Abstract
The central Andes of Colombia is a region of high biodiversity that has been intensely transformed, mostly by unsustainable agricultural practices, and especially by extensive cattle grazing. Whereas cattle farms are often considered ecological deserts, cattle production can be approached in a different way: by integrating more trees into the pastures, introducing better animal management practices, and restoring protective forests, so that productivity, biodiversity, and the flow of ecosystem services can be positively impacted. In this case study, we describe the agroecological transformation of Hacienda Pinzacuá, a 45-hectare farm that has become an island of regenerative agriculture amidst a highly fragmented landscape. We explain how the farm’s land use history led to the severe degradation of its once fertile soils; how key land management decisions were made and gradually implemented through trial and error; and the significant land cover changes that occurred over 20 years of transformation. We also provide data on how these changes have impacted productivity, biodiversity, and ecosystem services to illustrate how conservation and production can work synergistically to transform the land and the people. Today Pinzacuá stands out as an island of vegetation in an otherwise treeless landscape and has become a high-quality matrix that serves as habitat or refuge for a variety of taxa striving to persist in this fragmented landscape. Finally, we reflect on the challenges faced along the process, and the prospects for maintaining Pinzacuá as both an island of biodiversity and an example for other farmers seeking more resilient productive alternatives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Given the lack of information on growth and silvicultural management for dinde, research was conducted on 12 farms of the region to develop preliminary spacing and thinning guidelines (see Montes et al. 2017). Dinde performed similar to other trees used for reforestation in the humid American tropics, with a Mean Annual Increment in Diameter at Breast Height (MAIDBH) of 2.56 cm year−1, a growth rate which is higher than it has been reported for sites in Honduras and Cuba (Cordero and Boshier 2003) but lies on the lower end of fast-growing native and exotic species in Central America. This growth rate stands overall within the range that has been reported for other native species in tropical humid regions elsewhere in Latin America (Piotto et al. 2004; Wishnie et al. 2007; van Breugel et al. 2011).
References
Amézquita MC, Murgueitio E, Ibrahim RB (2010) Carbon sequestration in pasture and silvopastoral systems compared with native forests in ecosystems of tropical America. In: Abberton M, Conant R, Batello C (eds) Grassland carbon sequestration: management, policy and economics: proceedings of the workshop on the role of grassland carbon sequestration in the mitigation of climate change. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
Arias Giraldo LM, Camargo García JC, Cardona Trujillo H (2009) Carbono orgánico edáfico en rodales de guadua, Guadua angustifolia Kunth., Poaceae y en pasturas arborizadas en la zona cafetera de Colombia. In: Murgueitio E, Cuartas C, Naranjo J (eds) Ganadería del futuro: Investigación para el desarrollo. Cali, Fundación CIPAV, pp 246–261
Aynekulu E, Suber M, Zomer R, Mboi D, Arango J, Rosenstock TS (2019) Mitigation benefits from expansion of trees on rangeland: an analytical proof of concept for Colombia. CCAFS working paper no. 295. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Wageningen. Available online at: www.ccafs.cgiar.org
Becerra I, Becerra M, Montes N (2017a) Dinámica de mercado: departamento de Quindío. Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria, UPRA, Bogotá
Becerra I, Becerra M, Montes N (2017b) Dinámica de mercado: departamento de Caldas. Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria, UPRA, Bogotá
Becerra I, Becerra M, Montes N (2017c) Dinámica de mercado: departamento de Risaralda. Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria, UPRA, Bogotá
