Software Reliability Model Related to Total Number of Faults Under Imperfect Debugging

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing (IASC 2021)

Abstract

In the current research on software reliability models, the total number of faults and its relevance to imperfect debugging are not sufficiently emphasized or considered. To solve this problem, we firstly classify and analyze the total number of faults in the current reliability models, and then establish a generalized imperfect debugging framework model that considers fault detection and repair. On this basis, we further consider the phenomenon of introducing new faults in debugging and establish concrete imperfect debugging models from the perspective of incremental changes in the total number of faults. By using 12 publicly published failure data sets (FDS) widely used to evaluate the reliability models, we demonstrate the overall performance of the proposed models. The results show that the proposed models have an excellent account in fitting and prediction, which proves their effectiveness and flexibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmad, N., Bokhari, M.U., Quadri, S.M.K., et al.: The exponentiated Weibull software reliability growth model with various testing-efforts and optimal release policy: a performance analysis. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 25(2), 211–235 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yanniprincy, B., Sridhar, S.: Prediction of software reliability using cobb-douglas model in SRGM. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 62(2), 355–363 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, C., Meng, F., Kao, Y., et al.: Survey of software reliability growth model. J. Softw. 28(9), 2402–2430 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, C., Cui, G., Liu, H., et al.: Component-based software reliability process technologies. Chin. J. Comput. 37(12), 2586–2612 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, C., Meng, F., Wan, K., et al.: Analysis on SRGM modeling categories and performances. J. Harbin Inst. Technol. 48(8), 171–178 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goel, A.L., Okumoto, K.: Time-dependent error-detection rate model for software reliability and other performance measures. IEEE Trans. Reliab. R-28(3), 206–211 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.1979.5220566

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamada, S., Hishitani, J., Osaki, S.: Software-reliability growth with a Weibull test-effort: a model and application. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 42(1), 100–106 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapur, P.K., Pham, H., Anand, S., et al.: A Unified approach for develo** software reliability growth models in the presence of imperfect debugging and error generation. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 60(1), 331–340 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ompal, S., Reecha, K., Jagvinder, S.: Considering the effect of learning with two types of imperfect debugging in software reliability growth modeling. Commun. Dependability Qual. Manage. 13(4), 29–39 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, D., Kapur, R., Sehgal, V.K., Jha, P.C.: On the development of software reliability growth models with two types of imperfect debugging. Commun. Dependability Qual. Manage. 10(3), 105–122 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kapur, P.K., Shatnawi, O., Aggarwal, A.G., et al.: Unified framework for development testing effort dependent software reliability growth models. WSEAS Trans. Syst. 8(4), 521–531 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goseva-Popstojanova, K., Trivedi, K.S.: Failure correlation in software reliability models. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 49(1), 37–48 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiu, K.C., Huang, Y.S., Lee, T.Z.: A study of software reliability growth from the perspective of learning effects. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93(10), 1410–1421 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, C.Y., Lyu, M.R., Kuo, S.Y.: A Unified scheme of some nonhomogenous Poisson process models for software reliability estimation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 29(3), 261–269 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pham, H.: Software reliability and cost models: perspectives, comparison, and practice. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 149(3), 475–489 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsu, C.J., Huang, C.Y., Chang, J.R.: Enhancing software reliability modeling and prediction through the introduction of time-variable fault reduction factor. Appl. Math. Model. 35(1), 506–521 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pham, H., Nordmann, L., Zhang, X.: A general imperfect-software-debugging model with S-shaped fault-detection rate. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 48(2), 169–175 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wood, A.: Predicting software reliability. Computer 29(11), 69–77 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad, N., Khan, M.G.M., Rafi, L.S.: Analysis of an inflection s-shaped software reliability model considering log-logistic testing-effort and imperfect debugging. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 11(1), 161–171 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Musa, J.D., Iannino, A., Okumoto, K.: Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction and Application. McGraw Hill, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stringfellow, C., Andrews, A.A.: An empirical method for selecting software reliability growth models. Empir. Softw. Eng. 7(4), 319–343 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shyur, H.J.: A stochastic software reliability model with imperfect-debugging and change-point. J. Syst. Softw. 66(2), 135–141 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, X., Pham, H.: Software field failure rate prediction before software deployment. J. Syst. Softw. 79(3), 291–300 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamada, S., Tokuno, K., Osaki, S.: Imperfect debugging models with fault introduction rate for software reliability assessment. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 23(12), 2241–2252 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, X., Teng, X., Pham, H.: Considering fault removal efficiency in software reliability assessment. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 33(1), 114–120 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pham, H.: An imperfect-debugging fault-detection dependent-parameter software. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 4(4), 325–328 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pham, H., Zhang, X.M.: NHPP software reliability and cost models with testing coverage. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 145(2), 443–454 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ohba, M., Chou, X.M.: Does imperfect debugging affect software reliability growth? In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 237–244. ACM (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pham, H., Zhang, X.: An NHPP software reliability model and its comparison. Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng. 4(03), 269–282 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, C. et al. (2022). Software Reliability Model Related to Total Number of Faults Under Imperfect Debugging. In: Li, X. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing. IASC 2021. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 80. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81007-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation