Data Model, E-Infrastructure Services, and the Virtual Research Environment (VRE)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Landscape of the Sierra Nevada

Abstract

Sierra Nevada is a unique setting in which a broad and extensive research tradition converges in both time and space with intensive monitoring of the environment. Our aim is to establish a large data set together with an information network based on a powerful e-Infrastructure of communications, supercomputing, and distributed “cloud.” This e-infrastructure will be made available to the scientific community, environmental managers, and the general public. It will allow, among many other things, access to large volumes of data including biotic components (fauna and flora) as well as abiotic ones (atmospheric, terrestrial, and freshwater elements). This will allow the user to work with analytical tools in a number of virtual research environments (VREs) such as virtual laboratories for researchers, support tools for environmental managers, or social science data for the general public. To answer the questions and provide the information required by the different users of the system, we propose the creation of the following VLABs: Ecosystems, Species, and Climate. These laboratories will have a specific part (associated with their subject matter) and another transversal part that can be extended to any laboratory of the same type. Laboratories will emerge from the scientific proposal resulting from the use of e-infrastructure. The following have been identified as examples: (i) Climate: Meteorology in Sierra Nevada environment—VRE ClimaNevada; (ii) Species: Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica)—VRE Capra; (iii) Ecosystems: Sierra Nevada high-mountain lakes—VRE MountainLakes. All laboratories will have tools that can be structured in the following interdependent hierarchical levels: Access to data, Statistics, GIS & Artificial Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation. Currently, a multitude of initiatives around the world promote the creation and use of VREs. These are web-based, community-oriented, flexible, and secure collaborative working environments designed to meet the premises of Open Science. In the present study, we identify and analyze the main challenges to be solved (starting with the data) to fully achieve the proposed vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 96.29
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 126.59
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 179.34
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker M, Olabarriaga SD, Wilkins-Diehr N et al (2019) The global impact of science gateways, virtual research environments and virtual laboratories. Future Gener Comput Syst 95:240–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carusi A, Reimer T (2010) Virtual research environment collaborative landscape study. JISC Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavan V, Penev L (2011) The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. BMC Bioinform 12(S15):S2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook R, Lineback P (2008) Sierra nevada network data management plan

    Google Scholar 

  • Corti L, Van den Eynden V, Bishop L, et al (2020) Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice (second). SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enquist CA, Jackson F, Garfin ST et al (2017) Foundations of translational ecology. Front Ecol Environ 15(10):541–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman A, Pepe A, Blocker AW et al (2014) Ten simple rules for the care and feeding of scientific data. PLoS Comput Biol 10(4):e1003542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton SE, Anderson SS, Bagby SC, et al (2015) The Tao of open science for ecology. Ecosphere 6(7):art120

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson SK, Morris JK, Sanders JS, et al (2006) Understanding barriers to implementation of an adaptive land management program. Conserv Biol 20(5):1516–1527. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3879143

  • Lawrence KA, Zentner M, Wilkins-Diehr N et al (2015) Science gateways today and tomorrow: positive perspectives of nearly 5000 members of the research community. Concurrency Comput Pract Exp 27(16):4252–4268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadow AM, Ferguson DB, Guido Z et al (2015) Moving toward the deliberate coproduction of climate science knowledge. Weather, Clim Soc 7(2):179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener WK (2015) Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Comput Biol 11(10):e1004525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener WK, Jones MB (2012) Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends Ecol Evol 27(2):85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng RD (2011) Reproducible research in computational science. Science 334(6060):1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman OJ, Jones MB, Schildhauer MP (2011) Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science 331(6018):703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüegg J, Gries C, Bond-Lamberty B et al (2014) Completing the data life cycle: using information management in macrosystems ecology research. Front Ecol Environ 12:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sáenz AJ, Alcácer C, Rodríguez S (2017) Entornos Virtuales de Investigación para la toma de decisiones en el áambito del Medio Ambiente Urbano. WPS Review International on Sustainable Housing and Urban Renewal 1(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano JC (2018) Repositorios públicos frente a la mercantilización de la Ciencia: apostando por la ciencia abierta y la evaluación cualitativa. MÉI: Métodos de Información 9(17):74–101. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6840541

  • Spierenhurg M (2012) Getting the message across: biodiversity science and policy interfaces: a review. GAIA 21(2):125–134. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/oekom/gaia

  • Stodden V, McNutt M, Bailey DH et al (2016) Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science 354(6317):1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel C, Moser SC, Kasperson RE, Dabelko GD (2007) Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Glob Environ Change 17(3):349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ et al (2016) The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3(1):160018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohner C, Peterseil J, Poursanidis D (2019) DEIMS-SDR—a web portal to document research sites and their associated data. Ecol Inform 51:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young JC, Waylen KA, Sarkki S et al (2014) Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another. Biodivers Conserv 23(2):387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamora R, Pérez Luque AJ, Bonet FJ et al (2016) Global change impacts in Sierra Nevada: challenges for conservation. Consejería de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio. Junta de Andalucía. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/5468.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out within the framework of the collaboration agreement between the Ministry of Environment and Territorial Planning of the Regional Government of Andalusia and the University of Granada for the implementation of activities related to the Sierra Nevada Global Change Observatory. We are also grateful for the partial support received from the LIFE-ADAPTAMED (LIFE14 CCA/ES/ 000612) projects: Protection of key ecosystem services threatened by climate change through adaptive management of Mediterranean socio-ecosystems, from the H2020 European Long-Term Ecosystem and socio-ecological Research Infrastructure (eLTER) project and from the Smart Ecomountain Lifewatch ERIC Thematic Center (LifeWatch-2019-10-UGR-01). We are grateful to the management and technical team of the Sierra Nevada Natural Area for their continued collaboration in the framework of the joint activities that we develop in the Global Change Observatory. Juan Miguel González Aranda, Antonio José Sáenz Albanés, and Antonio Pérez Luque have contributed to the development of the ideas expressed in this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Guerrero Alonso, P.D., Merino Ceballos, M., Moreno Llorca, R., Ros Candeira, A., Zamora, R. (2022). Data Model, E-Infrastructure Services, and the Virtual Research Environment (VRE). In: Zamora, R., Oliva, M. (eds) The Landscape of the Sierra Nevada. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94219-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation