Abstract
Existing design standards and guidelines provide guidance on what factors to consider to produce interactive systems that are not only usable, but also accessible. However, these standards are usually general, and when it comes to designing an interactive system for children with Learning Difficulties or Disabilities (LD) and/or Autism Spectrum Conditions (ASC) they are often not specific enough, leading to systems that are not fit for that purpose. If we dive into the area of educational robotics, we face even more issues, in part due to the relative novelty of these technologies. In this paper, we present an analysis of 26 existing educational robots and the interfaces used to control them. Furthermore, we present the results of running focus groups and a questionnaire with 32 educators with expertise in Special Education and parents at four different institutions, to explore potential accessibility issues of existing systems and to identify desirable characteristics. We conclude introducing an initial set of design recommendations, to complement existing design standards and guidelines, that would help with producing future more accessible control interfaces for educational robots, with an especial focus on hel** pupils with LDs and/or ASC.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, C., Campbell, A., Montgomery, R., Cooper, M., Kirkpatrick, A.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, W3C Working Draft (May 2021). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022
Andruseac, G.G., Adochiei, R.I., Păsărică, A., Adochiei, F., Corciovă, C., Costin, H.: Training program for dyslexic children using educational robotics. In: 2015 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB), pp. 1–4 (November 2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB.2015.7391547
Angel-Fernandez, J.M., Vincze, M.: Towards a formal definition of educational robotics. In: Proceedings of the Austrian Robotics Workshop 2018, pp. 37–42. Innsbruck University Press (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.15203/3187-22-1-08
Armesto, L., Fuentes-Durá, P., Perry, D.: Low-cost printable robots in education. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 81(1), 5–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-015-0199-x
Barakova, E.I., Bajracharya, P., Willemsen, M., Lourens, T., Huskens, B.: Long-term LEGO therapy with humanoid robot for children with ASD. Expert Syst. 32(6), 698–709 (2015)
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 112: Principles for the presentation of information (iso 9241-112:2017). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 161: Guidance on visual user-interface elements (iso 9241-161:2016). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Ergonomics of human- system interaction - part 171: Guidance on software accessibility (iso 9241-171:2008). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (iso 9241-210:2010). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 420: Selection of physical input devices (iso 9241-420:2011). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Ergonomics of human-system interaction part 920: Guidance on tactile and haptic interactions (iso 9241-920:2009). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Information technology - user interface component accessibility - part 23: Visual presentation of audio information (including captions and subtitles) (iso/iec 20071-23:2018). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Cruz, A.M., Rincon, A.M.R., Duenas, W.R.R., Torres, D.A.Q., Bohorquez-Heredia, A.F.: What does the literature say about using robots on children with disabilities? Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. 12(5), 429–440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.131830. pMID: 28440095
Galvez Trigo, M.J., Standen, P.J., Cobb, S.V.G.: Robots in special education: reasons for low uptake. J. Enabling Technol. 13(2), 59–69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-12-2018-0070
Game Developers Conference: State of the Game Industry 2022 (January 2022). https://reg.gdconf.com/LP=3493. Accessed 10 Feb 2022
van den Heuvel, R.J.F., Lexis, M.A.S., Gelderblom, G.J., Jansens, R.M.L., de Witte, L.P.: Robots and ICT to support play in children with severe physical disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. 11(2), 103–116 (2016)
Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces - part 2: Multimedia navigation and control (iso 14915-2:2003). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Kay, J.S., Moss, J.G.: Using robots to teach programming to k-12 teachers. In: 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–6 (October 2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462375
Kirkpatrick, A., Connor, J.O., Campbell, A., Cooper, M.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, W3C Recommendation (June 2018). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022
Knight, V.F., Wright, J., Wilson, K., Hooper, A.: Teaching digital, block-based coding of robots to high school students with autism spectrum disorder and challenging behavior. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49(8), 3113–3126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04033-w
Lees, D., Lepage, P.: Robots in education: the current state of the art. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 24(4), 299–320 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2190/39YJ-CHWF-NBL8-3WA4
Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L. (eds.): Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994)
Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books Inc., New York (1980)
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 100: Introduction to standards related to software ergonomics (iso/tr 9241-100:2011). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 411: Evaluation methods for the design of physical input devices (iso/ts 9241-411:2014). Standard, International Organization for Standardization
Qbilat, M., Iglesias, A.: Accessibility guidelines for tactile displays in human-robot interaction. A comparative study and proposal. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G. (eds.) ICCHP 2018, Part II. LNCS, vol. 10897, pp. 217–220. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94274-2_29
Qbilat, M., Iglesias, A., Belpaeme, T.: A proposal of accessibility guidelines for human-robot interaction. Electronics 10(5), 561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050561
Roscoe, J., et al.: Engaging students with profound and multiple disabilities using humanoid robots. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8514, pp. 419–430. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_39
Wood, L.J., Robins, B., Lakatos, G., Syrdal, D.S., Zaraki, A., Dautenhahn, K.: Develo** a protocol and experimental setup for using a humanoid robot to assist children with autism to develop visual perspective taking skills. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robot. 10(1), 167–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Galvez Trigo, M.J., Standen, P.J., Cobb, S.V.G. (2022). Educational Robots and Their Control Interfaces: How Can We Make Them More Accessible for Special Education?. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. User and Context Diversity. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13309. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05039-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05039-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05038-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05039-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)