Abstract

Referencing Baxter’s chapter in the first edition, this chapter is able initially to report on an increased level of institutional acceptance of Practice as Research (PaR) in South Africa since 2017. Drawing on a review informed by recent interviews, it reports that Master’s programmes are more successful than PhDs because they are less subject to a lingering logocentrism and the challenge of meeting examination requirements which reinforce the global North as knowledge centre. A pragmatic approach continues to nudge things forward as the limitations of the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) system emerge. But, along with a dynamic practitioner-researcher culture driving new inter-disciplinary forms, a growing sense of decolonizing radicalism promises further systemic change in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    With thank our interviewees: Chris Broodryk (University of Pretoria), DeBeer Cloete (University of the Free State), Marié-Heleen Coetzee (University of Pretoria), Christo Doherty (University of Witwatersrand), Juanita Finestone (University Currently Known As Rhodes), Mark Fleishman (University of Cape Town), Pedzisai Maedza (University of Warwick), Sara Matchett (University of Cape Town), Allan Munro (University of Pretoria), Samuel Ravengai (University of Witwatersrand), Brenda Schmahmann (University of Johannesburg), Myer Taub (University of Witwatersrand) and Miranda Young (University of KwaZulu-Natal). We also offer thanks to colleagues who responded with such speed and generosity.

  2. 2.

    See Stewart on the paucity of research on PaR “structural and implementation issues,” globally as well as in South Africa (2021: 12).

  3. 3.

    Baxter, 2013: 171–174.

  4. 4.

    Higher Education Act, no. 101 of 1997, as amended 2017: Section 3.

  5. 5.

    Borgdorff, 2012: 24–25.

  6. 6.

    As a starting point for further reading on these movements and their particular influence on decolonization in the arts, see Same Mdluli’s article (2017).

  7. 7.

    Kramer et al. discuss this unhelpful binary between global South and global North in their analysis of PaR applied research and knowledge-producing systems in South Africa (2019: 2).

  8. 8.

    2020: 56.

  9. 9.

    Coetzee, Cloete, Finestone, Fleishman, Maedza, Matchett, Ravengai, Schmahmann, interviews, 2021, June. See also Stewart, 2021 for a detailed unpacking of current “artistic research” PhD programmes in South Africa.

  10. 10.

    Fleishman, Finestone, Schmahmann, interviews, 2021, June.

  11. 11.

    Ravengai, Young, interviews, 2021, June.

  12. 12.

    Unfortunately, there is not space in this chapter to go into incidences of MA by PaR difficulties with examiners, but we encourage readers to pursue the published writing of those we interviewed for more insights.

  13. 13.

    See also Stewart, 2021: 7, citing Vanlee and Ysebaert, 2019: 38.

  14. 14.

    Interview, 2021, June.

  15. 15.

    Stewart discusses this point of originality in PhD as opposed to PhD work from the perspective of assessment, rather than research process (2021: 8).

  16. 16.

    Interview, 2021, June.

  17. 17.

    Young, Cloete, Doherty, Schmahmann, Broodryk, and Matchett, interviews, 2021, June.

  18. 18.

    Doherty, interview, 2021, June.

  19. 19.

    Matchett, Fleishman, interview, 2021, June.

  20. 20.

    Ravengai, interview, 2021, June.

  21. 21.

    Taub, Doherty, Maedza interviews, 2021, June.

  22. 22.

    Taub, interview, 2021, June.

  23. 23.

    Interview, 2021, June.

  24. 24.

    Interview, 2021, June.

  25. 25.

    Young, interview, 2021, June. See also Kramer et al. on the value of innovative approaches to knowledge production, especially in South Africa’s post-apartheid context of “uneven access to higher education facilities, unequal employment opportunities in research-based institutions and underrepresentation of previously disadvantaged groups in knowledge-making contexts” (2019: 5, citing Waghid, 2002).

  26. 26.

    Interview, 2021, June.

  27. 27.

    Interview, 2021, June.

  28. 28.

    Interview, 2021, June.

  29. 29.

    Interview, 2021, June.

  30. 30.

    Interviews, 2021, June.

  31. 31.

    2021 Huddersfield talk.

  32. 32.

    Interview, 2021, June. See also the Arts Research Africa project for more insights on arts PaR throughout the continent: https://www.wits.ac.za/ara-conference/about-ara/

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Nelson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nelson, R., Halligey, A., Low, K. (2022). South Africa. In: Practice as Research in the Arts (and Beyond). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90542-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation