Facilitating Best Practice in Security: The Role of Regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Handbook of Security

Abstract

This chapter provides a review of regulatory systems applied to the security sector, critiquing the benefits and shortcomings of contemporary systems on the basis of the available evidence. They summarise regulatory theory and outline the range of conduct and competency issues behind interventions in the industry, arguing in favour of a ‘smart’ model of licensing that includes disqualifying offences, mandatory pre-service training and close monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin, A., Williams, D., and Dixon, C. (2018). Safety in Numbers: Australia’s Private Security Guard Force and Counterterrorism. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, T. (2016). Raising the Bar: Professionalism and Service Delivery Standards within New Zealand’s Contract Private Security Industry. Security Journal, 30(2): 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M. (2020). The ‘New’ Private Security Industry, the Private Policing of Cyberspace and the Regulatory Questions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 36(1), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., and George, B. (2006). Regulation of Private Security: Models for Analysis, in Gill, M. (ed.) Handbook of Security. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, M., and Stiernstedt, P. (2018). Comparing Private Security Regulation in the European Union. Policing and Society, 28(4), 398–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cansler, J. (2020). Q&A: How Companies Are Using Drones for Security. Accessed December 3 from https://www.gsx.org/session-spotlights/how-companies-are-using-drones-for-security/

  • Cihan, A. (2016). The Private Security Industry in Turkey: Officer Characteristics and their Perception of Training Sufficiency. Security Journal, 29(2), 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG (2005). Special Meeting on Counter-Terrorism, 27 September 2005. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, J. (2020). COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine Inquiry, Final Report and Recommendations. Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoESS. (2013). Private Security Services in Europe: CoESS Facts and Figures 2013, Wemmel: Confederation of European Security Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoESS. (2020). The New Normal 2.0: Private Security and COVID-19 in Europe. Wemmel: Confederation of European Security Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. (2009). Celebrating 40 Years, ASIAL 1969–2009, Then and Now: Licensing and Training. Security Insider, August/September, 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg Ross Dawson. (2015). Research on Violence Reduction. London: Security Industry Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A., Lister, S., Blackburn, S., and Burnett, J. (2005). Plural Policing. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W.C., Strauchs, J.J., and van Meter, C.W. (1990) Private Security Trends 1970–2000. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., Ortiz, C., Dadush, S., Irish, J., Alvarado, A., and Davis, D. (2003). The Public Accountability of Private Police: Lessons from New York, Johannesburg, and Mexico City. Policing and Society, 13(2), 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waard, J. (1999). The Private Security Industry in International Perspective. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7(2), 143–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiberg, A. (2010). The Tools of Regulation. Sydney: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P., and Braithwaite, J. (1986). Of Manners Gentle: The Enforcement Strategies of Australian Business Regulatory Agencies. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham, N., and Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart Regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkin, D. (2019). Regulating Private Security Provision for Victims of Domestic Violence. Theoretical Criminology, 23(3), 415–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakalik, S.J., and Wildhorn, S. (1971a). Current Regulation of Private Police: Agency Experience and Views. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakalik, S.J., and Wildhorn, S. (1971b). Private Police in the United States: Findings and Recommendations. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Jr., R. (1990). Licensing and Regulation of the Private Security Industry: A Historical View of the Court’s Role. Journal of Security Administration, 13(1&2), 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalla, M., Maxwell, S., and Mamayek, C. (2017). Legitimacy of Private Police in Developed, Emerging, and Transitional Economies. Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 25(1), 76–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Justice. (2005). Engaging the Private Sector to Promote Homeland Security: Law Enforcement-Private Security Relationships. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newspoll. (2004). Security Study: Prepared for the Australian Security Industry Association Limited. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., and Cho, J. (2018). Global Trends in the Standardisation of the Burglary-Resistant Testing of Security Hardware. Security Journal, 31(1), 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T. (1995). Security Managers’ Perceptions of Industry Regulation. Security Journal, 6(2), 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T. (ed.) (2017). Understanding Crime Prevention: The Case Study Approach. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T., and Hayes, H. (1999). An Evaluation of the Queensland Security Providers Act. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T., and Sarre, R. (2008). Develo** a Risk Profile and Model Regulatory System for the Security Industry. Security Journal, 21(4), 264–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenzler, T., and Sarre, R. (2012). The Evolution of Security Industry Regulation in Australia. International Journal for Crime and Justice, 1(1), 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Private Security Advisory Council. (1977). Law Enforcement and Private Security Sources and Areas of Conflict and Strategies for Conflict Resolution. Washington, DC: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santonen, T., and Paasonen, J. (2016). Evaluating the Adequacy of Private Security Regulation in Finland. Security Journal, 30(2), 585–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R. (2014). Legal Powers and Obligations, in T. Prenzler (ed.) Professional Practice in Crime Prevention and Security Management. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R., and Prenzler, T. (1999). The Regulation of Private Policing: Reviewing Mechanisms of Accountability. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 1(3), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R., and Prenzler, T. (2009). The Law of Private Security in Australia. Sydney: Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre, R., and Prenzler, T. (2011). Private Security and Public Interest: Exploring Private Security Trends and Directions for Reform in the New Era of Plural Policing. Sydney: Australian Security Industry Association Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Industry Authority. (2004). SIA Annual Report 2003/2004. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Industry Authority. (2010a). The Impact of Regulation on the Door Supervision Sector. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Industry Authority. (2010b). The Impact of Regulation on the Security Guard Sector. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Industry Authority. (2020a). Annual Report and Accounts 2019/2020. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Industry Authority. (2020b). Protecting Society. Accessed on December 2 from https://www.sia.homeoffice.gov.uk/Pages/about-protecting-society.aspx.

  • Security Industry Authority. (2020c). SIA Heroes. Accessed on December 2 from https://www.sia.homeoffice.gov.uk/Pages/sia-heroes.aspx

  • Shearing, C., and Stenning, P. (1981). Modern Private Security: Its Growth and Implications, in Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, B. (2021, January 4). SA Police Reveal 99 Security Guards Stood Down or Sacked for Coronavirus Medi-hotel Breaches. Accessed on January 7 from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-03/coronavirus-sa-medi-hotel-quarantine-security-guard-breaches/13028380

  • Sparrow, M. (2000). The Regulatory Craft. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, P. (2000). Powers and Accountability of Private Police. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(3): 325–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, N. (2018). Privatizing Crime Control. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 679(1), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNODC. (2014). State Regulation Concerning the Civilian Private Security Services and their Contribution to Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Steden, R., and Nalla, M. (2010). Citizen Satisfaction with Private Security Guards in the Netherlands. European Journal of Criminology, 7(3): 214–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Steden, R., and Sarre, R. (2007a). The Growth of Private Security: Trends in the European Union. Security Journal, 20(4): 222–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Steden, R., and Sarre, R. (2007b). The Growth of Privatized Policing: Some Cross-national Data and Comparisons. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 31(1): 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. (2002). A Comparative Overview of Legislation Governing the Private Security Industry in the European Union. Birmingham: ECOTEC Research and Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. (2015). The Impact of the Private Security Industry Act 2001. Security Journal, 28(4), 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildhorn, S. (1975). Issues in Private Security. Santa Monica: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Prenzler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Prenzler, T., Sarre, R. (2022). Facilitating Best Practice in Security: The Role of Regulation. In: Gill, M. (eds) The Handbook of Security. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91735-7_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91735-7_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91734-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91735-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation