Abstract
English-medium instruction (EMI) has already been an inseparable component of numerous tertiary education systems across the globe. As a receptive skill, reading is considered to be the main input source in EMI contexts. Given the gap between departmental studies and intensive English programs, the complexity of reading texts in EMI courses can place a burden on university students, especially for those who cannot employ effective reading strategies. Therefore, this mixed method study aims to investigate the metacognitive reading strategies used by students at a technical university in Turkey where EMI is implemented in engineering departments. To triangulate the quantitative data retrieved from a scale called Metacognitive Reading Strategies Questionnaire (MRSQ), a focus group interview session was conducted with six participants. For data analysis, NVivo 12 Pro and Amazon AWS Transcribe were used. The quantitative results showed that the participants tended to use analytic strategies (determining the meaning of critical words, visualizing descriptions and drawing on self-knowledge) more than pragmatic ones (re-reading for better comprehension and making notes to help them remember). However, the qualitative results revealed that the interviewed participants favored pragmatic strategies: they made notes, underlined critical information, translated and used margins for notetaking. In addition, the participants highlighted the importance of guidance by their EMI instructors as regards the use of strategies. The pedagogical implications of this study encourage the implementation of both analytic and pragmatic reading strategies in EMI settings and highlight the importance of PD (Professional Development) activities to train subject teachers in implementing strategies in their courses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063–1081.
Airey, J. (2011). The disciplinary literacy discussion matrix: A heuristic tool for initiating collaboration in higher education. Across the Disciplines, 8(3). http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/clil/airey.cfm
Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2006). Language and the experience of learning university physics in Sweden. European Journal of Physics, 27, 553–560.
Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalisation and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education & Management, 10(1), 3–25.
Arkın, İ. E. (2013). English-medium instruction in higher education: A case study in a Turkish university context. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU).
Başıbek, N., Dolmacı, M., Cengiz, B. C., Bür, B., Dilek, Y., & Kara, B. (2014). Lecturers’ perceptions of English medium instruction at engineering departments of higher education: A study on partial English medium instruction at some state universities in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1819–1825.
Byun, K., Chu, H., Kim, M., Park, I., Kim, S., & Jung, J. (2011). English-medium teaching in Korean higher education: Policy debates and reality. Higher Education, 62(4), 431–449.
Coşgun, G., & Hasırcı, B. (2017). The impact of English medium instruction (EMI) on students’ language abilities. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 9, 11–20.
Cresswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). PHI Learning Private.
Çubukcu, F. (2008). How to enhance reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. The Journal of International Social Research, 1&2, 83–93.
Dafouz, E., & Camacho-Miñano, M. M. (2016). Exploring the impact of English-medium instruction on university student academic achievement: The case of accounting. English for Specific Purposes, 44, 57–67.
Dearden, J. (2015). English as a medium of instruction-a growing global phenomenon. British Council. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/e484_emi_cover_option_3_final_ web.pdf
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2011). Internationalisation, multilingualism and English‐medium instruction. World Englishes, 30(3), 345–359.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Ekoç, A. (2020). English medium instruction (EMI) from the perspectives of students at a technical university in Turkey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 231–243.
Farrell, T. S. (2020). Professional development through reflective practice for English-medium instruction (EMI) teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 277–286.
Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 21–45.
Floris, F. D. (2014). Learning subject matter through English as the medium of instruction: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Asian Englishes, 16(1), 47–59.
Hosenfeld, C. (1976). Learning about learning: Discovering our students’ strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 9, 117–129.
Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5, 110–123.
Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2014). English-medium instruction in Chinese higher education: A case study. Higher Education, 67(5), 551–567.
Iwai, Y. (2011). The effects of metacognitive reading strategies: Pedagogical implications for EFL/ESL teachers. The Reading Matrix, 11(2), 150–159.
Jiang, L., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2019). Implementing English-medium instruction (EMI) in China: Teachers’ practices and perceptions, and students’ learning motivation and needs. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 107–119.
Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Karakaş, A. (2014). Lecturers’ perceptions of their English abilities and language use in English-medium universities. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(2), 114–125.
Karakaş, A. (2016). Turkish lecturers’ views on the place of mother tongue in the teaching of content courses through English medium. Asian Englishes, 18(3), 1–16.
Karakaş, A. (2017). The forgotten voices in higher education: Students’ satisfaction with English-medium instruction. The Journal of English as an International Language, 12(1), 1–14.
Karbalaei, A. (2010). A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 165–180.
Kılıçkaya, F. (2006). Instructors’ attitudes towards English-medium instruction in Turkey. Humanising Language Teaching, 8(6), 1–16.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of foreign language instruction in an English-medium university in Turkey. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 81–93.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2013). Students’ approaches to learning in an English-medium higher education. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 2, 30–39.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2014). Students’ perceptions of English language versus Turkish language used as the medium of instruction in higher education in Turkey. Turkish Studies, 9(12), 443–459.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2018). Confronting similar challenges?: Exploring students’ experiences of studying engineering at a Turkish university: Turkish versus English-language medium of instruction. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 2-3, 145–160.
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178–181.
Lawrence, L. J. (2007). Cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies revisited: Implications for instruction. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 55–71.
Li, C., & Ruan, Z. (2015). Changes in beliefs about language learning among Chinese EAP learners in an EMI context in Mainland China: A socio-cultural perspective. System, 55, 43–52.
Li, S., & Munby, H. (1996). Metacognitive strategies in second language academic reading: A qualitative investigation. English for Specific Purposes, 15(3), 199–216.
Macaro, E. (2019). Exploring the role of language in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1620678
Macaro, E., & Akincioglu, M. (2018). Turkish university students’ perceptions about English medium instruction: Exploring year group, gender and university type as variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1367398
Macaro, E., Akincioglu, M., & Dearden, J. (2016). English medium instruction in universities: A collaborative experiment in Turkey. Studies in English Language Teaching, 4(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v4n1p51
Macaro, E., Akincioglu, M., & Han, S. (2020). English medium instruction in higher education: Teacher perspectives on professional development and certification. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 144–157.
Macaro, E., & Han, S. (2020). English medium instruction in China’s higher education: Teachers’ perspectives of competencies, certification and professional development. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(3), 219–231.
Malmström, H., Mežek, Š., Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., & Irvine, A. (2017). Engaging with terminology in the multilingual classroom: Teachers’ practices for bridging the gap between L1 lectures and English reading. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 3–18.
Nash-Ditzel, S. (2010). Metacognitive reading strategies can improve self-regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 45–63.
Nergis, A. (2013). Exploring the factors that affect reading comprehension of EAP learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 1–9.
Noda, M. (2003). Evaluation in reading. In H. Nara & M. Noda (Eds.), Acts of reading: Exploring connections in pedagogy of Japanese (pp. 197–222). University of Hawai’i Press.
Ölçü, Z., & Eröz, T. B. (2013). Attitudes of university faculty towards English medium instruction in Turkey. Çankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 185–200.
**, D. N. F. (2007). Medium and learning in Chinese and English in Hong Kong classrooms. Language Policy, 6(1), 163–183.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219–225.
Razı, S. (2008). The impact of learning multiple foreign languages on using metacognitive reading strategies. The Reading Matrix, 8, 117–138.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51.
Shaw, P., & McMillion, A. (2008). Proficiency effects and compensation in advanced second-language reading. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7(3), 123–143.
Singhal, M. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and L2 readers. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 1–10.
Somer, S. (2001). The role of English-medium instruction in engineering and architecture courses at Anadolu University. Unpublished master’s thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 304–318.
Taraban, R., Kerr, M., & Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students’ metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 67–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Çoban, M., Razı, S. (2022). Questioning the Metacognitive Reading Strategies in an English-Medium Instruction (EMI) Setting. In: Kirkgöz, Y., Karakaş, A. (eds) English as the Medium of Instruction in Turkish Higher Education. Multilingual Education, vol 40. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88597-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88597-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88596-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88597-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)