Broom DM, Galindo FM, Murgueitio E (2013) Sustainable, efficient livestock production with high biodiversity and good welfare for animals. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 280:2013–2025
Calle A (2008) What makes an early adopter? Transforming landscapes one farmer at a time. Trop Resour 27:7–14
Calle A (2020) Can short-term payments for ecosystem services deliver long-term tree cover change? Ecosyst Serv 42(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101084
Calle A, Holl KD (2019) Riparian forest recovery following a decade of cattle exclusion in the Colombian Andes. For Ecol Manage 52(August):10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117563
Calle Z, Méndez LE (2017) Assessment of the regenerating woody vegetation in Pinzacua. Unpublished data
Calle Z, Piedrahita L (2007) ¿Cómo diseñar estrategias para el manejo de plantas de interés para la conservación en paisajes ganaderos? Agroforestería en las Américas 45:117–122
Calle Z, Murgueitio E, Chará J, Molina CH, Zuluaga AF, Calle A (2013) A strategy for scaling-up intensive silvopastoral systems in Colombia. J Sustain For 32(7):677–693
Calle Z, Molina C CH, Molina D CH, Molina D EJ, Molina E JJ, Murgueitio C B, Murgueitio C A, Murgueitio R E (2022) A highly productive biodiversity island within a monoculture landscape: El Hatico nature reserve (Valle del Cauca, Colombia). In: Montagnini F (ed) Biodiversity islands: strategies for conservation in human-dominated environments. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, Springer, Cham, pp 279–304
Camargo JC, Cardona GA (2005) Análisis de fragmentos de bosque y guaduales. In: Consultancy report – regional integrated silvopastoral approaches to ecosystem management project. The World Bank, GEF, CIPAV, p 38
Chará J, Reyes E, Peri P, Otte J, Arce E, Schneider F (2019) Silvopastoral systems and their contribution to improved resource use and sustainable development goals: Evidence from Latin America. FAO, CIPAV and Agri Benchmark, Cali. Retrieved from http://www.livestockdialogue.org/fileadmin/templates/res_livestock/docs/2018_Ulaanbataar/Silvopastoral_Systems_and_their_contribution_to_improved_resource_use_and_SDG.pdf
Chazdon RL, Harvey C, Komar O, Griffith DM, Ferguson BG, Martínez-Ramos M, Morales H, Nigh R, Soto-Pinto L, van Bruegel M, Philpott S (2009) Beyond reserves: a research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 4:142–153
Chízmar Fernández C (2009) Plantas comestibles de Centroamérica. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad – INBio. Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica
Cioffi G, Morales-Escobar L, Braca A, De Tommasi N (2003) Antioxidant chalcone glycosides and flavanones from Maclura (Chlorophora) tinctoria. J Nat Prod 66:1061–1064
Comisión Conjunta (2008) Plan de Ordenación y Manejo Cuenca Hidrográfica (POMCH) del Rio La Vieja. Corporación Autonóma Regional del Quindío, Corporación Autonóma Regional de Risaralda, Corporación Autonóma Regional del Valle del Cauca, Cali
Cordero J, Boshier DH (2003) Descripción de Especies: Maclura tinctoria. In: Cordero J, Boshier DH (eds) Arboles de Centroamérica: un manual para extensionistas. Oxford Forestry Institute (OFI, Oxford University, Oxford, UK) and Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE), Turrialba, pp 690–697
DANE (2014) Tercer Censo Nacional Agropecuario 2014 Tercer CNA. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística, Gobierno Nacional, Bogotá DC
Davis ALV, Scholtz CH, Dooley PW, Bham N, Kryger U (2004) Scarabaeine dung beetles as indicators of biodiversity, habitat transformation and pest control chemicals in agro-ecosystems. S Afr J Sci 100:415–424
De Beenhouwer M, Aerts R, Honnay O (2013) A global meta-analysis of the biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits of coffee and cacao agroforestry. Agric Ecosyst Environ 175:1–7
Delgado M, Pérez C (2018) Proyecciones de actividad económica regional 2017-2021. Fedesarrollo, Bogotá
Espinal S (1977) Zonas de Vida y Formaciones Vegetales de Colombia, vol. XIII, no. 11. Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi–IGAC, Bogotá
Etter A (1998) General ecosystem Map of Colombia (1:1,500,000). Instituto Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá
FAO (2006) Informe Pecuario. Subdirección de Políticas y Apoyo en Materia de Publicación Electrónica. FAO, Rome
Gaba S, Bretagnolle F, Rigaud T, Philippot L (2014) Managing biotic interactions for ecological intensification of agroecosystems. Front Ecol Evol 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00029
Giraldo C, Escobar F, Chará JD, Calle Z (2011) The adoption of silvopastoral systems promotes the recovery of ecological processes regulated by dung beetles in the Colombian Andes. Insect Conserv Divers 4:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00112.x
Giraldo C, Hernández M, Giraldo AM, Calle A, Mendivil J, Quevedo C, Velásquez A, Perdomo A, Castaño K, Giraldo NV, Chará J (2019) Resultados de monitoreo de biodiversidad – Finca de Referencia Pinzacuá. Proyecto Ganadería Colombiana Sostenible. CIPAV, Cali
Griscom BW, Adams J, Ellis PW, Houghton RA, Lomax G, Miteva DA, Schlesinger WH, Shoch D, Siikamäki JV et al (2017) Natural climate solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(44):11645–11650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114
Harvey CA, Villanueva C, Esquivel H, Gómez R, Ibrahim M, López M, Martinez J, Muñoz D, Restrepo C, Saénz JC, Villacís J, Sinclair FL (2011) Conservation value of dispersed tree cover threatened by pasture management. For Ecol Manag 261(10):1664–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.004
Holmann F, Rivas L, Carulla J, Rivera B, Giraldo LA, Guzman S, Martinez M, Medina A, Farrow A (2003) Evolution of milk production systems in tropical latin america and its interrelationship with markets: an analysis of the Colombian case (online). Livest Res Rural Dev 15(9) Available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/9/holm159.htm
Ibrahim M, Chacón M, Cuartas C, Naranjo J, Ponce G, Vega P, Casasola F, Rojas J (2007) Carbon storage in soil and biomass in land use systems of ranchlands of Colombia, Costa Rica and Nicaragua. Agroforestería en las Américas 45:27–36
IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management (2020) Nature based solutions. Retrieved from https://www.iucn.org/commissions/commission-ecosystem-management/our-work/nature-based-solutions on May 24, 2020
Kattan GH, Alvarez-López H (1996) Preservation and management of biodiversity in fragmented landscapes in the Colombian Andes. In: Schelhas J, Greenberg R (eds) Forest patches in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, D. C
Kattan GH, Franco P, Rojas V (2004) Biological diversification in a complex region: a spatial analysis of faunistic diversity and biogeography of the Andes of Colombia. J Biogeogr 31:1829–1839
Kremen C, Merenlender AM (2018) Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362(6412):eaau6020
La Patria (2019) Las cuentas del turismo en el Eje Cafetero. Monday, April 15, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.lapatria.com/economia/las-cuentas-del-turismo-en-el-eje-cafetero-435307 on February 25, 2020
López Murillo E (2015) El valor del suelo. Columna de opinión La Cronica del Quindío. Retrieved on June 1, 2020 from https://www.cronicadelquindio.com/noticia-noticia_opinion-titulo-el-valor-del-suelo-cronica-del-quindio-op-11685
Maas B, Clough Y, Tscharntke T (2013) Bats and birds increase crop yield in tropical agroforestry landscapes. Ecol Lett 16:1480–1487
Martins MM, Setz EZF (2000) Diet of buffy tufted-eared marmosets (Callithrix aurita) in a forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Int J Primatol 21:467–476
Mejía Cubillos J (2013) Perfil económico del Eje Cafetero. Análisis con miras a la competitividad territorial. Adaptación del informe final de la consultoría “Competitividad territorial de la Ecorregión Eje Cafetero. Análisis desde el perfil económico del Eje Cafetero como aporte a la línea de base de la Agenda de Desarrollo Sostenible” realizada para Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. MPRA Paper No. 43873. Retrieved on June 1, 2020 from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43873/
Mendenhall C, Karp D, Meyer C, Hadly E, Daily G (2014) Predicting biodiversity change and averting collapse in agricultural landscapes. Nature 509:213–217. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13139
Mesa Arboleda HF (2009) Balance de gases de efecto invernadero en un modelo de producción de ganadería doble propósito con alternativas silvopastoriles en Yaracuy, Venezuela. MS thesis. CATIE, Turrialba, 225 p
Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (eds) Biodiversity hotspots. Springer, London, pp 3–22
Moebius-Clune BN, Moebius-Clune DJ, Gugino BK, Idowu OJ, Schindelbeck RR, Ristow AJ, van Es HM, Thies JE, Shayler HA, McBride MB, Kurtz KSM, Wolfe DW, Abawi GS (2016) Comprehensive assessment of soil health – the Cornell framework, Edition 3.2. Cornell University, Ithaca
Montagnini F, Ibrahim M, Murgueitio E (2013) Silvopastoral systems and climate change mitigation in Latin America. Bois et forêts des Tropiques 316:3–16
Montes-Londoño (2019) Monitoring of species richness of butterfly in Pinzacua through Visual Encounterying surveying. Unpublished data
Montes Londoño I, Rodríguez Susa MS (2011) Evaluación de la capacidad de autodepuración de una quebrada con bosque de guadua ribereño en la cuenca del Río La Vieja. Undergraduate thesis. Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá
Montes-Londoño I, Montagnini F, Ashton MS (2017) Allometric relationships and reforestation guidelines for Maclura tinctoria, an important multi-purpose timber tree of Latin America. New For. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-017-9617-1
Murgueitio E, Calle Z, Uribe F, Calle A, Solorio B (2011) Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. For Ecol Manag 261(10):1654–1663
Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108:237–307
Naranjo JF, Cuartas CA, Murgueitio E, Chará J, Barahona R (2012) Balance de gases de efecto invernadero en sistemas silvopastoriles intensivos con Leucaena leucocephala en Colombia. Livestock research for rural development, 24, Article #150. Retrieved May 31, 2020 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/8/nara24150.htm
Pagiola S, Ríos AR (2013) Evaluation of the impact of payments for environmental services on land use change in Quindío, Colombia. PES learning papers. World Bank, Washington DC
Pagiola S, Honey-Rosés J, Freire-González J (2020) Assessing the permanence of land-use change induced by payments for environmental services: evidence from Nicaragua. Trop Conserv Sci 13:1940082920922676
Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2010) The agricultural matrix as alternative to the land sparing/agriculture intensification model. PNAS 107:5786–5791
Peters VE, Greenberg R (2013) Fruit supplementation affects birds but not arthropod predation by birds in Costa Rican agroforestry systems. Biotropica 45:102–110
Pezo D, Ibrahim M (1998) Sistemas Silvopastoriles. Materiales de Enseñanza no. 44/CATIE CATIE-GTZ Turrialba, 276 pp
Philpott SM, Bichier P (2012) Effects of shade tree removal on birds in coffee agroecosystems in Chiapas, Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 149:171–180
Piotto D, Montagnini F, Kanninen M, Ugalde L, Viquez E (2004) Forest plantations in Costa Rica and Nicaragua: performance of species and preferences of farmers. J Sustain For 18(4):59–77
Poch TJ, Simonetti JA (2013) Ecosystem services in human-dominated landscapes: insectivory in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 87:871–879
Prevedello JA, Almeida-Gomes M, Lindenmayer DB (2018) The importance of scattered trees for biodiversity conservation: a global meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 55:205–214
Rangel A (1949) Maderas industriales de Colombia Caribb For 10(3):161–162
Reyes E, Bellagamba A, Molina JJ, Izquierdo L, Deblitz C, Chará J, Mitchell L, Romanowicz B, Gómez M, Murgueitio E (2017) Measuring sustainability on cattle ranches. Working paper on Silvopastoral Systems. Agribenchmark, CIPAV, Fedegan, World Animal Protection. Retrieved from http://www.cipav.org.co/pdf/ReportSPS6-Colombiancasestudies.pdf
Rivers MC, Barstow M, Mark J (2017) Maclura tinctoria. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2017: e.T61886731A61886745. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T61886731A61886745.en. Feb 29, 2020
Rodríguez N, Armenteras D, Morales M, Romero M (2004) Ecosistemas de los Andes Colombianos. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá
Roig JT (1974) Plantas medicinales, aromáticas o venenosas de Cuba. Ed Ciencia y Técnica, Instituto del Libro. La Habana, Cuba
Sadeghian S, Murgueitio E, Mejía C, Rivera JM (2001) Ordenamiento ambiental y reglamentación del uso y manejo del suelo en la zona cafetera. En: Suelos del eje cafetero. Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, GTZ, Fondo Editorial del Departamento de Risaralda, Pereira, pp 96–108
Sánchez Gómez EL, Camargo García JC (2015) Diversidad de avifauna en paisajes rurales de la cuenca del río La Vieja, Eje Cafetero de Colombia. Recursos Naturales y Ambiente:83–89
Somarriba E (1997) Pastoreo bajo plantaciones forestales. Agroforestería en las Américas 4:26–28
Suárez A, Williams-Linera G, Trejo C, Valdez-Hernández JI, Cetina-Alcala VM, Vibrans H (2012) Local knowledge helps select species for forest restoration in a tropical dry forest of central Veracruz, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 85:35–55
Toro Zuluaga G (2005) Eje Cafetero colombiano: compleja historia de caficultura, violencia y desplazamiento. Documento preparado para el Congreso 2004 de la Asociación de Estudios Latinoamericanos (LASA), Las Vegas, Nevada, octubre 7-9, 2004. Revista de Ciencias Humanas UTP 35: 127–149
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59
Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria, UPRA (2019a) Gestión de información agropecuaria y planificación del desarrollo agropecuario: Qundío. Retrieved on June 1, 2020 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Wnmc5v8CGRi0q0-Hz65bAqIV_4yjZL0V/view
Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria, UPRA (2019b) Gestión de información agropecuaria y planificación del desarrollo agropecuario: Caldas. Retrieved on June 1, 2020 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/11013KahlDDAN628zQrY6lR0OcQBvQaD9/view
Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria, UPRA (2019c) Gestión de información agropecuaria y planificación del desarrollo agropecuario: Risaralda. Retrieved on June 1, 2020 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cgTexaHDDyXOrl8QhhLeH4bjx3aackm4/view
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2004) Informe Regional de Desarrollo Humano. PNUD, Manizáles
van Breugel M, Hall JS, Craven DJ, Gregoire TG, Park A, Dent DH, Wishnie MH, Mariscal E, Deago J, Ibarra D, Cedeño N, Ashton MS (2011) Early growth and survival of 49 tropical tree species across four sites differing in soil fertility and rainfall. For Ecol Manag 261:1580–1589
Vílchez S, Harvey C, Sáenz JC, Casanoves F, Carvajal JP, Villalobos JG, Hernandez B, Medina A, Montero J, Merlo D, Sinclair FL (2013) Consistency in bird use of tree cover across tropical agricultural landscapes. Ecol Appl 24:158–168
Wishnie MH, Dent DH, Mariscal E, Deago J, Cedeño N, Ibarra D, Condit R, Ashton MS (2007) Performance of 24 tropical tree species in relation to reforestation strategies in Panama. For Ecol Manag 243:39–49
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montes-Londoño, I., Calle, A., Montes, O., Montes, A. (2022). Hacienda Pinzacuá: An Example of Regenerative Agriculture Amidst a Transformed Landscape in the Colombian Andes. In: Montagnini, F. (eds) Biodiversity Islands: Strategies for Conservation in Human-Dominated Environments. Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92234-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92234-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92233-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92234-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)