Abstract
This chapter examines how environmental civil society organizations in China construct their accountabilities through social media use. Through case studies of three environmental civil society organizations in Bei**g, China, this research explores the impact and potential of social media to change the conceptualization of accountability and finds that information technology has been an instrument for organizations to demonstrate their accountability and transparency, lacking the engagement and direct input from the public and the community. This chapter argues that civil society organizations’ current underutilization of social media mainly focuses on resource-based accountability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anheier, H. K., Hass, R., & Beller, A. (2013). Accountability and transparency in the German nonprofit sector: A paradox? International Review of Public Administration; Seoul, 18(3), 69–84.
Appleby, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations and the utilization of social media: Maximizing and measuring return of investment. SPNHA Review, 12(1), 5–26.
Barman, E., & MacIndoe, H. (2012). Institutional pressures and organizational capacity: The case of outcome measurement. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 70–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01302.x
Blouin, M., & Lee, R. (2013). Is your financial information online? Nonprofit World, 31(2), 22–23.
Bothwell, R. O. (2001). Trends in self-regulation and transparency of nonprofits in the U.S. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 2(3), 604–622.
Büsgen, M. M. (2006). NGOs and the search for Chinese civil society environmental nongovernmental organizations in the Nujiang campaign. ISS Working Paper Series/General Series, 422, 61. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/19180
Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How does accountability affect mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.143
Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K. L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., & Sweetser, K. D. (2010). Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.003
Dong, T., Liang, C., & He, X. (2017). Social media and Internet public events. Telematics and Informatics, 34(3), 726–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.024
Dumont, G. E. (2013). Transparency or accountability? The purpose of online technologies for nonprofits. International Review of Public Administration, 18(3), 7–30.
Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004269430
Ebrahim, A. (2016). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. In D. A. Renz (Ed.). The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (pp. 102–123). Jossey-Bass.
Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (Eds.). (1996). Beyond the magic bullet: NGO performance and accountability in the post-cold war world. Kumarian Press.
Fedorenko, I., & Sun, Y. (2016). Microblogging-based civic participation on environment in China: A case study of the PM 2.5 campaign. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2077–2105. http://dx.doi.org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/10.1007/s11266-015-9591-1
Frumkin, P. (2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Harvard University Press.
Frumkin, P., & Kim, M. T. (2001). Strategic positioning and the financing of nonprofit organizations: Is efficiency rewarded in the contributions marketplace? Public Administration Review, 61(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00029
Glover, T. D. (2004). Narrative inquiry and the study of grassroots associations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VOLU.0000023633.40621.b4
Guo, C., & Saxton, G. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79.
Kearns, K. P. (1996). Managing for accountability: Preserving the public trust in public and nonprofit organizations. Jossey-Bass.
Kim, D., Chun, H., Kwak, Y., & Nam, Y. (2014). The employment of dialogic principles in website, Facebook, and Twitter platforms of environmental nonprofit organizations. Social Science Computer Review, 32(5), 590–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314525752
Kou, Y., Kow, Y. M., Gui, X., & Cheng, W. (2017). One social movement, two social media sites: A comparative study of public discourses. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26(4–6), 807–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9284-y
Kruse, L. M., Norris, D. R., & Flinchum, J. R. (2018). Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. The Sociological Quarterly, 59(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143
Lee, R. L., & Joseph, R. C. (2012). Survival of the fittest: Online accountability in complex organizational populations. SAIS 2012 Proceedings, 30, 7.
Leggett, A. (2017). Online civic engagement and the anti-domestic violence movement in China: Shifting norms and influencing law. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(5), 2251–2277. http://dx.doi.org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/10.1007/s11266-016-9680-9
Li, J., & Li, X. (2017). Media as a core political resource: The young feminist movements in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1274265
Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648
Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.
MacIndoe, H., & Barman, E. (2013). How organizational stakeholders shape performance measurement in nonprofits: Exploring a multidimensional measure. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 716–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012444351
Manetti, G., Bellucci, M., & Bagnoli, L. (2017). Stakeholder engagement and public information through social media: A study of Canadian and American public transportation agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(8), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016649260
Maxwell, S. P., & Carboni, J. L. (2016). Social media management: Exploring Facebook engagement among high-asset foundations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 27(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21232
Nah, S., & Saxton, G. D. (2013). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society, 15(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812452411
Nygreen, K. (2017). Negotiating tensions: Grassroots organizing, school reform, and the paradox of neoliberal democracy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 48(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12182
Rainey, S., Wakunuma, K., & Stahl, B. (2017). Civil society organizations in research: A literature-based typology. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(5), 1988–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9816-y
Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009341086
Saxton, G. D., Neely, D. G., & Guo, C. (2014). Web disclosure and the market for charitable contributions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.12.003
Schmitz, H. P., Raggo, P., & Bruno-van Vijfeijken, T. (2012). Accountability of transnational NGOs: Aspirations vs. practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1175–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011431165
Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41.
Slatten, L. A. D., Guidry Hollier, B. N., Stevens, D. P., Austin, W., & Carson, P. P. (2016). Web-based accountability in the nonprofit sector: A closer look at arts, culture, and humanities organizations. Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, 46(5), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2016.1211048
Sloan, M. F. (2009). The effects of nonprofit accountability ratings on donor behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008316470
Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. SAGE.
Snow, D. A., & Trom, D. (2002). The case study and the study of social movements. In B. Klandermans & S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 146–172). University of Minnesota Press.
Sobieraj, S. (2006). The implications of transitions in the voluntary sector for civic engagement: A case study of association mobilization around the 2000 presidential campaign. Sociological Inquiry, 76(1), 52–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2006.00144.x
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Publications.
Svensson, P. G., Mahoney, T. Q., & Hambrick, M. E. (2015). Twitter as a communication tool for nonprofits: A study of sport-for-development organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1086–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014553639
Tai, Z. (2006). The Internet in China: Cyberspace and civil society. Routledge.
Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Accountability.org: Online disclosures by U.S. nonprofits. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 693–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9452-3
Tu, F. (2016). WeChat and civil society in China. Communication and the Public, 1(3), 343–350.
Wagner, A. (2012). “Third sector” and/or “civil society”: A critical discourse about scholarship relating to intermediate organizations. Voluntary Sector Review, 3(3), 299–328. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080512X658036
Waters, R. D., & Lo, K. D. (2012). Exploring the impact of culture in the social media sphere: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations' use of Facebook. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(3), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2012.728772
Wu, F., & Yang, S. (2016). Web 2.0 and political engagement in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2055–2076. http://dx.doi.org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/10.1007/s11266-015-9627-6
Yang, G. (2003). The co-evolution of the internet and civil society in China. Asian Survey, 43(3), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2003.43.3.405
Yang, G., & Calhoun, C. (2007). Media, civil society, and the rise of a green public sphere in China. China Information, 21(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X07079644
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
Young, J. A. (2017). Facebook, Twitter, and Blogs: The adoption and utilization of social media in nonprofit human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1192574
Zhou, H., & Pan, Q. (2016). Information, community, and action on Sina-Weibo: How Chinese philanthropic NGOs use social media. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2433–2457. http://dx.doi.org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/10.1007/s11266-016-9685-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
**e, M., Chao, CC. (2022). Social Media as Mechanism for Accountability: Cases of China’s Environmental Civil Society. In: Ngwainmbi, E.K. (eds) Dismantling Cultural Borders Through Social Media and Digital Communications. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92212-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92212-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92211-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92212-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)