Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies ((LNDECT,volume 145))

  • 975 Accesses

Abstract

Employee stock ownership plans have undergone many changes in China. This paper examines how employee optimism affects their participation in ESOP. Using the annualized stock return to characterize the employee sentiment, our results based on the Chinese listed firms that have carried out ESOP throughout 2014-2020 show that employee optimism promotes participation in ESOP. Moreover, our cross-sectional analyses show that this effect is more significant in firms whose employees have a lower level of education or salary. Further, we find that ESOP with sufficient employee participation has a positive implication, leading to more corporate innovation and the increased quality of information disclosure. This paper expands the application range of employee sentiment from option plans to ESOP. Secondly, it provides a further understanding of ESOP from the perspective of employees and supplements this part of the literature. Besides, it has a certain guiding significance for improving the design of the employee stock ownership plan system and promoting enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 245.03
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 316.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmat, N.H.C., Arendt, S.W., Russell, D.W.: Examining work factors after malaysias minimum wage implementation. Int. J. Contemporary Hosp. Manag. 31(12), 4462–4481 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altınkılıç, O., Hansen, R.S.: Are there economies of scale in underwriting fees? evidence of rising external financing costs. Rev. Financ. Stud. 13(1), 191–218 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, M., Coval, J., Stein, J.C.: Corporate financing decisions when investors take the path of least resistance. J. Financ. Econ. 84(2), 266–298 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benartzi, S.: Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401 (k) accounts to company stock. J. Financ. 56(5), 1747–1764 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergman, N.K., Jenter, D.: Employee sentiment and stock option compensation. J. Financ. Econ. 84(3), 667–712 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boudreaux, C.J.: Employee compensation and new venture performance: does benefit type matter? Small Bus. Econ. 57(3), 1453–1477 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00357-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bova, F., Kolev, K., et al.: Non-executive employee ownership and corporate risk. Account. Rev. 90(1), 115–145 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, S., Mayers, D.: Managerial vote ownership and shareholder wealth: evidence from employee stock ownership plans. J. Financ. Econ. 32(1), 103–131 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chi, W., Chen, Y.: Employee satisfaction and the cost of corporate borrowing. Financ. Res. Lett. 40(101), 666 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conyon, M., Freeman, R.B.: Shared modes of compensation and firm performance UK evidence. In: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980-2000. University of Chicago Press, pp. 109–146 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Core, J.E., Guay, W.R.: Stock option plans for non-executive employees. J. Financ. Econ. 61(2), 253–287 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Devers, C.E., Wiseman, R.M., Holmes Jr., R.M.: The effects of endowment and loss aversion in managerial stock option valuation. Acad. Manag. J. 50(1), 191–208 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duan, J., Peluso, A.M., et al.: How employment relationship types influence employee work outcomes: the role of need for status and vigor. J. Bus. Res. 128, 211–221 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fang, H., Nofsinger, J.R., Quan, J.: The effects of employee stock option plans on operating performance in Chinese firms. J. Banking Financ. 54, 141–159 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang, V.W., Tian, X., Tice, S.: Does stock liquidity enhance or impede firm innovation? J. Financ. 69(5), 2085–2125 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gamble, J.E.: Esops: financial performance and federal tax incentives. J. Lab. Res. 19(3), 529–541 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gordon, L.A., Pound, J.: Esops and corporate control. J. Financ. Econ. 27(2), 525–555 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hallock, K.F., Olson, C.A.: The value of stock options to non-executive employees (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hashimoto, A., Okada, H., et al.: The productivity effects of employee stock ownership plans and bonuses: evidence from Japanese panel data. Am. Econ. Rev. 188(7), 1287–1295 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. He, J.J., Tian, X.: The dark side of analyst coverage: the case of innovation. J. Financ. Econ. 109(3), 856–878 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hochberg, Y.V., Lindsey, L.: Incentives, targeting, and firm performance: an analysis of non-executive stock options. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23(11), 4148–4186 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hodge, F.D., Rajgopal, S., Shevlin, T.J.: How do managers value stock options and restricted stock? Social Science Electronic Publishing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hodge, F.R.S.S.: How do managers value stock options and restricted stock? University of Washington, Seattle (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Huberman, G., Sengmueller, P.: Performance and employer stock in 401 (k) plans. Rev. Financ. 8(3), 403–443 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huddart, S., Lang, M.: Information distribution within firms: evidence from stock option exercises. J. Account. Econ. 34(1–3), 3–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hullmann, R., Hennig, J.C.: How to boost participation in employee ownership plans–a contextual analysis of profit sharing. In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, vol. 2020, p. 14884 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jones, D.C., Kato, T., Pliskin, J.: Profit sharing and gainsharing: A review of theory, incidence, and effects (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kelso, L.O., Hetter, P.: Two-factor theory. Vintage Books (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, E.H., Ouimet, P.: Broad-based employee stock ownership: motives and outcomes. J. Financ. 69(3), 1273–1319 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kruse, D.L., Blasi, J.R.: Employee ownership, employee attitudes, and firm performance (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  31. McDonald, R.L.: The tax (dis) advantage of a firm issuing options on its own stock. J. Public Econ. 88(5), 925–955 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Oyer, P., Schaefer, S.: Why do some firms give stock options to all employees?: an empirical examination of alternative theories. J. Financ. Econ. 76(1), 99–133 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pugh, W.N., Oswald, S.L., Jahera, J.S., Jr.: The effect of esop adoptions on corporate performance: are there really performance changes? Manag. Decis. Econ. 21(5), 167–180 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sautner, Z., Weber, M., Glaser, M.: What determines how top managers value their stock options? Social Science Electronic Publishing (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Smith, C.W., Jr.: Investment banking and the capital acquisition process. J. Financ. Econ. 15(1–2), 3–29 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thibaut, J.W., Walker, L.: Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Van Dyne, L., Pierce, J.L.: Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav. Int. J. Indust. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Behav. 25(4), 439–459 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ying, Q., Song, D., Huang, D., ul Ain, Q. (2022). Research on Employee Sentiment and Employee Stock Ownership Plan. In: Xu, J., Altiparmak, F., Hassan, M.H.A., García Márquez, F.P., Hajiyev, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management – Volume 2. ICMSEM 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 145. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10385-8_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation