Behind the Scenes: Exploring Context and Audience Engagement Behaviors in YouTube Vlogs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13315))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Famous video bloggers (vloggers) on YouTube can develop large audiences, which can be related to the gaining of audience engagement (AE), manifested by the viewers’ participation and consumption on YouTube. Studies have unveiled vloggers’ behaviors for engaging audiences, or audience engagement behaviors (AEBs), in their videos, including interacting with viewers via comments, disclosing self-information, giving rewards, and offering other information. Meanwhile, video blogs (vlogs) are produced under “vlogging context” - situational elements involved in vlog production. Studies have shown the effect of context on the content of online media. However, while it can be argued that context can affect vlog content produced, the contextual factors that may shape vloggers’ AEBs within the content have not been explicitly explored. This research aims to propose contextual factors that can condition vloggers’ AEBs on YouTube. A qualitative case study on three popular vloggers was implemented. A thematic analysis was performed on sampled vloggers’ videos to identify contextual factors that can condition the three vloggers’ AEBs. The results propose that personal, environmental, and medium context are three main contextual factors that condition the three vloggers’ AEBs. This research argues that how vloggers’ AEBs are presented to the audience depends on their vlogging context. It expands the understanding of YouTube vloggers or similar streaming media creators’ practices for AE by considering the role of context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Videos are referenced using their numbers in the Appendix. For the full list of videos referenced in the paper, please see Table 1 in the Appendix.

References

  1. Zhang, H.: Evoking presence in vlogging: a case study of U. K. beauty blogger Zoe Sugg. First Monday 23(1) (2018). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i1.8107

  2. Kaminsky, M.S.: Naked Lens-Video Blogging and Video Journaling to Reclaim the YOU in YouTube: How to Use Online Video to Increase Self Expression, Enhance Creativity, and Join the Video Regeneration. Organik Media Incorporated, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weaver, A.J., Zelenkauskaite, A., Samson, L.: The (non) violent world of YouTube: content trends in web video. J. Commun. 62(6), 1065–1083 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01675.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corrêa, S.C.H., Soares, J.L., Christino, J.M.M., de Sevilha Gosling, M., Gonçalves, C.A.: The influence of YouTubers on followers’ use intention. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 14(2) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-09-2019-0154

  5. DataReportal, Hootsuite, We Are Social.: Share of internet users worldwide watching vlogs weekly as of 3rd quarter 2021, by age and gender. Statista (2022). https://www-statista-com.hallam.idm.oclc.org/statistics/1254829/age-gender-reach-worldwide-watching-vlogs/. Accessed 08 Feb 2022

  6. Funk, M.: How many YouTube channels are there? (2020). https://www.tubics.com/blog/number-of-youtube-channels. Accessed 16 Jan 2021

  7. Burgess, J., Green, J.: YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture, 2nd edn. Politya, Cambridge (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khan, M.L.: Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Comput. Hum. Behav. 66, 236–247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McRoberts, S., Bonsignore, E., Peyton, T., Yarosh, S.: Do it for the viewers! Audience engagement behaviors of young YouTubers. In: Read, J.C., Stenton, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 334–343. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930676

  10. Tarnovskaya, V.: Reinventing personal branding building a personal brand through content on YouTube. J. Int. Bus. Res. Mark. 3(1), 29–35 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.31.3005

  11. Jerslev, A.: Media times| in the time of the microcelebrity: celebrification and the YouTuber Zoella. Int. J. Commun. 10, 5233 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marôpo, L., Jorge, A., Tomaz, R.: “I felt like I was really talking to you!”: intimacy and trust among teen vloggers and followers in Portugal and Brazil. J. Child. Media 14(1), 22–37 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.1699589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rybaczewska, M., Jebet Chesire, B., Sparks, L.: YouTube vloggers as brand influencers on consumer purchase behaviour. J. Intercult. Manag. 12(3), 117–140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2020-0047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Odden, L.: What is Content? Learn from 40+ definitions (2013). http://www.toprankblog.com/2013/03/what-is-content/. Accessed 04 Feb 2022

  15. Matuk, C., DesPortes, K., Hoadley, C.: Conceptualizing context in CSCL: cognitive and sociocultural perspectives. In: Cress, U., Rosé, C., Wise, A.F., Oshima, J. (eds.) International Handbook of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. CCLS, vol. 19, pp. 85–101. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonnenwald, D.H.: Evolving perspectives of human behavior: contexts, situation, social networks and information horizons. In: Wilson, T., Allen, D. (eds.) Exploring the Contexts of Information Behaviour, pp. 176–190. Taylor Graham, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dey, A.K.: Understanding and using context. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 5(1), 4–7 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007790170019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lena, J.C.: Social context and musical content of rap music, 1979–1995. Soc. Forces 85(1), 479–495 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bickham, D.S., Rich, M.: Is television viewing associated with social isolation?: roles of exposure time, viewing context, and violent content. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 160(4), 387–392 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.4.387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaakonmäki, R., Müller, O., Vom Brocke, J.: The impact of content, context, and creator on user engagement in social media marketing. In: Bui, T.X., Sprague, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1152–1160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.136

  21. Nardi, B.A., Schiano, D.J., Gumbrecht, M., Swartz, L.: Why we blog. Commun. ACM 47(12), 41–46 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1035134.1035163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yarosh, S., Bonsignore, E., McRoberts, S., Peyton, T.: YouthTube: youth video authorship on YouTube and Vine. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 1423–1437. ACM, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819961

  23. Snelson, C.: Vlogging about school on YouTube: an exploratory study. New Media Soc. 17(3), 321–339 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813504271

  24. Farahbakhsh, F., Shahidinejad, A., Ghobaei-Arani, M.: Context‐aware computation offloading for mobile edge computing. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03030-1

  25. Rubin, A.M., Rubin, R.B.: Age, context and television use. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 25(1), 1–13 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158109386424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tur-Viñes, V., Castelló-Martínez, A.: Commenting on top Spanish YouTubers: “no comment.” Soc. Sci. 8(10), 266 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Berryman, R., Kavka, M.: ‘I guess a lot of people see me as a big sister or a friend’: the role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers. J. Gend. Stud. 26(3), 307–320 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1288611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferchaud, A., Grzeslo, J., Orme, S., LaGroue, J.: Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Comput. Hum. Behav. 80, 88–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Bérail, P., Guillon, M., Bungener, C.: The relations between YouTube addiction, social anxiety and parasocial relationships with YouTubers: a moderated-mediation model based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Comput. Hum. Behav. 99, 190–204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.007

  30. Buf, D.M., Ștefăniță, O.: Uses and gratifications of YouTube: a comparative analysis of users and content creators. Rom. J. Commun. Public Relations 22(2), 75–89 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2020.2.301

  31. Kamboj, S.: Applying uses and gratifications theory to understand customer participation in social media brand communities: perspective of media technology. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 32(1), 205–231 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-11-2017-0289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Biel, J.I., Gatica-Perez, D.: Vlogsense: conversational behavior and social attention in YouTube. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. (TOMM) 7(1), 1–21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2037676.2037690

  33. Rieder, B., Coromina, Ò., Matamoros-Fernández, A.: Map** YouTube: a quantitative exploration of a platformed media system. First Monday 25(8) (2020). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i8.10667

  34. Jolly, J.L., Matthews, M.S.: Why we blog: homeschooling mothers of gifted children. Roeper Rev. 39(2), 112–120 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1289579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Blumler, J.G., Katz, E.: The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage, Newbury Park (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zimmer, F., Scheibe, K., Stock, W.G.: A model for information behaviour research on social live streaming services (SLSSs). In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) SCSM 2018. LNCS, vol. 10914, pp. 429–448. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91485-5_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Zainal, Z.: Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan 5(1), 1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang, H.: Data sets, analysis and descriptions for the case study. Zenodo (2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5975892

  40. Patton, M.Q.: Purposeful sampling. In: Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, pp. 169–186. Sage, Beverly Hills (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Perry, C.: Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. Eur. J. Mark. 32(9/10), 785–802 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569810232237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zoella [YouTube Channel]. https://www.youtube.com/user/zoella280390

  43. DanTDM [YouTube Channel]. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCS5Oz6CHmeoF7vSad0qqXfw

  44. Lilly Singh [YouTube Channel]. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfm4y4rHF5HGrSr-qbvOwOg

  45. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pyett, P.M.: Validation of qualitative research in the “real world”. Qual. Health Res. 13(8), 1170–1179 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303255686

  47. Anney, V.N.: Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: looking at trustworthiness criteria. J. Emerg. Trends Educ. Res. Policy Stud. (JETERAPS) 5(2), 272–281 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Krefting, L.: Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 45(3), 214–222 (1991). https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.3.214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Patton, M.Q.: Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv. Res. 34(5 Pt 2), 1189 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Q on CBC: Lilly Singh: Superwoman of the internet (2014). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9STyy1KNgY. Accessed 12 Dec 2017

  51. RandomMan: My boyfriend does my makeup (2020). https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/my-boyfriend-does-my-makeup. Accessed 11 June 2021

  52. Sasso, S.: The best video challenge since boyfriends putting on makeup (2016). https://www.refinery29.com/2016/11/131177/jenna-marbles-boyfriend-voiceover-challenge. Accessed 13 Sep 2018

  53. Pires, F., Masanet, M.J., Scolari, C.A.: What are teens doing with YouTube? Practices, uses and metaphors of the most popular audio-visual platform. Inf. Commun. Soc. 24(9), 1175–1191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1672766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Calder, B.J., Malthouse, E.C., Schaedel, U.: An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. J. Interact. Mark. 23(4), 321–331 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zimmer, F., Scheibe, K., Zhang, H.: Gamification elements on social live streaming service mobile applications. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12194, pp. 184–197. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hantian Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1. List of the videos referenced in the paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, H. (2022). Behind the Scenes: Exploring Context and Audience Engagement Behaviors in YouTube Vlogs. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media: Design, User Experience and Impact. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05061-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05060-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05061-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation