Towards an Intra-BRICS Implementation and Accountability Framework on Sustainable Development Goals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of Intra-BRICS Cooperation

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires an effective, legitimate, collaborative and well-function system of accountability that enables various account holders to take different responsibilities to achieve the goals. This is an essential lesson from the 15 years of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). It is something that has also been under development for some time since the mid-2000s. The BRICS is a significant platform in international development diplomacy by virtue of the size of their voice and the potential weight of their exemplary conduct concerning matters of the global public good. Together they account for about 43% of the global population, about 25% of the global GDP, 11% of global foreign direct investment flows and 17% of world trade. The BRICS countries have made the achievement of development goals crucial for realising the vision of an inclusive, just and equitable world system. They have also committed themselves to achieve SDG. In their Goa summit meeting in India in 2016, the (BRICS 2016) countries welcomed the world’s commitment to a people-centred and holistic approach to sustainable development and the emphasis on equality, equity and quality of life. They supported the reaffirmation of common but differentiated responsibilities as a guiding principle. In 2017, in China, the BRICS countries committed to enhance BRICS cooperation on climate change and expand green financing (BRICS 2017). They are committed to results-oriented cooperation. There is no better way in which BRICS could play a catalytic role in this area than to adopt an intra-BRICS accountability framework and, secondly, champion accountability across the world as a form of “exemplary behaviour”. This chapter discusses how this implementation and mutual accountability framework could be framed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The high-level political forum on sustainable development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6(3), 222–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, M. (2017a). BRICS and MDGs. In The economies of China and India (pp. 325–341). World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, M. (2017b). India and the MDGs in the context of develo** countries particularly in South Asia. In The economies of China and India (pp. 55–73). World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (2004). The liberal virus: Permanent war and the Americanization of the world. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaut, J. M. (1993). The colonizer’s model of the world: Geographical diffusionism and Eurocentric history, (Vol. 1). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BRICS. (2015). 7th BRICS Summit: Ufa Declaration Ufa, Russia, July 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRICS. (2016a). 8th BRICS Summit: Goa Declaration Goa, India, October 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRICS. (2016b). 8th BRICS Summit: Goa Declaration Goa, India, October 16. http://sabtt.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Goa-declaration-2016b.pdf

  • Bruner, J. L. (2012). Is poverty reduction enough?: Lessons from Bolsa Familia in Brazil. In Learning and doing policy analysis in education (pp. 13–40). Brill Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Development Policy. (2013). The United Nations Development Strategy Beyond 2015. In The United Nations Development Strategy Beyond 2015. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engebretsen, E., Heggen, K., & Ottersen, O. P. (2017). The sustainable development goals: Ambiguities of accountability. The Lancet, 389(10067), 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, Francisco, H. G., Leite, P. G., Bourguignon, F., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2003). Meeting the millennium development goals in Brazil: Can microeconomic simulations help? [With comments]. Economía, 3(2), 235–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S. (2004). Millennium development goals: Why they matter. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 10(4), 395–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S., & Greenstein, J. P. (2011). Accountability and MDGs: Methodology for measuring government performance for global goals (UNICEF Social and Economic Working Paper, June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S., Greenstein, J., & Stewart, D. (2013). How should MDG success and failure be judged: Faster progress or achieving the targets? World Development, 41, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2009). A decolonial approach to political-economy: Transmodernity, border thinking and global coloniality. Kult Fall, 6, 10–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1992). The west and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp. 275–332). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidelberg, R. L. (2017). Political accountability and spaces of contestation. Administration & Society, 49(10), 1379–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Dahl, A. L., & Persson, Å. (2018). The emerging accountability regimes for the sustainable development goals and policy integration: Friend or foe? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(8), 1371–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ki-Moon, B. (2013). United Nations Pubns (The Millennium Development Goals Report 2013). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, B. (2010). Who are the MDG Trailblazers? A new MDG progress index (Center for Global Development Working Paper [222]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maathai, W. (2011). Challenge for Africa. Sustainability Science, 6(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, P., & Lucci, P. (2013). Recasting MDG 8: Global policies for inclusive growth (Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Policy Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. (2013). Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: On (de)coloniality, border thinking, and epistemic disobedience. Confero Essays on Education Philosophy and Politics, 1(1), 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motala, S., Ngandu, S., Mti, S., Arends, F., Winnaar, L., Khalema, E., Makiwane, M., Ndinda, C., Moolman, B., Maluleke, T., & Chola, L. (2015). Millennium development goals: Country report 2015. Statistics South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2013). Why decoloniality in the 21st century. The Thinker, 48, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nhamo, G. (2017). New global sustainable development agenda: A focus on Africa. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nhema, A. G. (2010). An MDG-plus agenda for Africa. IDS Bulletin, 41(1), 127–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobhan, R. (2013). Designing MDGs for a more just world (Southern Voices of Post-2015 International Development Goals Occasional Paper [1]).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN High Level Panel. (2013). Millennium development goals.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Group. (2003). Indicators for monitoring the millennium development goals definitions rationale concepts and sources. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren, L. (2010). Time running out as Africa sprints towards MDG deadline: Water and sanitation. Water Wheel, 9(1), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zondi, S. (2016). Ubuntu and Sumak Kawsay: The inter-parliamentary union and the search for a global south humanist paradigm of development. South African Journal of International Affairs, 23(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zondi, S. (2018). Decolonising international relations and its theory: A critical conceptual meditation. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 45(1), 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siphamandla Zondi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zondi, S. (2022). Towards an Intra-BRICS Implementation and Accountability Framework on Sustainable Development Goals. In: Zondi, S. (eds) The Political Economy of Intra-BRICS Cooperation. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97397-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation