Nostalgia for Oranges: Plantations as a Development Promise in Socialist Cuba

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Plantations in the Modern World

Abstract

Plantations have mainly been studied as precursor forms of capitalism or as their most exemplary outcome, as a system which relies on the alienation of workers and non-human actors and the production or reproduction of racial, national and gender discrimination. Exploring former workers’ nostalgia about their municipality’s plantation past and its multiple meanings, this chapter describes how citrus plantations have come to materialize the promises of development and modernity of the Cuban Revolution and to embody the Socialist State’s sovereignty in marginal areas of Western Cuba. State sovereignty was instituted through boundary drawing and processes of exclusion-inclusion that crystallize around the constitution of state property and state farms. The plantation transformed people’s life and working conditions, linking new norms and values to personal experiences of upward mobility. As the plantation collapsed, diverging accounts of its demise keep asserting State Sovereignty as a form of vanished normality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Thailand)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Thailand)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 99.99
Price excludes VAT (Thailand)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 99.99
Price excludes VAT (Thailand)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    I draw on an ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Arenas during 16 months from 2016 to 2018 and shorter visits in 2019 and 2022, archives from Pinar del Rio Historical Archives, the State’s Departments of Agriculture and Spatial Planning in Pinar del Rio and private collections owned by my interlocutors in Arenas. All names and locations have been anonymized to protect my informants whom I thank for their trust and help. To avoid putting them at risk, some of their distinctive social features and part of their stories were modified in such a way that do not affect the general argument of the paper. I would like to thank Marta Macedo, Irene Peano, Colette Le Petitcorps, Birgit Müller, Marie-Laure Geoffray, Felix Traoré, Kateryna Soroka, Gala Aguero, Benoit de L’Estoile for their insights and feedbacks on earlier versions of this chapter.

  2. 2.

    In the following section, I rely on unpublished manuscripts written by historians of the municipality. The historian (el historiador) of the municipality is a civil servant, usually holding a degree in history and closely linked to the municipal section of the Communist Party. From the 1980s, the Cuban Communist Party gave orientation to create working groups under the supervision of the municipal historians to gather testimonies and archives and to write down the history of each municipio. In Arenas, several manuscripts were written from the beginning of the 1990s and the end of the 2000s by several historiadores and sometimes, their team of volunteers. To preserve anonymity of the location and of the other informants, I cannot cite their writings here although I am grateful for their precious work.

  3. 3.

    In 1964, the plan designed for the area forecast the development of 16,000 ha of citrus trees and 2000 ha of mango trees. In 1970, “198 caballerias” of citrus trees (around 2650 ha) were reported to have been planted according to the municipal historians. By the mid-1980’s, Arenas’s citrus plantations covered around 20,000 ha (measure taken from satellite maps and maps from the archives of the Dirección Provincial de Planificación Física de Pinar del Río). The main production were oranges, and to a lesser extent grapefruit and limes (Nova González 1996; see also Ríos Hernández 2014).

  4. 4.

    From 1961 to 1965, a counter-revolutionary war took place in the Escambray Mountains, in the centre of the Island. Johanna Swanger argues that the insurrection aroused and gained support within the peasants of the area, a mainly white population, amidst fears that the Land Reform would be reverted, that the State would collectivize land threatening property rights and destroy the values of a white and patriarchal society promoting women education, racial equality, or homosexuality and interracial marriages. The revolutionary government, arguing that it was an attempt of the CIA to overthrow the newly instated Revolution severely fought against the insurrection. In 1963, revolutionary authorities enforced massive displacements to cut the insurgents from local supports and sent entire villages to camps. Alongside the victory of the Bay of Pigs, the “Battle of the Escambray” became a founding moment in the official history of the Revolutionary fight against US imperialism (Swanger 2015).

  5. 5.

    The commercial cultivation of citrus fruits in Cuba was introduced by American settlers at the end of the nineteenth century, following frosts that strongly affected production in Florida. The crop was intended above all for export to North America. However, its development in Cuba was limited throughout the first half of the twentieth century due to the significant increase in production in Florida and California, which were in direct competition with Cuban exports (Jiménez Villasuso and Zamora Rodriguez 2010; Ríos Hernández 2014: 113). Technical assessment for the crop was not properly structured and little research had been conducted on variety selection before the 1970s.

  6. 6.

    Skin colour and race are mentioned here as they are integral to people’s self-identification in Arenas’s social space alongside gender or age. I use the categories people used in my presence to talk about themselves.

  7. 7.

    Imports fell by 75% for oil, 78% for fertilizers and pesticides, and 50% for food (Wright 2009: 67).

  8. 8.

    Granja and lote are designations that referred to different ways of organizing state farms between the 1960s and 1990s when the main concern was the adequate size of the “production units”.

References

  • Bloch, V. 2018. La lutte : Cuba après l’effondrement de l’URSS. Paris: Vendémiaire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. 1982. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century, vol. II : The Wheels of Commerce. New York: William Collins Sons & Co Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calá González, M.M. 1992. “La Revolución en el Poder.” In Monografía sobre la historia municipal de Arenas, ed. G. Ortega Rodríguez, 229–195. (Unreleased).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardot, P., and C. Laval. 2020. Dominer. Enquête sur la souveraineté de l’État en Occident. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, R. 1964. Cuba socialisme et développement. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, R. 1970. Cuba est-il socialiste? Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deere, C.D., N. Pérez Rojas, C. Torres Vila, M. Garcia Aguiar, and E. Gonzalez Mastrapa. 1998. Guines, Santo Domingo, Majibacoa: Sobre sus historias agrarias. La Habana: Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espina Prieto, M.P. 2008. Políticas de atención a la pobreza y la desigualdad: examinando el rol del Estado en la experiencia cubana. Buenos Aires: Clacso.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2003. Industria citrícola de Cuba: Crecimiento y perspectivas de mercado (CCP: CI 03/9; p. 12). Grupo intergubernamental sobre frutos cítricos. https://www.fao.org/publications/card/es/c/798d9b8a-b593-5e8b-95a3-864c4144015f/.

  • Ferguson, J. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: “development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in lesotho. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa Albelo, V. 2005. “Los campesinos en el proyecto social cubano.” Revista Temas 44: 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, L. 2012. Visions of Power in Cuba: Revolution, Redemption, and Resistance, 1959–1971. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, J. I. 2007. “Prophecy and the Near Future : Thoughts on Macroeconomic, Evangelical, and Punctuated Time.” American Ethnologist 34 (3): 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. 2015. “Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene : Making kin.” Environmental humanities 6 (1): 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D., N. Ishikawa, S.F. Gilbert, K. Olwig, A.L. Tsing and N. Bubandt. 2016. “Anthropologists Are Talking–About the Anthropocene.” Ethnos 81 (3): 535–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnecker, C.P. 2011. Cooperativas y socialismo: Una mirada desde Cuba. La Habana: Editorial Caminos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, K. 2014. “Waiting for the Surveyor : Development Promises and the Temporality of Infrastructure.”The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 19 (2): 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. 1998. Marx Went AWAY–But Karl Stayed Behind. Updated Edition of Karl Marx Collective: Economy, Society and Religion in a Siberian Collective Farm. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. 2007. “Sovereignty.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics, ed. D. Nugent and J. Vincent, 418–436. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2002. The Perception of the Environment Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, S. 2021. “The Anthropology of Hope.”Oxford Research Encyclopedias. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.182.

  • Jiménez Villasuso, R., and V. Zamora Rodriguez. 2010. “Principales cultivares y patrones utilizados en la citricultura.” Red Interamericana de Citricos (RIAC), Taller Regional sobre viveros de citricos 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, R. 2000. “Social Sovereignty.” Theory, Culture & Society 17 (4): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyva Remón, A. and M.A. Arias Guevara. 2000. “Nuevos productores usufructuarios: Hacia un estudio de su estructura interna.” In Cambios tecnológicos, sustentabilidad y participación, ed. N. Pérez Rojas, E. González Mastrapa and M. Garcia Aguiar, 185–197. La Habana: Universidad de La Habana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T.M. 2017a. “The Price of Un/Freedom: Indonesia’s Colonial and Contemporary Plantation Labor Regimes.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 59 (2): 245–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T.M. 2017b. “After the Land Grab: Infrastructural Violence and the “Mafia System” in Indonesia’s Oil Palm Plantation Zones.”Geoforum 96: 328–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack Bequer, M. and M.A. Balbel Pérez. 2018. “Unidades Básicas de Producción Cooperativa. Una variante de producción cooperativa en tierras de propiedad estatal.” In El Cooperativismo en Cuba. Situación actual y propuestas para su regulación y fomento, ed. G. Fajardo García and M. Moreno Cruz, 81–95. Valencia: CIRIEC España.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S.W. 1986. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muiño, E.S. 2014. “Obstáculos para la transición socio-ecológica: El caso de Cuba en el «período especial».” Revista de Economía Crítica 17: 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muíño, E.S. 2017. Opción Cero. El reverdecimiento forzoso de la Revolución cubana. Madrid: Catarata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navaro-Yashin, Y. 2012. The Make-Believe Space: Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nova González, A. 1996. The Citrus Industries in Cuba and Florida. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, International working paper series(IW96-2). https://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00067338/00001/25x.

  • Núñez González, N., P. Rodríguez Ruiz, M. Pérez Alvarez and O. Buscarón Ochoa. 2011. Las relaciones raciales en Cuba. Estudios contemporáneos. La Habana: Fundación Fernando Ortiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ríos Hernández, A. 2014. La Agricultura en Cuba. La Habana: Editorial INFOIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosendahl, M. 1997. Inside the revolution: Everyday life in socialist Cuba. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, P., and M. Benjamin. 1994. The Greening of the Revolution: Cuba’s Experiment with Organic Agriculture. Melbourne: Ocean Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. 1998. Seeing Like a State : How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre, R. 1970. Diez años de arquitectura en Cuba revolucionaria. La Habana: Ediciones Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanger, J. 2015. Rebel Lands of Cuba: The Campesino Struggles of Oriente and Escambray, 1934–1974. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thivet, D. 2014. “La Via Campesina et l’appropriation de l’agroécologie.” In Dynamiques des agricultures biologiques, ed. A. Cardona, F. Chrétien, B. Leroux, F. Ripoll, and D. Thivet, 75–92. Versailles: Editions Quae & Educagri éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A.L. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World : On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uekötter, F. 2014. Comparing Apples, Oranges, and Cotton : Environmental Histories of the Global Plantation. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdés Paz, J. 2009. Los procesos de organización agraria en Cuba, 1959–2006. s.l.: Fundación Antonio Núñez Jiménez de la Naturaleza y el Hombre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdery, K. 2003. The Vanishing Hectare : Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Verdery, K. 2007. “After Socialism.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics, ed. D. Nugent and J. Vincent, 21–36. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villegas Chadez, R. 2017. “Esencia y perfeccionamiento de las UBPC en el proceso de actualización del modelo económico cubano.” In Políticas públicas y procesos rurales en Cuba. Aproximaciones desde las Ciencias Sociales, ed. A. Leyva Remón and D. Echevarría León. Panamá: Ruth Casa Editorial, Editorial de Ciencias Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. 2009. Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security in an Era of Oil Scarcity: Lessons from Cuba. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Aureille .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aureille, M. (2023).  Nostalgia for Oranges: Plantations as a Development Promise in Socialist Cuba. In: Le Petitcorps, C., Macedo, M., Peano, I. (eds) Global Plantations in the Modern World. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08537-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08537-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08536-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08537-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation