Abstract
Many of the processes and outcomes of informal workplace learning remain almost unnoticed by the learner, which makes it difficult to empirically investigate informal workplace learning using retrospective self-reports. Intensive longitudinal methods allow for a data collection in situ, that means during or close to the actual processes. One such approach is the diary method, more rarely also referred to as working journals or learning logs. This chapter provides an introduction to the diary method as a data gathering tool for investigating informal workplace learning. It provides a discussion of different forms of validity, a systematic overview of typical research questions, diary parameters such as sampling methods, recording methods, and item formats as well as reporting standards in diary studies. In the second part of this chapter, two diary studies are presented to illustrate the various forms of implementation. The first study by Rausch investigates learning from errors in the workplace with a paper-based diary. In this section, the focus is on the measurement of emotions and the lack of correlation between diary and questionnaire data of similar phenomena. The second study by Goller and Steffen investigates the informal workplace learning of nurses during a special instructional setting (student-run hospital wards) and implemented voice recording. Future directions for diary studies on workplace learning are reviewed with respect to technological developments and mixed method designs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basch, J., & Fisher, C. (2000). Affective events-emotions matrix: A classification of work events and associated emotions. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Härtel, & W. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 36–48). Quorum Books.
Beal, D. J., & Weiss, H. M. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(4), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103257361
Berings, M. G. M. C., Doornbos, A. J., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2006). Methodological practices in on-the-job learning research. Human Resource Development International, 9(3), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860600893557
Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., & Roberson, L. (1995). Cookies, Disposition, and Job Attitudes: The Effects of Positive Mood-Inducing Events and Negative Affectivity on Job Satisfaction in a Field Experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1030
Brown, S. P., Westbrook, R. A., & Challagalla, G. (2005). Good cope, bad cope: Adaptive and maladaptive co** strategies following a critical negative work event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 792–798. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.792
Clardy, A. (2018). 70-20-10 and the dominance of informal learning: A fact in search of evidence. Human Resource Development Review, 17(2), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318759399
Cuyvers, K., Van den Bossche, P., & Donche, V. (2022). Longitudinal case study research to study self-regulation of professional learning: Combining observations and stimulated recall interviews throughout everyday work. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 579–600). Springer.
Dörner, D. (1996). The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Perseus.
Fisher, C. D., & To, M. L. (2012). Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 865–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1803
Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2008). Negative knowledge: Understanding professional learning and expertise. Vocations and Learning, 1(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-008-9006-1
Goller, M., & Steffen, B. (in press). Lernen auf der Schulstation [Learning during student-run hospital-wards]. In M.A. Marchwacka (Ed.), Handbuch Pflegebildung. Theoretische Ansätze, empirische Erkenntnisse und praktische Anwendungen (pp. 182–193). Hogrefe.
Goller, M., Steffen, B., & Lau, D. (2020). Schulstationen in der Pflegeausbildung: Zur Lernförderlichkeit eines komplexen Lehr-Lernarrangements [Student-run hospital wards during nursing training. On the learning potential of a complex learning arrangement]. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 116(3), 364. https://doi.org/10.25162/zbw-2020-0016
Goller, M., Steffen, B., & Lau, D. (2022). Kompetenzerwerb auf der Schulstation: Eine Mixed-Methods-Replikationsstudie [Competence development at student-run hospital wards: A mixed-methods replication study]. In U. Weyland & K. Reiber (Eds.), Professionalisierung der Gesundheitsberufe. Berufliche und hochschulische Bildung im Spiegel aktueller Forschung. Beiheft 33 der Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik (pp. 21–47). Franz Steiner Verlag.
Grealish, L., & Trede, F. (2013). Student nurse led ward in aged care. In J. Higgs, D. Sheehan, J. B. Currens, W. Letts, & G. M. Jensen (Eds.), Realising exemplary practice-based education (pp. 93–100). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-188-7_9
Grund, S., Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2021). Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel models with the R package mdmb: A flexible sequential modeling approach. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 2631–2649. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01530-0
Hauck, C., & Schuster, E. (2014). Schulstationen – Von der Definition zur Handlungsempfehlung [Student-run hospital wards. From definition to recommendation for action]. Pädagogik der Gesundheitsberufe, 1, 70–77.
Hertel, F., & Bergjan, M. (2015). Schulstation als ‘Capstone’ der Pflegeausbildung – Evaluation einer besonderen klinischen Lernumgebung [Student-run hospital wards as a ‘Capstone’ in nursing education. Evaluation of a special clinical learning environment]. In F. Arens (Ed.), Praxisbegleitung in der beruflichen und akademischen Pflegeausbildung: Eine Standortbestimmung (pp. 224–245). wvb.
Hufford, M. R. (2007). Special methodological challenges and opportunities in ecological momentary assessment. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 54–75). Oxford University Press.
Jobe, J. B. (2000). Cognitive process in self-report. In A. A. Stone, J. S. Turkkan, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 25–28). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kubey, R., Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Experience sampling method applications to communication research questions. Journal of Communication, 46(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01476.x
Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice & using software. SAGE.
Lauber, A. (2017). Von Könnern lernen: Lehr-/Lernprozesse im Praxisfeld Pflege aus der Perspektive von Lehrenden und Lernenden [Learning from skilled professionals. Learning/Teaching processes in the practical field of nursing from teachers’ and learners’ perspectives] Waxmann.
Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2014). Technology-enhanced professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 1187–1212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_43
Newton, N. A., Khanna, C., & Thompson, J. (2008). Workplace failure: Mastering the last taboo. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.60.3.227
Ohly, S., & Schmitt, A. (2015). What makes us enthusiastic, angry, feeling at rest or worried? Development and validation of an affective work events taxonomy using concept map** methodology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9328-3
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
Oser, F., & Spychiger, M. (2005). Lernen ist schmerzhaft [Learning is painful]. Beltz
Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120–141). Routledge.
Putz, D., Schilling, J., Kluge, A., & Stangenberg, C. (2013). Measuring organizational learning from errors: Development and validation of an integrated model and questionnaire. Management Learning, 44(5), 511–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612444391
Rausch, A. (2012). Prozessnahe und retrospektive Erhebungsmethoden der Arbeitsanalyse in der betrieblichen Ausbildung [Real-time and retrospective data collection methods of work analysis in in-company training]. Empirische Pädagogik, 26(2), 247–270.
Rausch, A. (2013). Task characteristics and learning potentials – Empirical results of three diary studies on workplace learning. Vocations and Learning, 6(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-012-9086-9
Rausch, A. (2014). Using diaries in research on work and learning. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses on professional learning (Vol. 9, pp. 341–366). Springer). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7012-6_17
Rausch, A. (in preparation). Emotions, co**, and emotions, again – An extended replication study on learning from errors in the workplace.
Rausch, A., Schley, T., & Warwas, J. (2015). Problem solving in everyday office work – A diary study on differences between apprentices and skilled employees. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34, 448–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2015.1060023
Rausch, A., Seifried, J., & Harteis, C. (2017). Emotions, co** and learning in error situations in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(5), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-01-2017-0004
Reis, H. T. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-world” – A conceptual rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 3–21). Guilford Press.
Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190–222). Cambridge University Press.
Rintala, A., Wampers, M., Myin-Germeys, I., & Viechtbauer, W. (2019). Response compliance and predictors thereof in studies using the experience sampling method. Psychological Assessment, 31(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000662
Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., & Batinic, B. (1999). Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 527–547.
Sawchuk, P. H. (2009). Informal learning and work: From genealogy and definitions to contemporary methods and findings. In R. Maclean & D. Wilson (Eds.), International handbook of education for the changing world of work (pp. 319–331). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5281-1_21
Schwartz, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (2007). The analysis of real-time momentary data: A practical guide. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 76–113). Oxford University Press.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Assessing frequency reports of mundane behaviors: Contributions of cognitive psychology to questionnaire construction. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 98–119). Sage.
Schwarz, N. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time” – A cognitive rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22–42). Guilford Press.
Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgment (pp. 55–72). Pergamon.
Seifried, J., & Rausch, A. (2022). Applying the experience sampling method to research on workplace learning. In M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications, and empirical illustrations (pp. 19–41). Springer.
Sharples, S., & Cobb, S. (2015). Methods for collecting and observing participant responses. In J. R. Wilson & S. Sharples (Eds.), Evaluation of human work (pp. 83–118). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18362
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (2007). Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 371–386). Oxford University Press.
Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., & Atienza, A. (2007). In L. Nebeling (Ed.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research. Oxford University Press.
Tourangeau, R. (2000). Remembering what happened: Memory errors and survey reports. In A. A. Stone, J. S. Turkkan, C. A. Bachrach, J. B. Jobe, H. S. Kurtzman, & V. S. Cain (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 29–47). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tulis, M., Steuer, G., & Dresel, M. (2016). Learning from errors: A model of individual processes. Frontline Learning Research, 4(4), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i2.168
Wheeler, L., & Reis, H. T. (1991). Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00252.x
Wilson, J. R., & Sharples, S. (2015). Evaluation of human work (4th ed.). CRC Press.
Witte, S., Greis, G., & Darmann-Finck, I. (2016). Optimale Bedingungen für die klinische Kompetenzentwicklung auf Ausbildungsstationen/-bereichen [Optimial conditions for clinical competence development in student-run hospital wards/-section]. Pädagogik der Gesundheitsberufe, 3(3), 20–27.
Zhao, B., Olivera, F., & Edmondson, A. C. (2014). Learning from errors in organizations: The effects of negative emotions on motivation and cognition. In J. A. Miles (Ed.), New directions in management and organization theory (pp. 23–61). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rausch, A., Goller, M., Steffen, B. (2022). Uncovering Informal Workplace Learning by Using Diaries. In: Goller, M., Kyndt, E., Paloniemi, S., Damşa, C. (eds) Methods for Researching Professional Learning and Development. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08518-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08517-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08518-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)