Influence of the Deck Length on the Fragility Assessment of Italian R.C. Link Slab Bridges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures (EUROSTRUCT 2021)

Abstract

This work focuses on the fragility assessment of reinforced concrete multi-span continuous bridges, which is a widespread structural typology in Italy, with the aim of investigating the peculiar vulnerabilities of the bridge class under investigation, the reinforced concrete link slab jointless bridges. The need for a deeper study on the topic derives from the wide diffusion of such typology on the Italian road network, which has been recently struck by earthquakes and needs intervention works for the safety of old bridges and viaducts. Starting from a real case study located in Centre Italy, a couple of reinforced concrete bridge case studies is chosen in order to consider the influence of different length for the deck and to provide a forecast for the structural behaviour of the selected bridge class. The associated numerical models are able to capture the failure mechanisms most likely to occur, and a dedicated modelling strategy is developed to capture the potential failure on the kinematic links on the superstructure. A probabilistic framework is developed considering both the site-dependent seismic hazard, which accounts for the parameters characterizing a medium seismicity level area as well as the record-to-record variability, and the demand parameters related to the examined vulnerabilities. Seismic analyses are carried out through the Multiple Stripe Analysis methodology to furnish the fragility curves for all the response parameters relevant for the structural system. Performance thresholds are chosen for each bridge component according to the current codes and literature. As a result, fragility curves provide useful insights about the main structural deficiencies of the system at hand in order to evaluate possible intervention strategies against social and economic losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 373.43
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 481.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 481.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scozzese F, Ragni L, Tubaldi E, Gara F (2019) Modal properties variation and collapse assessment of masonry arch bridges under scour action. Eng Struct 199:109665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ragni L, Scozzese F, Gara F et al (2019) Dynamic identification and collapse assessment of Rubbianello Bridge. In: IABSE Symposium Report, pp 619–626

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007) Seismic fragility curves for typical highway bridge classes in the Central and South-eastern United States. Earthq Spectra 23:615–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramanathan K, DesRoches R, Padgett JE (2010) Analytical fragility curves for multispan continuous steel girder bridges in moderate seismic zones. Transp Res Rec 2202(1):173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mangalathu S, Jeon JS, Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2016) ANCOVA-based grou** of bridge classes for seismic fragility assessment. Eng Struct 123:379–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Briseghella B, Siviero E, Zordan T (2004) A composite integral bridge in Trento, Italy: Design and Analysis. In: IABSE Symposium Report, vol 88, no 6, pp 297–302

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caner A, Zia P (1998) Behavior and design of link slabs for jointless bridge decks. PCI J 43:68–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sevgili G, Caner A (2009) Improved seismic response of multisimple-span skewed bridges retrofitted with link slabs. J Bridge Eng 14(6):452–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang C, Shen Y, Zou Y, Zhuang Y, Li T (2019) Analysis of mechanical characteristics of steel-concrete composite flat link slab on simply-supported beam bridge. KSCE J Civ Eng 23(8):3571–3580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1921-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carbonari S, Gara F, Dall’Asta A, Dezi L (2016) Shear connection local problems in the seismic design of steel-concrete composite decks. In: Italian Concrete Days. Springer, Cham, pp 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78936-1_25

  11. Dezi L, Carbonari S, Dall’Asta A, Gara F, Minnucci L (2018) Seismic behaviour of steel-concrete composite bridge decks. Steel and Steel-concrete composite structures in seismic areas: advances in research and design. Research Project RP3, ReLUIS-DPC 2014-2018, pp 451–478. Doppia Voce, Napoli. ISBN 978-88-89972-74-8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tubaldi E, Barbato M, Dall’Asta A (2010) Transverse seismic response of continuous steel-concrete composite bridges exhibiting dual load path. Earthq Struct 1(1):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tubaldi E, Barbato M, Dall’Asta A (2011) Influence of model parameter uncertainty on seismic transverse response and vulnerability of steel–concrete composite bridges with dual load path. J Struct Eng 138(3):363–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tubaldi E, Dall’Asta A (2012) Transverse free vibrations of continuous bridges with abutment restraint. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(9):1319–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gara F, Regni M, Roia D, Carbonari S, Dezi F (2019) Evidence of coupled soil-structure interaction and site response in continuous viaducts from ambient vibration tests. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 120:408–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti: D.M.03.03.1975, Approvazione delle norme tecniche per le costruzioni in zone sismiche. G.U. n.93, 08.04.1975

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jalayer F, Cornell CA (2009) Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38(8):951–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scozzese F, Dall’Asta A, Tubaldi E (2019) Seismic risk sensitivity of structures equipped with anti-seismic devices with uncertain properties. Struct Saf 77:30–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Au SK, Beck JL (2003) Subset simulation and its application to seismic risk based on dynamic analysis. J Eng Mech 129(8):901–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramanathan KN (2012) Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy. Georgia Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  21. **e Y, Zhang J, DesRoches R, Padgett JE (2019) Seismic fragilities of single-column highway bridges with rocking column-footing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 48(7):843–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ibarra LF, Krawinkler H (2005) Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, pp 29–51

    Google Scholar 

  23. Porter K, Kennedy R, Bachman R (2007) Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthq Spectra 23(2):471–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker JW (2015) Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthq Spectra 31(1):579–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. CEN (2005) EN 1998-2: Eurocode 8 - design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 2: bridges

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2018) D.M.17.01.2018, Aggiornamento delle Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, G.U. n.42, 20.02.2018

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mander JB, Priestley MJ, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McKeena F, Fenves G, Scott M (2015) Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  29. González F et al (2019) Seismic response of bridge piers on pile groups for different soil dam** models and lumped parameter representations of the foundation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 48(3):306–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Minnucci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Minnucci, L., Scozzese, F., Dall’Asta, A., Carbonari, S., Gara, F. (2022). Influence of the Deck Length on the Fragility Assessment of Italian R.C. Link Slab Bridges. In: Pellegrino, C., Faleschini, F., Zanini, M.A., Matos, J.C., Casas, J.R., Strauss, A. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Association on Quality Control of Bridges and Structures. EUROSTRUCT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91877-4_83

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91877-4_83

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91876-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91877-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation