berg, Charles. 2002. Latino Images in Film, Stereotypes, Subversion, Resistance. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, Jorge. 2005. La Ola Latina: Cómo Los Hispanos Están Transformando la Política en los Estados Unidos. New York: Rayo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reig, Ramón. 2011. Los Dueños del Periodismo: Claves de la estructura mediática mundial y de España. Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa, S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retis, Jessica. 2007. “Mass Media and Migration in Spain, Emergence and Consolidation of the New Media of the Latin American Diaspora.” Unpublished research paper, English translation. Madrid, Spain: Observatorio de las Migraciones y la Convivencia Intercultural de la Ciudad de Madrid, 30 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rex, John. 1997. “The Concept of a Multicultural Society.” In The Ethnicity Reader: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Migration, ed. Montserrat Guibernau and John Rex. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón, Omar, and María Paula Martínez. 2014. “Colombianidades Export Market.” In Contemporary Latina/o Media: Production, Circulation, Politics, ed. Arlene Dávila and Yeidy M. Rivero, 169–185. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ríos, Diana I., and Mari Castañeda, eds. 2011. Soap Operas and Telenovelas in the Digital Age: Global Industries and New Audiences. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Chris. 2010. “Personal Computers.” In Communication Technology Update and Fundamentals, ed. August E. Grant and Jennifer H. Meadows, 12th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, América. 1999. Making Latino News, Race, Language, Class. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Pagán, Saida. 2021. Interview on The Laura Flanders Show, American Public Television. Excerpted in palabra, Twitter @palabranahj 1 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, Viviana, and Juan Piñón. 2014. “Spanish, English, or Spanglish? Media Strategies and Corporate Struggles to Reach Second and Later Generations of Latinos.” International Journal of Hispanic Media 7 (August): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, Marc R., Doris Meissner, et al. 2014. The Deportation Dilemma: Reconciling Tough and Humane Enforcement. New York: Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryssdal, Kai. 2019. “Marketplace.” National Public Radio, 9 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Ruiz, Enrique. 1998. “El cine Mexicano y la Globalización.” In Horizontes del Segundo Siglo: Investigación y Pedagogía del Cine Mexicano, Latinoamericano y Chicano, ed. Julianne Burton-Carvajal, Patricia Torres, and Ángel Miquel. Guadalajara / Mexico, D.F.: Universidad de Guadalajara / Instituto Mexicano de Cinematografía.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2005. “The Repositioning of Citizenship and Alienage: Emergent Subjects and Spaces for Politics.” Globalizations 2/1 (May): 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneier-Madanes, Graciela, ed. 1995. L’Amérique Latine et ses Télévisions, Du Local au Mondial. Paris: Anthropos/INA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scolari, Carlos, and Juan Piñón. 2016. “Las narrativas transmedia en el mercado audiovisual latino de Estados Unidos, actores, contenidos y estrategias.” Comunicación y Sociedad 27 (Sep-Dec): 13–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, Katie. 2017. “Tales of Deportation in Trump’s America: Week Three.” BBC News, 31 March https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39461852?ocid=socialflow_twitter

  • Shohat, Ella. 2006. Taboo Memories, Diasporic Voices. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shorris, Earl. 1992. Latinos: A Biography of the People. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Robert Mark, and Kelly L. Patterson. 2015. Qualitative Research Methods for Community Development. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, John. 1998. Latin American Television: A Global View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. “International Television Channels in the Latin American Audiovisual Space.” In Transnational Television Worldwide: Towards a New Media Order, ed. Jean K. Chalaby, 196–215. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, John, and Joseph Straubhaar. 2013. Latin American Television Industries. London: BFI/Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepler, Renee, and Brown, Anna. 2016. “Statistical Portrait of Hispanics in the United States.” Pew Research Center, 19 April http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-hispanics-in-the-united-states/

  • Straubhaar, Joseph D. 1984. “Brazilian Television: The Decline of American Influence.” Communication Research 11/2: 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. “Beyond Media Imperialism: Asymmetrical Interdependence and Cultural Proximity.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 8: 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “Telenovelas in Brazil: From Traveling Scripts to a Genre and Proto-Format both National and Transnational.” In Global Television Formats: Understanding Television Across Borders, ed. Tasha Oren and Sharon Shahaf, 148–177. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, Mary. 2005. “SONY Pencils in Animax Bow in Latin America, Toon Feevee Set to Start in July.” Variety Sunday, 15 May, posted 10 p.m. PT

    Google Scholar 

  • Thussu, Daya Kishan. 2010. “Map** Global Media Flow and Contra-Flow.” In International Communication: A Reader, ed. Daya Kishan Thussu, 221–238. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • UnidosUS. 2020. “The American Election Eve Poll 2020.” Latino Decisions, November https://electioneve2020.com/poll/?utm_source=hpage&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=adelante#/en/demographics/latino

  • Venegas, Cristina. 1998. “Land as Memory in the Transnational Telenovela.” Spectator 19 (1): 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Hansi Lo. 2021. “Immigration Hard-Liner Files Reveal 40-Year Bid Behind Trump’s Census Obsession.” National Public Radio, posted 15 February, 5:01 a.m. ET https://www.npr.org/2021/02/15/967783477/immigration-hard-liner-files-reveal-40-year-bid-behind-trumps-census-obsession Accessed 15 February 2021.

  • Westgate, Christopher. 2014. “One Language, One Nation, and One Vision: NBC Latino, Fusion, and Fox News Latino.” In Contemporary Latina/o Media: Production, Circulation, Politics, ed. Arlene Dávila and Yeidy M. Rivero, 82-102. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Kenton T. 2016. Spanish-language Television in the United States: Fifty Years of Development. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Group at SUNY Buffalo. 2012. “Mixed Methods for Studies that Address Broad and Enduring Issues in Education Research.” Report. http://gse.buffalo.edu/gsefiles/documents/faculty/Mixed-Methods-Statement.pdf

  • **ca da Silva. 1996. Directed by Walter Avancini and Jacques Lagôa. Rede Manchete, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yúdice, George. 2002. “Las industrias culturales: Más allá de la lógica puramente económica, al aporte social.” In Pensar Iberoamérica: Revista de Cultura 1 (June-September).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Benamou, C.L. (2022). Not So Niche: Innovation, Access, and Opportunity in the (Ibero) American Mediascape. In: Transnational Television and Latinx Diasporic Audiences. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11527-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation