The Consequences for Climate of Meat Consumption

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Our Carbon Hoofprint

Part of the book series: Food and Health ((FH))

  • 681 Accesses

Abstract

Livestock production generates a significant share of total global greenhouse gas emissions and poses other, non-climatic challenges to society and nature. At the same time, livestock and meat also provide social and environmental benefits. Acknowledging the broader importance of livestock, this chapter focuses on meat production and consumption’s impact on climate, with an emphasis on the role of ruminants. Regional differences in production and consumption, the role of metrics in comparing different climate gases, and effects of grazing on soil carbon and albedo are discussed both in a general global context, and in more detail in a case study for Norway. The chapter concludes that there remains a role for livestock in the future, but that improvements in production and reductions in ruminant meat consumption, combined with targeted measures in other sectors, are key ingredients to limit future warming beyond global targets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.norden.org/en/news/nordic-nutrition-recommendations-2022-join-work

  2. 2.

    https://www.health.harvard.edu/nutrition/when-it-comes-to-protein-how-much-is-too-much

References

  • AgriAnalyse. (2019a). Landbruksbarometeret 2019 (p. 53). AgriAnalyse. https://www.bondelaget.no/getfile.php/13907525-1557133354/MMA/Bilder%20NB/Arrangementer/Landbruksbarometeret%202019/Landbruksbarometeret%202019%20korr8.pdf

  • AgriAnalyse. (2019b). Prosjektnotat januar 2019—Ammeku og produksjonsutvikling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleksandrowicz, L., Green, R., Joy, E. J., Smith, P., & Haines, A. (2016). The impacts of dietary change on greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water use, and health: A systematic review. PLoS One, 11(11), e0165797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkemade, R., Reid, R. S., van den Berg, M., de Leeuw, J., & Jeuken, M. (2013). Assessing the impacts of livestock production on biodiversity in rangeland ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(52), 20900–20905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011013108

  • Allen, M., Cain, M., Lynch, J., & Frame, D. (2018). Climate metrics for ruminant livestock. Oxford Martin Programme on Climate Pollutants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen, H., & Hermansen, E. A. (2020). Green transformation is a boundary object: An analysis of conceptualisation of transformation in Norwegian primary industries. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 251484862093433. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620934337

  • Animalia. (2020). Kjøttets tilstand 2020 (p. 152). Animalia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austrheim, G., Speed, J. D., Evju, M., Hester, A., Holand, Ø., Loe, L. E., Martinsen, V., Mobæk, R., Mulder, J., & Steen, H. (2016). Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in an alpine ecosystem grazed by sheep–An experimental approach. Basic and Applied Ecology, 17(7), 596–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R., Froggatt, A., & Wellesley, L. (2014). Livestock–climate change’s forgotten sector. Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, R. (2019). Unpublished data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, R. M., Bogren, W., Bernier, P., & Astrup, R. (2016). Carbon-equivalent metrics for albedo changes in land management contexts: Relevance of the time dimension. Ecological Applications, 26(6), 1868–1880. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-1597.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugge, A. B., & Alfnes, F. (2018). Kjøttfrie spisevaner – hva tenker forbrukerne? (nr. 14-2018; Oppdragsrapport, p. 93). Forbruksforskningsinstituttet SIFO, OsloMet – storbyuniversitetet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. (2018). Guest post: A new way to assess ‘global warming potential’ of short-lived pollutants. Carbon Brief. https://www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-a-new-way-to-assess-global-warming-potential-of-short-lived-pollutants

  • Cao, L., & Caldeira, K. (2010). Atmospheric carbon dioxide removal: Long-term consequences and commitment. Environmental Research Letters, 5(2), 024011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caro, D., Davis, S. J., Bastianoni, S., & Caldeira, K. (2014). Global and regional trends in greenhouse gas emissions from livestock. Climatic Change, 126(1–2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1197-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, N., Patra, P. K., Bisht, J. S. H., Ito, A., Umezawa, T., Saigusa, N., Morimoto, S., Aoki, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Fujita, R., Takigawa, M., Watanabe, S., Saitoh, N., & Canadell, J. G. (2021). Emissions from the oil and gas sectors, coal mining and ruminant farming drive methane growth over the past three decades. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2021-015

  • Chang, J., Peng, S., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Dangal, S. R. S., Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Tian, H., & Bousquet, P. (2019). Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11066-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M., Hill, J., & Tilman, D. (2018). The diet, health, and environment Trilemma, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. A., Domingo, N. G. G., Colgan, K., Thakrar, S. K., Tilman, D., Lynch, J., Azevedo, I. L., & Hill, J. D. (2020). Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLEAR Center at UC Davis. (2020, July 7). Why methane from cattle warms the climate differently than CO2 from fossil fuels. CLEAR Center. https://clear.ucdavis.edu/explainers/why-methane-cattle-warms-climate-differently-co2-fossil-fuels

  • Climate Action Tracker. (no date). Climate Action Tracker. https://climateactiontracker.org/

  • Cole, J. R., & McCoskey, S. (2013). Does global meat consumption follow an environmental Kuznets curve? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 9(2), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, A., & Wang, S. (2005). Spatiotemporal variations in land surface albedo across Canada from MODIS observations. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(5), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit, H. A., Austnes, K., Hylen, G., & Dalsgaard, L. (2015). A carbon balance of Norway: Terrestrial and aquatic carbon fluxes. Biogeochemistry, 123(1–2), 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Departementene. (2016). Kjente ressurser – uante muligheter Regjeringens bioøkonomistrategi (No. 11/2016; p. 71). Nærings- og fiskeridepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIFI. (2018). Nye krav og kriterier til anskaffelser av bærekraftig mat og drikke. https://www.anskaffelser.no/nyhet/2018/09/nye-krav-og-kriterier-til-anskaffelser-av-baerekraftig-mat-og-drikke-innspill-onskes

  • Een Thuen, A., & Tufte, T. (2019). Kastrat – mer enn en nisjeproduksjon? Bondebladet. https://www.bondebladet.no/kronikk/kastrat-mer-enn-en-nisjeproduksjon/

  • European Commission. (2020). Farm to fork strategy. For a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAOSTAT. (2020). Live Animals. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QA

  • Farstad, F. M., Hermansen, E. A. T., van Oort, B., Grønlund, A., Mittenzwei, K., Brudevoll, K., & Sødal Grasbekk, B. (2020). Forbudet mot nydyrking av myr: Bakgrunn, effekter og utfordringer (CICERO Report 2020:11; CICERO Report) (p. 57). CICERO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FFCC. (2021). Farming for change. Map** a route to 2030 (p. 52). Food, Farming and Countryside Commission (FFCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, T., Röös, E., & Little, D. (2015). What is efficiency? And is it sustainable? 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, T., Godde, C., Muller, A., Röös, E., Smith, P., de Boer, I., Zu Ermgassen, E., Herrero, M., van Middelaar, C., Schader, C., & van Zanten, H. (2017). Grazed and confused? Grazed and confused? READCUBE. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=GrazedandConfused?&btnG=&hl=en&num=20&as_sdt=0%2C22

  • Gerber, P. J. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities (Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Ed.). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Carbon Project (GCP). (2021). Global methane budget. Global Carbon Project (GCP). https://www.globalcarbonproject.org/methanebudget/

  • Godfray, H. C. J., Aveyard, P., Garnett, T., Hall, J. W., Key, T. J., Lorimer, J., Pierrehumbert, R. T., Scarborough, P., Springmann, M., & Jebb, S. A. (2018). Meat consumption, health, and the environment. FOOD SECURITY, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gren, I.-M., & Aklillu, A. Z. (2016). Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: A review of the literature. Forest Policy and Economics, 20, 128–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grønlund, A., Knoth de Zarruk, K., Rasse, D., Riley, H., Klakegg, O., & Nystuen, I. (2008). Kunnskapsstatus for utslipp og binding av karbon i jordbruksjord (No. 132/2008; Bioforsk Report) (p. 47). Bioforsk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gütschow, J., Jeffery, M. L., Gieseke, R., Gebel, R., Stevens, D., Krapp, M., & Rocha, M. (2016). The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series. Earth System Science Data, 8, 571–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gütschow, J., Jefferey, L., Gieseke, R., & Günther, A. (2019). The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series (1850–2017) (Vol. 2.1). GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/PIK.2019.018

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hegrenes, A., & Asheim, L. J. (2006). Verdi av fôr frå utmarksbeite og sysselsetting i beitebaserte næringar (p. 34).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsedirektoratet. (2020). Utviklingen i norsk kosthold 2019 (IS-2880) (p. 102). Helsedirektoratet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillestad, M. E. (2019). Beitemarka—Et ukjent karbonlager (No. 5–2019; AgriAnalyse Rapport).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelt, A. L., Jenssen, E., Hansen, Ø., Ystad, E., & Olsen, A. (2019). Økonomien i grasbasert melk- og kjøttproduksjon i Nord-Norge (No. 5, nr.140; NIBIO report) (p. 53). NIBIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, G. W., Perrin, A., Whybrow, S., & Macdiarmid, J. I. (2016). Achieving dietary recommendations and reducing greenhouse gas emissions: Modelling diets to minimise the change from current intakes. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0370-1

  • IPBES. (2019). The global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Summary for policymakers (p. 60). Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Summary for policymakers (IPCC AR5). IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. In V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, & T. Waterfield (Eds.). Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. IPCC. http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf

  • IPCC. (2019a). IPCC 2019 SPM SR climate change and land.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2019b). Summary for policymakers. IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate (p. 36). IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLD. (2017). Meld. St. 41. Klimastrategi for 2030 – norsk omstilling i europeisk samarbeid.

    Google Scholar 

  • KLD. (2021). Klimaplan for 2021–2030. Meld.St.13 (2020–2021). Melding til Stortinget (Melding Til Stortinget Meld.St.13 (2020–2021); p. 212). Klima- og miljødepartement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimautvalget. (2016). Landbruk og klima – utredning fra arbeidsgruppe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen, H. (2018). Utsyn over norsk landbruk. Tilstand og utviklingstrekk 2018 (Vol. 4). NIBIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • LSB. (2020). Livestock units. https://www.lifestyleblock.co.nz/lifestyle-file/livestock-a-pets/the-basics/item/800-livestock-units

  • Lynch, J., Garnett, T., Persson, M., Röös, E., & Reisinger, A. (2020). Methane and the sustainability of ruminant livestock. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdiarmid, J. I., Douglas, F., & Campbell, J. (2016). Eating like there’s no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet. Appetite, 96, 487–493. READCUBE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.011.

  • Martinsen, V., Mulder, J., Austrheim, G., & Mysterud, A. (2011). Carbon storage in low-alpine grassland soils: Effects of different grazing intensities of sheep. European Journal of Soil Science, 62(6), 822–833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metera, E., Sakowski, T., Słoniewski, K., & Romanowicz, B. (2010). Grazing as a tool to maintain biodiversity of grassland – A review. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 28(4), 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miljødirektoratet. (2020). Klimakur 2030: Tiltak og virkemidler mot 2030 (M-1625 | 2020; p. 1191).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittenzwei, K., Milford, A. B., & Grønlund, A. (2017). Status og potensial for økt produksjon og forbruk av vegetabilske matvarer i Norge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., & Williams, M. L. (2015). Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15(15), 8889–8973. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, X., & Groffman, P. M. (2018). Declines in methane uptake in forest soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(34), 8587–8590. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807377115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. G., Manning, M. R., Dlugokencky, E. J., Fisher, R. E., Lowry, D., Michel, S. E., Myhre, C. L., Platt, S. M., Allen, G., Bousquet, P., Brownlow, R., Cain, M., France, J. L., Hermansen, O., Hossaini, R., Jones, A. E., Levin, I., Manning, A. C., Myhre, G., et al. (2019). Very strong atmospheric methane growth in the four years 2014—2017: Implications for the Paris agreement. American Geophysical Union, 38. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009

  • Nordborg, M., & Röös, E. (2016). Holistic management–a critical review of Allan Savory’s grazing method. Holistic Management–a Critical Review of Allan Savory’s Grazing Method. READCUBE. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/244566/local_244566.pdf

  • Norges Bondelag. (2020). Landbrukets klimaplan 2021–2030. Norges Bondelag. https://www.bondelaget.no/tema/landbruketsklimaplan/landbrukets-klimaplan-pdf/

  • Norges Bondelag. (2021). Bondelagets bærekraftstrategi for norsk matproduksjon 2021–2030. https://www.digiblad.no/norges_bondelag/baerekraftstrategi_2021-2030/

  • Norwegian Environment Agency & Statistics Norway. (2021). Klimagassutslipp fra jordbruk. Miljøstatus. https://miljostatus.miljodirektoratet.no/tema/klima/norske-utslipp-av-klimagasser/klimagassutslipp-fra-jordbruk/

  • Nucci, D., Fatigoni, C., Amerio, A., Odone, A., & Gianfredi, V. (2020). Red and processed meat consumption and risk of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2021). Meat consumption. https://doi.org/10.1787/fa290fd0-en. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/fa290fd0-en

  • Olofsson, J., Oksanen, L., Callaghan, T., Hulme, P. E., Oksanen, T., & Suominen, O. (2009). Herbivores inhibit climate-driven shrub expansion on the tundra: HERBIVORES INHIBIT SHRUB EXPANSION. Global Change Biology, 15(11), 2681–2693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01935.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, J., te Beest, M., & Ericson, L. (2013). Complex biotic interactions drive long-term vegetation dynamics in a subarctic ecosystem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1624), 20120486. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opio, C., Gerber, P., Mottet, A., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., MacLeod, M., Vellinga, T., Henderson, B., & Steinfeld, H. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains – A global life cycle assessment. Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains – A global life cycle assessment. READCUBE. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains – A global life cycle assessment.&btnG=&hl=en&num=20&as_sdt=0%2C22.

  • Pettersen, I., Grønlund, A., Elstad Stensgård, A., & Walland, F. (2017). Klimatiltak i jordbruk og matsektoren. Kostnadsanalyse av fem tiltak (NIBIO Report No. 3/2/2017; p. 99). NIBIO. https://docplayer.me/42544786-Klimatiltak-i-norsk-jordbruk-og-matsektor.html

  • Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018). Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science, 360(6392), 987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasse, D., Økland, I., Bárcena, T. G., Riley, H., Martinsen, V., Sturite, I., O’Toole, A., Øpstad, S., Cottis, T., & Budai, A. (2019). Muligheter og utfordringer for økt karbonbinding i jordbruksjord (NIBIO Report 5(36):2019; p. 94). NIBIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisinger, A., & Clark, H. (2018). How much do direct livestock emissions actually contribute to global warming? Global Change Biology, 24(4), 1749–1761. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richi, E. B., Baumer, B., Conrad, B., Darioli, R., Schmid, A., & Keller, U. (2015). Health risks associated with meat consumption: A review of epidemiological studies. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridoutt, B. (2020). Climate neutral livestock production – A radiative forcing-based climate footprint approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125260

  • Ritchie, H. (2019). Food production is responsible for one-quarter of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/food-ghg-emissions

  • Ritchie, H. (2020). Environmental impacts of food production—Our world in data. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food

  • Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2017, August 25). Meat and dairy production. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production

  • Rivedal, S. (2020). Klimagassutslipp. Nibio. https://www.nibio.no/tema/miljo/tiltaksveileder-for-landbruket/tiltak-mot-klimagassutslipp-fra-landbruket

  • Rogelj, J., & Schleussner, C.-F. (2019). Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level. Environmental Research Letters, 14(11), 114039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj, J., Shindell, D., Jiang, K., et al. (2018). Chapter 2: Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable development (IPCC SR1.5). IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sans, P., & Combris, P. (2015). World meat consumption patterns: An overview of the last fifty years (1961–2011). Meat Science, 109, 106–111. READCUBE. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., et al. (2019). The global methane budget 2000-2017 [preprint]. Atmosphere – Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2019-128

  • Savory Institute. (2013). Restoring the climate through capture and storage of soil carbon using holistic planned grazing (p. 20). Savory Institute. https://savory.global/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/restoring-the-climate.pdf

  • Schmitz, O. J., Raymond, P. A., Estes, J. A., Kurz, W. A., Holtgrieve, G. W., Ritchie, M. E., Schindler, D. E., Spivak, A. C., Wilson, R. W., & Bradford, M. A. (2014). Animating the carbon cycle. Ecosystems, 17(2), 344–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaab, J., Bavay, M., Davin, E., Hagedorn, F., Hüsler, F., Lehning, M., Schneebeli, M., Thürig, E., & Bebi, P. (2015). Carbon storage versus albedo change: Radiative forcing of forest expansion in temperate mountainous regions of Switzerland. Biogeosciences, 12(2), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-467-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shindell, D. T., Fuglestvedt, J. S., & Collins, W. J. (2017). The social cost of methane: Theory and applications. Faraday Discussions, 200, 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00009J

  • Sillmann, J., Aunan, K., Emberson, L., Büker, P., van Oort, B., O’Neill, C., Otero, N., Pandey, D., & Brisebois, A. (2021). Combined impacts of climate and air pollution on human health and agriculture. Environmental Research Letters, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1df8

  • Skagen, K. (2020). Bærekraftig matproduksjon En diskursiv tilnærming til koordinering [Master thesis]. University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed, J. D., Martinsen, V., Mysterud, A., Mulder, J., Holand, Ø., & Austrheim, G. (2014). Long-term increase in aboveground carbon stocks following exclusion of grazers and forest establishment in an alpine ecosystem. Ecosystems, 17(7), 1138–1150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., de Vries, W., Vermeulen, S. J., Herrero, M., Carlson, K. M., Jonell, M., Troell, M., DeClerck, F., Gordon, L. J., Zurayk, R., Scarborough, P., Rayner, M., Loken, B., Fanzo, J., et al. (2018). Options for kee** the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562, 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway. (1999). Classification of livestock—Statistics Norway. https://www.ssb.no/en/klass/klassifikasjoner/29

  • Statistics Norway. (2021a). Emission to air. Table 08940: Greenhouse gases, by source, energy product and pollutant 1990—2020. PX-Web SSB. http://www.ssb.no/en/statbanken/statbank/table/08940/

  • Statistics Norway. (2021b). Holdings, agricultural area and livestock. Table 12660: Livestock grazing on outfield pastures (M) 1995—2020. PX-Web SSB. http://www.ssb.no/en/statbanken/statbank/table/12660/

  • Statistics Norway. (2021c). Livestock husbandry. Table 03710: Domestic animals per 1 March, by type of herd 1990—2021. PX-Web SSB. http://www.ssb.no/en/statbanken/statbank/table/03710/

  • Stevanovic, M., Popp, A., Bodirsky, B. L., Humpeno, F., Mu, C., Kreidenweis, U., Rolinski, S., Biewald, A., & Wang, X. (2017). Mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and land-use change: Consequences for food prices. Environmental Science & Technology, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • te Beest, M., Sitters, J., Ménard, C. B., & Olofsson, J. (2016). Reindeer grazing increases summer albedo by reducing shrub abundance in Arctic tundra. Environmental Research Letters, 11(12), 125013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjärnemo, H., & Södahl, L. (2015). Swedish food retailers promoting climate smarter food choices—Trapped between visions and reality? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 24, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Totland, T. H., Meln, B. K., Lundberg-Hallén, N., Helland-Kigen, K. M., Lund-Blix, N. A., Myhre, J. B., Johansen, A. M. W., Løken, E. B., & Andersen, L. F. (2012). Norkost 3 En landsomfattende kostholdsundersøkelse blant menn og kvinner i Norge i alderen 18-70 år, 2010-11 (p. 70). Helsedirektoratet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, T., & Thuen, A. E. (2019). Arealutvikling og arealbruk—Korn, gras og drøvtyggere (AgriAnalyse Rapport No. 12–2019; p. 59). AgriAnalyse.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Pol, A., Chabbi, A., de Vliegher, A., Hennessy, D., Hutchings, N., & Klumpp, K. (2018). Grazing for carbon: End report. EIP-AGRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindl, I., Popp, A., Bodirsky, B. L., Rolinski, S., Lotze-Campen, H., Biewald, A., Humpenöder, F., Dietrich, J. P., & Stevanović, M. (2017). Livestock and human use of land: Productivity trends and dietary choices as drivers of future land and carbon dynamics. Global and Planetary Change, 159, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellesley, L., Happer, C., & Froggatt, A. (2015). Changing climate, changing diets. Pathways to lower meat consumption. 8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bob van Oort .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Oort, B., Andrew, R., Holmelin, N.B. (2023). The Consequences for Climate of Meat Consumption. In: Mayerfeld, D. (eds) Our Carbon Hoofprint. Food and Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09023-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation