Clavicle Fractures: To Operate or Not?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Controversies in Orthopedic Surgery of The Upper Limb

Abstract

Clavicle fractures are common injuries accounting for 2.6–4% of all fractures in adults. They have been traditionally treated conservatively; however, in the cases of displacement, surgical treatment has inarguably reduced the rate of nonunions. Plate fixation is the most common procedure used for the treatment of middle-third clavicle fractures, but intramedullary nails can be also used with similar functional and clinical results, as well as complication rate. Regarding fractures of the distal third of the clavicle, there are up-to-date no high-quality studies comparing surgical vs. conservative treatment, and until then it seems prudent to treat these injuries nonoperatively initially and reserve surgery for severely displaced fractures, high-demand patients, or failures of nonoperative care. In these cases, locking plate fixation seems a wiser approach especially if using pre-contoured implants and coracoclavicular ligament augmentation. Medial clavicle fractures account for 2–11% of all clavicle fractures and are usually associated with high-energy trauma. In displaced fractures, surgical treatment has been advised although no randomized controlled study has been published to date, being open reduction and plate fixation the choice in the published series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 93.08
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCarthy MM, Bihl JH, Frank RM, Salem HS, McCarty EC, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures among US high school athletes, 2008-2009 through 2016-2017. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7:2325967119861812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult: epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80:476–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kihlström C, Möller M, Lönn K, Wolf O. Clavicle fractures: epidemiology, classification and treatment of 2 422 fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register; an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Huttunen TT, Launonen AP, Berg HE, Lepola V, Felländer-Tsai L, Mattila VM. Trends in the incidence of clavicle fractures and surgical repair in Sweden: 2001-2012. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:1837–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neer CS. Nonunion of the clavicle. J Am Med Assoc. 1960;172:1006–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Qin M, Zhao S, Guo W, Tang L, Li H, Wang X, et al. Open reduction and plate fixation compared with non-surgical treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(20):e15638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahrens PM, Garlick NI, Barber J, Tims EM. The clavicle trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:1345–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Echalier C, Sakek F, Soumagne T, el Rifaï S, Berthier F, Uhring J, et al. Prospective evaluation of early functional recovery of displaced fractures of the middle third of the clavicle whether operated or not. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107:102768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee GB, Kim H, Jeon I-H, Koh KH. Long-term outcomes of initially conservatively treated midshaft clavicle fractures. Clin Shoulder Elbow. 2021;24:9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sørensen A-KR, Hammeken LH, Qvist AH, Jensen SL, Ehlers LH. Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is not cost-effective. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020;29:27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu J, Srivastava K, Washington T, Hoegler J, Guthrie ST, Hakeos W, et al. Cost-effectiveness of operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2019;101:35–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kask G, Raittio L, Mattila VM, Launonen AP. Cost-effectiveness of operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a systematic literature review. Curr Rev Musculoskeletal Med. 2020;13:391–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amer K, Smith B, Thomson JE, Congiusta D, Reilly MC, Sirkin MS, et al. Operative versus nonoperative outcomes of middle-third clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34:e6–e13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Langenhan R, Bushuven S, Reimers N, Probst A. S-shaped titanium endomedullary nail reduces telesco** of comminuted midshaft clavicular fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31:391–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kabelitz N, Kabelitz M, Frima H, Rehm A, Sommer C, Michelitsch C. Lateral approach for intramedullary nailing of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures; a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01620-4. Online ahead of print.

  17. Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79:537–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Swarup I, Maheshwer B, Orr S, Kehoe C, Zhang Y, Dodwell E. Intermediate-term outcomes following operative and nonoperative management of midshaft clavicle fractures in children and adolescents. JBJS Open Access. 2021;6:–e20.00036.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Riiser MO, Molund M. Long-term functional outcomes and complications in operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents: a retrospective comparative study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021;41:279–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Storti TM, Camilo MS, Silva RFA, Faria RSS, Simionatto CL, Paniago AF. Clinical evaluation of the treatment of clavicle fractures: intramedullary nail × plate. Acta Ortop Bras. 2021;29:34–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ankers T, Sawalha S, Nixon M, Kenyon P, Webb M. Does a skin incision along Langer’s lines reduce complications following fixation of displaced middle-third clavicle fractures? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03766-7. Online ahead of print.

  22. Wijdicks F-JG, van der Meijden OAJ, Millett PJ, Verleisdonk EJMM, Houwert RM. Systematic review of the complications of plate fixation of clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:617–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Prasarn ML, Meyers KN, Wilkin G, Wellman DS, Chan DB, Ahn J, et al. Dual mini-fragment plating for midshaft clavicle fractures: a clinical and biomechanical investigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135:1655–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen MJ, DeBaun MR, Salazar BP, Lai C, Bishop JA, Gardner MJ. Safety and efficacy of using 2.4/2.4 mm and 2.0/2.4 mm dual mini-fragment plate combinations for fixation of displaced diaphyseal clavicle fractures. Injury. 2020;51:647–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DeBaun MR, Chen MJ, Campbell ST, Goodnough LH, Lai C, Salazar BP, et al. Dual mini-fragment plating is comparable with precontoured small fragment plating for operative diaphyseal clavicle fractures: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34:e229–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sheth U, Fernandez CE, Morgan AM, Henry P, Nam D. Are two plates better than one? A systematic review of dual plating for acute midshaft clavicle fractures. Shoulder Elbow. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732211002495.

  27. Hulsmans MH, van Heijl M, Houwert RM, Burger BJ, Verleisdonk E, Jan M, Veeger DJ, et al. Surgical fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review of biomechanical studies. Injury. 2018;49:753–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wurm M, Zyskowski M, Greve F, Gersing A, Biberthaler P, Kirchhoff C. Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(1):122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dombrowsky AR, Boudreau S, Quade J, Brabston EW, Ponce BA, Momaya AM. Clinical outcomes following conservative and surgical management of floating shoulder injuries: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020;29:634–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Oh JH, Kim SH, Lee JH, Shin SH, Gong HS. Treatment of distal clavicle fracture: a systematic review of treatment modalities in 425 fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:525–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh A, Schultzel M, Fleming JF, Navarro RA. Complications after surgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105:853–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Salazar BP, Chen MJ, Bishop JA, Gardner MJ. Outcomes after locking plate fixation of distal clavicle fractures with and without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31:473–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Laux CJ, Villefort C, el Nashar R, Farei-Campagna JM, Grubhofer F, Bouaicha S, et al. Stand-alone coracoclavicular suture repair achieves very good results in unstable distal clavicle fractures at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2021;30:2090–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kalamaras M, Cutbush K, Robinson M. A method for internal fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures: early observations using a new technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2008;17:60–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vaishya R, Vijay V, Khanna V. Outcome of distal end clavicle fractures treated with locking plates. Chin J Traumatol. 2017;20:45–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Abe S, Koizumi K, Murase T, Kuriyama K. Comparing the locking screw direction of three locking plates for lateral clavicle fractures: a simulation study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Karuppaiah K, Bilal A, Colegate-Stone T, Sinha J, Tahmassebi R, Tavakkolizadeh A. Outcome following management of unstable lateral end clavicle fractures with locking plate and coracoid anchor augmentation. Shoulder Elbow. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573220981708.

  38. Vikas V, Bhatia N, Jalan D, Prakash J, Singh J, Khare S. Clinical outcome of Neer type II lateral end clavicle fractures with coracoclavicular ligament disruption treated with pre-contoured locking plate and endobutton. Cureus. 2021;13(1):e12585.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. **e Z, Song M, Zhou J, Yin G, Lin H. Precontoured locking compression plate with titanium alloy cable system: in treatment of Neer type IIb distal clavicle fracture. Orthop Surg. 2021;13:451–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang F, Fu Q, Li Y, Lu N, Chen A, Zhao L. Locking plate combined with titanium cable for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang J, Guan J, Liu M, Cui Y, Zhang Y. Treatment of distal clavicle fracture of Neer type II with locking plate in combination with titanium cable under the guide. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bakir MS, Unterkofler J, Haralambiev L, Kim S, Carbon R, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Medial injuries of the clavicle: more prevalent than expected? A big data analysis of incidence, age, and gender distribution based on nationwide routine data. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;47:1175–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gumina S, Carbone S, Polizzotti G, Paglialunga C, Preziosi Standoli J, Candela V. The rare medial-end clavicle fractures: epidemiological study on inhabitants of a suburban area. Cureus. 2021;13(9):e18008.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Throckmorton T, Kuhn JE. Fractures of the medial end of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16:49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lindsey MH, Grisdela P, Lu L, Zhang D, Earp B. What are the functional outcomes and pain scores after medial clavicle fracture treatment? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479:2400–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Salipas A, Kimmel LA, Edwards ER, Rakhra S, Moaveni AK. Natural history of medial clavicle fractures. Injury. 2016;47:2235–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sidhu VS, Hermans D, Duckworth DG. The operative outcomes of displaced medial-end clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24:1728–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Frima H, Houwert RM, Sommer C. Displaced medial clavicle fractures: operative treatment with locking compression plate fixation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Li Z, Liu H, Chen D, Chen C, Zhang Y, Xue E. A new technique for medial-end comminuted clavicle fractures. Injury. 2019;50:811–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zúñiga DG, García LF, Leal JA. Biplanar osteosynthesis for severely displaced proximal-third clavicle fracture: a case report. JBJS case. Connect. 2021;11(2) https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.20.00584.

  51. Dion MO, Martel S, Pelet S. Surgical treatment of a medial clavicle fracture nonunion with medial clavicle resection and stabilization to the sternum with palmaris longus graft. Case Rep Orthop. 2019;2019:7123790.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moreno-García, A., Rodríguez-Merchán, E.C. (2022). Clavicle Fractures: To Operate or Not?. In: Rodríguez-Merchán, E.C., Moreno-Garcìa, A. (eds) Controversies in Orthopedic Surgery of The Upper Limb . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04907-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04907-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04906-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04907-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation