Review: A Grounded Theory of Organizational Communication and Technology (OCT) of COVID-19 Before Delta and the Vaccine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organizational Communication and Technology in the Time of Coronavirus

Abstract

In this final chapter we performed a grounded-theory analysis of the 19 content chapters of this book. We identified 18 grounded theory categories that summarize major themes in the book and grouped them accordingly. The core element of grounded theory is a focus on the emergence of theory from the data (here, the data are chapters) while remaining open to all possible meanings and interpretations of data (Treem & Browning. Grounded theory. In C. Scott & L. Lewis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication. Wiley, 2017). We looked for likenesses among the 19 content chapters and linked them to one or more of the 18 categories elaborated in this final chapter. A fairly disparate group of scholar-researchers began off with exactly the same set of research questions and produced a pleasingly varied—and pleasingly complex—set of answers. Yet the chapters also illustrate the concept: equifinality—namely, they all eventually arrive at pretty much the same place. Important for our purposes here, they have integrative complexity, in which chapter complexity can be represented by the number of different positions created to represent them and the order necessary to integrate them. Our conclusion is that organizational communication technology (OCT) serves as the integrator for the complexity surrounding work life during early stages of coronavirus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 128.39
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 171.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alterman, Richard. (1988). Adaptive planning. Cognitive Science, 12(3), 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikel M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. (Ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M. C. (1993). Joint performance across cultures: Improvisation in a Persian garden. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, David M. (Ed.). (2011). Storytelling and the future of organizations: An antenarrative handbook (Vol. 11). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botti, Simona, Orfali, Kristina, & Iyengar, Sheena Sethi. (2009). Tragic choices: Autonomy and emotional responses to medical decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, L. D. (1992). Lists and stories as organizational communication. Communication Theory, 2, 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, L. D., & Morris, G. H. (2012). Stories Of life in the workplace: An open architecture for organizational narratology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummett, Barry. (2008). A rhetoric of style. Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Charles, & Poole, Marshall Scott. (2010). Strategic organizational communication in a global economy (7th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Charles, & Poole, Marshall Scott. (2012). Strategic organizational communication: In a global economy. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, François. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, François, & Sandler, Sergeiy. (2014). Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin. Communication Theory, 24(3), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couser, G. Thomas. (2018). Vulnerable subjects: Ethics and life writing. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, & Guattari, Felix. (1983). Anti-oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, Gerardine, & Poole, Marshall Scott. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, C., Browning, L. D., Sitkin, S., & Sutcliffe, K. (2000). Impression management and the use of procedures at the Ritz-Carlton: Moral standards and dramaturgical discipline. Communication Studies, 51, 404–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amital. (1996). The responsive community: A communitarian perspective. American Sociological Review, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J. (2017). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 921–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Yiannis. (2004). Narratives, stories, texts. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 61–79). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Contreras, Angel F., Ceberio, Matine, & Kreinovich, Vladik. (2020). Plans are worthless but planning is everything: A theoretical explanation of Eisenhower’s observation. In Decision making under constraints (pp. 93–98). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY, Anchor books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresov, Chistopher, & Drazin, Robert. (1997). Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomi, A., & Harrison, J. R. (2012). The garbage can model of organizational choice: Looking forward at forty. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch Jr., John G., & Cohen, Jerry L. (1978). The use of subjective expected utility theory as an aid to understanding variables that influence hel** behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(10), 1138–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malgieri, Gianclaudio, & Niklas, Jędrzej. (2020). Vulnerable data subjects. Computer Law & Security Review, 37, 105415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. (1981). Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Sandra D. (2003). Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, Wanda J., Yates, Jo Anne, Okamura, Kazou, & Fujimoto, Masayo. (1995). Sha** electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science, 6(4), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Guihyun, & DeShon, Rirchard P. (2018). Effects of group-discussion integrative complexity on intergroup relations in a social dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 146, 62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, Brian T. B. T., Hærem, Thorvald, & Hillison, Derek. (2010). Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organization Studies, 31(7), 917–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polster, Erving. (1987). Every person’s life is worth a novel. WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, Nils-Eric. (2019). The ontology of decision-making. In Tobias Hansson Wahlberg & Robin Stenwall (Eds.), Maurinian truths: Essays in honour of Anna-Sofia Maurin on her 50th birthday. https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/35448559-6bf9-4974-8663-ee04ff83a679

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Craig, & Medaugh, Melissa. (2017). Axial coding. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip. (1987). The idea of a communitarian morality. California Law Review, 75, 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, K., Suh, E. S., & de Weck, O. (2017). Correlating integrative complexity with system modularity. In International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treem, J., & Browning, L. (2017). Grounded theory. In C. Scott & L. Lewis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 8). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron. (1973). If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing. Policy Sciences, 4, 127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry D. Browning .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Browning, L.D., Sørnes, JO., Svenkerud, P.J. (2022). Review: A Grounded Theory of Organizational Communication and Technology (OCT) of COVID-19 Before Delta and the Vaccine. In: Browning, L.D., Sørnes, JO., Svenkerud, P.J. (eds) Organizational Communication and Technology in the Time of Coronavirus. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94814-6_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation