Graphic Representations of Spoken Interactions from Journalistic Data: Persuasion and Negotiations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience Case Studies (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12764))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2084 Accesses

Abstract

Generated graphic representations for interactions involving persuasion and negotiations are intended to assist evaluation, training and decision-making processes and for the construction of respective models. As described in previous research, discourse and dialog structure are evaluated by the y level value around which the graphic representation is developed. Special emphasis is placed on emotion used as a tool for persuasion with the respective expressions, pragmatic elements and the depiction of information not uttered and their subsequent use in the collection of empirical and statistical data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexandris, C.: Issues in Multilingual Information Processing of Spoken Political and Journalistic Texts in the Media and Broadcast News, Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexandris, C., Mourouzidis, D., Floros, V.: Generating graphic representations of spoken interactions revisited: the tension factor and information not uttered in journalistic data. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12181, pp. 523–537. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49059-1_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexandris, C.: Evaluating cognitive bias in two-party and multi-party spoken interactions. In: Proceedings from the AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford University (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alexandris, C.: Visualizing Pragmatic Features in Spoken Interaction: Intentions, Behavior and Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Linguistics Research on the Era of Artificial Intelligence – LREAI, Dalian, October 25–27, 2019, Dalian Maritime University (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexandris, C.: Measuring cognitive bias in spoken interaction and conversation: generating visual representations. In: Beyond Machine Intelligence: Understanding Cognitive Bias and Humanity for Well-Being AI Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium Stanford University, Technical Report SS-18-03, pp. 204-206 AAAI Press Palo Alto, CA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alexandris, C., Nottas, M., Cambourakis, G.: Interactive evaluation of pragmatic features in spoken journalistic texts. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9171, pp. 259–268. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21006-3_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Alexandris, C.: English, german and the international “semi-professional” translator: a morphological approach to implied connotative features. J. Lang. Transl. Sejong Univ. Korea 11(2), 7–46 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arockiaraj, C.M.: Applications of neural networks in data mining. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3(1), 8–11 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Austin, J.L.: How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edn. University Press, Oxford Paperbacks, Oxford (1962).(Urmson, J.O., Sbisà, M. (eds.) 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carlson, L., Marcu, D., Okurowski, M. E.: Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. In: Proceedings of the 2nd SIGDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Eurospeech 2001, Denmark, September 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cutts, M.: Oxford Guide to Plain English, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evans, N.J., Park, D.: Rethinking the persuasion knowledge model: schematic antecedents and associative outcomes of persuasion knowledge activation for covert advertising. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 36(2), 157–176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2015.1023873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Floros, V., Mourouzidis, D.: Multiple Task Management in a Dialog System for Call Centers. Master’s thesis, Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, National University of Athens, Greece (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grice, H.P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hatim, B.: Communication Across Cultures: Translation Theory and Contrastive Text Linguistics. University of Exeter Press, Exeter, UK (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hedderich, M.A., Klakow, D.: Training a neural network in a low-resource setting on automatically annotated noisy data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Deep Learning Approaches for Low-Resource NLP, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 12–18. Association for Computational Linguistics-ACL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hilbert, M.: Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: how noisy information processing can bias human decision making. Psychol. Bull. 138(2), 211–237 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis, J.R.: Introduction to Practical Speech User Interface Design for Interactive Voice Response Applications, IBM Software Group, USA, Tutorial T09 presented at HCI 2009 San Diego. CA, USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, B.: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CA (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma, J.: A comparative analysis of the ambiguity resolution of two English-Chinese MT approaches: RBMT and SMT. Dalian Univ. Technol. J. 31(3), 114–119 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marcu, D.: Discourse trees are good indicators of importance in text. In: Mani, I., Maybury, M. (eds.) Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 123–136. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mourouzidis, D., Floros, V., Alexandris, C.: Generating graphic representations of spoken interactions from journalistic data. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11566, pp. 559–570. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22646-6_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Nass, C., Brave, S.: Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. The ΜΙΤ Press, Cambridge, MA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nottas, M., Alexandris, C., Tsopanoglou, A., Bakamidis, S.: A hybrid approach to dialog input in the citzenshield dialog system for consumer complaints. In: Proceedings of HCI 2007, Bei**g, People’s Republic of China (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paltridge, B.: Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pan, Y.: Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction. Advances in Discourse Processes series, vol. 67. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Stamford, CT, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Plutchik, R.: A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions. Soc. Sci. Inf. 21, 529–553 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1177/053901882021004003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Poria, S., Cambria, E., Hazarika, D., Mazumder, N., Zadeh, A., Morency, L-P.: Context-dependent sentiment analysis in user-generated videos. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, July 30-August 4 2017, pp. 873–88. Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1081

  30. Rocklage, M., Rucker, D., Nordgren, L.: Persuasion, emotion, and language: the intent to persuade transforms language via emotionality. Psychol. Sci. 29(5), 749–760 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617744797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696–735 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (1969)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Shah, K., Kopru, S., Ruvini, J-D.: Neural network based extreme classification and similarity models for product matching. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2018, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 1-6, 2018, pp. 8–15. Association for Computational Linguistics-ACL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Skonk, K.: 5 Types of Negotiation Skills, Program on Negotiation Daily Blog, Harvard Law School, 14 May 2020. https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/negotiation-skills-daily/types-of-negotiation-skills/. Accessed 11 Nov 2020

  35. Stede, M., Taboada, M., Das, D.: Annotation Guidelines for Rhetorical Structure Manuscript. University of Potsdam and Simon Fraser University, Potsdam (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Trofimova, I.: Observer bias: an interaction of temperament traits with biases in the semantic perception of lexical material. PLoS ONE 9(1), e85677 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wardhaugh, R.: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UK (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Williams, J.D., Asadi, K., Zweig, G.: Hybrid code networks: practical and efficient end-to-end dialog control with supervised and reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, July 30-August 4 2017, pp. 665–677. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson, M., Wilson, T.P.: An oscillator model of the timing of turn taking. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12(6), 957–968 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yu, Z., Yu, Z., Aoyama, H., Ozeki, M., Nakamura, Y.: Capture, recognition, and visualization of human semantic interactions in meetings. In: Proceedings of PerCom, Mannheim, Germany, 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zeldes, A.: rstWeb - a browser-based annotation interface for rhetorical structure theory and discourse relations. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2016 System Demonstrations. San Diego, CA, pp. 1–5 (2016). http://aclweb.org/anthology/N/N16/N16-3001.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Alexandris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alexandris, C., Floros, V., Mourouzidis, D. (2021). Graphic Representations of Spoken Interactions from Journalistic Data: Persuasion and Negotiations. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Design and User Experience Case Studies. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12764. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78468-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78468-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78467-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78468-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation