Global Research Trend on Social Media for Election: A Bibliometrics Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Comprehensible Science (ICCS 2021)

Abstract

Social media can be used by users to communicate, and exchange information with each other. There has been a trend of global research on social media for elections in the last ten years. Therefore, this study aims to answer global research trends on social media for elections from 2010 to 2020. Method This study uses the Scopus search engine to identify social media literature for elections from 2010–2020. This study took articles from the Scopus database totaling 1555 documents. This study uses bibliometric analysis to complete records of every publication related to social media for elections, such as documents by affiliation, documents by country, documents by type, documents by source, and documents by year. This study uses VOS viewers for visualization analysis in the form of co-authorship and co-occurrence analysis. This study uses Nvivo 12 plus assistance to see the contribution of social media in the election. Finding in this study, the publication of global research on social media for elections from 2010 to 2020 has increased significantly every year. The United States has become the most contributing and leading country in global research on social media for election. Community Communication and Information and the Journal of Information Technology and Politics has the most publications related to social media research for election. Social media greatly contributed to the election both in political communication, candidate campaigns, and others. In future research, internet-based data collection systems associated with the public in elections will become increasingly popular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 192.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martínez-López, F.J., Merigó, J.M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., Nicolás, C.: Fifty years of the European journal of marketing: a bibliometric analysis. Eur. J. Mark. 52(1–2), 439–468 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, B., Sharma, A., Vatavwala, S., Kumar, P.: Digital mediation in business-to-business marketing: a bibliometric analysis. Ind. Mark. Manag. 85(September), 126–140 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nusair, K., Butt, I., Nikhashemi, S.R.: A bibliometric analysis of social media in hospitality and tourism research. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 31(7), 2691–2719 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Merigó, J.M., Yang, J.B.: A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega (U.K.) 73, 37–48 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Noor, S., Guo, Y., Shah, S.H.H., Saqib Nawaz, M., Butt, A.S.: Bibliometric analysis of social media as a platform for knowledge management. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. 16(3), 33–51 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, X., Wang, S., Tang, Y., Hao, T.: A bibliometric analysis of event detection in social media. Online Inf. Rev. 43(1), 29–52 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gan, C., Wang, W.: Research characteristics and status on social media in China: a bibliometric and co-word analysis. Scientometrics 105(2), 1167–1182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1723-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nurmandi, A., et al.: To what extent is social media used in city government policy making? Case studies in three asean cities. Public Policy Adm. 17(4), 600–618 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maurer, P., Diehl, T.: What kind of populism? Tone and targets in the Twitter discourse of French and American presidential candidates. Eur. J. Commun. 35(5), 453–468 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross, K., Fountaine, S., Comrie, M.: Facebooking a different campaign beat: party leaders, the press and public engagement. Media Cult. Soc. 42(7–8), 1260–1276 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cameron, M.P., Barrett, P., Stewardson, B.: Can social media predict election results? Evidence from New Zealand. J. Polit. Mark. 15(4), 416–432 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barclay, F.P., Chinnasamy, P., Pichandy, P.: Political opinion expressed in social media and election outcomes - US presidential elections 2012. GSTF J. Mob. Commun. Netw. Appl. 1(2), 19–26 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jamie Bartlett, S.J., Krasodomski-Jones, A., Daniel, N., Fisher, A.: Social media for election communication and monitoring in Nigeria. DEMOS Dep. Int. Dev., p. 64 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Falasca, K., Dymek, M., Grandien, C.: Social media election campaigning: who is working for whom? A conceptual exploration of digital political labour. Contemp. Soc. Sci. 14(1), 89–101 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elswah, M.P.N.H.: The challenges of monitoring social media in the arab world: the case of the 2019 Tunisian elections. In: COMPROP, pp. 1–6 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Enli, G.: Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. Eur. J. Commun. 32(1), 50–61 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klinger, U.: MASTERING THE ART OF SOCIAL MEDIA: swiss parties, the 2011 national election and digital challenges. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16(5), 717–736 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. **ng, D., Zhao, Y., Dong, S., Lin, J.: Global research trends in stem cells for osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized study. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 21(7), 1372–1384 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ellegaard, O., Wallin, J.A.: The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact? Scientometrics 105(3), 1809–1831 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J.M., Popa, S.: Twenty years of the journal of knowledge management: a bibliometric analysis. J. Knowl. Manag. 22(8), 1655–1687 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Modak, N.M., Lobos, V., Merigó, J.M., Gabrys, B., Lee, J.H.: Forty years of computers & chemical engineering: a bibliometric analysis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 141, 614–629 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J.M., Baier-Fuentes, H.: Knowledge management: a global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 140(July 2018), 194–220 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bonilla, C.A., Merigó, J.M., Torres-Abad, C.: Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 105(2), 1239–1252 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1747-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, M.H., Yu, T.C., Ho, Y.S.: A bibliometric analysis of the performance of water research. Scientometrics 84(3), 813–820 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., Strohmaier, M.: Election campaigning on social media: politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Polit. Commun. 35(1), 50–74 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Papakyriakopoulos, O., Serrano, J.C.M., Hegelich, S.: Political communication on social media: a tale of hyperactive users and bias in recommender systems. Online Soc. Networks Media 15, 100058 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nulty, P., Theocharis, Y., Popa, S.A., Parnet, O., Benoit, K.: Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European parliament. Elect. Stud. 44(July), 429–444 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kreiss, D., Mcgregor, S.C.: Technology firms shape political communication: the work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 U.S. presidential cycle. Polit. Commun. 35(2), 155–177 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stieglitz, S., Brockmann, T., Xuan, L. D.: Usage of social media for political communication. In: Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2012, no. July 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Narasimhamurthy, N.: Use and rise of social media as election campaign medium in India. Int. J. Interdiscip. Multidiscip. Stud. 1(8), 202–209 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. MacNamara, J., Kenning, G.: E-electioneering 2010: trends in social media use in Australian political communication. Media Int. Aust. 139(139), 7–22 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Valderrama-Zurián, J.C., Aguilar-Moya, R., Melero-Fuentes, D., Aleixandre-Benavent, R.: A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. J. Informetr. 9(3), 570–576 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Synnestvedt, M.B., Chen, C., Holmes, J.H.: CiteSpace II: visualization and knowledge discovery in bibliographic databases. In: AMIA 2005 Symposium Proceedings, pp. 724–728 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gan, C., Wang, W.: A bibliometric analysis of social media research from the perspective of library and information science. In: Li, H., Mäntymäki, M., Zhang, X. (eds.) I3E 2014. IAICT, vol. 445, pp. 23–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45526-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Leung, X.Y., Sun, J., Bai, B.: Bibliometrics of social media research: a co-citation and co-word analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 66, 35–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ball, P. : Pemilu Inggris: Mengapa disebut-sebut sebagai salah satu yang paling aneh dan unik di dunia? bbcnews.com Indonesia (2019). https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah-50674443

  37. Bovet, A., Makse, H.A.: Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1–14 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Karami, A., Bennett, L.S., He, X.: Mining public opinion about economic issues: Twitter and the U.S. presidential election. Int. J. Strateg. Decis. Sci. 9(1), 18–28 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Boulianne, S.: Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research. Inf. Commun. Soc. 18(5), 524–538 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gao, Y., et al.: Publication trends of research on diabetes mellitus and T cells (1997–2016): a 20-year bibliometric study. PLoS One 12(9), 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Subekti, D., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D.: Analysis of Twitter’s election official as tools for communication and interaction with indonesian public during the 2019 presidential election in indonesia. In: Antipova, T. (ed.) ICADS 2021. AISC, vol. 1352, pp. 309–323. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71782-7_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Enli, G., Moe, H.: Social media and election campaigns - key tendencies and ways forward. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16(5), 637–645 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Widhiasthini, N.W.: Sharing economy on election campaign through social media. Int. Res. J. Manag. IT Soc. Sci. 7(6), 79–85 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Subekti, D., Nurmandi, A., Salahudin (2022). Global Research Trend on Social Media for Election: A Bibliometrics Analysis. In: Antipova, T. (eds) Comprehensible Science. ICCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85799-8_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation