Abstract
Systems biomechanics of the cell is a new area of study that focuses on system-level mechanical phenomena in the cell, notably involving interaction of the cell boundary with the cytoskeleton that it confines. Mechanical effects are reviewed that are associated with the conformations adopted by constrained microtubule fibers, including interphase asters of microtubules, mitotic cytoskeletons consisting of two coupled asters, and the cytoskeleton in interacting cells. Mechanical origin of stability and instability of symmetry, asymmetry, and structural multistability is highlighted. Dynamical effects of emergent irreversibility, hysteresis, and multiperiodic dissipative oscillations are also analyzed, leading to a discussion of the central place of systems biomechanics of the cell in the organization of living matter.
This chapter is based closely on the author’s prior work, Systems Biomechanics of the Cell (Springer, 2013).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamsen G, Sundvold-Gjerstad V, Habtamu M et al (2018) Polarity of CD4+ T cells towards the antigen presenting cell is regulated by the Lck adapter TSAd. Sci Rep 8:13319
Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J et al (2002) Molecular biology of the cell. Garland Science, New York
Arkhipov SN, Maly IV (2006a) Contribution of whole-cell optimization via cell body rolling to polarization of T cells. Phys Biol 3:209–219
Arkhipov SN, Maly IV (2006b) Quantitative analysis of the role of receptor recycling in T cell polarization. Biophys J 91:4306–4316
Arkhipov SN, Maly IV (2007) A model for the interplay of receptor recycling and receptor-mediated contact in T cells. PLoS One 2:e633
Arkhipov SN, Maly IV (2008) Retractile processes in T lymphocyte orientation on a stimulatory substrate: morphology and dynamics. Phys Biol 5:16006
Ashkin A, Schütze K, Dziedzic JM et al (1990) Force generation of organelle transport measured in vivo by an infrared laser trap. Nature 348:346–348
Baratt A, Arkhipov SN, Maly IV (2008) An experimental and computational study of effects of microtubule stabilization on T-cell polarity. PLoS One 3:e3861
Bergstralh DT, Dawney NS, St Johnston D (2017) Spindle orientation: a question of complex positioning. Development 144:1137–1145
Bjerknes M (1986) Physical theory of the orientation of astral mitotic spindles. Science 234:1413–1416
Brangwynne CP, MacKintosh FC, Kumar S et al (2006) Microtubules can bear enhanced compressive loads in living cells because of lateral reinforcement. J Cell Biol 173:733–741
Bray D (2001) Cell movements: from molecules to motility. Garland, New York
Burakov A, Nadezhdina E, Slepchenko B et al (2003) Centrosome positioning in interphase cells. J Cell Biol 162:963–969
Bykovskaja SN, Rytenko AN, Rauschenbach MO et al (1978) Ultrastructural alteration of cytolytic T lymphocytes following their interaction with target cells: I. hypertrophy and change of orientation of the Golgi apparatus. Cell Immunol 40:164–174
Chowdhury D (2019) Laying tracks for poison delivery to "kiss of death": search for immune synapse by microtubules. Biophys J 116:2057–2059
Combs J, Kim SJ, Tan S et al (2006) Recruitment of dynein to the Jurkat immunological synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:14883–14888
Cytrynbaum EN, Scholey JM, Mogilner A (2003) A force balance model of early spindle pole separation in Drosophila embryos. Biophys J 84:757–769
Delaunay D, Cortay V, Patti D et al (2014) Mitotic spindle asymmetry: a Wnt/PCP-regulated mechanism generating asymmetrical division in cortical precursors. Cell Rep 6:400–414
Di Pietro F, Echard A, Morin X (2016) Regulation of mitotic spindle orientation: an integrated view. EMBO Rep 17:1106–1130
Dupin I, Camand E, Etienne-Manneville S (2009) Classical cadherins control nucleus and centrosome position and cell polarity. J Cell Biol 185:779–786
Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A (2001) Integrin-mediated activation of Cdc42 controls cell polarity in migrating astrocytes through PKCzeta. Cell 106:489–498
Euteneuer U, Schliwa M (1992) Mechanism of centrosome positioning during the wound response in BSC-1 cells. J Cell Biol 116:1157–1166
Faivre-Moskalenko C, Dogterom M (2002) Dynamics of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers: the role of catastrophes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:16788–16793
Gliksman NR, Parsons SF, Salmon ED (1992) Okadaic acid induces interphase to mitotic-like microtubule dynamic instability by inactivating rescue. J Cell Biol 119:1271–1276
Gomes ER, Jani S, Gundersen GG (2005) Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 121:451–463
Gomez TS, Billadeau DD (2008) T cell activation and the cytoskeleton: you can’t have one without the other. Adv Immunol 97:1–64
Gotlieb AI, May LM, Subrahmanyan L et al (1981) Distribution of microtubule organizing centers in migrating sheets of endothelial cells. J Cell Biol 91:589–594
Grill SW, Gönczy P, Stelzer EH et al (2001) Polarity controls forces governing asymmetric spindle positioning in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Nature 409:630–633
Grill SW, Kruse K, Jülicher F (2005) Theory of mitotic spindle oscillations. Phys Rev Lett 94:108104
Gu B, Mai YW, Ru CQ (2009) Mechanics of microtubules modeled as orthotropic elastic shells with transverse shearing. Acta Mech 207:195–209
Harold FM (2001) The way of the cell. Oxford University Press, New York
Holy TE (1997) Physical aspects of the assembly and function of microtubules. Dissertation, Princeton University
Holy TE, Dogterom M, Yurke B et al (1997) Assembly and positioning of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:6228–6231
Hornak I, Rieger H (2020) Stochastic model of T cell repolarization during target elimination I. Biophys J 118:1733–1748
Howard J (1998) Mechanics of motor proteins and the cytoskeleton. Sinauer, Cambridge
Howard J (2006) Elastic and dam** forces generated by confined arrays of dynamic microtubules. Phys Biol 3:54–66
Hyman AA, White JG (1987) Determination of cell division axes in the early embryogenesis of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 105:2123–2135
Kim M (2018) Mechanism of MDCK II cell polarization during the cell division: a computational study. Appl Math Comput 317:1–11
Kim M (2019) A numerical mechanical model integrating actin treadmilling and receptor recycling to explain selective disengagement of immune cells. Math Biosci 316:108244
Kim MJ, Maly IV (2009) Deterministic mechanical model of T-killer cell polarization reproduces the wandering of aim between simultaneously engaged targets. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000260
Kim MJ, Rejniak KA (2014) Mechanical aspects of microtubule bundling in taxane-treated circulating tumor cells. Biophys J 107:1236–1246
Koonce MP, Tikhonenko I (2018) Centrosome positioning in Dictyostelium: moving beyond microtubule tip dynamics. Cell 7:29
Koonce MP, Köhler J, Neujahr R et al (1999) Dynein motor regulation stabilizes interphase microtubule arrays and determines centrosome position. EMBO J 18:6786–6792
Kozlowski C, Srayko M, Nedelec F (2007) Cortical microtubule contacts position the spindle in C. elegans embryos. Cell 129:499–510
Kuhn JR, Poenie M (2002) Dynamic polarization of the microtubule cytoskeleton during CTL-mediated killing. Immunity 16:111–121
Kupfer A, Singer SJ (1989) Cell biology of cytotoxic and helper T cell functions: immunofluorescence microscopic studies of single cells and cell couples. Annu Rev Immunol 7:309–337
Kupfer A, Louvard D, Singer SJ (1982) Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center in cultured fibroblasts at the edge of an experimental wound. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79:2603–2607
Kupfer H, Monks CKF, Kupfer A (1994) Small splenic B cells that bind to antigen-specific T helper (Th) cells and face the site of cytokine production in the Th cells selectively proliferate: immunofluorescence microscopic studies of Th-B antigen-presenting cell interactions. J Exp Med 179:1507–1515
Letort G, Nedelec F, Blanchoin L et al (2016) Centrosome centering and decentering by microtubule network rearrangement. Mol Biol Cell 27:2833–2843
Levy JR, Holzbaur ELF (2008) Dynein drives nuclear rotation during forward progression of motile fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 121:3187–3195
Lillie F (1901) The organization of the egg of Unio, based on a study of its maturation, fertilization, and cleavage. J Morphol 17:227–292
Lowin-Kropf B, Smith Shapiro V, Weiss A (1998) Cytoskeletal polarization of T cells is regulated by an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol 140:861–871
Maly IV (2011) Systems biomechanics of centrosome positioning: a conserved complexity. Commun Integr Biol 4:230–235
Maly IV (2012) Equilibria of idealized confined astral microtubules and coupled spindle poles. PLoS One 7:e38921
Maly IV (2013) Systems biomechanics of the cell. Springer, Boston
Maly VI, Maly IV (2010) Symmetry, stability, and reversibility properties of idealized confined microtubule cytoskeletons. Biophys J 99:2831–2840
McCarthy EK, Goldstein B (2006) Asymmetric spindle positioning. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18:79–85
Mickey B, Howard J (1995) Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. J Cell Biol 130:909–917
Nedelec F (2002) Computer simulations reveal motor properties generating stable anti-parallel microtubule interactions. J Cell Biol 158:1005–1015
Pearson CG, Bloom K (2004) Dynamic microtubules lead the way for spindle positioning. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:481–492
Piel M, Meyer P, Khodjakov A et al (2000) The respective contributions of the mother and daughter centrioles to centrosome activity and behavior in vertebrate cells. J Cell Biol 149:317–329
Pinot M, Chesnel F, Kubiak JZ et al (2009) Effects of confinement on the self-organization of microtubules and motors. Curr Biol 19:954–960
Rubinstein B, Larripa K, Sommi P et al (2009) The elasticity of motor-microtubule bundles and shape of the mitotic spindle. Phys Biol 6:016005
Sarkar A, Rieger H, Paul R (2019) Search and capture efficiency of dynamic microtubules for centrosome relocation during IS formation. Biophys J 116:2079–2091
Schuh M, Ellenberg J (2008) A new model for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes. Curr Biol 18:1986–1992
Serrador JM, Nieto M, Sánchez-Madrid F (1999) Cytoskeletal rearrangement during migration and activation of T lymphocytes. Trends Cell Biol 9:228–233
Stowers L, Yelon D, Berg LJ et al (1995) Regulation of the polarization of T cells toward antigen-presenting cells by Ras-related GTPase CDC42. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:5027–5031
Sunchu B, Cabernard C (2020) Principles and mechanisms of asymmetric cell division. Development 147:dev167650
Symes K, Weisblat DA (1992) An investigation of the specification of unequal cleavages in leech embryos. Dev Biol 150:203–218
Tang N, Marshall WF (2012) Centrosome positioning in vertebrate development. J Cell Sci 125:4951–4961
Théry M, Racine V, Pépin A et al (2005) The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat Cell Biol 7:947–953
Ueda M, Gräf R, MacWilliams HK et al (1997) Centrosome positioning and directionality of cell movements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:9674–9678
Watt FM, Hogan BL (2000) Out of Eden: stem cells and their niches. Science 287:1427–1430
Wei Z, Greaney J, Loh WN et al (2020) Nampt-mediated spindle sizing secures a post-anaphase increase in spindle speed required for extreme asymmetry. Nat Commun 11:3393
Yvon AMC, Walker JW, Danowski B et al (2002) Centrosome reorientation in wound-edge cells is cell type specific. Mol Biol Cell 13:1871–1880
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maly, I. (2021). Forces that Shape the Cell. In: Quantitative Elements of General Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79146-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79146-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79145-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79146-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)