Abstract
In this chapter, we argue in favor of the value of cartooning in educational contexts as a cross-curricular tool to foster students’ agency, multimodal communication, and civic engagement. We designed and conducted two cartoon workshops in primary schools in Argentina. Thirty-three students aged 10–13 years old were asked to create a multimodal cartoon about social inequalities and social empathy. Most of the students were able to accomplish the task by deploying a repertoire of multimodal narrative and rhetorical resources. They created imaginary and experiential situations in order to address—from their own viewpoint—economic, gender, and ethnic inequalities, often denouncing a lack of empathic concern. This evidenced a committed, or a committed-playful motivation. We provide insights into the scope of this creative and multimodal activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arizpe, E. & Styles, M. (2008). A critical review of research into children’s responses to multimodal texts. In J. Flood, S. Heath & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts: Volume II (pp. 363–373). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Attardo, S. (1997). The semantic foundations of cognitive theories of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 10(4), 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1997.10.4.395
Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Mouton de Gruyter.
Avilés, C., Navia, J. A., Ruiz-Pérez, L. M., & Zapatero-Ayuso, J. A. (2020). How enaction and ecological approaches can contribute to sports and skill learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.523691
Bariaud, F. (2013/1989). Age differences in children’s humor. In P. McGhee (Ed.), Humor and children’s development: A guide to practical applications (pp. 21–42). Routledge.
Barraza Molina, E. (2006). La historieta y su uso como material didáctico para la enseñanza de la historia en el aula. Perspectiva Educacional, Formación de Profesores, 47, 73–97. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=333328828005
Bateman, J. (2014). Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. Routledge.
Bermudez, A. (2012). Youth civic engagement: Decline or transformation? A critical review. Journal of Moral Education, 41(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2012.732296
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge.
Bonhomme, M. (1998). Les figures clés du discours. Éditions du Seuil.
Bugallo, L., Zinkgräf, C., & Pedrazzini, A. (2019/2020). Propiciar la multimodalidad en niños y adolescentes a través de la producción de humor gráfico. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación, 22(89), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi89
Castorina, J. A. (2012). Psicología y Epistemología Genéticas. Lugar Editorial.
Coccoz, V., Lozada, M., Salsa, A., & Scheuer, N. (2019). Enactive experience promotes early number understanding: A study with 3-year-old children. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(8), 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1676758
Comer, K. (2015). Illustrating praxis: Comic composition, narrative rhetoric, and critical multiliteracies. Composition Studies, 43(1), 75–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40139040
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3),164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
El Refaie, E., & Hörschelmann, K. (2010). Young people’s readings of a political cartoon and the concept of multimodal literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003679719
Falardeau, M. (2015). Humour et liberté d’expression. Les langages de l’humour. Presses de l’Université Laval.
Fraley, B., & Aron, A. (2004). The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters. Personal Relationships, 11, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00071.x
Forceville, C., El Refaie, E., & Meesters, G. (2014). Stylistics and comics. In M. Burke (Ed.), Routledge handbook of stylistics (pp. 485–499). Routledge.
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Issa, S. (2017). Comics in the English classroom: A guide to teaching comics across English studies. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 9(4), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2017.1355822
Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In S. Price, C. Jewitt, & B. Brown (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital technology research (pp. 250–265). Sage.
Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking paths to literacy. Routledge.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Loizou, E. (2005). Infant humor: The theory of the absurd and the empowerment theory. International Journal of Early Years Education, 13(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760500048329
Lozada, M., & Carro, N. (2016). Embodied action improves cognition in children: Evidence from a study based on Piagetian conservation tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(393), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00393
Macedonia, M. (2019). Embodied learning: Why at school the mind needs the body. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2098), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02098
Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. E. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Elsevier.
McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics. The invisible art. Harper Perennial.
Mireault, G., & Reddy, V. (2016). Humor in infants. Developmental and psychological perspectives. Springer International Publishing.
Musa, N. K. H., Shahrill, M., Batrisyia, I., & Azamain, M. S. (2020). Incorporating the use of comics in the secondary mathematics teaching of the order of operations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012004/pdf
Negro Alousque, I. (2013). Visual metaphor and metonymy in French political cartoons. RESLA, 26, 365–384.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Ogier, S., & Ghosh, K. (2018). Exploring student teachers’ capacity for creativity through the interdisciplinary use of comics in the primary classroom. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 9(4), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2017.1319871
Pantaleo, S. (2011). Grade 7 students reading graphic novels: ‘You need to do a lot of thinking.’ English in Education, 45(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2011.01093.x
Pantaleo, S. (2014). Language, literacy and visual texts. English in Education, 49, 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12053
Pedrazzini, A., & Scheuer, N. (2018a). Sobre la relación verbal-visual en el humor gráfico y sus recursos. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación, 74, 123–141. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi74.1091
Pedrazzini, A., & Scheuer, N. (2018b). Distinguishing cartoon subgenres based on a multicultural contemporary corpus. European Journal of Humour Research, 6(1), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2018.6.1.pedrazzini
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1962). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Postema, B. (2013). Narrative structure in comics: Making sense of fragments. RIT Press.
Reddy, V. (1991). Playing with others’ expectations: Teasing and mucking about in the first year. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind (pp. 143–158). Basil Blackwell.
Segundo-Ortin, M. (2020). Agency from a radical embodied standpoint: An ecological-enactive proposal. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1319), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01319
Shultz, T. R. (1976). A cognitive-developmental analysis of humor. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 11–36). Transaction Publishers.
Vilches, L. (1984). La lectura de la imagen: Prensa, cine, televisión. Paidós.
Wallner, L. (2019). Gutter talk: Co-constructing narratives using comics in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(6), 819–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1452290
Wiegerová, A., & Navrátilová, H. (2017). Let’s not be scared of comics (researching possibilities of using conceptual comics in teaching nature study in kindergarden). Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(21), 576–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.248
Williams, R.M.-C. (2008). Image, text, and story: Comics and graphic novels in the classroom. Art and Education, 61(6), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2008.11652072
Acknowledgments
We thank the teachers and school management teams that gave us the opportunity to implement our cartoon workshops. We are especially thankful to all the students that participated in this experience and created their own cartoons.
This study has been partially supported by grants PIP 1908, PIP 0498, and PUE 22920180100046CO from CONICET, PICT 2020-00557 from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, and C-162 from Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pedrazzini, A., Zinkgräf, C., D’Adamo, P., Bugallo, L., Lozada, M. (2022). Cartooning in Educational Contexts: A Promising Way to Promote Cross-Curricular Work with Children and Adolescents. In: Aman, R., Wallner, L. (eds) Teaching with Comics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05194-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05194-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05193-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05194-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)