SpringerLink
Log in

The Rise and Fall of Evidence-Based Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse

  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

The idea that teaching practices should at least, be informed by evidence, continues to capture the imagination of many politicians and policy makers. Most recently, in Australia, the report – Through Growth to Achievement (Gonski 2.0) – recommends the formation of a National Evidence and Research Institute. Despite the body of work that has raised questions about the feasibility of the idea of evidence-based practice in education (Biesta, Studies in Philosophy and Education 29:491–503, 2010b), there is growing acceptance of the discourse of neoliberalism making further in-roads into the classroom as well as narrowing what is viewed as “good” educational research. This chapter argues for a strengthening of the case for teacher judgment and the role that research can play for professional action in the ambiguous circumstances of teaching. Research can only indicate what has worked, not what will work, which means that the outcomes of research cannot be translated instrumentally into rules for action. Teachers can build an investigative stance to teaching, which involves reflecting on, and theorizing what is happening in their classrooms, schools, and neighborhoods. It takes up the question of local differences as well as a realistic approach to what constitutes actual school improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AITSL. (2011a). Australian Professional Standard for Principals. Carlton South, VIC: MCEECDYA Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • AITSL. (2011b). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Sydney, NSW: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Retrieved from www.aitsl.edu.au

  • AITSL. (2012a). Australian charter for the professional learning of teachers and school leaders. Melbourne, VIC: Education Services Australia Retrieved from aitsl.edu.au/localleadership

  • AITSL. (2012b). Australian teacher performance and development framework. Sydney, NSW: AITSL. Retrieved from aitsl.edu.au/localleadership

  • AITSL. (2015). Preparing future leaders: Effective preparation for aspiring school principals. Sydney, NSW: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. Retrieved from www.aitsl.edu.au

  • AITSL. (2018). Leading for impact: Australian guidelines for school leadership development. Melbourne, VIC: AITSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, E. (2000). In defense of ideas, or why “what works” is not enough. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, R. (2018a). Gonski looks to evidence-based teaching as the way forward. Retrieved 2020, from https://www.theeducatoronline.com/k12/news/gonski-looks-to-evidencebased-teaching-as-the-way-forward/248477

  • Ballantyne, R. (2018b). Inequality in education costing Australia billions – Report. Retrieved 2020, from https://www.theeducatoronline.com/k12/news/inequality-in-education-costing-australia-billions%2D%2Dreport/248385

  • Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2004). Pragmatising the curriculum: Bringing knowledge back into the curriculum conversation, but via pragmatism. Curriculum Journal, 25(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.874954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010a). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO/London, England: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010b). Why “what works” still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2014). Evidence based practice in education: Between science and democracy. In A. D. Reid, E. P. Hart, & M. A. Peters (Eds.), A companion to research in education (pp. 391–400). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, J. M., Aston, R., & Quach, J. (2018). Promoting evidence uptake in schools: A review of the key features of research and evidence institutions. Melbourne, VIC: Report Prepared for Education Excellence Review Secretariat, Department of Education, Australian Government, University of Melbourne. https://doi.org/10.4225/49/5aa61c6c75a9e.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Australian Governments. (2008). National partnership on improving teacher quality. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20130328232835/http://smarterschools.gov.au/

  • Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2003). Death to critique and dissent? The policies and practices of new managerialism and of “evidence-based practice”. Gender and Education, 15(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025032000042167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct. In J. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works (1899–1924) (Vol. 14). Carbondale, IL/Edwardville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DfEE. (1998). Teachers: Meeting the challenge of change. (x). London, England: DfEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, T. (2000). “All the evidence shows …”: Reasonable expectations of educational research. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3–4), 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (2001). Making evidence-based practice educational. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 555–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., & Benefield, P. (2001). Systematic reviews of educational research: Does the medical model fit? British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 527–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2005). New labour and teacher education: The end of an era. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000337228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J., Barton, L., Miles, S., Whiting, C., & Whitty, G. (2000). Teacher education in transition. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2017). The prevailing logic of teacher education: Priveleging the practical in Australia, England and Scotland. In M. A. Peters, B. Cowie, & I. Menter (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education. Singapore, Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D., Arcus, T., Boston, K., Gould, V., Johnson, W., O’Brien, L., … Roberts, M. (2018). Through growth to achievement: Report of the review to achieve educational excellence in Australian schools. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA “effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2010). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap (Vol. 2). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (1997). Educational research and teaching: A response to David Hargreaves’ TTA lecture. British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2000). Some questions about evidence-based practice in education. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, September 13–15, 2001, Faculty of Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001819.htm

  • Hammersley, M. (2001). On “systematic” reviews of research literatures: A “narrative” response to Evans and Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2002). Research and evidence-based practice in education: An assessment of David Hargreaves’ critique. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research, policymaking and practice. London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I. (2010). Teacher learning: A call to complexity. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(5), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2010.516956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1996, April). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. Paper presented at the Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1997). In defence of research for evidence-based teaching: A rejoinder to Martin Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). Revitalising educational research: Lessons from the past and proposals for the future. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(2), 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2001a). A capital theory of school effectiveness and improvement. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2001b, 13–15 September). Qualifications and curriculum authority: The Nuttall Memorial/Carfax Lecture – BERA 2001. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference, Melbourne, VIC, 19–21 October 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, D. (2018). What price the gap? Education and inequality in Australia: Issues paper. Retrieved 2020, from https://publiceducationfoundation.org.au/what-price-the-gap-education-and-inequality-in-australia/#:~:text=Education%20and%20Inequality%20in%20Australia%E2%80%9D%20reveals%20that%20growing%20educational%20inequality,equivalent%20to%201.2%25%20of%20GDP

  • Hodgkinson, P. (2000). Who wants to be a social engineer? A commentary on David Blunkett’s speech to the ESRC. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/1/hodgkinson.html

  • Lingard, B., & Renshaw, P. (2010). Teaching as research-informed and research-informing profession. In A. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education (pp. 26–39). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2008). Evidence-based policy in the age of spin: On politics and truth. In K. Michael & M. G. Micheal (Eds.), Australia and the new technologoes: Evidence based policy in public administration. Wollongong, NSW: University of Wollongong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, O., & Murray, J. (2013). The School Direct programme and its implications for research-informed teacher education and teacher educators. In L. Florian & N. Pantić (Eds.), Learning to teach: Exploring the history and role of higher education in teacher education (pp. 3–8). London, England: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menter, I., Hulme, M., Elliot, D., & Jon, L. (2010). Literature review on teacher education in the 21st century. Edinburgh, UK: Education Analytical Services, Schools Research, Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C., & Gale, T. (2010). Schooling in disadvantaged comunities: Playing the game from the back of the field. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, P. (2020). The shock of dealing with Covid-19 has made teachers even stronger and better at their craft. EduResearch Matters. https://www.aare.edu.au/blog/?p=7103

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, develo** and retaining effective teachers (6th ed.). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirrie, A. (2001). Evidence-based practice in education: The best medicine? British Journal of Educational Studies, 49(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London, England/New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2016). National education evidence base, inquiry report no. 80. Retrieved from https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/education-evidence/report

  • Reid, A. (2018). Beyond Certainty: A Process for Thinking About Futures for Australian Education. Commissioned by the Australian Secondary Principals’ Association (ASPA). https://www.saspa.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/aspa0001_Monograph_digital.pdf

  • Ridgway, J., Zawojewski, J. S., & Hoover, M. N. (2000). Problematising evidence-based policy and practice. Evaluation & Research in Education, 14(3–4), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790008666971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B. (2003). Educational research for professional practice: More than providing evidence for doing “x rather than y” of finding the “size of the effect of A on B”. Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, E. E., & Gale, T. (2018). Labor proposes a new $280m Evidence Institute for Schools, but where is the evidence we need it?. EduResearch Matters. Retrieved 3 Oct 2018, from http://www.aare.edu.au/blog/?tag=evidence-institute-for-schools

  • Sachs, J. (2000). The activist professional. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, I. (2003). Is it “what works” that matters? Evaluation and evidence-based policy-making. Research Papers in Education, 18(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, H., Kushner, S., Jones, K., & James, D. (2003). From evidence-based practice to practice-based evidence: The idea of situated generalisation. Research Papers in Education, 18(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skourdoumbis, A., & Gale, T. (2013). Classroom teacher effectiveness research: A conceptual critique. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 892–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2004). Education research can and must address “what works” questions. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 27–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2008a). Evidence-based reform in education: What will it take? European Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 124–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2008b). Evidence-based reform in education: Which evidence counts? Educational Researcher, 37(1), 47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2008c). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education: What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St Pierre, E. A. (2002). “Science” rejects postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 25–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, England: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEMAG. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/action_now_classroom_ready_teachers_print.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Bev Rogers

Authors
  1. Bev Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bev Rogers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Leadership, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA

    Fenwick W. English

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rogers, B. (2022). The Rise and Fall of Evidence-Based Research. In: English, F.W. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99097-8_64

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation