Quantum Logical Information Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Foundations for Information Theory

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy ((BRIEFSPHILOSOPH))

  • 561 Accesses

Abstract

The transition to density matrices in QM is facilitated by reformulating the ‘classical’ (i.e., non-quantum) results about logical entropy using density matrices. Then the transition to the quantum version of logical entropy is made using the semi-algorithmic procedure of “linearization.” Given a concept applied to sets, apply that concept to the basis set of a vector space and whatever it linearly generates gives the corresponding vector space concept. Classically, the logical entropy \(h\left ( f^{-1}\right ) \) of the inverse-image partition of \(f:U\rightarrow \mathbb {R} \) with point probabilities on U is the application of the product probability p × p measure on U × U to the ditset \(\operatorname {dit}\left ( f^{-1}\right ) \). That is linearized in quantum logical information theory with qudit spaces replacing the ditsets. Another set of classical definitions start with two probability distributions \(p=\left ( p_{1},\ldots ,p_{n}\right ) \) and \(q=\left ( q_{1},\ldots ,q_{n}\right ) \) over the same index set. Since probability distributions are supplied by density matrices, the corresponding quantum logical notions are developed starting with two density matrices ρ and τ. Finally, we show how to make the generalization of Hamming distance and that it in fact ends up being the same as the existing quantum notion of the Hilbert-Schmidt distance between two density matrices—which is the quantum version of the Euclidean distance squared d(p||q) between two probability distributions in ‘classical’ logical information theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 53.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 68.56
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The row designators are on listed on the left-hand side of the tensor product and the column designators are similar.

  2. 2.

    This notion of “decoherence” is used in an older sense, not the recent sense given by the work of Zurek [14] and others.

  3. 3.

    Many of these results in this chapter were developed in [6].

References

  1. Auletta, Gennaro, Mauro Fortunato, and Giorgio Parisi. 2009. Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, Charles H. 2003. Quantum Information: Qubits and Quantum Error Correction. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42: 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024439131297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Birkhoff, Garrett, and John Von Neumann. 1936. The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 37: 823–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen-Tannoudji, Claude, Bernard Diu, and Franck Laloë. 2005. Quantum Mechanics: Volumes 1 and 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ellerman, David. 2009. Counting Distinctions: On the Conceptual Foundations of Shannon’s Information Theory. Synthese 168: 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9333-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellerman, David. 2018. Logical Entropy: Introduction to Classical and Quantum Logical Information Theory. Entropy 20: Article ID 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20090679.

  7. Ellerman, David. 2018. The quantum logic of direct-sum decompositions: the dual to the quantum logic of subspaces. Logic Journal of the IGPL 26: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzx026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fano, Ugo. 1957. Description of States in Quantum Mechanics by Density Matrix and Operator Techniques. Reviews of Modern Physics 29: 74–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaeger, Gregg. 2007. Quantum Information: An Overview. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manfredi, Giovanni, and M. R. Feix. 2000. Entropy and Wigner Functions. Physical Review E 62: 4665–4674. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.4665.

  11. Nielsen, Michael, and Isaac Chuang. 2000. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tamir, Boaz, and Eliahu Cohen. 2014. Logical Entropy for Quantum States. Ar**v.org. http://de.arxiv.org/abs/1412.0616v2.

  13. Tamir, Boaz, and Eliahu Cohen. 2015. A Holevo-type bound for a Hilbert Schmidt distance measure. Journal of Quantum Information Science 5: 127–133. https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2015.54015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zurek, Wojciech Hubert. 2003. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Review of Modern Physics 75: 715–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ellerman, D. (2021). Quantum Logical Information Theory. In: New Foundations for Information Theory. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86552-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation