Labor Market Analysis Based on the Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Working Activities of Employees in the Present and Future Production Structure of 2027

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Capital and Production Structure in the Greek Economy

Part of the book series: The Political Economy of Greek Growth up to 2030 ((TPEGG))

  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to analyze the knowledge requirements for production transformation in the aftermath of the 2010–2020 Greek economic crisis. The topic that the chapter is called to analyze is the following: The production structure of the Greek economy as reflected in 2018 in the sectors of the economy based on their employment has an equivalent in the professions that exist. Based on this analysis of professions, it is possible to identify the knowledge requirements that the Greek economy had in 2018 based on the structure of employment. This structure has the characteristics of the period after the crisis of 2011–2015 which was particularly strong for the country. Then, based on the available methodology and projecting the corresponding picture of employment and occupations for 2027, a new map of knowledge requirements for the new production structure can be identified, which is estimated to emerge in the year 2027. Thus, the differences in the two production structures can be identified, and any gaps that may arise can be predicted. The results of this analysis are of particular value for the design of formal, non-formal and informal education policy in order to facilitate the operation of the production model, to serve and possibly influence the restructuring of the production model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    I would like to thank Dr. Angelos Efstratoglou for sharing his “Research on the relationship between employment and occupations,” INE/GSEE 2020 (mimeo).

  2. 2.

    The analysis and processing of the data were done using Excel. Initially, a routine was developed in Visual Basic with which the occupations—sectors were assigned to the sector items. From the resulting table were created the corresponding cumulative tables per item. Finally, with the use of formulas and appropriate formatting, the final reference tables were presented.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2010). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (1st ed., Vol. 4b, pp. 1044–1172). North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelakun, O. J. (2011). Human capital development and economic growth in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H. (2013). The “task approach” to labor markets: An overview. Journal for Labour Market Research, 46(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-013-0128-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H., & Handel, M. J. (2013). Putting tasks to the test: Human capital, job tasks, and wages. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(S1), S59–S96. https://doi.org/10.1086/669332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bochańczyk, D., & Pęciak, R. (2015). Institutions in the context of sustainable development. The Macrotheme Review: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Global Macro Trends, 4, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buta, S. (2015). Human capital theory and human resource management. Implications in development of knowledge management strategies. EcoForum, 4(1(6)), 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedefop. (2008). Terminology of European education and training policy: A selection of 100 key terms. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, ISBN 92-896-0472-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPD. (2013). Megatreds: The trends sha** work and working lives. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L., & Saenz Molina, J. (2020). “Forced automation” by COVID-19? Early trends from current population survey data [Discussion Paper]. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, M., Rebelo, S., & Trabandt, M. (2020). The macroeconomics of epidemics (No. w26882; p. w26882). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26882

  • Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (2000). Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 806–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giouli E., Pisinas Y, Kanzola A.M., & Petrakis P. (2021) Human capital and production structure: Evidence from Greece. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 7(1), ISSN 2411-9571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, M. (2016). The O*NET content model: Strengths and limitations. Journal for Labour Market Research, 49, 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-016-0199-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzis, A. N. (2018). Greece’s institutional trap. Managerial and Decision Economics, 39(8), 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. Y. (2019). The fourth industrial revolution: Trends and impacts on the world of work. In S. McGrath, M. Mulder, J. Papier, & R. Suart (Eds.), Handbook of vocational education and training (pp. 177–194). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94532-3_115

  • Martín Fuentes, N., Moder, I. (2021). The scarring effects of past crises on the global economy (Published as part of the ECB Economic Bulletin, Issue 8/2020). ECB. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-bulletin/focus/2021/html/ecb.ebbox202008_01~038be4510.en.html

  • Mulvaney, D., Busby, J., & Bazilian, M. D. (2020). Pandemic disruptions in energy and the environment. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8(052). https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.052

  • Petrakis, P. E. (2020a). The new political economy of Greece up to 2030. Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9783030470753

  • Petrakis, P. E. (2020b). Theoretical approaches to economic growth and development: An interdisciplinary perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economics, 98(5), 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijdens, K. G., De Ruijter, J., & De Ruijter, E. (2012). Measuring work activities and skill requirements of occupations: Experiences from a European pilot study with a web-survey. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoulfidis, L., & Zouboulakis, M. (2016). Greek sovereign defaults in retrospect and prospect. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 14(2), 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020 [Department for Economic and Social Affairs]. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF. (2018). Future of jobs report [Insight Report]. Centre for the New Economy and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEF. (2020). Future of jobs report [Insight Report]. Centre for the New Economy and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2019). Building human capital (World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work). World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panagiotis E. Petrakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex

Annex

A. The Data of Ο*Net

Each profession is composed of 4 components based on the platform Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) and O’NET on Line. The DOT and O’NET online databases developed by the United States Department of Labor. These databases were developed by labor market analysts who mapped thousands of workplaces to record the different types of work and what they include. Access to DOT is via the link https://occupationalinfo.org/. The four components are analyzed as follows:

Work Activities::

is a systematic and deliberate action that requires different and complementary skills. A work activity involves different people working together in an organized way, in a common idea or project, to turn them into a specific result.

Knowledge::

is an organized portfolio consisting of principles and truths, commonly accepted data that apply to various areas of life. According to Cedefop (2008), knowledge is the result of the assimilation of information acquired through learning.

Skills::

defines the ability of an individual to apply knowledge and know-how in such a way as to be able to complete his tasks and solve problems (Cedefop, 2008). According to O*NET, the term skill also refers to those skills developed that facilitate learning and the faster acquisition of knowledge.

Abilities::

refers to what we are capable of and can do when we make the maximum effort. For example, we may be able to solve mathematical equations, write perfect texts, disassemble a machine or persuade others to form an idea of something specific.

Each analytical profession has a unique six-digit code which follows the coding given by DOT (Dictionary of Occupational Titles) and O*NET Online (Occupational Information Network) in the occupations included and described by these databases (e.g., 4224—Hotel Receptionists -> 238,367,038—Hotel front desk clerk).

The Dictionary of Occupational Titles was developed by the United States Department of Labor and has helped employers, government officials, and HR professionals identify more than 13,000 different jobs. It was created by Job Analysts who visited and observed thousands of work environments in order to record the different types of work and the elements involved in their execution. DOT gradually evolved into the state-of-the-art online information platform: Occupational Information Network—O*NET developed by the United States Department of Labor, Employment and Training (USDOL/ETA) and first launched in 1998. The O*NET online platform is the most important source of information on employment and occupation in the United States and provides the most up-to-date data on understanding the changing nature of work and its impact on the workforce.

For a list of Working Activities—Knowledge—Skills—Abilities based on DOT and O’NET see O’NET Database.

B. Ranking by Importance Index (RBI)

An indicator that characterizes every knowledge, skill, ability, work activity and marks the degree of importance that each such element has in the execution of an Analytical Occupation. All Analytical Occupations contain a range of Work Activities, Knowledge, Skills and Abilities. These elements are found mostly in all occupations while what differs is the RBI (Ranking by Importance) index. The RBI index takes values from 1 to 100.

The most critical work activities, knowledge, skills and abilities from those that compose an Analytical Occupation are at the top with the RBI index approaching 100. The RBI that approaches the value of 1 marks the work activities, knowledge, skills and abilities of the Analytical Occupation that is of lesser importance for the performance of the occupation. These are the components of the Analytical Occupation (WA, A, S, K) that are not considered prerequisites for the performance of the occupation or are found less frequently in its practice.

Therefore, each Analytical Occupation corresponds to a unique outline of Work Activities, Knowledge, Abilities and Skills as the RBI for each component of the Analytical Occupation differs depending on the importance it has for the execution of each Analytical Occupation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petrakis, P.E. (2022). Labor Market Analysis Based on the Knowledge, Skills, Abilities and Working Activities of Employees in the Present and Future Production Structure of 2027. In: Petrakis, P.E. (eds) Human Capital and Production Structure in the Greek Economy. The Political Economy of Greek Growth up to 2030. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04938-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04938-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04937-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04938-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation