User Experience Design in Software and Hardware Components Studied in Human-Computer Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering II (ADM 2021)

Abstract

User Experience (UX) is a concept based on the human-product interaction. An increase of UX studies in the Human-Computer interaction (HCI) field was observed in the last decade. Empirical studies based their experimental activity on HCI products, which are characterized by two components: Software and intangible (digital interfaces and web apps) and Hardware and physical (devices). Trough an explorative study, the authors propose a research direction to compares UX studies targeting software and hardware components of HCI products. A preliminary sample of papers was considered. The authors collected contributions where UX in HCI design is investigated through case studies involving devices with software and hardware components. Objectives, methods, and tools of each case study were compared. It emerged that complex systems require both quantitative and qualitative analysis approaches, as the wide variety of tools for data acquisition and processing show. Since Hardware components are more closely related to products such as consumer goods and engineering products, it is possible that methods and tools used to study hardware components could also be applicable to other physical and tangible products, i.e., the main reference for product, engineering, and mechanical design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 263.74
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norman, D., Miller, J., Henderson, A.: What You See, Some of What’s in the Future, And How We Go About Doing It: HI at Apple Computer, p. 1. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as Experience, vol. 11. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Law, E.L.-C., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Hassenzahl, M., Blythe, M.: Towards a UX Manifesto. In: Proceedings of HCI 2007, the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference University of Lancaster, UK (Sep. 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Martens, J.-B.: User experience over time: an initial framework. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, pp. 729–738 (Apr. 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Law, E.-C., van Schaik, P.: Modelling user experience – an agenda for research and practice. Interact. Comput. 22(5), 313–322 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassenzahl, M.: Experience design: technology for all the right reasons. Synth. Lect. Hum. Center. Inform. 3(1), 1–95 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pucillo, F., Cascini, G.: A framework for user experience, needs and affordances. Des. Stud. 35(2), 160–179 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ogunyemi, A.A., Lamas, D., Lárusdóttir, M.K., Loizides, F.: A systematic map** study of HCI practice research. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 35(16), 1461–1486 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience – a research agenda. Behav. Inform. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wong, M.L., Khong, C.W., Thwaites, H.: Applied UX and UCD design process. Interface Des. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 51, 703–708 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Remy, C., Huang, E.M.: Addressing the Obsolescence of End-User Devices: Approaches from the Field of Sustainable HCI. In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. AISC, vol. 310, pp. 257–267. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson, J., Lanius, C., Weber, R.: The past, present, and future of UX empirical research. Commun. Des. Q. Rev. 5(3), 10–23 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berni, A., Borgianni, Y.: Applications of virtual reality in engineering and product design: why, what, how, when and where. Electronics 9(7), 1064 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berni, A., Borgianni, Y.: From the definition of user experience to a framework to classify its applications in design. In: 23rd International Conference on Engineering Design ICED (Aug. 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alben, L.: Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design. Interactions 3(3), 11–15 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19(4), 319–349 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Norman, D.A.: Emotional design. Ubiquity, p. 1 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ding, Y., Cao, Y., Qu, Q., Duffy, V.G.: An exploratory study using electroencephalography (EEG) to measure the smartphone user experience in the short term. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(11), 1008–1021 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ekşioğlu, M.: User experience design of a prototype Kiosk: a case for the Istanbul public transportation system. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 32(10), 802–813 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, S., Ryu, H., Park, B., Yun, M.H.: Using physiological recordings for studying user experience: case of conversational agent-equipped TV. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(9), 815–827 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ducasse, J., Kljun, M., Čopič Pucihar, K.: Interactive web documentaries: a case study of audience reception and user engagement on iOtok. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(16), 1558–1584 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alhadreti, O.: Assessing academics’ perceptions of blackboard usability using SUS and CSUQ: a case study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., 1–13 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lindgaard, G.: Challenges to assessing usability in the wild: a case study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 31(9), 618–631 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Assila, A., de Oliveira, K.M., Ezzedine, H.: Integration of subjective and objective usability evaluation based on IEC/IEC 15939: a case study for traffic supervision systems. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 32(12), 931–955 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rhiu, I., Yun, M.H.: Exploring user experience of smartphones in social media: a mixed-method analysis. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 34(10), 960–969 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aizpurua, A., Miñón, R., Gamecho, B., Cearreta, I., Arrue, M., Garay-Vitoria, N.: Accessible ubiquitous services for supporting daily activities: a case study with young adults with intellectual disabilities. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 35(17), 1608–1629 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Choe, M., Choi, Y., Kim, H.K.: Comparison of gaze cursor input methods for virtual reality devices. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 35(7), 620–629 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buck, R., Khan, M., Fagan, M., Coman, E.: The user affective experience scale: a measure of emotions anticipated in response to pop-up computer warnings. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 34(1), 25–34 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shin, D.-H.: Cross-platform users’ experiences toward designing interusable systems. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 32(7), 503–514 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Petrie, H., Othman, M.K., Power, C.: Smartphone guide technology in cultural spaces: measuring visitor experience with an iPhone multimedia guide in Shakespeare’s Church. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 33(12), 973–983 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim, M., Kim, J., Jeong, K., Kim, C.: Gras** VR: presence of pseudo-haptic interface based portable hand grip system in immersive virtual reality. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 36(7), 685–698 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sekhavat, Y.A., Zarei, H.: Sense of immersion in computer games using single and stereoscopic augmented reality. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 34(2), 187–194 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cristescu, I.: Motions in human-computer interaction: the role of nonverbal behavior in interactive systems. Inform. Econ. 1(42), 7 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurora Berni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Berni, A., Borgianni, Y. (2022). User Experience Design in Software and Hardware Components Studied in Human-Computer Interaction. In: Rizzi, C., Campana, F., Bici, M., Gherardini, F., Ingrassia, T., Cicconi, P. (eds) Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering II. ADM 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91234-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91234-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91233-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91234-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation