Introduction: Contextualising Digital Afterlives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Creation and Inheritance of Digital Afterlives
  • 477 Accesses

Abstract

We are all going to die, but in the words of Freddie Mercury ‘Who Wants to Live Forever?’ We live in a digital era, where social media is a part of the everyday lives of many. Social media platforms were designed for the living; however, they are being used to nurture ongoing relationships with the dead and are increasingly being used to discuss death, dying and grieving. In this digitised world, technology exists which enables us to create avatars allowing us to ‘live forever’ and advise future generations as reanimated digital zombies. The convergence of death-related issues and technology has become a growing and important area of study across many disciplines, including Sociology; Human-Computer Interaction (HCI); Science, Technology and Society (STS); Cyberpsychology; Death Studies; and Psychology. In our digital society, ubiquitous smart technology ensures the dead permeate into the everyday lives of the living; as sometimes they wait patiently in a state of suspension for the swipe of a finger or the click of a mouse to conjure them back into existence. Adopting qualitative methods and a constructivist grounded theory methodology, this study explores the nature and impact of the creation and inheritance of digital afterlives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aries, P. 1981. The Hour of Our Death. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, Debra. 2015. Who Wants to Live Forever? Living, Dying and Grieving in Our Digital Society. Social Sciences 4 (4): 1127–1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4041127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belgrave, L., and K. Charmaz. 2014. Studying Illness and Dying Through Constructivist Grounded Theory. In The Social Construction of Death: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. L. Van Brussel and N. Carpentier, 34–48. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert. 1962. Society as Symbolic Interaction: 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgstrom, E. 2017. Social Death. QJM 110 (1): 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcw183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouc, Amanda, S. Hye Han, and Natalie Pennington. 2016. ‘Why Are They Commenting on His Page?ʼ: Using Facebook Profile Pages to Continue Connections with the Deceased. Computers in Human Behavior 62: 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braman, J., A. Dudley, and G. Vincenti. 2011. Death, Social Networks and Virtual Worlds: A Look into the Digital Afterlife. In Proceedings —2011 9th International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, SERA 2011, 186–192. Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Towson University. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA.2011.35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Michael. 2015. Christopher Hitchens’ Public Dying: Toward a Secular-Humanist Ars Moriendi: 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222815606453.

  • Brubaker, Jed R., Gillian R. Hayes, and Paul Dourish. 2013. Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning. The Information Society 29 (3): 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Brian, and Katie Landry. 2010. Logging on and Letting out: Using Online Social Networks to Grieve and to Mourn. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (5): 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, Stephen. 2012. Immortality: The Quest to Live Forever and How It Drives Civilization. Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. 2000. Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Contructivist Methods. In The Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clabburn, Oliver. 2018. Investigating the Use of Digital Legacies with People Affected by Motor Neurone Disease (MND): An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Death over Dinner. 2017. Death Over Dinner. 2017. http://deathoverdinner.org/about

  • Doka, Kenneth J. 1999. Disenfranchised Grief. Bereavement Care 18 (3): 37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert. 2001. Loneliness of the Dying. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, Nicole B. 2007. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 210–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. 2018. Doing Grounded Theory, ed. U. Flick. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. 2011. Humanity 2.0. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. 2019. Nietzschean Meditations: Untimely Thoughts at the Dawn of the Transhuman Era. Vol. 1. mbassador GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty, Emily, Jessica Cobb, Meryl Gabeler, Christine Nelson, Ellis Weng, and J.T. Hancock. 2011. I Said Your Name in an Empty Room: Grieving and Continuing Bonds on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11), 997–1000. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979091.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. 2015th ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1966. Awareness of Dying. Godin: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorer, G. 1955. The Pornography of Death. Encounter 5: 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1965. Death, Grief & Mourning in Contemporary Britain. London: Cresset Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harju, Anu A., Katrina Doveling, and Vered (Rose) Shavit. 2014. Researching Digital Memorial Culture and Death Online. 21 (1): 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, Larissa, and Jung Moon. 2017. Visual Afterlife: Posthumous Phone Practices. In Selfie Citizenship, 119–126. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kasket, Elaine. 2012. Continuing Bonds in the Age of Social Networking: Facebook as a Modern-Day Medium. Bereavement Care 31 (2): 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2012.710493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastenbaum, R. 2007. Death Anxiety.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastenbaum, R.J. 2016. Death, Society, and Human Experience. 11th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litton, Robert Jay. 1979. The Broken Connection. New York: Simon K Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. 2015. Digital Sociology. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, Alice, and Nicole B. Ellison. 2012. ‘There Isn’t Wifi in Heaven!’ Negotiating Visibility on Facebook Memorial Pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56 (3): 378–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massimi, Michael. 2012. Thanatosensitively Designed Technologies for Bereavement Support.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthee, Nicolas. 2019. Studying Ritual in Contexts of Online Grief and Bereavement: Methodological Considerations. Ritual in a Digital Society: 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, Philip A. 1992. Death in High Modernity: The Contemporary Presence and Absence of Death. The Sociological Review 40 (S1): 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, Philip A., and Chris Shilling. 1993. Modernity, Self-Identity and the Sequestration of Death. Sociology 27 (3): 411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, Ananda. 2010. Creating a Presence on Social Networks Via Narbs. Global Media Journal 9 (16): 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, Robert A. 2001. Meaning Reconstruction & the Experience of Loss. American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, Carl, and David Watson. 2019. Are the Dead Taking Over Facebook? A Big Data Approach to the Future of Death Online. Big Data & Society 6: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719842540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul-Choudhury, Sumit. 2011. Digital Legacy: The Fate of Your Online Soul. New Scientist 210 (2809): 41–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, Natalie. 2013. You Don’t De-Friend the Dead: An Analysis of Grief Communication by College Students Through Facebook Profiles. Death Studies 37 (July 2015): 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2012.673536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Whitney. 2011. LOLing at Tragedy: Facebook Trolls, Memorial Pages and Resistance to Grief Online. 16 (12): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitsillides, S., M. Waller, and D. Fairfax. 2013. What Role Does Digital Information Play in the Way We Are (Re)Membered. In Digital Death, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett, Terry. 2008. Going Postal: The Hilarious Novel from the Fantastically Funny Terry Pratchett. Vol. 33. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechers, Angela. 2012. My Mourning Junkie: Wailing at the Facebook Wall. In Workshop on Memento Mori: Held in Conjunction with ACM SIGCHI 2012 in Austin, Texas, vol. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, Paul C. 2008. Grief Across Cultures: A Review and Research Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, Maggi, and David Burden. 2019. Digital Immortality and Virtual Humans. Postdigital Science and Education 1 (1): 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, Maggi, and Victoria Mason-Robbie. 2020. Digital Afterlife: Death Matters in a Digital Age. CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seigfried-Spellar, K., and S. Chowdhury. 2017. Death and Lolz- Understanding the Personality Characteristics of RIP Trolls. In 22nd Annual CyberPsychology, CyberTherapy & Social Networking Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, N. 2001. Theories of Grief: A Critical Review. In Grief, Mourning and Death Rituals, ed. J. Hockey, J. Katz, and N. Small. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofka, Carla J. 1997. Social Support ‘Internetworks.’ Caskets for Sale, and More: Thanatology and the Information Superhighway. Death Studies 21 (6): 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811897201778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofka, Carla. 2020. The Transition from Life to the Digital Afterlife. In Digital Afterlife: Death Matters in a Digital Age, 57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sofka, C., I. Cupit, and K. Gilbert. 2012. In Dying, Death, and Grief in an Online Universe, ed. Carla J. Sofka, Illene N. Cupit, and Kathleen R. Gilbert. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrive Global. 2017. Thrive Global. 2017. https://journal.thriveglobal.com/michael-hebb-death-over-dinner-38ae6553d21b

  • Valentine, Christine. 2008. Bereavement Narratives: Continuing Bonds in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Tony. 1994. The Revival of Death. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. A New Model of Grief: Bereavement and Biography.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Jade’s Dying Body: The Ultimate Reality Show. Sociological Research Online 14 (5). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2061.

  • ———. 2017. How the Dead Survive. In Postmortal Society, ed. Hviid Jacobsen, 1st ed., 19–39. Oxford: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Tony, Rachid Hourizi, Wendy Moncur, and Stacey Pitsillides. 2012. Does the Internet Change How We Die and Mourn? Overview and Analysis. Omega: The Journal of Death and Dying 64 (4): 275–302. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.64.4.a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, T. 2015. Paris Charlie Hebdo Attack: Je Suis Charlie Hashtag One of Most Popular in Twitter History. Telegraph Online. 2015. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11336879/Paris-Charlie-Hebdo-attack-Je-Suis-Charlie-hashtag-one-of-most-popular-in-Twitter-history.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra J. Bassett .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bassett, D.J. (2022). Introduction: Contextualising Digital Afterlives. In: The Creation and Inheritance of Digital Afterlives. Palgrave Studies in the Future of Humanity and its Successors. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91684-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation