Abstract
This paper examines the impact of the audit committee’s effectiveness (ACE) on the performance of Malaysian Takaful companies licensed by the Central Bank of Malaysia. In addition, this study investigates the moderator role of Shariah Committee Quality (SCQ) on the relationship between ACE and performance. The study uses a sample of 11 Malaysian Takaful from 2010 to 2017. Performance is proxied using return on assets and return on equity, while ACE is measured via four attributes, mainly audit committee (AC) chairman specialization, size, independence, and meeting. Furthermore, SCQ is quantified via an index based on six attributes. To answer our research questions, a panel fixed effect regression is used. Our results show that ACE positively affects performance. At the individual level, a larger and more independent audit committee positively related to performance of Malaysian Takaful companies. However, AC meeting and chairperson specialization do not affect performance. Moreover, Shariah Committee Quality positively moderates the relationship between ACE and Malaysian Takaful companies. Results provision the important role played by AC in boosting performance. Our findings are of great importance to Malaysian regulators to enhance the existing corporate governance effectiveness by directing Takaful companies to establish robust and high-quality audit and Shariah committees. This research provides a new understanding regarding AC as a component of CG and its relationship with performance. This study is supposed to fill the gap in corporate governance by testing the impact of AC effectiveness on performance and its implementation in Malaysia especially in the Takaful sector. Besides, this study brings additional evidence of the influence of AC on performance, which is moderated by SCQ.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, L.J., Parker, S.: Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing J. Pract. Theory 19(2), 47–66 (2000)
Abbott, L.J., Parker, S., Peters, G.F.: Audit committee characteristics and financial misstatement: a study of the efficacy of certain blue ribbon committee recommendations (2002). SSRN 319125
Abbott, L.J., Parker, S., Peters, G.F.: Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing J. Pract. Theory 23(1), 69–87 (2004)
Al-Amarneh, A., Yaseen, H.: Corporate governance and dividend policy in Jordan. Int. J. Econ. Financ. 6(4), 210–219 (2014)
Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., Nagel, S.: Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Account. Financ. 52(4), 971–1000 (2012)
AlMatrooshi, S., Musleh Al-Sartawi, A., Sanad, Z.: Do audit committee characteristics of Bahraini listed companies have an effect on the level of internet financial reporting? Corporate Ownership Control 13(3), 131–147 (2016). https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3p12
Alqatamin, R.M.: Audit committee effectiveness and company performance: evidence from Jordan. Account. Financ. Res. 7(2), 48 (2018)
Bansal, N., Sharma, A.K.: Audit committee, corporate governance and firm performance: empirical evidence from India. Int. J. Econ. Financ. 8(3), 103 (2016)
Bauer, R., Frijns, B., Otten, R., Tourani-Rad, A.: The impact of corporate governance on corporate performance: evidence from Japan. Pac. Basin Financ. J. 16(3), 236–251 (2008)
Bhardwaj, M.N., Rao, C.: Role of audit committee in corporate governance. Int. J. Manag. Soc. Sci. Res. Rev. 1(10), 61–67 (2015)
Blue Ribbon Committee: Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees, The Business Lawyer (1999)
Bosse, D.A., Phillips, R.A.: Agency theory and bounded self-interest. Acad. Manag. Rev. 41(2), 276–297 (2016)
Bouaziz, W., Bouri, A.: Ownership structure and financial institutes risk taking: evidence from Tunisian quoted bank (financial institute). Int. J. Manag. Financ. Account. 4(1), 47–60 (2012)
Buallay, A., El Khoury, R., Hamdan, A.: Sustainability reporting in smart cities: a multidimensional performance measures. Cities 119, 103397 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103397
Cavana, R., Delahaye, B., Sekeran, U.: Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)
Chan, K.C., Li, J.: Audit committee and firm value: evidence on outside top executives as expert-independent directors. Corporate Gov. Int. Rev. 16(1), 16–31 (2008)
Claessens, S., Yurtoglu, B.B.: Corporate governance in emerging markets: a survey. Emerg. Mark. Rev. 15, 1–33 (2013)
Darko, J., Aribi, Z.A., Uzonwanne, G.C.: Corporate governance: the impact of director and board structure, ownership structure and corporate control on the performance of listed companies on the Ghana stock exchange. Corp. Gov. 16(2), 259–277 (2016)
Eldaia, M.: Moderating role of Shariah committee quality on the relationship between audit committee and Malaysian Takaful performance: a literature review. Int. J. Islamic Econ. (IJIE) 2(01) (2020)
Eldaia, M., Hanefah, M., Marzuki, A.: Moderating role of Shariah committee quality on relationship between board of directors effectiveness and the performance of Malaysian Takaful. Competitiveness Rev. Int. Bus. J. (2022)
Fama, E.F., Jensen, M.C.: Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econ. 26(2), 301–325 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., Nieto, M.: Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships. RMS 10(1), 85–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0141-9
Frazier, P.A., Tix, A.P., Barron, K.E.: Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J. Couns. Psychol. 51(1), 115 (2004)
Gati, V., Basuki, B.: Shariah supervisory board, the political connection and performance. Revista Espacios 41(22), 365–378 (2020)
Hair, J.F., Celsi, M., Ortinau, D.J., Bush, R.P.: Essentials of Marketing Research, vol. 2. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York (2010)
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2017)
Kajola, S.O.: Corporate governance and firm performance: the case of Nigerian listed firms. Eur. J. Econ. Financ. Adm. Sci. 14(14), 16–28 (2008)
Kalbers, L.P., Fogarty, T.J.: Audit committee effectiveness: an empirical investigation of the contribution of power. Auditing 12(1), 24 (1993)
Kallamu, B.S., Saat, N.A.M.: Audit committee attributes and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian finance companies. Asian Rev. Account. 23(3), 206–231 (2015)
Karamanou, I., Vafeas, N.: The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: an empirical analysis. J. Account. Res. 43(3), 453–486 (2005)
Khalifa, H., Alkdai, H., Hanefah, M.M.: Audit committee characteristics and earnings management in Malaysian Shariah-compliant companies. Bus. Manag. Rev. 2(2), 52–61 (2012)
El Khoury, R., Naimy, V., Iskandar, S.: ESG versus corporate financial performance: evidence from East Asian firms in the industrials sector. Stud. Appl. Econ. 39(3) (2021a)
El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N., Alareeni, B., Khoury, R., El Nasrallah, N., Alareeni, B.: ESG and financial performance of banks in the MENAT region: concavity–convexity patterns. J. Sustain. Financ. Investment 1–25 (2021b)
Klapper, L.F., Love, I.: Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. J. Corp. Finan. 10(5), 703–728 (2004)
Makhlouf, M.H., Laili, N.H., Ramli, N.A., Basah, M.Y.: Board of directors’ effectiveness and firm performance: evidence from Jordan. Res. J. Financ. Account. 8(18), 23–34 (2017)
Mathew, S., Ibrahim, S., Archbold, S.: Corporate governance and firm risk. Corporate Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 18(1), 52–67 (2020)
MCCG. Malaysian code on corporate governance securities commission Malaysia. Securities Commission Malaysia (2017)
Menon, K., Deahl Williams, J.: The use of audit committees for monitoring. J. Account. Public Policy 13(2), 121–139 (1994)
Mohd Saleh, N., Mohd Iskandar, T., Mohid Rahmat, M.: Audit committee characteristics and earnings management: evidence from Malaysia. Asian Rev. Account. 15(2), 147–163 (2007)
Mohid Rahmat, M., Mohd Iskandar, T., Mohd Saleh, N.: Audit committee characteristics in financially distressed and non-distressed companies. Manag. Audit. J. 24(7), 624–638 (2009)
Nasrallah, N., El Khoury, R.: Is corporate governance a good predictor of SMEs financial performance? Evidence from develo** countries (the case of Lebanon). J. Sustain. Financ. Investment (2021a). https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1874213
Nasrallah, N., El Khoury, R.: Proxy measure for SMEs financial performance in opaque markets. In: Alareeni, B., Hamdan, A., Elgedawy, I. (eds.) ICBT 2020. LNNS, vol. 194, pp. 1457–1473. Springer, Cham (2021b). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69221-6_108
Othman, R., Ponirin, H., Ghani, E.K.: The effect of board structure on shareholders’ wealth in small listed companies in Malaysia. Manag. Sci. Eng. 3(4), 1–15 (2009)
Pearce, J.A., Zahra, S.A.: Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. J. Manage. Stud. 29(4), 411–438 (1992)
Pfeffer, J.: Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: a study of organization-environment linkage. Adm. Sci. Q. 18(3), 349–364 (1973). https://doi.org/10.2307/2391668
Rahim, M.F.A., Johari, R.J., Takril, N.F.: Revisited note on corporate governance and quality of audit committee: Malaysian perspective. Procedia Econ. Financ. 28, 213–221 (2015)
Rasli, S., Kassim, A.A.M., Bhuiyan, A.B.: Shariah governance characteristics and risk-taking of local and foreign Islamic banks in Malaysia: a conceptual model. J. Account. Financ. Emerg. Econ. 6(2), 441–451 (2020)
Shatnawi, S.A., Eldaia, M., Marei, A., Aaraj, S.A.: The relationship between audit committee characteristics on accounting-based performance (ROA and ROE) as a measure of performance evidence from Jordan. Int. J. Bus. Digit. Econ. 2(2), 15–27 (2021a)
Shatnawi, S.A., Hanefah, M., Eldaia, M.: Moderating effect of enterprise risk management on the relationship between board structures and corporate performance. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Manag. Pract. 2(6), 01–15 (2019)
Shatnawi, S.A., Marei, A., Hanefah, M.M., Eldaia, M., Alaaraj, S.: Audit committee and financial performance in Jordan: the moderating effect of ownership concentration. Montenegrin J. Econ. 17(4), 45–53 (2021b)
Spira, L.F.: Ceremonies of governance: perspectives on the role of the audit committee. J. Manag. Gov. 3(3), 231–260 (1999)
Tariq, Y.B., Abbas, Z.: Compliance and multidimensional firm performance: evaluating the efficacy of rule-based code of corporate governance. Econ. Model. 35, 565–575 (2013)
Turley, S., Zaman, M.: The corporate governance effects of audit committees. J. Manag. Gov. 8(3), 305–332 (2004)
Weir, C., Laing, D., McKnight, P.J.: Internal and external governance mechanisms: their impact on the performance of large UK public companies. J. Bus. Financ. Acc. 29(5–6), 579–611 (2002)
**e, H.: The mispricing of abnormal accruals. Account. Rev. 76(3), 357–373 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Eldaia, M., Hanefah, M. (2023). Impact of Audit Committee Effectiveness on Malaysian Takaful Performance, and Moderating Role of Shariah Committee Quality. In: Alareeni, B., Hamdan, A. (eds) Explore Business, Technology Opportunities and Challenges After the Covid-19 Pandemic. ICBT 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 495. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08954-1_65
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08954-1_65
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08953-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08954-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)