SpringerLink
Log in

Using the MMPI-3 in Forensic Psychological Assessments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Forensic Psychology

Abstract

This chapter introduces the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) and provides considerations for its use in forensic psychological evaluations. We start with a brief historical overview of the MMPI instruments, culminating in the development of the MMPI-3. We describe the 52 scales of the test and general psychometric properties, including how research on previous MMPI versions can inform MMPI-3 interpretation. The remainder of our chapter focuses on considerations when using the MMPI-3 for various forensic applications, including competency to stand trial, criminal responsibility, violence risk assessment, mental injury and disability, and family court evaluations. We end the chapter with conclusions and future directions for MMPI-3 research to inform use of the test in forensic settings.

Yossef S. Ben-Porath is an author of the MMPI-3 and receives royalties from its sales. Yossef Ben-Porath, Martin Sellbom and Dustin Wygant are also paid consultants to the University of Minnesota Press, publisher of the MMPI instruments. All authors also receive research funding from the MMPI test publisher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, L., Quilty, L. C., Chmielewski, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Associations between DSM-5 Section III personality traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scales in a psychiatric patient sample. Psychological Assessment, 27, 811–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Veltri, C. O. C., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2000). The level of service inventory-revised. Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anestis, J. C., Finn, J. A., Gottfried, E. D., Hames, J. L., Bodell, L. P., Hagan, C. R., Arnau, R. C., Anestis, M. D., Arbisi, P. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2018). Burdensomeness, belongingness, and capability: Assessing the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide with MMPI-2- RF scales. Assessment, 25, 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbisi, P. A., Polusny, M. A., Erbes, C. R., Thuras, P., & Reddy, M. K. (2011). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form in National Guard soldiers screening positive for posttraumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury. Psychological Assessment, 23, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, E. M., Hagan, L. D., Mason, J., Handel, R. W., & Archer, R. P. (2012). MMPI-2-RF characteristics of custody evaluation litigants. Assessment, 19, 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2012). Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2013). Assessing personality and psychopathology with self-report inventories. In J.R. Graham & J.A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 10: Assessment). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath Y. S., & Tellegen A. (2008/2011). MMPI-2RF: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020b). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Puente, A. (2020). MMPI-3 Spanish manual supplement. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnie, R. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd, K. S. (2001). Assessing parenting competence in child protection cases: A clinical practice model. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K., Hart, S., Webster, C., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20 V3: Assessing risk for violence. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(3), 347–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Wygant, D. B. (2009). Empirical correlates and interpretation of the MMPI-2-RF Cognitive Complaints Scale. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 996–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wygant, D. B., & Green, P. (2007). Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2. Assessment, 14, 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. M., Morse, S. J., & Packer, I. K. (2013). Evaluation of criminal responsibility. In R. K. Otto & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume 11 forensic psychology (2nd ed., pp. 440–472). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. W., & Martindale, D. A. (2013). Child custody evaluations: Current literature and practical applications (Chapter 6, pp. 101–138). In I. Weiner (series ed.) & R. K. Otto (Ed.), Forensic psychology, Vol. 11 of the Handbook of psychology (2nd ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, L. M., Green, D., Belfi, B., McGrath, R. E., Griswold, H., & Schreiber, J. (2015). Identifying aggression in forensic inpatients using the MMPI-2-RF: An examination of MMPI-2-RF scale scores and estimated psychopathy indices. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14(4), 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (Vol. 2). Solicitor General Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J.L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issues from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291–315). Springer Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R. (1960). Foreword. In W. G. Dahlstrom & G. S. Welsh (Eds.), An MMPI handbook: A guide to use in clinical practice and research (pp. vii–xi). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R. (1972). Foreword. In G. S. Welsh & W. G. Dahlstrom (Eds.), An MMPI handbook, Vol 1, Clinical interpretation (pp. xiii–iv). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1940). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule. Journal of Psychology, 10, 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P. B., & Ternes, M. S. (2016). The detection of content-based invalid responding: A meta-analysis of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form’s (MMPI-2-RF) over-reporting validity scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein Haneveld, E., Kamphuis, J. H., Smid, W., & Forbey, J. D. (2017). Using MMPI–2–RF correlates to elucidate the PCL–R and its four facets in a sample of male forensic psychiatric patients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(4), 398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotov, R., Krueger, R.F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T.M., Althoff, R.R., Bagby, R.M., Brown, T. A., Carpenter, W. T., Caspi A., Anna Clark, L., Eaton, N. R., Forbes, M. K., Forbush, K. T., Goldberg, D., Hasin, D., Hyman, S. E., Ivanova, M. Y., Lynam, D. R., Markon, K., … Zimmerman, M. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraeplin, E. (1921). Ueber Entwurtzelung. Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Neurologie Und Psychiatrie, 63, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutchen, T. J., Wygant, D. B., Tylicki, J. L., Dieter, A. M., Veltri, C. O., & Sellbom, M. (2017). Construct validity of the MMPI–2–RF Triarchic Psychopathy Scales in correctional and collegiate samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(4), 408–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1972). Some limitations of objective personality tests. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives (pp. 45–58). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin, B., Wallis, R. R., & Paine, C. (1971). Patterns of psychological test usage in the United States: 1935–1969. Professional Psychology, 2, 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marek, R. J., Martin-Fernandez, K., Heinberg, L. J., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2020). An investigation of the eating concerns scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–3 (MMPI-3) in a postoperative bariatric surgery sample. Obesity Surgery, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05113-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S. (1986). The child abuse potential inventory: Manual (2nd ed.). Psytec Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. (1972). Psychometric considerations for a revision of the MMPI. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives (pp. 59–83). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, I. R. (2009). Evaluation of criminal responsibility. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T. R., Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Patrick, C. J. (2014). Further development and construct validation of MMPI-2-RF indices of global psychopathy, fearless-dominance, and impulsive-antisociality in a sample of incarcerated women. Law and Human Behavior, 38(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000040.

  • Pinsoneault, T. B., & Ezzo, F. R. (2012). A comparison of MMPI-2-RF profiles between child maltreatment and non-maltreatment custody cases. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12, 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirelli, G., Gottdiener, W. H., & Zapf, P. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of competency to stand trial research. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 17, 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M. (2017). Using the MMPI-2-RF to characterize defendants evaluated for competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16, 304–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M. (2019). The MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Assessment of personality and psychopathology in the 21st century. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 149–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M. (2020). Examining the criterion and incremental validity of the MMPI-3 Self-Importance scale. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000975

  • Sellbom, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Validity of the MMPI-2-RF (restructured form) L-r and K-r Scales in detecting underreporting in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 20, 370–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Baum, L. J., Erez, E., & Gregory, C. (2008). Predictive validity of the MMPI–2 Restructured Clinical (RC) scales in a batterers’ intervention program. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(2), 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Patrick, C. J., Wygant, D. B., Gartland, D. M., & Stafford, K. P. (2012). Development and construct validation of MMPI-2-RF measures assessing global psychopathy, fearless-dominance, and impulsive-antisociality. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Stafford, K. P. (2007). A comparison of MMPI–2 measures of psychopathic deviance in a forensic setting. Psychological Assessment, 19, 430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., Drislane, L. E., Johnson, A. K., Goodwin, B. E., Phillips, T. R., & Patrick, C. J. (2016). Development and validation of MMPI-2-RF scales for indexing triarchic psychopathy constructs. Assessment, 23, 527–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., Lee, T. T. C., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Arbisi, P. A., & Gervais, R. O. (2012). Differentiating PTSD symptomatology with the MMPI-2-RF (restructured form) in a forensic disability sample. Psychiatry Research, 197, 172–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., & Wygant, D. B. (2018). Forensic applications of the MMPI-2 restructured form: A case book. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., Wygant, D. B., & Bagby, R. M. (2012). Utility of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting non-credible somatic complaints. Psychiatry Research, 197, 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharf, A. J., Rogers, R., Williams, M. M., & Henry, S. A. (2017). The effectiveness of the MMPI-2-RF in detecting feigned mental disorders and cognitive deficits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39, 441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545.

  • Solomon, D., Morgan, B., Asberg, K., & Achee, D. (2014). Treatment implications based on measures of child abuse potential and parental mental health: Are we missing an intervention opportunity. Children and Youth Services Review, 43, 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarescavage, A. M., Azizian, A., Broderick, C., & English, P. (2019). Associations between MMPI-2-RF Scale scores and institutional violence among patients detained under sexually violent predator laws. Psychological Assessment, 31(5), 707–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarescavage, A. M., Cappo, B. M., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2018). Assessment of sex offenders with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality/Inventory–2–restructured form. Sexual Abuse, 30(4), 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarescavage, A. M., Glassmire, D. M., & Burchett, D. (2018). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-restructured form markers of future suicidal behavior in a forensic psychiatric hospital. Psychological Assessment, 30, 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarescavage, A. M., Glassmire, D. M., & Burchett, D. (2016). Introduction of a conceptual model for integrating the MMPI-2-RF into HCR-20V3 violence risk assessments and associations between the MMPI-2-RF and institutional violence. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 626–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarescavage, A. M., Luna-Jones, L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2014). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2–Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors of violating probation after felonious crimes. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarescavage, A., Wygant, D. B., Gervais, R. O., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2013). Association between the MMPI-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among non-head injury disability claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2008). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form): Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylicki, J. L., Gervais, R. O., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2020). Examination of the MMPI-3 Over-reporting Scales in a Forensic Disability Sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1856414.

  • Vines, L. M., Wygant, D. B., & Gervais, R. O. (2012). Empirically guided case conceptualization of posttraumatic stress disorder with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in a forensic disability evaluation. Journal of Psychological Practice, 17, 180–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, M. R., Tylicki, J. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2021). Utility of the MMPI-3 Validity Scales for detecting over-reporting and under-reporting and their effects on substantive scale validity: A simulation study. Psychological Assessment‚ 33(5), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000988.

  • Whitman, M. R., Tylicki, J. L., Mascioli, R., Pickle, J., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) in a clinical neuropsychology setting. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000969

  • Wolf, E. J., Miller, M. W., Orazem, R. J., Weierich, M. R., Castillo, D. T., Milford, J., Kaloupek, D. G., & Keane, T. M. (2008). The MMPI-2 restructured clinical scales in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid disorders. Psychological Assessment, 20, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wygant, D. B., Arbisi, P. A., Bianchini, K. J., & Umlauf, R. L. (2017). Waddell non-organic signs: New evidence suggests somatic amplification among outpatient chronic pain patients. The Spine Journal, 17(4), 505–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wygant, D. B., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Arbisi, P. A., Berry, D. T., Freeman, D. B., & Heilbronner, R. L. (2009). Examination of the MMPI-2 restructured form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scales in civil forensic settings: Findings from simulation and known group samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(7), 671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wygant, D. B., & Sellbom, M. (2012). Viewing psychopathy from the perspective of the personality psychopathology five model: Implications for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(5), 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Stafford, K. S., Freeman, D. B., et al. (2010). Further validation of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF response bias scale: Findings from civil and criminal forensic settings. Psychological Assessment, 22, 745–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, P. A., & Roesch, R. (2009). Evaluation of competence to stand trial. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading Suggestions

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Sellbom, M. (2021). Interpreting the MMPI-3. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020b). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3): Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellbom, M., & Wygant, D. B. (2018). Forensic applications of the MMPI-2 restructured form: A case book. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarescavage, A. M., Glassmire, D. M., & Burchett, D. (2016). Introduction of a conceptual model for integrating the MMPI-2-RF into HCR-20V3 violence risk assessments and associations between the MMPI-2-RF and institutional violence. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 626–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wygant, D. B., Walls, B. D., Brothers, S. L., & Berry, D. T. R. (2018). Assessment of malingering and defensiveness on the MMPI-2 257 and MMPI-2-RF. In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 257–279). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Martin Sellbom

  2. Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY, USA

    Dustin B. Wygant

  3. John Carroll University, University Heights, OH, USA

    Anthony M. Tarescavage

  4. Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA

    Yossef S. Ben-Porath

Authors
  1. Martin Sellbom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dustin B. Wygant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anthony M. Tarescavage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yossef S. Ben-Porath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Sellbom .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Carlo Garofalo

  2. Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Jelle J. Sijtsema

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sellbom, M., Wygant, D.B., Tarescavage, A.M., Ben-Porath, Y.S. (2022). Using the MMPI-3 in Forensic Psychological Assessments. In: Garofalo, C., Sijtsema, J.J. (eds) Clinical Forensic Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80882-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80882-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80881-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80882-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation