SpringerLink
Log in

Safety Warnings for Automation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Springer Handbook of Automation

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks ((SHB))

  • 4559 Accesses

Abstract

Automated systems can provide tremendous benefits to users; however, there are also potential hazards that users must be aware of to safely operate and interact with them. To address this need, safety warnings are often provided to operators and others who might be placed at risk by the system. This chapter discusses some of the roles safety warnings can play in automated systems. During this discussion, the chapter addresses some of the types of warnings that might be used, along with issues and challenges related to warning effectiveness. Design recommendations and guidelines are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 399.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parasuraman, R., Riley, V.A.: Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum. Factors. 39, 230–253 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D.: How in the world did we get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Hum. Factors. 37(1), 5–19 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Perrow, C.: Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Endsley, M.R.: Automation and situation awareness. In: Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M. (eds.) Automation and Human Performance, pp. 163–181. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Metzger, U., Parasuraman, R.: The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: an empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring. Hum. Factors. 43(4), 519–528 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Hum. Factors. 37(2), 381–394 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lehto, M.R., Clark, D.R.: Warning signs and labels in the workplace. In: Karwowski, W., Mital, A. (eds.) Workspace, Equipment and Tool Design, pp. 303–344. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehto, M.R., Salvendy, G.: Warnings: a supplement not a substitute for other approaches to safety. Ergonomics. 38(11), 2155–2163 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Antwi-Afari, M.F., Li, H., Wong, J.K.-W., Oladinrin, O.T., Ge, J.X., Seo, J., Wong, A.Y.L.: Sensing and warning-based technology applications to improve occupational health and safety in the construction industry: a literature review. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26(8), 1534–1552 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2018-0188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Safety Light Curtains | DeTec | SICK. https://www.sick.com/us/en/opto-electronic-protective-devices/safety-light-curtains/detec/c/g461751. Accessed 22 May 2021.

  13. Described Product S300 Safety Laser Scanner. https://cdn.sick.com/media/docs/3/13/613/operating_instructions_s300_safety_laser_scanner_en_im0017613.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2021.

  14. Intelligent Safety Concept for Protecting Robots | SICK. https://www.sick.com/us/en/industries/household-appliances/material-infeed-housing-mounting/intelligent-safety-concept-for-protecting-robots/c/p663809). Accessed 22 May 2021.

  15. Safe Human-Robot Collaboration in the Final Assembly of Electric Motors | SICK. https://www.sick.com/us/en/industries/automotive-and-parts-suppliers/parts-suppliers/powertrain-suppliers/safe-human-robot-collaboration-in-the-final-assembly-of-electric-motors/c/p571844. Accessed 22 May 2021.

  16. Meyer, J.: Responses to dynamic warnings. In: Wogalter, M.S. (ed.) Handbook of Warnings, pp. 89–108. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lehto, M.R.: Optimal warnings: an information and decision theoretic perspective. In: Wogalter, M.S. (ed.) Handbook of Warnings, pp. 89–108. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Duffy, R.R., Kalsher, M.J., Wogalter, M.S.: Increased effectiveness of an interactive warning in a realistic incidental product-use situation. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 15, 159–166 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frantz, J.P., Rhoades, J.M.: A task-analytic approach to the temporal and spatial placement of product warnings. Hum. Factors. 35, 719–730 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wogalter, M.S., Barlow, T., Murphy, S.A.: Compliance to owner’s manual warnings: influence of familiarity and the placement of a supplemental directive. Ergonomics. 38, 1081–1091 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.: Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Wogalter, M.S., Vigilante, W.J.: Attention switch and maintenance. In: Wogalter, M.S. (ed.) Handbook of Warnings, pp. 89–108. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Young, S.L., Wogalter, M.S.: Effects of conspicuous print and pictorial icons on comprehension and memory of instruction manual warnings. Hum. Factors. 32, 637–649 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lehto, M.R., Miller, J.M.: Warnings, Volume 1: Fundamentals, Design and Evaluation Methodologies. Fuller Technical, Ann Arbor (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sanderson, P.: The multimodal world of medical monitoring displays. Appl. Ergon. 37, 501–512 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sanders, M.S., McCormick, E.J.: Human Factors in Engineering and Design, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wogalter, M.S., Kalser, M.J., Racicot, B.M.: Behavioral compliance with warnings: effects of voice, context, and location. Saf. Sci. 16, 637–654 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wogalter, M.S., Young, S.L.: Behavioural compliance to voice and print warnings. Ergonomics. 34, 79–89 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Coren, S., Ward, L.M.: Sensation and Perception, 3rd edn. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Edworthy, J., Hellier, E.: Complex nonverbal auditory signals and speech warnings. In: Wogalter, M.S. (ed.) Handbook of Warnings, pp. 89–108. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Warren, R.M., Warren, R.P.: Auditory illusions and confusions. Sci. Am. 223, 30–36 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Samuel, A.G.: Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 110, 474–494 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Momtahan, K.L.: Map** of Psychoacoustic Parameters to the Perceived Urgency of Auditory Warning Signals. Carleton University, Ottawa Ontario (1990). Unpublished Master’s thesis

    Google Scholar 

  34. Edworthy, J., Loxley, S.L., Dennis, I.D.: Improving auditory warning design: relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Hum. Factors. 33, 205–231 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, J.D., Hoffman, J.D., Hayes, E.: Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 65–72. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ng, J.Y.C., Man, J.C.F., Fels, S., Dumont, G., Ansermino, J.M.: An evaluation of a vibro-tactile display prototype for physiological monitoring. Anesth. Analg. 101, 1719–1724 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hickey, J.J.: Shoulder Rumble Strip Effectiveness: Drift-off-road Accident Reductions on the Pennsylvania Turnpike (Transportation Research Record 1573), pp. 105–109. Washington, National Research Council (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Selcon, S.J., Taylor, R.M., Shadrake, R.A.: Multimodal cockpit warnings: pictures, words or both? In: Proc. Hum. Factors Soc. 36th Annu. Meet., pp. 57–61. Human Factor Society, Santa Monica (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Selcon, S.J., Taylor, R.M.: Evaluation of the situational awareness rating technique (SART) as a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Proc. AGARD AMP Symp. Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations. Copenhagen (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Proc. AGARD AMP Symp. Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations. Copenhagen (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sklar, A.E., Sarter, N.B.: Good vibrations: tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Hum. Factors. 41, 543–552 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ho, C., Reed, N., Spence, C.: Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance. Hum. Factors. 49(6), 1107–1114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X249965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Conzola, V.C., Wogalter, M.S.: Using voice and print directives and warnings to supplement product manual instructions – conspicuous print and pictorial icons. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 23, 549–556 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Penney, C.G.: Modality effects in short-term verbal memory. Psychol. Bull. 82, 68–84 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Automated Vehicles for Safety | NHTSA: (2020) Retrieved from https://www.nhtsa.gov/technology-innovation/automated-vehicles-safety

  46. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. Part A: Syst. Hum. 30(3), 286–297 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors. 37(1), 32–64 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Parasuraman, R.: Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models. Ergonomics. 43(7), 931–951 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Horrey, W.J., Wickens, C.D., Strauss, R., Kirlik, A., Stewart, T.R.: Supporting situation assessment through attention guidance and diagnostic aiding: the benefits and costs of display enhancement on judgment skill. In: Kirlik, A. (ed.) Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction: Methods and Models for Cognitive Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 55–70. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Flanagan, P., McAnally, K.I., Martin, R.L., Meehan, J.W., Oldfield, S.R.: Aurally and visually guided visual search in a virtual environment. Hum. Factors. 40(3), 461–468 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yeh, M., Wickens, C.D., Seagull, F.J.: Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention. Hum. Factors. 41(4), 524–542 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Graham, S.E., Matthews, M.D.: Infantry Situation Awareness: Papers from the 1998 Infantry Situation Awareness Workshop. US Army Research Institute, Alexandria (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Davison, H., Wickens, C.D.: Rotorcraft hazard cueing: the effects on attention and trust. In: Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Aviat. Psychol. Columbus. The Ohio State University, Columbus (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mosier, K.L., Skitka, L.J., Heers, S., Burdick, M.: Automation bias: decision making and performance in high-tech cockpits. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 8(1), 47–63 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wickens, C.D., Gempler, K., Morphew, M.E.: Workload and reliability of predictor displays in aircraft traffic avoidance. Transp. Hum. Factors. 2(2), 99–126 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L., Reyes, M.L.: Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Hum. Factors. 44(2), 314–334 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Kramer, A.F., Cassavaugh, N., Horrey, W.J., Becic, E., Mayhugh, J.L.: Influence of age and proximity warning devices on collision avoidance in simulated driving. Hum. Factors. 49(5), 935–949 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Maltz, M., Shinar, D.: Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid drivers. Hum. Factors. 46(2), 357–366 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Dingus, T.A., McGehee, D.V., Manakkal, N., Jahns, S.K., Carney, C., Hankey, J.M.: Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices. Hum. Factors. 39(2), 216–229 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sarter, N.B., Schroeder, B.: Supporting decision making and action selection under time pressure and uncertainty: the case of in-flight icing. Hum. Factors. 43(4), 573–583 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wiegmann, D.A., Rich, A., Zhang, H.: Automated diagnostic aids: the effects of aid reliability on users’ trust and reliance. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2(4), 352–367 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Dixon, S.R., Wickens, C.D.: Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Hum. Factors. 48(3), 474–486 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Seagull, F.J., Sanderson, P.M.: Anesthesia alarms in context: an observational study. Hum. Factors. 43(1), 66–78 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. Automatica. 19, 775–779 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Henderson, J.A., Twerski, A.D.: Doctrinal collapse in products liability: the empty shell of failure to warn. New York Univ. Law Rev. 65(2), 265–327 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Papastavrou, J., Lehto, M.R.: Improving the effectiveness of warnings by increasing the appropriateness of their information content: some hypotheses about human compliance. Saf. Sci. 21, 175–189 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  67. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Dover, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Lehto, M.R., Papastavrou, J.: Models of the warning process: important implications towards effectiveness. Saf. Sci. 16, 569–595 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wogalter, M.S., Dejoy, D.M., Laughery, K.R.: Organizing theoretical framework: a consolidated-human information processing (C-HIP) model. In: Wogalter, M., DeJoy, D., Laughery, K. (eds.) Warnings and Risk Communication. Taylor and Francis, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Miller, J.M., Lehto, M.R.: Warnings and Safety Instructions: The Annotated Bibliography, 4th edn. Fuller Technical, Ann Arbor (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Papastavrou, J., Lehto, M.R.: A distributed signal detection theory model: implications for the design of warnings. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 1(3), 215–234 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Breznitz, S.: Cry-Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bliss, J.P., Fallon, C.K.: Active warnings: false alarms. In: Wogalter, M.S. (ed.) Handbook of Warnings, pp. 231–242. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Sorkin, R.D., Kantowitz, B.H., Kantowitz, S.C.: Likelihood alarm displays. Hum. Factors. 30, 445–459 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Moray, N.: Monitoring, complacency, scepticism and eutactic behaviour. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 31(3), 175–178 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Edworthy, J.: Warnings and hazards: an integrative approach to warnings research. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 2, 2–18 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lehto, M.R., Nah, H.: Decision making and decision support. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3rd edn, pp. 191–242. Wiley, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Cohen, M.S.: The naturalistic basis of decision biases. In: Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., Zsambok, E. (eds.) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, pp. 51–99. Ablex, Norwood (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69, 99–118 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Simon, H.A.: Alternative visions of rationality. In: Simon, H.A. (ed.) Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., ABC Research Group: Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hammond, K.R.: Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertain, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., Zsambok, E.: Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Ablex, Norwood (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Owens, D.A., Helmers, G., Sivak, M.: Intelligent vehicle highway systems: a call for user-centred design. Ergonomics. 36(4), 363–369 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hancock, P.A., Parasuraman, R.: Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle-highway systems (IVHS). J. Saf. Res. 23, 181–198 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wickens, C.D.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 2nd edn. Harper Collins, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tenney, R.R., Sandell Jr., N.R.: Detection with distributed sensors. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 17(4), 501–510 (1981)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  90. Ekchian, L.K., Tenney, R.R.: Detection networks. In: Proc. 21st IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, pp. 686–691 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Papastavrou, J.D., Athans, M.: On optimal distributed decision architectures in a hypothesis testing environment. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 37(8), 1154–1169 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. Papastavrou, J.D., Athans, M.: The team ROC curve in a binary hypothesis testing environment. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 31(1), 96–105 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Tsitsiklis, J.N.: Decentralized detection. Adv. Stat. Signal Proc. 2, 297–344 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Lehto, M.R., Papastavrou, J.P., Giffen, W.: An empirical study of adaptive warnings: human vs. computer adjusted warning thresholds. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 2(1/2), 19–33 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  95. Lehto, M.R., Papastavrou, J.P., Ranney, T.A., Simmons, L.: An experimental comparison of conservative versus optimal collision avoidance system thresholds. Saf. Sci. 36(3), 185–209 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Maule, A.J., Hockey, G.R.J.: State, stress, and time pressure. In: Svenson, O., Maule, A.J. (eds.) Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, pp. 83–102. Plenum, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Flin, R., Salas, E., Straub, M., Martin, L.: Decision-Making under Stress: Emerging Themes and Applications. Routledge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Lehto, M.R.: A proposed conceptual model of human behavior and its implications for design of warnings. Percept. Mot. Skills. 73(2), 595–611 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1991.73.2.595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Frantz, J.P., Rhoades, T.P., Lehto, M.R.: Warnings and risk communication. In: Wogalter, M.S., DeJoy, D.M., Laughery, K. (eds.) Warnings and Risk Communication, pp. 291–312. Taylor and Francis, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lehto, M.R., Salvendy, G.: Models of accident causation and their application: review and reappraisal. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 8, 173–205 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Hammer, W.: Product Safety Management and Engineering, 2nd edn. American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE), Des Plaines (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  102. Suoakas, J., Rouhiainen, V.: Work Safety Analysis: Method Description and User’s Guide, Research Report 314. Technical Research Center of Finland, Tempere (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Suoakas, J., Pyy, P.: Evaluation of the Validity of Four Hazard Identification Methods with Event Descriptions, Research Report 516. Technical Research Center of Finland, Tempere (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Lehto, M.R.: Determining warning label content and format using EMEA. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles 44(28), 774–777 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Askarian, M., Zarghami, R., Jalali-Farahani, F., Mostoufi, N.: Fusion of micro-macro data for fault diagnosis of a sweetening unit using Bayesian network. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 115, 325–334 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  106. Hurdle, E.E., Bartlett, L.M., Andrews, J.D.: System fault diagnostics using fault tree analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. O J. Risk Rel. 221(1), 43–55 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Gheraibia, Y., Kabir, S., Aslansefat, K., Sorokos, I., Papadopoulos, Y.: Safety + AI: a novel approach to update safety models using artificial intelligence. IEEE Access. 7, 135855–135869 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  108. Zhuo-Hua, D., Zi-xing, C.A., **-xia, Y.U.: Fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control for wheeled mobile robots under unknown environments: a survey. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3428–3433. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  109. Dhillon, B.S.: Applied Reliability and Quality: Fundamentals, Methods and Procedures. Springer Science & Business Media (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  110. Department of Defense: MIL-HBDK-217F: Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment. Rome Laboratory, Griffiss Air Force Base (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  111. Bukowski, R.W., Budnick, E.K., Schemel, C.F.: Estimates of the operational of fire protection systems. In: Proc. Soc. Fire Prot. Eng. Am. Inst. Archit., pp. 111–124 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  112. DiMattia, D.G., Khan, F.I., Amyotte, P.R.: Determination of human error probabilities for offshore platform musters. J. Loss Prev. Proc. Ind. 18, 488–501 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  113. Gertman, D.I., Blackman, H.S.: Human Reliability, Safety Analysis Data Handbook. Wiley, New York (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  114. Swain, A.D., Guttman, H.: Handbook for Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington (1983). NUREG/CR-1278

    Google Scholar 

  115. Embrey, D.E.: SLIM-MAUD: An Approach to Assessing Human Error Probabilities Using Structured Expert Judgment. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington (1984). NUREG/CR-3518, Vols. 1 and 2

    Google Scholar 

  116. OSHA: Guidelines for Robotics Safety. US Department of Labor, Washington (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  117. OSHA: Industrial robots and robot system safety. In: OSHA Technical Manual (OTM) _ Section IV_ Chapter 4 – Heat Stress _ Occupational Safety and Health Administration. United States Department of Labor (2016) https://www.osha.gov/otm/section-4-safety-hazards/chapter-4

    Google Scholar 

  118. American National Standard for Industrial Robots and Robot Systems: Safety Requirements, ANSI/RIA R15.06-2012. Robotic Industries Association/the American National Standards Institute, Ann Arbor/New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  119. CobotsGuide | Cobot Safety. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://cobotsguide.com/safety/

  120. Murashov, V., et al.: Working safely with robot workers: recommendations for the new workplace. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13(3), D61–D71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1116700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Ahlstrom, V.: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration: Human Factors Design Standard. DTFAA, Atlantic City International Airport (2016). Report No. DOT/FAA/HF-STD-001B

    Google Scholar 

  122. Houser, A., Pierowicz, J., McClellan, R.: Concept of Operations and Voluntary Operational Requirements for Automated Cruise Control/Collision Warning Systems (ACC/CWS) On-board Commercial Motor Vehicles. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Washington (2005). Report No. FMCSA-MCRR-05–007, retrieved from http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/facts-research/research-technology/report/forward-collision-warning-systems.htm

    Google Scholar 

  123. US Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration: Horns, backup alarms, and automatic warning devices, Title 30 Code of Federal Regulations (30 CFR 56.14132, 57.1413230, 77.410, 77.1605) (n.d.). retrieved from http://www.msha.gov/STATS/Top20Viols/tips/14132.htm

  124. De Freitas, J., Censi, A., Smith, B.W., Di Lillo, L., Anthony, S.E., Frazzoli, E.: From driverless dilemmas to more practical commonsense tests for automated vehicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118(11) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010202118

  125. Tesla crash: Self-driving cars aren’t ready to drive themselves yet. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2021/04/20/tesla-autopilot-crash-what-can-cant-self-driving-cars-do/7283027002/

  126. Greenlee, E.T., DeLucia, P.R., Newton, D.C.: Driver vigilance in automated vehicles: hazard detection failures are a matter of time. Hum. Factors. 60(4), 465–476 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  127. Greenlee, E.T., DeLucia, P.R., Newton, D.C.: Driver vigilance in automated vehicles: effects of demands on hazard detection performance. Hum. Factors. 61(3), 474–487 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818802095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Parasuraman, R.: Vigilance, monitoring and search. In: Boff, J.R., Kaufmann, L., Thomas, J.P. (eds.) Handbook of Human Perception and Performance, Vol.2, Cognitive Processes and Performance, pp. 41–1–41-49. Wiley, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  129. Seppelt, B.D., Victor, T.W.: Potential solutions to human factors challenges in road vehicle automation. In: Lecture Notes in Mobility, vol. 3, pp. 131–148. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40503-2_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  130. McBride, S.E., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D.: Understanding human management of automation errors. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 15(6), 545–577 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2013.817625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Khastgir, S., Birrell, S., Dhadyalla, G., Jennings, P.: Calibrating trust to increase the use of automated systems in a vehicle. In: Stanton, N., Landry, S., Di Bucchianico, G., Vallicelli, A. (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 484. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41682-3_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  132. Pipkorn, L., Victor, T.W., Dozza, M., Tivesten, E.: Driver conflict response during supervised automation: do hands on wheel matter? Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 76, 14–25 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  133. Atwood, J.R., Guo, F., Blanco, M.: Evaluate driver response to active warning system in level-2 automated vehicles. Accid. Anal. Prev. 128, 132–138 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  134. Chancey, E.T., Bliss, J.P., Yamani, Y., Handley, H.A.H.: Trust and the compliance-reliance paradigm: the effects of risk, error bias, and reliability on trust and dependence. Hum. Factors. 59(3), 333–345 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816682648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Sanchez, J., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., Rovira, E.: Understanding reliance on automation: effects of error type, error distribution, age and experience. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 15(2), 134–160 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2011.611269

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Mark R. Lehto

  2. School of Engineering Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Gaurav Nanda

Authors
  1. Mark R. Lehto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gaurav Nanda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mark R. Lehto or Gaurav Nanda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. PRISM Center and School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Shimon Y. Nof

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lehto, M.R., Nanda, G. (2023). Safety Warnings for Automation. In: Nof, S.Y. (eds) Springer Handbook of Automation. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation