Abstract
The implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires an effective, legitimate, collaborative and well-function system of accountability that enables various account holders to take different responsibilities to achieve the goals. This is an essential lesson from the 15 years of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). It is something that has also been under development for some time since the mid-2000s. The BRICS is a significant platform in international development diplomacy by virtue of the size of their voice and the potential weight of their exemplary conduct concerning matters of the global public good. Together they account for about 43% of the global population, about 25% of the global GDP, 11% of global foreign direct investment flows and 17% of world trade. The BRICS countries have made the achievement of development goals crucial for realising the vision of an inclusive, just and equitable world system. They have also committed themselves to achieve SDG. In their Goa summit meeting in India in 2016, the (BRICS 2016) countries welcomed the world’s commitment to a people-centred and holistic approach to sustainable development and the emphasis on equality, equity and quality of life. They supported the reaffirmation of common but differentiated responsibilities as a guiding principle. In 2017, in China, the BRICS countries committed to enhance BRICS cooperation on climate change and expand green financing (BRICS 2017). They are committed to results-oriented cooperation. There is no better way in which BRICS could play a catalytic role in this area than to adopt an intra-BRICS accountability framework and, secondly, champion accountability across the world as a form of “exemplary behaviour”. This chapter discusses how this implementation and mutual accountability framework could be framed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The high-level political forum on sustainable development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6(3), 222–233.
Agarwal, M. (2017a). BRICS and MDGs. In The economies of China and India (pp. 325–341). World Scientific.
Agarwal, M. (2017b). India and the MDGs in the context of develo** countries particularly in South Asia. In The economies of China and India (pp. 55–73). World Scientific.
Amin, S. (2004). The liberal virus: Permanent war and the Americanization of the world. Monthly Review Press.
Blaut, J. M. (1993). The colonizer’s model of the world: Geographical diffusionism and Eurocentric history, (Vol. 1). Guilford Press.
Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.
BRICS. (2015). 7th BRICS Summit: Ufa Declaration Ufa, Russia, July 9.
BRICS. (2016a). 8th BRICS Summit: Goa Declaration Goa, India, October 16.
BRICS. (2016b). 8th BRICS Summit: Goa Declaration Goa, India, October 16. http://sabtt.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Goa-declaration-2016b.pdf
Bruner, J. L. (2012). Is poverty reduction enough?: Lessons from Bolsa Familia in Brazil. In Learning and doing policy analysis in education (pp. 13–40). Brill Sense.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(1).
Committee for Development Policy. (2013). The United Nations Development Strategy Beyond 2015. In The United Nations Development Strategy Beyond 2015. United Nations.
Engebretsen, E., Heggen, K., & Ottersen, O. P. (2017). The sustainable development goals: Ambiguities of accountability. The Lancet, 389(10067), 365.
Ferreira, Francisco, H. G., Leite, P. G., Bourguignon, F., & Rodríguez-Clare, A. (2003). Meeting the millennium development goals in Brazil: Can microeconomic simulations help? [With comments]. Economía, 3(2), 235–279.
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2004). Millennium development goals: Why they matter. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 10(4), 395–402.
Fukuda-Parr, S., & Greenstein, J. P. (2011). Accountability and MDGs: Methodology for measuring government performance for global goals (UNICEF Social and Economic Working Paper, June).
Fukuda-Parr, S., Greenstein, J., & Stewart, D. (2013). How should MDG success and failure be judged: Faster progress or achieving the targets? World Development, 41, 19–30.
Grosfoguel, R. (2009). A decolonial approach to political-economy: Transmodernity, border thinking and global coloniality. Kult Fall, 6, 10–38.
Hall, S. (1992). The west and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp. 275–332). Polity Press.
Heidelberg, R. L. (2017). Political accountability and spaces of contestation. Administration & Society, 49(10), 1379–1402.
Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Dahl, A. L., & Persson, Å. (2018). The emerging accountability regimes for the sustainable development goals and policy integration: Friend or foe? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(8), 1371–1390.
Ki-Moon, B. (2013). United Nations Pubns (The Millennium Development Goals Report 2013). New York.
Leo, B. (2010). Who are the MDG Trailblazers? A new MDG progress index (Center for Global Development Working Paper [222]).
Maathai, W. (2011). Challenge for Africa. Sustainability Science, 6(1), 1–2.
Martins, P., & Lucci, P. (2013). Recasting MDG 8: Global policies for inclusive growth (Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Policy Paper).
Mignolo, W. (2013). Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: On (de)coloniality, border thinking, and epistemic disobedience. Confero Essays on Education Philosophy and Politics, 1(1), 129–150.
Motala, S., Ngandu, S., Mti, S., Arends, F., Winnaar, L., Khalema, E., Makiwane, M., Ndinda, C., Moolman, B., Maluleke, T., & Chola, L. (2015). Millennium development goals: Country report 2015. Statistics South Africa.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2013). Why decoloniality in the 21st century. The Thinker, 48, 11–15.
Nhamo, G. (2017). New global sustainable development agenda: A focus on Africa. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 227–241.
Nhema, A. G. (2010). An MDG-plus agenda for Africa. IDS Bulletin, 41(1), 127–128.
Sobhan, R. (2013). Designing MDGs for a more just world (Southern Voices of Post-2015 International Development Goals Occasional Paper [1]).
UN High Level Panel. (2013). Millennium development goals.
United Nations Development Group. (2003). Indicators for monitoring the millennium development goals definitions rationale concepts and sources. New York.
Van Vuuren, L. (2010). Time running out as Africa sprints towards MDG deadline: Water and sanitation. Water Wheel, 9(1), 25–27.
Zondi, S. (2016). Ubuntu and Sumak Kawsay: The inter-parliamentary union and the search for a global south humanist paradigm of development. South African Journal of International Affairs, 23(1).
Zondi, S. (2018). Decolonising international relations and its theory: A critical conceptual meditation. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 45(1), 16–31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zondi, S. (2022). Towards an Intra-BRICS Implementation and Accountability Framework on Sustainable Development Goals. In: Zondi, S. (eds) The Political Economy of Intra-BRICS Cooperation. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97397-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97397-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97396-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97397-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)