Understanding Social Constructionism of Water Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Constructions of Water Quality in South Africa
  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents social constructionism as the theoretical framing used in this book. Research situated within the social sciences has to be driven by a theoretical framework that enables the researcher to concentrate on a social analysis of the topic. The subject matter of this book is dominated by the natural sciences and creates a stark contrast with the social sciences, which focuses on the human element. Perceptions, attitudes or constructions are core elements of the human condition. Coexistence between the human and natural sciences, between human beings and nature and between objective conditions and perceptions guided the research towards social constructionism as the foundation of this research conducted for this book. Social constructionism in the context of water is directly related to the hydrosocial cycle. The hydrosocial cycle is therefore an important concept underlying most of the discussions on social constructionism in this book. In this chapter, social constructionism is explained, followed by a discussion of the social construction of nature and the hydrosocial cycle and social constructionism of water and water quality through the use of examples that further illustrate how social constructions embed power relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera-Klink, F., Perez-Moriana, E. & Sanchez-Garcia, J. 2000. The social construction of scarity: The case of water in Tenerife (Canary Islands). Ecological Economics, 34(2):223–245. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800900001609. Accessed on: 8 March 2017.

  • Andrews, T. 2012. What is social constructionism? Grounded Theory Review: An international Journal, (1)11. Available at: http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2012/06/01/what-is-social-constructionism/. Accessed on: 6 March 2017.

  • Bălan, S. 2010. M. Foucault’s view on power relations’. Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, 11(61). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321161337. Accessed on: 21 April 2020.

  • Bakker, K. 2003. The political ecology of water privatisation. Journal Studies in Political Economy A Socialist Review, 70(1):35–58. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07078552.2003.11827129?journalCode=rsor20. Accessed on: 20 May 2020.

  • Bakker, K. 2012. Water: Political, biopolitical, material. Social Studies of Science, 42(4):616–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelens, R. 2014. Cultural politics and the hydro-social cycle: Water, power and identity in the Andean Highlands. Geoforum, 57:234–247. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718513000432. Accessed on: 4 April 2017.

  • Bruffee, KA. 1986. Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English, 48(8):773–790. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/376723?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Accessed on: 4 April 2017.

  • Budds, J. & Hinojosa, L. 2012. Restructuring and rescaling water governance in mining contexts: The co-production of waterscapes in Peru. Water Alternatives, 5(1):119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, V. 2003. Social constructionism (2nd edition). London & New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, V. 2015. What is social constructionism? (3rd edition). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, G., Potter, RB. & Nortcliff, S. 2011. Water reuse for irrigation in Jordan: Perceptions of water quality among farmers. Agricultural Water Management, 98:847–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. & Braun, B. 1998. The construction of nature and the nature if construction: Analytical and political tools for building survivable futures. In Remaking reality: Nature at them. Edited by Castree, N. & Braun, B. New York, NY: Routledge:3–42. Available at: https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zgKIAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA2&dq=Castree+and+Braun+1998&ots=WOtC7pKQh&sig=AprMz_CRx75HXmpWFIICSA_**_g#v=onepage&q=Castree%20and%20Braun%201998&f=false. Accessed on: 3 April 2017.

  • Castree, N. 2001. Socializing nature: Theory, practice and politics. In Social nature: Theory, practice and politics. Edited by Castree, N. & Braun, B. Oxford and Malden: Basil Blackwell: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. 2013. Map** water: Thinking with watery places. In Thinking with water. Edited by Chen, C., MacLeod, J., & Neimanis, AG. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press: 274–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt, D. 1999. Contested natures. Environment and Planning: Society & Space, 17(3):372–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt, D. 2001. Being constructive about nature. In Social nature: Theory, practice and politics. Edited by Castree, N. & Braun, B. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers: 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt, D. 2002. What is the social construction of nature? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography, 26(6):768–790. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1191/0309132502ph402oa?journalCode=phgb. Accessed on: 8 March 2017.

  • Freitag, A. 2014. Naming, framing, and blaming: Exploring ways of knowing in the deceptively simple question ‘what is water quality?’ Springer Science & Business Media, 42(2):325–337. Available at: https://springer.longhoe.net/article/10.1007/s10745-014-9649-5. Accessed on: 8 March 2017.

  • Gergen, MM. & Gergen, KJ. 2004. Reflections: Between Narcissus and Dorian Grey. Community & Applied Psychology, 14(4):299–301. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.775/abstract. Accessed on: 3 April 2017.

  • Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what? London: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=&id=XkCR1p2YMRwC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=social+construction&ots=NF1cQ4Ysl3&sig=UmjKQz-xryP7rC9GMSROuIWazak#v=onepage&q=social%20construction&f=false. Accessed on: 6 March 2017.

  • Harrison, BC. & Dye, TR. 2008. Power and society: An introduction to the social sciences (11th edition). Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, CM. & Burgess, J. 1994. Social constructions of nature: A case study of conflicts over the development of Rainham marshes. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(3):291–310. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/622324?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Accessed on: 3 April 2017.

  • Heft, H. 1981. An examination of constructivist and Gibsonian approaches to environmental psychology. Springer, 4(4):227–245. Available at: https://springer.longhoe.net/article/10.1007/BF01375628. Accessed on: 6 March 2017. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393414?seq=1. Accessed on: 10 October 2018.

  • Ibarra, H. & Andrews, SB. 1993. Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perception. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2):277–303. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393414?seq=1. Accessed on: 10 October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaika, M. 2003. Constructing scarcity and sensationalising water politics: 170 days that shook Athens. Antipode, 35(5):919–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, F. & Strang, V. 2016. Thinking relationships through water. Society & Natural Resources, 29(6):633–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, SG. 2006. Commodification of nature: Social construction of bottled spring water. Oslo: University of Oslo. Available at: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/17790/Imsdal.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed on: 1 November 2017.

  • Linton, J. 2010. What is water? The history of a modern abstraction. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J. & Budds, J. 2014. The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilising a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 57:170–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J., Cromar, N., Fallowfield, H. & Oemcke, D. 2003. Community experience and perceptions of water reuse. Available at: http://ws.iwaponline.com/content/3/3/9. Accessed on: 26 January 2017.

  • Mehta, L. 2003. Contexts and constructions of scarcity. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(48): 1–12. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lyla_Mehta/publication/251901079_Contexts_and_constructions_of_water_scarcity/links/560e4c8908ae967420111f88.pdf. Accessed on: 8 March 2017.

  • Mehta, L. 2011. The social construction of scarcity: The case of water in western India. In Global political ecology. Edited by Peet, R., Robbins, P. & Watts, MJ. London & New York: Routledge: 654–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeng, K. 2018. Community perceptions on the health risks of acid mine drainage: The environmental justice struggles of communities near mining fields. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21:2619–2640. Available at: https://0-doi-org.oasis.unisa.ac.za/10.1007/s10668-018-0149-4. Accessed on. 1 June 2020.

  • Molle, F., Wester, P, Hirsch, P., Jensen, JR., Murray-Rust, H., Paranjpye, V., Pollard, S & Van der Zaag, P. 2007. River basin development and management. In Water for life: A comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Edited by Molden, D. London; Earthscan: 585-624. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40794254_River_basin_development_and_management. Accessed on: 5 September 2019.

  • Mpofu, C., Morodi, TJ. & Hattingh, JP. 2018. Governance and socio-political issues in management of acid mine drainage in South Africa. Water Policy, 20:77–89. Available at: https://iwaponline.com/wp/article/20/1/77/38136/Governance-and-socio-politicalissues-in. Accessed on: 1 June 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, ES. & Bakker, K. 2009. Transgressing scales: Water governance across the Canada–U.S. borderland. Annals of the Association of American, 99(1):99–117. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0004-5608.00157. Accessed on: 2 February 2017.

  • Ohlsson, L. & Turton, A. 2000. The turning of a screw: Social resource scarcity as a bottle-neck in adaption to water scarcity. Available at: https://www.soas.ac.uk/water/publications/papers/file38362.pdf. Accessed on: 24 May 2018.

  • Ohlsson, L. & Turton, A. 2003. Water scarcity and social stability: Towards a deeper understanding of the key concepts needed to manage water scarcity in develo** countries. Available at: https://www.soas.ac.uk/water/publications/papers/file38360.pdf. Accessed on: 31 May 2018.

  • Oktem, O. 2015. Water politics and political culture: Turkey’s compatibility with the European Union. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomino-Schalscha. M., Leaman-Constanzo. C. & Bond. S. 2016. Contested water, contests development: Unpacking the hydro-social cycle of the Nuble River, Chile. Third World Quarterly, 37(5):883–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, E. 2014. The social construction of water in Dominica and how it has influenced use and exportation. Phoenix: University of Arizona. Available at: http://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/3570237761/fmt/ai/rep/NPDF?_s=%2FP0hpYCMw19x%2FWxRHTCaNR5X6xY%3D. Accessed on: 22 February 2017.

  • Pinch, T. & Bijker, W. 1987. The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Edited by Bijker W., Hughes T. & Pinch T. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 399–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Po, M., Kaercher, JD. & Nancarrow, BE. 2003. Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water reuse (CSIRO Land and Water, Technical Report 54/03). Available at: https://www.clearwater.asn.au/user-data/research-projects/swf-files/16-laying-the-foundation-for-confident-barrier-free-water-conservation-and-reuse-literature-review.pdf. Accessed on: 26 January 2017.

  • Schmidt, JJ. 2014. Historicising the hydrosocial cycle. Water Alternatives, 7(1):220–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, V. 2004. The meaning of water. London: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, V. 2008. The social construction of water. In Handbook of landscape archaeology. Edited by David, B. & Thomas, J.: 123-130. Available at: https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=&id=9bRJDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA123&dq=veronica+strang+2008&ots=EM7K-XIkwx&sig=fSQObJJmH0pEVhnr5jjv-Vw18fg#v=onepage&q&f=false.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 1999. Modernity and hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3):443–465. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/0004-5608.00157. Accessed on: 2 February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 2009. The political economy and political ecology of the hydrosocial cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 142:56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torregrosa, ML., de las Mercedes, D., Acosta, A. & Kloster, K. 2019. Water and society: The multidimensionality of water quality. In Water quality in the Americas: Risks and opportunities. Edited by The Inter-American Network of Academies of Sciences. Mexico: INAS: 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trottier, J. 2008. Water crises: Political construction or physical reality? Contemporary Politics, 14(2):197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tvedt, T. 2015. Water and society: Changing perceptions of societal and historical development. London, New York: IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagemans, JP. 1986. Direct theory of perception: An evaluation by representatives of indirect theories of perception. L’annee psychologique, 86(2):261–273. Available at: http://www.persee.fr/doc/psy_0003-5033_1986_num_86_2_29144. Accessed on: 6 March 2017.

  • Wessels, M., Veldwisch GJ., Kujawa, K. & Delcarme, B. 2019. Upsetting the apple cart? Export fruit production, water pollution and social unrest in the Elgin Valley, South Africa. Water International, 44(2):188–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. & Boucher, S. 1993. Bargaining with nature: The discourse and practice of environmental planning gain. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 8(3):166–178. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/622360?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Accessed on: 3 April 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarteveen, M. 2015. Regulating water, ordering society: Practices and politics of water governance. Amsterdam: UNESCO Institute for Water Education, Universiteit van Amstar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Naidoo, S. (2022). Understanding Social Constructionism of Water Quality. In: Social Constructions of Water Quality in South Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98237-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation