SpringerLink
Log in

Malingering and Invalid Test Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essential Neuropsychology: A Concise Handbook for Adult Practitioners

  • 1060 Accesses

Abstract

The assessment of performance and symptom validity is an important part of a standard neuropsychological evaluation. This chapter provides information regarding malingering and other types of noncredible performance along with a brief overview of available tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 53.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 68.56
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DeRight, J., & Carone, D. A. (2015). Assessment of effort in children: A systematic review. Child Neuropsychology, 21(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., Suhr, J. A., & Conference Participants. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1053–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharland, M. J., & Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chafetz, M. D. (2020). Deception is different: Negative validity test findings do not provide “evidence” for “good effort”. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1–21. Epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sherman, E. M., Slick, D. J., & Iverson, G. L. (2020). Multidimensional malingering criteria for neuropsychological assessment: A 20-year update of the malingered neuropsychological dysfunction criteria. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 735–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boone, K. B. (2017). Self-deception in somatoform conditions: Differentiating between conscious and nonconscious symptom feigning. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Neuropsychological evaluation of somatoform and other functional somatic conditions: Assessment primer (pp. 3–42). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin, P. K., & Schroeder, R. W. (2020). Base rates of invalid test performance across clinical non-forensic contexts and settings. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 717–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sollman, M. J., & Berry, D. T. (2011). Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic update and extension. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(8), 774–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bender, S. D., & Frederick, R. (2018). Neuropsychological models of feigned cognitive deficits. In R. E. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (4th ed.). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubenzer, S. (2018). Assessing negative response bias in competency to stand trial evaluations. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Donders, J. (2005). Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering in a mixed pediatric sample. Child Neuropsychology, 11(2), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris, M., & Merz, Z. C. (2021). High elevation rates of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) in neuropsychological patients. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult,1–8. Epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Millis, S. R. (2009). What clinicians really need to know about symptom exaggeration, insufficient effort, and malingering: Statistical and measurement matters. In J. E. Morgan & J. J. Sweet (Eds.), Neuropsychology of malingering casebook. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marcopulos, B. A., Caillouet, B. A., Bailey, C. M., Tussey, C., Kent, J. A., & Frederick, R. (2014). Clinical decision making in response to performance validity test failure in a psychiatric setting. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(4), 633–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McWhirter, L., Ritchie, C. W., Stone, J., & Carson, A. (2020). Performance validity test failure in clinical populations—A systematic review. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 91(9), 945–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, J. J., & Millis, S. R. (2014). Examination of performance validity test failure in relation to number of tests administered. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Donders, J., Lefebre, N., & Goldsworthy, R. (2021). Patterns of performance and symptom validity test findings after mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 36(3), 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DeRight, J., & Jorgensen, R. S. (2015). I just want my research credit: Frequency of suboptimal effort in a non-clinical healthy undergraduate sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(1), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amlani, A., Grewal, G. S., & Feldman, M. D. (2016). Malingering by proxy: A literature review and current perspectives. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 61, S171–S176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carone, D. A., Iverson, G. L., & Bush, S. S. (2010). A model to approaching and providing feedback to patients regarding invalid test performance in clinical neuropsychological evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(5), 759–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carone, D. A., & Bush, S. S. (2013). Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering. Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Slick, D. J., & Sherman, E. M. S. (2013). Differential diagnosis of malingering. In D. A. Carone & S. S. Bush (Eds.), Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering (pp. 57–72). Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Conference Participants. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(7), 1093–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Larrabee, G. J. (2008). Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: Relationship to likelihood ratios. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(4), 666–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Aggregating validity indicators: The salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 26(2), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Latcham, R., White, A., & Sims, A. (1978). Ganser syndrome: The aetiological argument. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 41(9), 851–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering: TOMM. Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Greene, R. L. (2000). The MMPI-2: An interpretive manual. Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Delis, D. C. (2000). California verbal learning test. Adult version. Manual. Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Green, P. (2005). Green’s Word Memory Test user’s manual. Green’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wechsler, D. (2009). Advanced clinical solutions for the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV. The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Poynter, K., Boone, K. B., Ermshar, A., Miora, D., Cottingham, M., Victor, T. L., Ziegler, E., Zeller, M. A., & Wright, M. (2019). Wait, there’s a baby in this bath water! Update on quantitative and qualitative cut-offs for Rey 15-Item Recall and Recognition. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(8), 1367–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rivera, D., Perrin, P. B., Weiler, G., Ocampo-Barba, N., Aliaga, A., Rodríguez, W., Rodríguez-Agudelo, Y., Aguayo, A., Longoni, M., Trapp, S., Esenarro, L., & Arango-Lasprilla, J. C. (2015). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data for the Latin American Spanish speaking adult population. NeuroRehabilitation, 37(4), 719–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chafetz, M. D., Prentkowski, E., & Rao, A. (2011). To work or not to work: Motivation (not low IQ) determines symptom validity test findings. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(4), 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Boone, K. B., Lu, P., & Herzberg, D. S. (2002). The b test. Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Boone, K., Lu, P., & Herzberg, D. (2002). The dot counting test. Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Erdodi, L. A., & Abeare, C. A. (2020). Stronger together: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition as a multivariate performance validity test in patients with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(2), 188–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Green, P. (2004a). Manual for the Medical Symptom Validity Test for Windows. Green’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Green, P. (2008). Green’s Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT) for Microsoft Windows: User’s manual 1.0. Green’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Green, P. (2004b). Memory Complaints Inventory. Green’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Olsen, D. H. (2020). Performance validity in the dementia clinic: Specificity of validity tests when used individually and in aggregate across levels of cognitive impairment severity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, June, 1–24. Epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Moore, R. A., Lippa, S. M., Brickell, T. A., French, L. M., & Lange, R. T. (2020). Clinical utility of WAIS-IV ‘excessive decline from premorbid functioning’ scores to detect invalid test performance following traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(3), 512–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Private Practice, McLean, VA, USA

    Jonathan DeRight

Authors
  1. Jonathan DeRight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

DeRight, J. (2022). Malingering and Invalid Test Performance. In: Essential Neuropsychology: A Concise Handbook for Adult Practitioners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85372-3_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation