Abstract
This article offers an optimization procedure in designing much lighter supersonic wing by employing a composite structure by constraining the structural persistence due to flutter speed, a type of aeroelasticity failure. The application of composite material in aeroelasticity contributes to the changes in the expected flutter speed. The composite material such that graphite/epoxy gives high modulus compared to the metallic material such as aluminium where the structural flexibility could be improved. In contrast, the structural weight could be reduced through the optimization process. Technically, an optimization procedure that is utilizing the aeroelastic parameter as a constraint is called aeroelastic tailoring. In this paper, the objective of this tailoring process is to optimize the wing weight while maintaining the flutter boundaries, where the wing design adopted in this research has been analyzed at sea level. As the optimization process is on-going, the flutter speed and the plate manufacturing thickness become the restriction in the wing weight reduction. The investigation shows good agreement to the objective where the removal of weight for the High Modulus (HM) graphite/epoxy wing skin for the skin weight, clean wing and total wing with missile launcher external stores are 75.82%, 61.96% and 22.09%, respectively compared to the baseline aluminium wing model. For the tailoring process, it is found that the flutter Mach number increases more than 81% using as the Graphite/epoxy composite replaced the aluminium as the skin.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wright J, Cooper JE (2015) Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and loads, 2nd ed. Wiley
Jones L (1999) Mechanics of composite materials, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia
Kennedy G, Martins JRRA, Hansen JS (2008) Aerostructural optimization of aircraft structures using asymmetric subspace optimization. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Wu X, Dzenis YA (2001) Rate effects on mode-I delamination toughness of a graphite/eopxy laminated composite. Int J Fract Mech 112:9–12
MIL-A-8870C(AS) (1993) Military specification airplane strength and rigidity vibration, flutter, am divergence. Lakehurst, NJ
Abdullah NA, Sulaeman E (2014) Aeroelastic tailoring of oscillating supersonic wing with external stores. Appl Mech Mater 464:110–115
Rodden WP (1994) MSC/NASTRAN aeroelastic analysis: user’s guide, version 68. MSC.Software Corporation
Sulaeman E (2012) On the evaluation of negative altitude requirement for flutter speed boundary of transport aircraft and UAV. Appl Mech Mater 225:397–402
Azam N, Sulaeman E (2014) Aeroelastic flutter analysis of supersonic wing with multiple external stores. IIUM Eng J
Roylance D (2000) Laminated composite plates. Int J Mod Eng Res 15–17
Approved Navy Trainning System (2002) Plan for the AIM -9 sidewinder missile system
Approved Navy Trainning System (1998) Plan for the AIM-120 advanced medium range air to air missile. Nevada
Technology Z (2018) ZAERO versus 9.2 theoretical manual engineers’ toolkit for aeroelastic solutions, 3rd edn. ZONA Technology Inc., 9489 E. Ironwood Square Drive, Scottsdale
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude and thanks to Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE), Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE) and International Islamic University Malaysia for funding this research under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme for Research Acculturation of Early Career (RACER/1/2019/TK09/UIAM/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abdullah, N.A., Sulaeman, E., Ahmad, M.I.M. (2022). LCO Flutter Instability on Oscillating Supersonic Wing by Means of Linearized Aerodynamic Small Disturbance Theory. In: Abdullah, S., Karam Singh, S.S., Md Nor, N. (eds) Structural Integrity Cases in Mechanical and Civil Engineering. SDMMS 2020. Structural Integrity, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85646-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85646-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85645-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85646-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)