Abstract
For many biological systems different strategies, morphologies and/or behaviours have evolved in response to similar functional demands (a concept known as convergent evolution). The biodiversity on Earth thus holds a wealth of natural strategies that may provide tailored solutions to the social, economic and environmental challenges the world faces—a practice often referred to as biomimicry, biomimetics or bioinspiration. Despite the great potential and increasing popularity of bioinspiration as a research approach, deciding which biological systems to explore remains a challenging and complex task. Not only does the incompleteness of the knowledge about biodiversity inhibit the identification of suitable biological strategies, but also practitioners in the field of bioinspiration often rely on the assumption that natural structures are the result of evolutionary processes that strive for optimization, thereby failing to acknowledge the processes that might constrain adaptive evolution. The purpose of this chapter is threefold. First, we shed light on the evolutionary constraints and limitations that pose potential pitfalls for using biodiversity as a source of inspiration for innovation. Second, we highlight the central role that the study of convergent evolution could and should play in addressing the current challenges to approaches to bioinspiration. Finally, we provide valuable insights into methodological trends that might facilitate the identification and experimental analysis of biological systems and thereby advance our understanding of biological structures in novel ways. By engaging with these three lines of thought, we present a perspective on future directions for bioinspiration, drawing attention to the opportunities for improving the translation of biological knowledge into innovative solutions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abas, M. F. B., Rafie, A. S. B. M., Yusoff, H. B., & Ahmad, K. A. B. (2016). Flap** wing micro-aerial-vehicle: kinematics, membranes, and flap** mechanisms of ornithopter and insect flight. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 29(5), 1159–1177.
Adriaens, D. (2019). Evomimetics: The biomimetic design thinking 2.0. In R. J. Martín-Palma, M. Knez, & A. Lakhtakia (Eds.), Bioinspiration, biomimetics, and bioreplication IX (p. 1096509). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Arbour, V. M., & Zanno, L. E. (2020). Tail weaponry in ankylosaurs and glyptodonts: An example of a rare but strongly convergent phenotype. The Anatomical Record, 303(4), 988–998.
Autumn, K., Sitti, M., Liang, Y. A., Peattie, A. M., Hansen, W. R., Sponberg, S., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., Israelachvili, J. N., & Full, R. J. (2002). Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(19), 12252–12256.
Baik, S., Park, Y., Lee, T. J., Bhang, S. H., & Pang, C. (2017). A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi. Nature, 546(7658), 396–400.
Bars-Closel, M., Kohlsdorf, T., Moen, D. S., & Wiens, J. J. (2017). Diversification rates are more strongly related to microhabitat than climate in squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes). Evolution, 71(9), 2243–2261.
Barthlott, W., & Neinhuis, C. (1997). Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta, 202(1), 1–8.
Bartlett, M. D., Croll, A. B., King, D. R., Paret, B. M., Irschick, D. J., & Crosby, A. J. (2012). Looking beyond fibrillar features to scale gecko-like adhesion. Advanced Materials, 24(8), 1078–1083.
Borda, E., Oceguera-Figueroa, A., & Siddall, M. E. (2008). On the classification, evolution and biogeography of terrestrial haemadipsoid leeches (Hirudinida: Arhynchobdellida: Hirudiniformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 46(1), 142–154.
Boyer, S., Hérissant, L., & Sherlock, G. (2021). Adaptation is influenced by the complexity of environmental change during evolution in a dynamic environment. PLoS Genetics, 17(1), e1009314.
Broeckhoven, C., & du Plessis, A. (2017). Has snake fang evolution lost its bite? New insights from a structural mechanics viewpoint. Biology Letters, 13(8), 20170293.
Broeckhoven, C., & du Plessis, A. (2018). X-ray microtomography in herpetological research: A review. Amphibia-Reptilia, 39(4), 377–401.
Broeckhoven, C., & du Plessis, A. (2022). Esca** the labyrinth of bioinspiration: Biodiversity as key to successful product innovation. Advanced Functional Materials, 32(18), 2110235.
Broeckhoven, C., du Plessis, A., & Hui, C. (2017). Functional trade-off between strength and thermal capacity of dermal armor: insights from girdled lizards. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 74, 189–194.
Chatterjee, S., Lind, R., & Roberts, B. (2013). The novel characteristics of pterosaurs: Biological inspiration for robotic vehicles. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 8(2), 113–143.
Cunningham, J. A., Rahman, I. A., Lautenschlager, S., Rayfield, E. J., & Donoghue, P. C. (2014). A virtual world of paleontology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(6), 347–357.
Deldin, J. M., & Schuknecht, M. (2014). The AskNature database: Enabling solutions in biomimetic design. In A. K. Goel, D. A. McAdams, & R. B. Stone (Eds.), Biologically inspired design (pp. 17–27). Springer.
Ditsche, P., & Summers, A. P. (2014). Aquatic versus terrestrial attachment: Water makes a difference. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 5(1), 2424–2439.
Domel, A. G., Domel, G., Weaver, J. C., Saadat, M., Bertoldi, K., & Lauder, G. V. (2018). Hydrodynamic properties of biomimetic shark skin: Effect of denticle size and swimming speed. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 13(5), 056014.
Drol, C. J., Kennedy, E. B., Hsiung, B. K., Swift, N. B., & Tan, K. T. (2019). Bioinspirational understanding of flexural performance in hedgehog spines. Acta Biomaterialia, 94, 553–564.
du Plessis, A., & Broeckhoven, C. (2019). Looking deep into nature: A review of micro-computed tomography in biomimicry. Acta Biomaterialia, 85, 27–40.
du Plessis, A., & Broeckhoven, C. (2022). Functional synergy of biomimicry and additive manufacturing: Toward a bio-enhanced engineering approach. In M. Eggermont, V. Shyam, & A. F. Hepp (Eds.), Biomimicry for materials, design and habitats (pp. 269–289). Elsevier.
du Plessis, A., Broeckhoven, C., Yadroitsev, I., Yadroitsava, I., & le Roux, S. G. (2018). Analyzing nature’s protective design: The glyptodont body armor. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 82, 218–223.
du Plessis, A., Broeckhoven, C., Yadroitsava, I., Yadroitsev, I., Hands, C. H., Kunju, R., & Bhate, D. (2019). Beautiful and functional: A review of biomimetic design in additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 27, 408–427.
Farnsworth, M. (2020). Biomimicry and business: How companies are using nature’s strategies to succeed. Routledge.
Faulwetter, S., Vasileiadou, A., Kouratoras, M., Dailianis, T., & Arvanitidis, C. (2013). Micro-computed tomography: Introducing new dimensions to taxonomy. ZooKeys, 263, 1–15.
Fayemi, P. E., Wanieck, K., Zollfrank, C., Maranzana, N., & Aoussat, A. (2017). Biomimetics: Process, tools and practice. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 12(1), 011002.
Federle, W., Barnes, W. J. P., Baumgartner, W., Drechsler, P., & Smith, J. M. (2006). Wet but not slippery: Boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 3(10), 689–697.
Fish, F. E., & Beneski, J. T. (2014). Evolution and bio-inspired design: Natural limitations. In A. K. Goel, D. A. McAdams, & R. B. Stone (Eds.), Biologically inspired design (pp. 287–312). Springer.
Flammang, B. E., & Kenaley, C. P. (2017). Remora cranial vein morphology and its functional implications for attachment. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–5.
Flammang, P., Demeuldre, M., Hennebert, E., & Santos, R. (2016). Adhesive secretions in echinoderms: A review. In A. M. Smith (Ed.), Biological adhesives (pp. 193–222). Springer.
Gamble, T., Greenbaum, E., Jackman, T. R., Russell, A. P., & Bauer, A. M. (2012). Repeated origin and loss of adhesive toepads in geckos. PLoS One, 7(6), e39429.
Garner, A. M., Wilson, M. C., Russell, A. P., Dhinojwala, A., & Niewiarowski, P. H. (2019). Going out on a limb: How investigation of the anoline adhesive system can enhance our understanding of fibrillar adhesion. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59(1), 61–69.
Garner, A. M., Wilson, M. C., Wright, C., Russell, A. P., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Dhinojwala, A. (2021). The same but different: The setal arrays of anoles and geckos indicate alternative approaches to achieving similar adhesive effectiveness. Journal of Anatomy, 238(5), 1143–1155.
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., & Khorasani, M. (2021). Materials for additive manufacturing. In I. Gibson, D. Rosen, B. Stucker, & M. Khorasani (Eds.), Additive manufacturing technologies (pp. 379–428). Springer.
Gleich, A., Pade, C., Petschow, U., & Pissarskoi, E. (2010). Potentials and trends in biomimetics. Springer.
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences, 205, 581–598.
Graeff, E., Maranzana, N., & Aoussat, A. (2019). Biomimetics, where are the biologists? Journal of Engineering Design, 30(8-9), 289–310.
Graeff, E., Letard, A., Raskin, K., Maranzana, N., & Aoussat, A. (2021). Biomimetics from practical feedback to an interdisciplinary process. Research in Engineering Design, 32, 1–27.
Green, D. W., Watson, J. A., Jung, H. S., & Watson, G. S. (2019). Natural history collections as inspiration for technology. BioEssays, 41(2), 1700238.
Hedrick, B. P., Heberling, J. M., Meineke, E. K., Turner, K. G., Grassa, C. J., Park, D. S., Kennedy, J., Clarke, J. A., Cook, J. A., Blackburn, D. C., Edwards, S. V., & Davis, C. C. (2020). Digitization and the future of natural history collections. Bioscience, 70(3), 243–251.
Holmes, M. W., Hammond, T. T., Wogan, G. O., Walsh, R. E., LaBarbera, K., Wommack, E. A., Martins, F. M., Crawford, J. C., Mack, K. L., Bloch, L. M., & Nachman, M. W. (2016). Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes. Molecular Ecology, 25(4), 864–881.
Holzman, R., Collar, D. C., Mehta, R. S., & Wainwright, P. C. (2011). Functional complexity can mitigate performance trade-offs. The American Naturalist, 177(3), E69–E83.
Irschick, D. J., Austin, C. C., Petren, K., Fisher, R. N., Losos, J. B., & Ellers, O. (1996). A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad-bearing lizards. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society London, 59(1), 21–35.
Islam, M. K., Hazell, P. J., Escobedo, J. P., & Wang, H. (2021). Biomimetic armour design strategies for additive manufacturing: A review. Materials and Design, 205, 109730.
ISO/TC266. (2015). Biomimetics – Terminology, concepts and methodology. Beuth. ISO 18458:2015.
Johnson, E. H., & Carter, A. M. (2019). Defossilization: A review of 3D printing in experimental paleontology. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 430.
Kier, W. M., & Smith, A. M. (1990). The morphology and mechanics of octopus suckers. The Biological Bulletin, 178(2), 126–136.
King, D. R., Bartlett, M. D., Gilman, C. A., Irschick, D. J., & Crosby, A. J. (2014). Creating gecko-like adhesives for “real world” surfaces. Advanced Materials, 26(25), 4345–4351.
Kuolt, H., Kampowski, T., Pop**a, S., Speck, T., Tautenhahn, R., Moosavi, A., Weber, J., Gabriel, F., Pierri, E., & Dröder, K. (2021). Biomimetic suction cups for energy-efficient industrial applications. In K. Dröder & T. Vietor (Eds.), Technologies for economic and functional lightweight design: Zukunftstechnologien für den multifunktionalen Leichtbau (pp. 182–188). Springer.
Lee, H., Um, D. S., Lee, Y., Lim, S., Kim, H. J., & Ko, H. (2016). Octopus-inspired smart adhesive pads for transfer printing of semiconducting nanomembranes. Advanced Materials, 28(34), 7457–7465.
Lepora, N. F., Verschure, P., & Prescott, T. J. (2013). The state of the art in biomimetics. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 8(1), 013001.
Ma, J., & Müller, R. (2011). A method for characterizing the biodiversity in bat pinnae as a basis for engineering analysis. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 6(2), 026008.
Martini, R., Balit, Y., & Barthelat, F. (2017). A comparative study of bio-inspired protective scales using 3D printing and mechanical testing. Acta Biomaterialia, 55, 360–372.
McGhee, G. R. (2011). Convergent evolution: Limited forms most beautiful. MIT Press.
McKitrick, M. C. (1993). Phylogenetic constraint in evolutionary theory: Has it any explanatory power? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24(1), 307–330.
McMichael, J. M., & Francis, M. S. (1997). Micro air vehicles – Toward a new dimension in flight. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
Müller, R., Abaid, N., Boreyko, J. B., Fowlkes, C., Goel, A. K., Grimm, C., Jung, S., Kennedy, B., Murphy, C., Cushing, N. D., & Han, J. P. (2018). Biodiversifying bioinspiration. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 13(5), 053001.
Muñoz, M. M., & Price, S. A. (2019). The future is bright for evolutionary morphology and biomechanics in the era of big data. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59(3), 599–603.
Naylor, E. R., & Higham, T. E. (2019). Attachment beyond the adhesive system: The contribution of claws to gecko clinging and locomotion. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59(1), 168–181.
North, M. A., Del Grosso, C. A., & Wilker, J. J. (2017). High strength underwater bonding with polymer mimics of mussel adhesive proteins. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(8), 7866–7872.
Patek, S. N. (2014). Biomimetics and evolution. Science, 345(6203), 1448–1449.
Peattie, A. M., Dirks, J. H., Henriques, S., & Federle, W. (2011). Arachnids secrete a fluid over their adhesive pads. PLoS One, 6(5), e20485.
Persson, B. N. J., & Gorb, S. (2003). The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic plates with application to biological systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 119(21), 11437–11444.
Porter, M. M., & Ravikumar, N. (2017). 3D-printing a ‘family’ of biomimetic models to explain armored gras** in syngnathid fishes. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 12(6), 066007.
Porter, M. M., Adriaens, D., Hatton, R. L., Meyers, M. A., & McKittrick, J. (2015). Why the seahorse tail is square. Science, 349(6243), aaa6683.
Rayfield, E. J. (2007). Finite element analysis and understanding the biomechanics and evolution of living and fossil organisms. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 35, 541–576.
Riskin, D. K., & Fenton, M. B. (2001). Sticking ability in Spix's disk-winged bat, Thyroptera tricolor (Microchiroptera: Thyropteridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79(12), 2261–2267.
Rosenberg, H. I., & Rose, R. (1999). Volar adhesive pads of the feathertail glider, Acrobates pygmaeus (Marsupialia; Acrobatidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77(2), 233–248.
Russell, A. P. (2002). Integrative functional morphology of the gekkotan adhesive system (Reptilia: Gekkota). Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42(6), 1154–1163.
Russell, A. P., & Garner, A. M. (2021). Setal field transects, evolutionary transitions and gecko–anole convergence provide insights into the fundamentals of form and function of the digital adhesive system of lizards. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 6, 1–17.
Russell, A. P., Stark, A. Y., & Higham, T. E. (2019). The integrative biology of gecko adhesion: Historical review, current understanding, and grand challenges. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 59(1), 101–116.
Scherge, M., Gorb, S. N., & Gorb, S. (2001). Biological micro-and nanotribology. Springer.
Shyy, W., Kang, C. K., Chirarattananon, P., Ravi, S., & Liu, H. (2016). Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flap**-wing flight. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 472(2186), 20150712.
Snell-Rood, E. (2016). Interdisciplinarity: Bring biologists into biomimetics. Nature News, 529(7586), 277.
Speck, T., & Speck, O. (2008). Process sequences in biomimetic research. In C. A. Brebbia (Ed.), Design & nature IV: Comparing design in nature with science and engineering (pp. 3–11). WITPress.
Speck, O., Speck, D., Horn, R., Gantner, J., & Sedlbauer, K. P. (2017). Biomimetic bio-inspired biomorph sustainable? An attempt to classify and clarify biology-derived technical developments. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 12(1), 011004.
Stark, A. Y., Subarajan, S., Jain, D., Niewiarowski, P. H., & Dhinojwala, A. (2016). Superhydrophobicity of the gecko toe pad: Biological optimization versus laboratory maximization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374, 20160184.
Taylor, G., Carruthers, A., Hubel, T., & Walker, S. (2012). Wing morphing in insects, birds and bats: Mechanism and function. In J. Valasek (Ed.), Morphing aerospace vehicles and structures (pp. 13–40). Wiley.
Tramacere, F., Follador, M., Pugno, N. M., & Mazzolai, B. (2015). Octopus-like suction cups: from natural to artificial solutions. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 10(3), 035004.
Vincent, J. F. (2016). The trade-off: A central concept for biomimetics. Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials, 6(2), 67–76.
Vincent, J. F., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A. K. (2006). Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 3(9), 471–482.
Waite, J. H., Andersen, N. H., Jewhurst, S., & Sun, C. (2005). Mussel adhesion: Finding the tricks worth mimicking. The Journal of Adhesion, 81(3-4), 297–317.
Walker, G. (1993). Adhesion to smooth surfaces by insects – a review. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 13(1), 3–7.
Wanieck, K., & Beismann, H. (2021). Perception and role of standards in the world of biomimetics. Bioinspired, Biomimetic and Nanobiomaterials, 10(1), 8–15.
Wanieck, K., Fayemi, P. E., Maranzana, N., Zollfrank, C., & Jacobs, S. (2017). Biomimetics and its tools. Bioinspired, Biomimetic, and Nanobiomaterials, 6(2), 53–66.
Wen, L., Weaver, J. C., & Lauder, G. V. (2014). Biomimetic shark skin: Design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 217(10), 1656–1666.
Wen, L., Weaver, J. C., Thornycroft, P. J., & Lauder, G. V. (2015). Hydrodynamic function of biomimetic shark skin: Effect of denticle pattern and spacing. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 10(6), 066010.
Wu, M., Zheng, X., Liu, R., Hou, N., Afridi, W. H., Afridi, R. H., Guo, X., Wu, J., Wang, C., & ** and sensing. Advanced Science, 9(17), 2104382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broeckhoven, C., du Plessis, A. (2023). Convergent Evolution: Theory and Practice for Bioinspiration. In: Bels, V.L., Russell, A.P. (eds) Convergent Evolution. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11441-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11441-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11440-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11441-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)