Feasibility of Usage of Waste Plastic as a Bitumen Modifier: A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Road and Airfield Pavement Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 193))

  • 764 Accesses

Abstract

Bitumen is prone to deformations and cracking under severe temperatures and under fatigue. To overcome these drawbacks bitumen is modified by adding various additives. SBS and crumb rubber are some of the conventional bitumen modification materials. Recently, waste plastic has also been identified as a viable material to be used in bitumen modification. This would decrease the cost of bitumen modification as well as would provide a sustainable solution for waste plastic disposal. It has been found that incorporation of waste plastic in bitumen modification could increase the fracture resistance, rutting resistance and thermal stability of asphalt pavements. However, the ductility, elasticity and creep resistance were found to be decreased in waste plastic modified bitumen. Further, increased viscosity due to incorporation of waste plastic in bitumen modification had induced poor workability as well as higher mixing and paving temperatures. Increased temperatures not only cause ageing of bitumen but also cause emissions which could affect adversely on the environment. This paper critically reviews the properties of waste plastic modified bitumen with respect to several factors: types of plastic, modification methods, optimum plastic percentage, mixing temperature etc. Further, the paper discusses about the remedial measures that are being explored to improve the aforementioned drawbacks of waste plastic modified bitumen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacob H (1989) Classification, structure, genesis and practical importance of natural solid oil bitumen (“migrabitumen”). Int J Coal Geol 11(1):65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehrotra AK, Svrcek WY (1986) Viscosity of compressed Athabasca bitumen. Can J Chem Eng 64(5):844–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubio MC et al (2012) Warm mix asphalt: an overview. J Clean Prod 24:76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Svrcek WY, Mehrotra AK (1982) Gas solubility, viscosity and density measurements for Athabasca bitumen. J Can Petrol Technol 21(04)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sulyman M, Sienkiewicz M, Haponiuk J (2014) Asphalt pavement material improvement: a review. Int J Environ Sci Dev 5(5):444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu S, Ye Q, Li N (2008) Investigation of rheological and fatigue properties of asphalt mixtures containing polyester fibers. Constr Build Mater 22(10):2111–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Airey G, Singleton T, Collop A (2002) Properties of polymer modified bitumen after rubber-bitumen interaction. J Mater Civ Eng 14(4):344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kök BV, Çolak H (2011) Laboratory comparison of the crumb-rubber and SBS modified bitumen and hot mix asphalt. Constr Build Mater 25(8):3204–3212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jamshidi A et al (2017) Performance of pavements incorporating industrial byproducts: a state-of-the-art study. J Clean Prod 164:367–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leng Z, Padhan RK, Sreeram A (2018) Production of a sustainable paving material through chemical recycling of waste PET into crumb rubber modified asphalt. J Clean Prod 180:682–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ling T et al (2019) Value-added application of waste rubber and waste plastic in asphalt binder as a multifunctional additive. Materials 12(8):1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Awwad MT, Shbeeb L (2007) The use of polyethylene in hot asphalt mixtures. Am J Appl Sci 4(6):390–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Costa LM et al (2019) Using waste polymers as a reliable alternative for asphalt binder modification–performance and morphological assessment. Constr Build Mater 198:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kajugaran S, Weragoda V (2016) Development of polymer modified asphalt using filler. In: 2016 Moratuwa engineering research conference (MERCon). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khurshid MB et al (2019) Enhancement of hot mix asphalt (HMA) properties using waste polymers. Arab J Sci Eng 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  16. Punith V, Veeraragavan A (2007) Behavior of asphalt concrete mixtures with reclaimed polyethylene as additive. J Mater Civ Eng 19(6):500–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mortimer G (2017) Getting rid of plastic bags: a windfall for supermarkets but it won’t do much for the environment. Conversation 17

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mathew TV, Rao KK (2007) Chapter 23 pavement materials: bitumen, in pavement materials: bitumen, introduction to transportation engineering, NPTEL

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elseifi MA, Flintsch GW, Al-Qadi IL (2003) Quantitative effect of elastomeric modification on binder performance at intermediate and high temperatures. J Mater Civ Eng 15(1):32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Habib NZ et al (2011) Rheological properties of polyethylene and polypropylene modified bitumen. Int J Civil Environ Eng 3(2):96–100

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sitinamaluwa HS, Mampearachchi WK (2014) Development of a polymer-modified bitumen specification based on empirical tests–case study for Sri Lanka. Road Mater Pavement Des 15(3):712–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Özen H et al (2008) Laboratory performance comparison of the elastomer-modified asphalt mixtures. Build Environ 43(7):1270–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Airey GD (2003) Rheological properties of styrene butadiene styrene polymer modified road bitumens☆. Fuel 82(14):1709–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Painter P, Coleman M (1997) Crystallization, melting and glass transition. Fundamentals of polymer science. In: Painter PC, Coleman MM (eds) 2nd ed. Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., pp 259–303

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scofield L (1989) The history, development, and performance of asphalt rubber at ADOT: special report. 1989: Arizona Department of Transportation

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang B et al (2002) Louisiana experience with crumb rubber-modified hot-mix asphalt pavement. Transp Res Rec 1789(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee S-J et al (2007) Laboratory study of the effects of compaction on the volumetric and rutting properties of CRM asphalt mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng 19(12):1079–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang RY, Lee S (1996) Short-term and long-term aging behavior of rubber modified asphalt paving mixture. Transp Res Rec 1530(1):11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. **ao F, Amirkhanian SN (2008) Resilient modulus behavior of rubberized asphalt concrete mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Road Mater Pavement Des 9(4):633–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shu X, Huang B (2014) Recycling of waste tire rubber in asphalt and portland cement concrete: an overview. Constr Build Mater 67:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Newman K (2004) Polymer-modified asphalt mixtures for heavy-duty pavements: fatigue characteristics as measured by flexural beam testing. In: FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference, Atlantic city, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ota Vacin C (2002) Investigation of polymer modified asphalt by shear and tensile compliances. In: Material characterization for inputs into AASHTO 2002 guide session of the 2004 annual conference transportation association, Canada, Québec City, Québec

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zia KM, Bhatti HN, Bhatti IA (2007) Methods for polyurethane and polyurethane composites, recycling and recovery: a review. React Funct Polym 67(8):675–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Celauro C, Saroufim E, Mistretta MC, La Mantia FP (2020) Influence of short-term aging on mechanical properties and morphology of polymer-modified bitumen with recycled plastics from waste materials. Polymers 12(9):1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. González O et al (2002) Rheological techniques as a tool to analyze polymer− bitumen interactions: bitumen modified with polyethylene and polyethylene-based blends. Energy Fuels 16(5):1256–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abtahi SM, Sheikhzadeh M, Hejazi SM (2010) Fiber-reinforced asphalt-concrete–a review. Constr Build Mater 24(6):871–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tapkın S, Çevik A, Uşar Ü (2009) Accumulated strain prediction of polypropylene modified Marshall specimens in repeated creep test using artificial neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 36(8):11186–11197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Abtahi S et al (209) A comparative study on the use of SBS polymers and polypropylene fibers modifying asphalt concrete structures. In: International conference sustainable aggregates, asphalt technology and pavement

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tapkın S et al (2009) Repeated creep behavior of polypropylene fiber-reinforced bituminous mixtures. J Transp Eng 135(4):240–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huang H, White TD (1996) Dynamic properties of fiber-modified overlay mixture. Transp Res Rec 1545(1):98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ahmadinia E et al (2012) Performance evaluation of utilization of waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in stone mastic asphalt. Constr Build Mater 36:984–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Garcia-Morales M et al (2006) Effect of waste polymer addition on the rheology of modified bitumen. Fuel 85(7–8):936–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kulo g ˇ lu N (1999) Effect of astragalus on characteristics of asphalt concrete. J Mater Civil Eng 11(4): 283–286

    Google Scholar 

  44. Padhan RK et al (2013) Poly (ethylene terephthalate) waste derived chemicals as an antistrip** additive for bitumen–an environment friendly approach for disposal of environmentally hazardous material. Polym Degrad Stab 98(12):2592–2601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Anurag K, **ao F, Amirkhanian SN (2009) Laboratory investigation of indirect tensile strength using roofing polyester waste fibers in hot mix asphalt. Constr Build Mater 23(5):2035–2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen J-S, Lin K-Y (2005) Mechanism and behavior of bitumen strength reinforcement using fibers. J Mater Sci 40(1):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen H, Xu Q (2010) Experimental study of fibers in stabilizing and reinforcing asphalt binder. Fuel 89(7):1616–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Maurer DA, Malasheskie GJ (1989) Field performance of fabrics and fibers to retard reflective cracking. Geotext Geomembr 8(3):239–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Nai-sheng G, Ying-hua Z, Lue-lun S (2006) Effect of fiber contents on toughness of polyester fiber asphalt concrete. J Traffic Transp Eng 4

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ye Q, Wu S (2009) Rheological characteristics of polyester fiber modified asphalt mastic. J Highw Transp Res Dev 9:007

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fitzgerald RL (2000) Novel applications of caron fiber hot mix asphalt reinforcement and carbon-carbon pre-forms. Michigan Technological University Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yao Z et al (2018) Integrated utilization of recycled crumb rubber and polyethylene for enhancing the performance of modified bitumen. Constr Build Mater 170:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang J et al (2019) Experimental evaluation of crumb rubber and polyethylene integrated modified asphalt mixture upon related properties. Road Mater Pavement Des 20(6):1413–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shankani Gunarathna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gunarathna, S., Mampearachchi, W.K. (2022). Feasibility of Usage of Waste Plastic as a Bitumen Modifier: A Review. In: Pasindu, H.R., Bandara, S., Mampearachchi, W.K., Fwa, T.F. (eds) Road and Airfield Pavement Technology. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87379-0_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87379-0_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87378-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87379-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation